Pursuing U.S. Values and Self-Interest

Posted by Thomas R. Nides
October 6, 2011
President Obama Addresses the UN General Assembly 2011

Editor's Note: This entry first appeared as an opinion piece on Politico.

Just six months after the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization began supporting the Libyan people's efforts to overthrow a brutal dictator in power for 40 years, U.S. diplomats returned to raise the U.S. flag over our embassy in a new Libya.

In Tunisia and in Egypt, as well, citizens have claimed their freedom -- a remarkable achievement. But the struggle does not stop there. As these new democracies emerge, our diplomats and development experts will be on the ground, supporting the people as the build new and stable governments; jump-start and reform their economies, and create the foundations for enduring peace.

Why? The people of the region will benefit enormously from this democratic transition -- but so, too, will the American people. A peaceful, prosperous and democratic Middle East will likely create economic opportunity for U.S. businesses and enhanced national security for every American.

As President Barack Obama said at the United Nations last month, "[T]he United States will continue to support those nations that transition to democracy -- with greater trade and investment, so that freedom is followed by opportunity."

In the aftermath of each Middle East revolution, the State Department and USAID stepped in with humanitarian, development and security aid to help people defend their hard-won gains. Under Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's leadership, we are creating and implementing longer-term strategies, working with allies, partners and -- especially -- the people of the region to build democratic governments and open economies.

In Libya, the State Department and USAID are working with the Transitional National Council to promote democratic governance, establish legitimate institutions and provide for the needs of the Libyan people. We are helping them build vibrant political parties and civil society groups -- to prevent corruption and encourage political change.

The State Department is also leading U.S. efforts to prevent shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles from falling in to the hands of terrorists. While our teams on the ground are helping Libya's new government recover, secure and destroy the previous regime's dangerous weapons.

In Tunisia, the birthplace of the Arab Awakening, the United States is helping Tunisians organize credible elections and an inclusive political process, advance the rule of law, promote human rights and foster equitable, private-sector-led economic growth. Clinton just last month announced the U.S.-Tunisia Joint Political and Economic Partnership -- a framework for collaboration with the Tunisian people and their new government.

In recognition of Tunisia's commitment to democratic and economic reform, the country last week was selected to be eligible for a Millennium Challenge Corporation threshold program. In 2012, we hope to launch negotiations for a bilateral "Open Skies" Air Transport Agreement -- to open direct air routes between Tunisia and the United States and spur economic growth in both of our countries.

In Egypt, Washington moved quickly to provide urgent assistance for the political transition now underway. We are working with the Egyptians to promote an inclusive and transparent transition, train political leaders from all parties and support civil society. From debt relief and loan guarantees to new policies to increase trade and investment, we are committed to making sure the Arab Awakening is also an economic awakening, which delivers results for the Egyptian people.

As these positive changes emerge in the Middle East, we face challenging economic times here at home. Some question whether we should continue providing assistance overseas.

While this is an understandable concern in the current economic climate, significant cuts to the State Department and USAID budget would do serious, long-term harm to our national security -- and our economy.

Fortunately, here in the United States, leaders from both parties agree about the value of humanitarian and security assistance. Earlier this month, 78 Democratic and Republican senators came together to defeat an amendment that would have slashed State and USAID's current budget by 15 percent, or $6.9 billion.

Cuts of that magnitude would have stymied our work around the world -- including in Iraq and Afghanistan. But 78 senators makes it abundantly clear that foreign assistance is a key tool for advancing U.S. interests abroad.

The State and USAID budget -- all personnel, operations and programs -- is only 1 percent of the entire federal budget. One percent. That tiny share of the federal budget includes everything from protecting U.S. citizens overseas; to curbing violent extremism and nuclear proliferation; to helping U.S. businesses connect with new customers; to rolling back HIV/AIDS, malaria and child malnutrition; to maintaining our embassies. It funds everything we do to make the rest of the world safe for Americans to live, travel and conduct business -- and everything we do to keep our homeland secure.

We don't spend money on diplomacy and development just to feel good about ourselves. We fight hunger, stop oppression, prevent global pandemics and respond to crises abroad, because that is the most cost-effective way to enhance U.S. national security -- to protect America and the American people -- and to create jobs here at home. It has the additional benefit of also being the right thing to do.

Our national values, moral compass and self-interest are all perfectly aligned.

