Seeing the Real Impact of the Kimberley Process in a “For Sale” Sign

July 18, 2011
Miners Dig for Diamonds in Marange

In my role as the U.S. working-level focal point to the Kimberley Process -- the international grouping designed to prevent rebel groups or their allies from selling diamonds to fuel their conflicts (“conflict diamonds”) -- I have become all too familiar with the popular arguments about what this Process, known as the “KP,” cannot do. Some say it cannot, for instance, “deal with” Zimbabwe. Others contend it cannot put an end to smuggling and cannot affirm that the diamond you buy in a store is entirely “clean.”

Given that backdrop, the last thing I expected to see on my recent trip to the Central African Republic (CAR) was the true impact and power of a Department of State-supported USAID program in place there since 2007, evidenced in the form of a “for sale” sign.

Let me explain. This program, called PRADD (Property Rights and Artisanal Diamond Development), focuses on clarifying and securing the land tenure/property rights of individual miners as a means of making artisanal mining a meaningful economic activity, independent of pernicious relationships with traders further up the chain. As a result, more diamonds are brought into the legal chain of custody, and miners' livelihoods are secured and strengthened. To date, more than 2,000 mining claims in CAR have been mapped and publicly validated, and had property rights certificates delivered, through PRADD -- meaning the CAR government recognizes miners' property rights where none existed before.

The impact of this reform-facilitating project in CAR is enormous, particularly in the power it gives back to the miners and local communities. In fact, PRADD has been so successful that the CAR government now plans to adopt and implement the program by itself. As such, it demonstrates the impact of the mission of the KP worldwide -- to ensure that the entire rough diamond supply chain is formalized and accordingly “ring-fenced” so that conflict diamonds cannot penetrate the system.

Now to the “for sale” sign. While driving through the remote village of Bossui in southwest CAR, I noted a sign posted by a local miner looking to sell or rent his mining site. While it may seem banal to us, this is almost revolutionary in an artisanal diamond mining area, since it is only possible because the rights to the site have been formally negotiated and boundaries demarcated with local community and government stakeholders. In addition to active mining sites like this one changing hands, mined-out sites are being sold so they can be used for alternative livelihood efforts (e.g., fish ponds and fruit orchards) that PRADD is facilitating. Previously, miners could much more easily have been evicted with no notice (often violently), and former mining sites could have rotted away as environmentally degraded areas with no economic potential; however, now real value is being created that goes directly to individuals and their communities.

To me, this is the essence of what the KP and PRADD are all about. The KP's primary requirement is that a country has “internal controls” to track diamonds from production to export. In too many places, however, this is not happening because socio-economic factors are not sufficient to allow a miner to sell into the formal system. But through a program like PRADD, which provides time and assistance to governments to strengthen their internal controls, and empowers vulnerable communities to become secure enough to buy and sell their mining rights, the KP can make a significant step towards eventually ending the trade in conflict diamonds -- and possibly do much more.

That is something we can all be proud to be a part of.

Related Content: You can view photos from Special Advisor Brooks-Rubin's trip to Central Africa Republic here.



Sean C.
December 30, 2011

Sean in Ireland writes:

The sleight of hand is this report is very slick indeed - almost as slick as the discredited Kimberley Process (KP). The use of the term conflict diamonds instead of "conflict diamonds" is deliberately misleading. The difference as you well know is literally a matter of life and death for some unfortunate people.
Conflict diamonds to the average person means any diamonds that fund gross human right violations. "Conflict diamonds", however, has a very specific, very narrow meaning: "rough diamonds used by rebel groups or thier allies to fund violence aimed at undermining legitimate governments"
In November 2011 the KP members, including the USA, agreed to allow the export of blood diamonds from Zimbabwe. These blood or conflict diamonds are not regarded as "conflict diamonds" because the violence in Zimbabwe was carried out by government forces and not by rebels. These blood diamonds have now contaminated the global diamond market and are, according to the diamond industry, conflict free. The elephant in the room is the Israeli diamond industry - one of the world's leading centres for cutting an polishing diamonds. Diamonds are Israel's biggest export commodity, accounting for 30% of Israel's exports and generating over $! billion/yr. iin revenue for the nuclear-armed Israeli military regime that stands accused of war crimesa and crimies against humanity. Forty percent of the diamonds asols in America are crafted in Israel making them de-facto blood diamonds. But as the Israeli diamonds are cut & polished the y evade the KP regulations which only apply to rough diamonds Check out these links for a lot more information - and


Latest Stories

November 1, 2010

DipNote: The Week in Review

Writing for the U.S. Department of State DipNote blog, DipNote Managing Editor Luke Forgerson highlights blog postings from the week,… more