Secretary Clinton Speaks Before the Senate Appropriations Committee

Posted by DipNote Bloggers
March 2, 2011
Secretary Clinton Testifies on Capitol Hill on March 2, 2011

More:FY 2012 State and USAID - Core Budget | FY 2012 State and USAID - Overseas Contingency Operations

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testified today before the Senate Appropriations Committee on State and Foreign Operations. The Secretary said:

"...First, this budget funds vital civilian missions in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, al-Qaida is under pressure as never before. Alongside our military offensive, we are engaged in a major civilian effort to help build up the governments, economies, and civil societies of those countries in order to undercut the insurgency. These two surges set the stage for a third, a diplomatic push in support of an Afghan process to split the Taliban from al-Qaida, bring the conflict to an end, and help stabilize the entire region. Our military commanders, as you just heard, including General Petraeus, are emphatic that they cannot succeed without a strong civilian partner. Retreating from our civilian surge in Afghanistan with our troops still in the field would be a grave mistake.

"Equally important is our assistance to Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nation with strong ties and interests in Afghanistan. We are working to deepen our partnership and keep it focused on addressing Pakistan's political and economic challenges as well as our shared threats.

"And after so much sacrifice in Iraq, we have a chance to help the Iraqi people build a stable, democratic country in the heart of the Middle East. As troops come home, our civilians are taking the lead, helping Iraqis resolve conflicts peacefully, and training police.

"Shifting responsibilities from our soldiers to our civilians actually saves taxpayers a great deal of money. The military's total OCO request worldwide will drop by $45 billion from 2010, while our costs in State and USAID will increase by less than 4 billion. Every business owner I know would gladly invest 4 dollars to save 45.

"Second, even as our civilians help bring today's war to a close, we are working to prevent tomorrow's. This budget devotes over $4 billion to sustaining a strong U.S. presence in volatile places. In Yemen, it is helping to provide security, development, and humanitarian assistance to deny al-Qaida a safe haven. It focuses on those same goals in Somalia. It is helping Northern and Southern Sudanese chart a peaceful future, helping Haiti to rebuild, and it proposes a new Global Security Contingency Fund that would pool resources and expertise with the Defense Department to quickly respond to challenges as they emerge.

"This budget also strengthens our allies and partners. It trains Mexican police to take on violent cartels and secure our southern border. It provides nearly $3.1 billion for Israel and supports Jordan and the Palestinians. It does help Egypt and Tunisia build stable and credible democratic systems, and it supports security assistance to over 130 nations. As Senator Graham said, over the years we've seen great ties created because of that funding. We did help to train a generation of Egyptian officers who refused to fire on their own people.

"Third, we are making targeted investments in human security. We have focused on hunger, disease, climate change, and humanitarian emergencies, because they threaten not only the security of individuals but they are the seeds of future conflict.

"Our largest investment is in global health programs, including those launched by President George W. Bush. These programs stabilize entire societies that have been devastated by HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other illnesses. They save the lives of mothers and children, and halt the spread of deadly diseases.

"And yes, global food prices are approaching an all-time high. And three years ago, this led to protests and riots in dozens of countries. Food security is a cornerstone of global stability, and we, under our policy, are helping farmers grow more food, drive economic growth, and turn aid recipients into trading partners.

"And climate change threatens food security, human security, and national security, so our budget builds resilience against droughts, floods, and other weather disasters; promotes clean energy and preserves tropical forests.

"Fourth, we are committed to making our foreign policy a force for domestic economic renewal. We are working aggressively to promote sustained economic growth, level the playing field, and open markets to create jobs here at home. To give you just one example, our economic officers in Vietnam helped Boeing secure a $1.5 billion contract for eight 787 aircrafts to be assembled in North Charleston, South Carolina. And I personally lobbied for that, Senator.

