China, America, and Our Warming Planet

Posted by John Kerry
November 11, 2014
U.S. and Chinese Delegations Meet at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in November 2014
The United States and China are the world’s two largest economies, two largest consumers of energy, and two largest emitters of greenhouse gases: Together we account for about 40 percent of the world’s emissions.
 
We need to solve this problem together because neither one of us can solve it alone. Even if the United States somehow eliminated all of our domestic greenhouse gas emissions, it still wouldn’t be enough to counteract the carbon pollution coming from China and the rest of the world. Likewise, even if China went down to zero emissions, it wouldn’t make enough of a difference if the United States and the rest of the world didn’t change direction.
 
That’s the reality of what we’re up against. That’s why it matters that the world’s most consequential relationship has just produced something of great consequence in the fight against climate change.
 
Today, President Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping are jointly announcing targets to reduce carbon emissions in the post-2020 period. By doing this -- together and well before the deadline established by the international community -- we are encouraging other countries to put forward their own ambitious emissions reduction targets soon and to overcome traditional divisions so we can conclude a strong global climate agreement in 2015.
 
Our announcement can inject momentum into the global climate negotiations, which resume in less than three weeks in Lima, Peru, and culminate next year in Paris. The commitment of both presidents to take ambitious action in our own countries, and work closely to remove obstacles on the road to Paris, sends an important signal that we must get this agreement done, that we can get it done, and that we will get it done.
 
This is also a milestone in the United States-China relationship, the outcome of a concerted effort that began last year in Beijing, when State Councilor Yang Jiechi and I started the United States-China Climate Change Working Group. It was an effort inspired not just by our shared concern about the impact of climate change, but by our belief that the world’s largest economies, energy consumers, and carbon emitters have a responsibility to lead.
 
The targets themselves are also important. Ambitious action by our countries together is the foundation to build the low-carbon global economy needed to combat climate change. The United States intends to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025 – a target that is both ambitious and feasible. It roughly doubles the pace of carbon reductions in the period from 2020 to 2025 as compared to the period from 2005 to 2020. It puts us on a path to transform our economy, with emissions reductions on the order of 80 percent by 2050. It is grounded in an extensive analysis of the potential to reduce emissions in all sectors of our economy, with significant added benefits for health, clean air, and energy security.
 
Our target builds on the ambitious goal President Obama set in 2009 to cut emissions in the range of 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. We are on track to meet that goal, while creating jobs and growing the economy, with the help of a burgeoning clean energy sector. Since the president took office, wind energy production has tripled and solar energy has increased by a factor of ten. This summer, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed the first carbon pollution standards for existing power plants, which account for a third of United States carbon pollution.
 
The Chinese targets also represent a major advance. For the first time China is announcing a peak year for its carbon emissions -- around 2030 -- along with a commitment to try to reach the peak earlier. That matters because over the past 15 years, China has accounted for roughly 60 percent of the growth in carbon dioxide emissions world-wide. We are confident that China can and will reach peak emissions before 2030, in light of President Xi’s commitments to restructure the economy, dramatically reduce air pollution and stimulate an energy revolution.
 
China is also announcing today that it would expand the share of total energy consumption coming from zero-emission sources (renewable and nuclear energy) to around 20 percent by 2030, sending a powerful signal to investors and energy markets around the world and helping accelerate the global transition to clean-energy economies. To meet its goal, China will need to deploy an additional 800 to 1,000 gigawatts of nuclear, wind, solar and other renewable generation capacity by 2030 -- an enormous amount, about the same as all the coal-fired power plants that exist in China today, and nearly as much as the total electricity generation capacity of the United States.
 
There is no question that all of us will need to do more to push toward the de-carbonization of the global economy. But in climate diplomacy, as in life, you have to start at the beginning, and this breakthrough marks a fresh beginning: Two countries regarded for 20 years as the leaders of opposing camps in climate negotiations -- have come together to find common ground, determined to make lasting progress on an unprecedented global challenge. Let’s ensure that this is the first step towards a world that is more prosperous and more secure.
 
About the Author: John Kerry serves as the 68th U.S. Secretary of State. Go to www.state.gov/secretary and follow @JohnKerry on Twitter for more from the Secretary.
 
Editor's Note: This entry originally appeared as an Op-Ed in the New York Times.
 
For more information:

 

Comments

Comments

Brett C.
|
Canada
November 12, 2014
Being neither Chinese nor American, it has been frustrating to watch these two countries point fingers at each other and adopt "you first" attitudes. This meeting and it's resulting commitments is very gratifying.
Samuel B.
|
United States
November 12, 2014
China has enough sense to go with nuclear energy. The US, apparently, does not. Many third world countries don't yet have that option, but maybe China or Argentina will help them.
Marco G.
|
Texas, USA
November 12, 2014
Understood Sir .
Patrick W.
|
Maryland, USA
November 13, 2014
Here are some Ideas on solving some of Americas problems. First: legalize drugs, we lost that war before it started. Just open up more treatment centers and get everyone healthcare. The way things are we're just jacking up prices and making people rich off drug sales. Second: Take money out of our pay cheeks too pay for healthcare like social security. If you want same thing better pay more and get you own doctors. That way everyone is covered by a basic plan. Third : Greenhouse gases are every ones problem,and China is cutting back like we are because of the climate changes. So, some people should stop saying they are not helping it 's bad for our relationship and it's a lie.
Eric J.
|
New Mexico, USA
November 15, 2014

Dear Sec. Kerry,

I know probably just enough about these subjects to be dangerous in my commentary, but I'll pose a few observations that I hope folks will wrap their heads around the paradoxical nature of...and just maybe someone @ State will enlighten my confusion about where things stand and where folks' can make progress.

First, I think the Chinese have demonstrated that they can clear the air in Bejing, at least long enough to offer blue skies for this conference. But their press commented the other day that folks living there when factories and cars started rolling again and the smog rolls in..."would get used to it, like they did before."

Seems to me instead of change folks can live with, it be back to the same old, same old status quo. Fact is most of our cities would be just as polluted without the clean air act put into law decades ago...can we sell them some scrubbers for their coal fired electrical plants?

Sendondly this political bru..haha over the Keystone pipeline is a pretty telling dysfunctionality in a legislative process gone astray from legal challenge and State Dept review of application process that serves to not only protect America's interest, but contributes to enlightened environmental impact...to which it would appear that some in Congress would rather ram that pipeline down the public's throat for economic interest rather than long-term sustainability and public acceptance...which requires interested parties to have a little patience with process.

Folks have commented here that it's a process of finger pointing "you first" between the US and China...but the sad reality is that it's lookin' like a case of the "me-me's" where it concerns bi-lateral economic competition wherein industry and political interest trumps the public's health and the health of the environment.

Folks have commented that the US should engage the nuclear option, without bothering to offer solution to find an adequate place to permanently store nuclear waste that already is a considerable threat to the public health and national security as stored currently, nationwide.

So Mr. Secretary,

How can you help folks deconflict these conflicts of interest on an industrial scale, globally? There in the answers lies the keys to progress towards change we can all live with I believe.

It's got to be a "we" thing sir.

Best,

EJ

.

Latest Stories

Pages