To learn more, please visit www.state.gov and www.usaid.gov.

Comments

Comments

should37
October 8, 2011

W.W. writes:

An Army of Nobodies Spirit only:

After reviewing the U.S. proposal and the U.S. values, all agreement lately taken on international field will be reconsidered.

Free Trade agreement : A warning message has been delivered at Panama Colombian South Korean govs regarding the intent of U.S. to devastate their local economy to place over produced and over stocked U.S. goods,production needed to mantain an criminal oligharchic society that no longer has the right to stand, in order to generate financial poverty and indeed slavery on their soil.

Usaid is a criminal organization for the way it operated for istance in Haiti as per British Investigation

U.S. may lead when they will be show coherency on their choices and when it will demonstarte not to be a false prophet faking to stand for the people but defending the few part of a global mob financial criminal organization

@ Barak Obama : the problem of American economy it is not Europe but it is america

delated
October 8, 2011

D. writes:

reaffirming what written

still working for changes?

we still believe

Timoci V.
|
Fiji
October 6, 2011

Timoci V. in Fiji writes:

I would like to know more about the US stance on what is happening here in fiji as you might be more informed on how this dictator travelled to the U.S. recently. Is the term dictatorship here in fiji different from dictatorships in other countries like Libya and Egypt? Are they allowed to travel into the US to do deals without the knowledge of authorities?

Lauren
|
California, USA
October 6, 2011

Lauren in California writes:

Great entry. Provides a well thought out explanation for aid abroad and how it affects not only the country receiving aid, but also the U.S.

Thomas W.
|
United States
October 6, 2011

Thomas W. in the U.S.A. writes:

I'm thrilled to hear of the continuing commitment to international aid to fledgling democratic governments. I think we can all acknowledge the damage caused when we fail to support democratic elements in an unstable society (as in Afghanistan in the '80s) or when we actively support autocratic regimes in the name of "regional stability" (as in the Shah's Iran). Only heavy investment in the developing democracies of the Middle East and North Africa can spare us from repeating the terrible heartache, loss of life, and loss of economic security that followed the attacks of 9/11.

Zharkov
|
United States
October 7, 2011

Zharkov in the U.S.A. writes:

Sorry about Fiji. The US government might have been more interested in the military coup d'etat if Fiji had oil, gold, diamonds, atomic bombs, or threatened Israel. From all appearances, Fiji is on its own. No NATO bombing for you. Not even honorable mention at the UN.

What you need is a good earthquake and some t.v. news footage of the poorest villages, then maybe they will send you some camp stoves and a few Hollywood actors to lecture you on your Carbon footprint.

Zharkov
|
United States
October 8, 2011

Zharkov in the U.S.A. writes:

So my post on Fiji is to embarrassing to post?

Well, is anyone concerned about a military junta running Fiji? What about democracy, free speech, human rights, and all that good stuff?

"Sorry about Fiji. The US government might have been more interested in the military coup d'etat if Fiji had oil, gold, diamonds, atomic bombs, or threatened Israel. From all appearances, Fiji is on its own. No NATO bombing for you. Not even honorable mention at the UN.

What you need is a good earthquake and some t.v. news footage of the poorest villages, then maybe they will send you some camp stoves and a few Hollywood actors to lecture you on your Carbon footprint."

Maureen
|
Massachusetts, USA
October 7, 2011

Maureen in Massachusetts writes:

Thomas Nides/US values:

Your writing inspires me!

The last two paragraphs will have to be memorized and repeated to citizens in America that are not yet aware of the State dept. core mission. In fact, people just don't know how vital, how encompassing the role of the State dept. is in terms of the US homeland, its security and our "moral compass" around the globe. The mother of all think tanks no less.

One percent of our national budget...one percent. As I read the postings in just one day I have learned enormous amounts of information on such a variety of topics that it is simply amazing what a resource we have before us simply by showing interest and desire to know what our country is doing diplomatically, the humanitarian and human rights initiatives with USAID, the educational front and security initiatives across the globe. This is about going full circle and the investment comes back to our security as a nation.

This is not about parties-it is about country and our responsibility to lead and position the nation for the future.

.

Latest Stories

January 20, 2009

Careers at the U.S. Department of State: April

Human Resources Specialist discusses her experiences working at the U.S. Department of State. Full Text available at: http://careers.state.gov/resources/transcripts.html Author: statevideo… more

Pages