Secretary Clinton Delivers Remarks at Review Conference of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

Posted by DipNote Bloggers
May 4, 2010

In her address to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference at the United Nations in New York today, Secretary Clinton announced new Presidential policy initiatives that further the Administration's commitment to the Treaty's core bargain: states without nuclear weapons promise not to acquire them, states with nuclear weapons work towards eliminating them, and all enjoy access to the peaceful uses of the atom.

Secretary Clinton said, "President Obama and I know that there are many different perspectives and historical experiences represented in this room. We know there are doubts among some about whether nuclear weapons states, including my own country, are prepared to help lead this effort. I am here to tell you as clearly as I can: The United States will do its part. I represent a President and a country committed to a vision of a world without nuclear weapons and to taking the concrete steps necessary that will help us get there. And along with my delegation, I come to this conference with sincere and serious proposals to advance the fundamental aims of the NPT and strengthen the global nonproliferation regime.

"Now, President Obama and I have spoken often of rights and responsibilities, and for us that's not just a slogan; it is the guiding principles of our efforts. We recognize the rights of all countries in compliance with the treaty to realize the benefits of nuclear energy. And we recognize our responsibility to commit the resources that will help spread those benefits as widely as possible.

"We also recognize our responsibility as a nuclear weapons state to move toward disarmament, and that is exactly what we are doing. And as we work to uphold our end of the basic bargain of the NPT, we are asking all signatories to do the same, to work with us to strengthen global nonproliferation rules and hold accountable those who violate them.

"So as we begin this conference, let's remember why we are here, because it is easy to get lost in the jargon and the technical disputes. But there is a deeper mission here to create a safer world where all of our children and grandchildren can realize their God-given potential without the threat of nuclear proliferation."

The Secretary continued, "These Review Conferences have been held every five years for the last four decades, but too often they have fractured along familiar lines: nuclear weapons states versus non-nuclear-weapons states, or the Western Group versus the Non-Aligned Movement. Instead of working together to meet a common challenge, we have retreated into predictable positions to protect our presumed interest. This time must be different. As one minister said to me, 'We not only must think out of the box, we must think out of the blocs.'

"We know there are some countries who will choose not to be constructive. This morning, Iran's president offered the same tired, false, and sometimes wild accusations against the United States and other parties at this conference. But that's not surprising. As you all heard this morning, Iran will do whatever it can to divert attention away from its own record and to attempt to evade accountability. Ultimately, however, we will all be judged not for our words but for our actions. And we will all be measured not by how assertively we claim our rights but by how faithfully we uphold our responsibilities. And as the Secretary General said, in this regard the onus is on Iran. So far, it has failed to meet its burden. Iran is the only country represented in this hall that has been found by the IAEA Board of Governors to be currently in noncompliance with its nuclear safeguards obligations -- the only one. It has defied the UN Security Council and the IAEA, and placed the future of the nonproliferation regime in jeopardy. And that is why it is facing increasing isolation and pressure from the international community.

"But Iran will not succeed in its efforts to divert and divide. The United States and the great majority of the nations represented here come to this conference with a much larger agenda: to strengthen a global nonproliferation regime that advances the security of all nations, to advance both our rights and our responsibilities. So now is the time to focus on promoting practical solutions, not pursuing unrealistic agendas. Now is the time to build consensus, not to block it. And I call on Iran to join with all the other delegations represented at this meeting to go ahead and fulfill our international obligations and work toward the goal of a safer world."

The Secretary then announced that the United States will seek U.S. Senate advice and consent to ratification of several Protocols to the Africa Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Treaty of Pelindaba) and the South Pacific Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Treaty of Rarotonga). These treaties complement the NPT and enhance the international nonproliferation regime by prohibiting the development or testing of nuclear weapons within their respective geographic zones. Zone parties are also prohibited from stationing nuclear weapons within their territories. The United States is not eligible to be a Party to either of these treaties, but it is eligible to join treaty Protocols open for signature by the nuclear weapons states. These protocols include a pledge not to test nuclear weapons within the zones and legally-binding assurances not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against treaty Parties.

The Secretary also announced a campaign to raise $100 million over the next five years to broaden access to peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The funds are to significantly expand support for projects sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), addressing energy and important humanitarian purposes, such as cancer treatment and fighting infectious diseases, food and water security, and the development of infrastructure for the safe, secure use of civil nuclear power. These efforts will be aimed to assist developing countries. The United States has pledged $50 million to this effort and will work with others to meet the $100 million target by the opening of the next NPT Review Conference. Historically, the United States has been the single largest contributor to the IAEA's technical cooperation programs. These programs enable more than 100 states to enjoy the benefits of peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

Read the Secretary's full remarks or this fact sheet, which describes the Secretary's announcements regarding U.S. participation in nuclear-weapon-free zones and expanded support for peaceful uses of nuclear energy.



