Secretary Clinton Delivers Keynote at National Democratic Institute's 2011 Democracy Awards Dinner

Posted by DipNote Bloggers
November 8, 2011

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered keynote remarks at the National Democratic Institute's Democracy Awards Dinner in Washington, D.C., on November 7, 2011. During the event, Secretary Clinton said:

"...What a year 2011 has been for freedom in the Middle East and North Africa. We have seen what may well have been the first Arab revolution for democracy, then the second, then the third. And in Yemen, people are demanding a transition to democracy that they deserve to see delivered. And Syrians are refusing to relent until they, too, can decide their own future.

"Throughout the Arab world this year, people have given each other courage. Old fears have melted away and men and women have begun making their demands in broad daylight. They have given many of our diplomats courage, too, and I want to single out someone who is here with us tonight. When our Ambassador to Syria was mobbed, assaulted, and threatened, just for meeting with peaceful protestors, he put his personal safety on the line to let the Syrian people know that America stands with them. And he said he was inspired by their bravery. And as he drove into Hama, a city under assault by Asad's regime, the people of that city covered his car with flowers. Please join me in giving our own warm welcome to Ambassador Robert Ford and his wife and fellow Foreign Service Officer, Alison Barkley. Thanks to you, Robert, and to you, Alison, for your dedicated service to our country.

"Now, in Tunis, Cairo, and a newly free Tripoli, I have met people lifted by a sense that their futures actually do belong to them. In my travels across the region, I have heard joy, purpose, and newfound pride.

"But I've also heard questions. I've heard skepticism about American motives and commitments, people wondering if, after decades of working with the governments of the region, America doesn't -- in our heart of hearts -- actually long for the old days. I've heard from activists who think we aren't pushing hard enough for democratic change, and I've heard from government officials who think we're pushing too hard. I've heard from people asking why our policies vary from country to country, and what would happen if elections bring to power parties we don't agree with or people who just don't like us very much. I've heard people asking America to solve all their problems and others wondering whether we have any role to play at all. And beneath our excitement for the millions who are claiming the rights and freedoms we cherish, many Americans are asking the same questions."

Secretary Clinton continued, "...So let me start with one question I hear often: Do we really believe that democratic change in the Middle East and North Africa is in America's interest? That is a totally fair question. After all, transitions are filled with uncertainty. They can be chaotic, unstable, even violent. And, even if they succeed, they are rarely linear, quick, or easy.

"As we saw in the Balkans and again in Iraq, rivalries between members of different religions, sects, and tribes can resurface and explode. Toppling tyrants does not guarantee that democracy will follow, or that it will last. Just ask the Iranians who overthrew a dictator 32 years ago only to have their revolution hijacked by the extremists who have oppressed them ever since. And even where democracy does takes hold, it is a safe bet that some of those elected will not embrace us or agree with our policies.

"And yet, as President Obama said at the State Department in May, 'It will be the policy of the United States to promote reform across the region and to support transitions to democracy.' We believe that real democratic change in the Middle East and North Africa is in the national interest of the United States. And here's why.

"We begin by rejecting the false choice between progress and stability. For years, dictators told their people they had to accept the autocrats they knew to avoid the extremists they feared. And too often, we accepted that narrative ourselves. Now, America did push for reform, but often not hard enough or publicly enough. And today, we recognize that the real choice is between reform and unrest.

"Last January, I told Arab leaders that the region's foundations were sinking into the sand. Even if we didn't know exactly how or when the breaking point would come, it was clear that the status quo was unsustainable because of changes in demography and technology, high unemployment, endemic corruption and a lack of human rights and fundamental freedoms. After a year of revolutions broadcast on Al Jazeera into homes from Rabat to Riyadh, going back to the way things were in December 2010 isn't just undesirable. It's impossible.

"The truth is that the greatest single source of instability in today's Middle East is not the demand for change. It is the refusal to change. That is certainly true in Syria, where a crackdown on small, peaceful protests drove thousands into the streets and thousands more over the borders. It is true in Yemen, where President Saleh has reneged repeatedly on his promises to transition to democracy and suppressed his people's rights and freedoms. And it is true in Egypt. If -- over time -- the most powerful political force in Egypt remains a roomful of unelected officials, they will have planted the seeds for future unrest, and Egyptians will have missed a historic opportunity.

