Joining Together To Combat Conflict Minerals

November 15, 2011
Mining for Gold in the DRC

Gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum. These four metals are everywhere -- in our smart phones, laptops, ball point pens, and light bulbs -- but we don't often pause to think about where they originate. Often these minerals are mined from the vast natural resources of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and hundreds of thousands of Congolese depend on their trade to earn a living. But tragically, violent armed groups exploit and hijack this trade, using forced labor to profit from it and sometimes killing to control it. So production and trade that could be drivers of economic development instead fuel violence and instability and harm innocent Congolese.

The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Mineral Trade, which we launch today at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) in Washington, DC, seeks to help break the links between conflict and these resources. This new alliance brings together the U.S. government, almost 20 internationally-listed high-tech and automotive companies, four industry associations and six non-governmental organizations, as well as the International Conference of the Great Lakes Region, to respond practically to the challenges posed by conflict minerals. And we're actively working to expand this alliance to include even more partners and supporters.

Through a range of tools developed by a multi-stakeholder governance group, the PPA will take important steps toward securing legitimate, conflict-free minerals from the DRC. We will do so by supporting pilot programs -- with the ultimate goal of producing scalable, self-sustaining systems -- to demonstrate a fully traced and validated supply chain in a way that is credible to companies, civil society, and government. The PPA will also be a hub for those seeking information and ways to take action on responsible minerals trade

The PPA builds on the intent of section 1502 of last year's Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform legislation that seeks to end the cycle of conflict minerals. The law requires companies that are publicly traded in the United States to disclose the steps they're taking to purchase conflict-free gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum from the DRC or its neighboring countries. This kind of corporate due diligence -- now required by the DRC government and endorsed throughout the region -- will strengthen local efforts to regulate the trade and weaken a key driver of eastern Congo's horrific violence. While compliance with this disclosure requirement may be challenging given the complexity of the minerals supply chain, the U.S. government is working with a range of regional and local stakeholders to support the implementation of tools that can trace and certify the minerals trade as conflict-free.

Why are we taking these steps? Because excluding armed groups from the trade in minerals is good business for consumers, companies, the Congo, and the Great Lakes Region. But we also do this because it's very much the right thing to do for the people of Central Africa. Weakening the rebel groups and abusive armed forces that benefit from the illegal trade will help create a more peaceful and stable region. And, we all should be feel better knowing that the everyday objects which end up in our pockets, homes, and offices don't contribute to a cycle of violence for the people of the DRC.

Together, Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs María Otero and Under Secretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs Robert Hormats, continue their efforts working with others in our government, the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, and regional governments to respond to the Secretary's call to address the issue of conflict minerals.Learn more about the launch of the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Mineral Trade on the USIP website.

Comments

Comments

Zharkov
|
United States
November 15, 2011

Zharkov in the U.S.A. writes:

Once again, the absurd doctrine of "responsibility to protect" rears its ugly, inbred head to punish American industry.

While in Libya, you supported the "rebel groups", in the Congo, you support the government, and it leaves one curious about how an armed rebel group could receive US blessings for mass murder as happened to blacks in Libya.

Can you not see with your own eyes that crime problems in Africa are for African governments to solve? The U.S. cannot even fix it's own economy let alone Africa's.

Fascism or what today is called "public-private alliance", is no answer. The Dodd-Frank bill that was signed into law recently is a classic example - the legislation is full of mandatory programs that cost a lot of time and money, yet yield little (or negative) value for the economy.

One provision, for instance, requires that businesses dealing in certain commodities or whose products contain certain commodities, must now file an annual report certifying that their raw materials are 100% free of ‘conflict minerals’ that may have originated in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Given DR Congo’s massive gold and copper reserves, this is going to affect a lot of people. And how is it even realistic? It’s like requiring someone to file a report stating where the last drop of gasoline they put in their car came from. Any ideas? Saudi Arabia? Brazil? Canada? And why is DR Congo singled out over, say, Sierra Leone?

This is exactly the sort of thinking that only makes sense in Washington. It puts completely unnecessary and unrealistic obligations onto American firms, forcing them to deal with administrative nonsense instead of what actually matters in business: serving customers.

The concept isn’t difficult – when companies can focus on their core business and grow, they’re more likely to hire. For all the talk that politicians want to reduce the unemployment rate, everything they’re doing is making it extremely difficult for businesses to prosper and hire the unemployed American worker.

adri d.
|
Indonesia
November 15, 2011

Adri D. in Indonesia writes:

Yea it's unfair for them
and we should help them out
the Best possible way we can
Just to appreciate their work
or just to give a litlle back
Bless you Guys

Kyle R.
|
District Of Columbia, USA
December 30, 2011

Kyle in Washington, D.C. writes:

Agreed completely. It is the right thing to do, and arguments about "destroying American industry" ring hollow. Reading more about the Dodd-Frank Act's conflict minerals provisions on http://doddfranksummary.com, I came to the realization of just how important it is to ensure that this awful trade is stopped.

.

Latest Stories

January 1, 2010

A New Year for Sudan

About the Author: Major General (Ret) Scott Gration serves as the President's Special Envoy to Sudan. We've reached a new… more

Pages