New Mexico, USA
May 4, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

If I understand the premise outlined correctly, this is exactly what I've been trying to get folks to think about for a long time on this blog, that being in violation of this particular aspect as well as all the specific manifestations including violation of UN Sec. Council resolutions and being a state sponsor of terror pretty much automaticly voids a government's right to seek nuclear technology for any reason, "peaceful" generation of power included.

\'m glad to see she's publicly closing the loophole in international law where it concerns this issue;

"The international community’s record of enforcing compliance in recent years is unacceptable. So we need to consider automatic penalties for the violation of safeguards agreements such as suspending all international nuclear cooperation or IAEA technical cooperation projects until compliance has been restored. And we must use all of the possible financial and legal tools to disrupt illicit proliferation networks. That means tightening controls on transshipment and enhancing restrictions on transfers of sensitive technology. We should also find ways to dissuade states from utilizing the treaty’s withdrawal provision to avoid accountability."
-Hillary Clinton, U.S. Sec. of State

Now personally I perfer chairs to stools, and chairs generally come with four legs, not three.

So, as a thought, I'd suggest "disposal" is the fourth leg of the nuclear chair the future is going to rest on.

I hear a lot of talk about promoting peaceful use of nuclear energy but absolutely nothing about how to sustain such a global energy production capacity by dealing with the waste it generates that is going to be around for generations to come, permanently.

Until this issue is effectively addressed, your chair only has three legs and where's that get you?

Now I figure by suggesting an off-planet solution, I can pose the notion for all its worth without committing political suicide, having no capital to lose, and float the idea to those with a lot of political capital invested in making the whole thing work, but need a little time to put all the pieces together before taking a political gamble with the global community.

The NPT conference is part of that, as far as political attitudinal venture capital is concerned, potentially realizing life is going to get a whole lot harder if we don't deal with it as a community of nations, that has a few dysfunctional members running amok..

I think it's fine to hone in on a particular aspect of a case of serial contempt for the rule of law among nations, but let us not fail to see the forest for the trees.

Iran in totality is what if not in contempt of the rest of humanity? Certainly in contempt of the institution of the UN.

"The secretary general said that Iran must accept the fuel exchange and that the ball is now in Iran's court," Ahmadinejad said. "Well, I'd like to tell you and inform him as well that we'd accepted that from the start. . . . Therefore, we have now thrown the ball in the court of those who should accept our proposal."

Now I think folks understand why it is that I got a little adament more than a few times on Dipnote about why State dept. spokesmen shouldn't be saying "...the ball is in Iran's court."

Because they can't dribble worth a damn.


Folks are getting this now right?

Now folks talk about the path Saddam tred in regards to a nuclear Iran and the similarities of the end reached...speculatively of course.

Word on the street, as it were...

The only similarity I see are two fools begging for an education at the expense of their people.

'Nuff said.

South Korea
May 4, 2010

Palgye in South Korea writes:

Greek protesters drape banners on Acropolis
Greek protesters spread banners on Acropolis amid strikes against austerity.

noblesse oblige

Is Greece and anger the themselves will experience to be young is because of the bud but, economic crisis the mortar one map layer negates the real income of the themselves and entrusts the responsibility thinks in self the thing one cause. Thinks that the inside where when the help the outside is decided there must be reaction which corresponds in him.

May 4, 2010

B writes:

The law "must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in its eyes, shall be equally eligible to all high offices, public positions and employments, according to their ability, and without other distinction than that of their virtues and talents."
Any man aspires to liberty, to equality, but he can not achieve it without the assistance of other men, without fraternity, Work, family, fatherland

New Mexico, USA
May 5, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Quote of the Day; "If Obama was strong enough to overcome the resistance of his military establishment and take this dramatic step, our leaders cannot do otherwise. It's a matter of honor for them." -- Russian Diplomatic Academy Vice Rector Yevgeny Bazhanov, on whether Russia would follow the U.S. example of disclosing the size of its nuclear arsenal.


Will someone please thank the rector of the Russian version of the Foreign Service institute for me and please tell him that this kind of friendly "competition" is what "Keeping up with the Jones'." is all about.

Attitude is everything.


Latest Stories