"And so will we, because democracies make for stronger and stabler partners. They trade more, innovate more, and fight less. They help divided societies to air and hopefully resolve their differences. They hold inept leaders accountable at the polls. They channel people's energies away from extremism and toward political and civic engagement. Now, democracies do not always agree with us, and in the Middle East and North Africa they may disagree strongly with some of our policies. But at the end of the day, it is no coincidence that our closest allies -- from Britain to South Korea -- are democracies.

"Now, we do work with many different governments to pursue our interests and to keep Americans safe -- and certainly not all of them are democracies. But as the fall of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt made clear, the enduring cooperation we seek will be difficult to sustain without democratic legitimacy and public consent. We cannot have one set of policies to advance security in the here-and-now and another to promote democracy in a long run that never quite arrives.

"So for all these reasons, as I said back in March, opening political systems, societies, and economies is not simply a matter of idealism. It is a strategic necessity. But we are not simply acting in our self-interest. Americans believe that the desire for dignity and self-determination is universal -- and we do try to act on that belief around the world. Americans have fought and died for these ideals. And when freedom gains ground anywhere, Americans are inspired.

"So the risks posed by transitions will not keep us from pursuing positive change. But they do raise the stakes for getting it right. Free, fair, and meaningful elections are essential -- but they are not enough if they bring new autocrats to power or disenfranchise minorities. And any democracy that does not include half its population -- its women -- is a contradiction in terms. Durable democracies depend on strong civil societies, respect for the rule of law, independent institutions, free expression, and a free press. Legitimate political parties cannot have a militia wing and a political wing. Parties have to accept the results of free and fair elections. And this is not just in the Middle East. In Liberia, the leading opposition party is making unsubstantiated charges of fraud and refusing to accept first round voting in which it came in second. And this is already having harmful consequences on the ground. We urge all parties in Liberia to accept the will of the people in the next round of voting tomorrow. That is what democracy anywhere requires."

A full transcript of the Secretary's remarks will be posted here.

Comments

Comments

although83
November 8, 2011

W.W. writes:

A diplomatic source in Vienna told Haaretz that this is “the most damning report ever published by the IAEA and the conclusion arising from it is one: Iran is working to acquire a nuclear weapon.”

“The agency has serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear program,” the IAEA said in the report, which included a 13-page annex with key technical descriptions of research.

Citing “credible” information, the Vienna-based agency said the data “indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.”

It added: “The information also indicates that prior to the end of 2003, these activities took place under a structured program, and that some activities may still be ongoing.”

UG
November 9, 2011

U.G. writes:

Very good article... Congrats to everyone who are involved with this project.Don't worry about trying so hard,the best things come when you least expect them to!just outstanding!!

palgye
|
South Korea
November 9, 2011

Palgye in South Korea writes:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's President's usual behavior, the analogy look, rather than the development of nuclear weapons, I think he still wants to talk.

He's our - I contributed to the release of Americans detained in Iran will think. Of course, every one of your men, I contributed ten thousand 0.00000001%, but - how many times he's been doing it for our needs and I think acceptance is important to note that. Importantly, the story of the unemployed like me, even he seems a lot of attention, he suddenly seems interested in the development of nuclear weapons, the story of the media ...

From the press a little, Let's take a different approach? The way through until now, traditionally, "CNN-cnn.com", but a lot of effort, this time, even in this way, Let's take an informal approach? War is the opposite. Rather, Iran's database funded by L. Lang, think that should be open.

(Egypt also shift the blame to someone sikyeoseo, Israel must ease the hostility to believe that no war is so typical resolution, now, to think that the wrong decision.)

You use me a little by including it twice, or detained in Iran has freed the American people. Opening up and reform in Iran is thought possible. I want to believe him again (although, he ignored me, but ...)

Eric
|
New Mexico, USA
November 10, 2011

Eric in New Mexico writes:

If ever someone needed a real visual image of just where US policy is at this moment, in context to the scope of change afoot, there's a guy on a stick who'll demonstrate how to ride a truly massive wave with proper technique in this video.

In fact, the biggest wave ever ridden in recorded history;

"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15670415"

His media debriefing is absolutely priceless and I'm pretty sure Sec. Clinton will appreciate how he described the experience.

You got a lot of deep water in the off shore public piling into the shallows of dictatorial genocidal indifference and wha-la! You got a liquid mountain moving all by itself and...( no spoilers from me will you get...just watch and enjoy)

All I can say is democracy promotion must choose a correct line with proper technique to make the mountain propel it's correct policy forward through all uncertainties and perils.

EJ

.

Latest Stories

Pages