"Fifth and finally, this budget funds the people and the platforms that make everything possible that I've described. It allows us to sustain diplomatic relations with 190 countries. It funds political officers defusing crises, development officers spreading opportunity, economic officers who wake up every day thinking about how to put Americans back to work."

You can read the Secretary's open remarks here.

Related Entries:Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks Before Senate Committee on Foreign Relations | Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks Before the House Foreign Affairs Committee | Deputy Secretary Nides Briefs the Press on the State Department and USAID Budget | A New Way To Find Foreign Assistance Budget and Appropriation Data

Comments

Comments

Brian S.
|
Colorado, USA
March 3, 2011

Brian S. in Colorado writes:

Secretary Clinton, yesterday you told the Senate Committee on Appropriations that you were looking at new strategies to fight pirates off Somalia. You seemed to blame the Navy for not doing enough, and the shipping industry for enabling the Pirates. That is not fair. Neither the Navy nor industry can stop Pirates.

This problem cannot be solved by force alone. Pirate activity derives out of the economic situation ashore. The only solution will require a combination of economic development and strengthening of the Rule of Law.

Madam Secretary, you're in luck.

In December, 2008, a team that included the former Minister of Fisheries for the Puntland Regional Government, which ostensibly has authority over most of the Pirate havens, developed an approach to do exactly that, and submitted it to the CNO for consideration. Unfortunately, the Navy apparently feared that solving the Pirate problem too quickly might lead to smaller appropriations and fewer ships.

The approach was submitted to the POC designated for receipt of Unsolicited Proposals sent to AFRICOM. That contracting official made his own technical evaluation of the approach, based on who-knows-what expertise, without forwarding it, and found it lacked technical merit.

Finally, in April 2009 we tried to send it to Secretary Clinton. On 13 April, Ms. Martha L. (A/LM/AQM) emailed me to say that the State Department had no responsibility for Piracy, and therefore no interest in stopping it. That was then.

More good news. The former Minister, in collaboration with the current President of Puntland, is still prepared to implement this approach as soon as it is funded.

The US should not go ashore to implement this effort, but work through a local implementing partner like Musharax DGPL Ahmed Said Aw-Nur. If your intel is any good, you’ll see that nobody is better suited to this undertaking.

Shoot me an email when you’re ready to fix this.

Respectfully,

Brian S.

Portia
|
Ireland
March 7, 2011

Portia in Ireland writes:

Sadly Hilary, the women and children in all these countries suffer more now than ever before.

Like USA, before the white man came, the natives never knew rape, poverty etc until the men of god came to civilise them and taught them how to control women using rape.

Enough said.

Mark O.
|
Maryland, USA
March 4, 2011

Mark O. in Maryland writes:

It is easy for a country at war to marginalize the effects of soft power. Yet cultural and economic appeal are, or at once were, the primary factors in American world leadership. Clinton's analogy comparing State Department funding to a business investment highlights this potential strength; what's more, the hard-won gains that military can make in defending American safety will be erased without diplomacy and the use of soft power.

The Post today quotes Clinton's testimony to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations about an Afghan general: "The only thing he thought about Americans was that all the men wrestled and the women walked around in bikinis," due to the impression presented by the limited selection of American television he had experienced. Culture, media, economic and political aid: the State Department needs the resources to build the international image and prestige of the United States.

Another great example of the soft power necessary in securing peace for our country is highlighted by the new book by A. Ross Johnson, titled Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty: The CIA Years and Beyond. The eventual collapse of authoritarian communist states in Eastern Europe represented if anything a cultural, soft power victory for the West. Even when hard power may eventually be required, challenges to authoritarian rule such as the ongoing struggle in Libya begin and hopefully end with soft power, building trust and rebuilding stability. This is a key role for the State Department, and I hope that Congress understands and gives them the tools to achieve America's goals.

Latest Stories

September 22, 2008

Welcome to UNGA

About the Author: Brian H. Hook serves as Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations Affairs. The 63rd UN… more

Pages