Patrick in Maryland writes:

Hi, People of the DipNote Web Site & :)

The Snow is Coming, The Snow is Coming, not the British. hehe...:)

I think there should be information on DipNote about weather warnings for travelers. In areas that are about to get bad weather or have bad weather,and have travelers post in on conditions where they are.

This could be helpful to people who are thinking of traveling to different countries too.

Anyways, be safe out there if your traveling, or planing on driving.

See Ya...Department People :)

Posted on Fri Feb 05, 2010

Janette W. W. in Louisiana writes:

I think that at some point in very near future that we should not give the Hataians a fish but teach them how to fish. They have a good natural resource base. They need education on everything from monetization of their resources to human rights. I would gladly educate them on their chickens being that it is a major consumer staple. I have a site that teaches a person the proper care of chickens. It is at buildachickencoopeasy.com

Posted on Thu Feb 04, 2010

Karen H. in Oregon writes:

Through the creation of an international government based on fair and equitable practices.

I have been working to introduce a plan for an international government based on two proven concepts: the US Constitution and the cooperation of nature.

Under this plan, each nation would be treated the same way the states are treated within the United States, and making up each of the departments, experts in their fields from all over the world. The departments would function as advisors to the proposes international government, and be sovereign and autonomous. This would take politics out of the issues, and enable issues to be resolved.

With shared research, there would be no redundant efforts, and solutions would be culturally acceptible to all people. There would be no resistance to any plan, because there would be peer review.

Posted on Wed Feb 03, 2010

OysterCracker in California writes:

Apology accepted but how would statehood help Haiti when they're already so wary of foreign intervention? The U.S. and Haitians could profit by their mutual relationship without statehood. One of the biggest exchanges could be education. Sharing curriculum, partnering schools. Allowing Haitians easy access to American schools at 16 or 17. This would ensure a well qualified work force to rebuild and sustain Haiti's viability. I would also make forestry, planting projects mandatory service for all children so that Haiti's forests can be replanted qickly. Imagine an army of 7-17 year olds. They'll get the job done quickly and efficiently.

Posted on Wed Feb 03, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Flavius,

I suppose you feel I've been unfair to you by the sound of your post.

And since no one has officially taken up my invitation to explain the policy I had question of I figure you think that proves your point that this blog is not a two way street.

Well I'm not one to put State in a position to be damned if they do and damned if they don't.

Since the policy seems to contradict the stated intent of this blog.

I never called it a roadblock, I just said I don't like them in the way in general terms...and by way of having proof that none really existed to begin with I had fair reason to attain the perspective of noting the policy's illogical nature.

Be that as it may, an invitation is just that, and I'm not insisting on an explanation.

Like I said I think they are probably still thinking about it....having been witness to this entertaining conversation, and having published our thoughts on the matter.

There's another reason this blog may exist that hasn't even been explored yet and that's it's entertainment value to all those hard working busy civil servants and FSO's in far flung places chomping on policy's bit while trying to do their jobs effectively.

It may be that I just expressed their sentiments on logic's behalf without being aware of it.

We're a lot alike which is why we get along so well...(chuckle).

I'm not the most diplomatic sort, and I wouldn't pass the meds for world-wide service either.

I took the test several times knowing I had about as much chance of getting hired on as I would winning the powerball lotto.

So my chances of making a difference from the inside is about as good as me having millions to throw at as problem.

That is, slim to none at all. But I'm glad you think I actually might have a shot at it.

Under the circumstances I can only try and make sense of it all from where I sit, with all the time I need to figure things out, and no deadlines or commitments to bind me in process, save for love of humanity.

I find unlimited motivation in that.

And the blog allows me to express that, for all the good it might achieve.

Posted on Wed Feb 03, 2010

Joan in U.S.A. writes:

I think a series of web meetings on each category should be initiated by major corporations and universities with specific goals in mind. The groups would then compete for a prize which would be awarded to all members of the winning group in each category. The projects would be judged by "experts" who are qualified to determine the feasibility of each successful project. A panel of professionals would monitor the progress to ensure all ideas are being heard. It would need to be run similar to a Science Fair, just bigger. Something to think about.

Posted on Tue Feb 02, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

(chuckle) The reason I thought it illogical Flavius is because I already had evidence to the contrary nature of it..

And I offered you proof that if nothing else it is so illogical that the policy isn't enforce-able as written.

No beef with State, as I said it was perplexing me and I questioned it.

Simply because this blog has always been officially a two-way street.

Apparently....

We've all had our experiences.

The last time I took the test there were 15,000 applicants for some 400 postions.

I'm glad you think I have a shot against such long odds, but that won't change the medical basis for my not being available for world-wide service at this point.

That could change, but I don't have an extra 30 grand lying around to get the work done.

Now if you know a good think tank willing to pay me to think, I'm all ears.

That is unless the USG considers my presence here a "national asset" worth preservation and funding and offers me work as an analyst having already proved my worth...officially.

God knows the CIA won't ever tell me I'm "making it up" again the next time I drop a golden egg in their lap, that's for certain.

In this life, you win some and you lose some. I try not to hold attachment to ideas.

Saving lives is another matter.

In the battle of ideas, I place my faith in tangible results that I can reach out and touch, not in the process of getting there from here.

That's the way it has to be to become effective.

Roadblocks to that are mearly a nuisance, and most of them are illusory. If you treat them as such, they go by-by.

And sometimes they apologize.

(no reference to you)

All this said, I've enjoyed our conversation...a good give and take...

I don't know that we've solved anything, but if in the reading we've got folks to thinking, then all we can say is we've done our jobs as citizens, despite any flack we may take for it.

Or give each other...(chuckle).

Posted on Tue Feb 02, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

Oyster:

I have suggested that we offer Commonwealth status to the Republic of Haiti, if they're willing. And then after that, statehood.

I then said that someone must have put something in my drink to make me suggest that. Maybe it was Eric.

My suggestion was perhaps the most revolutionary and outside the box of any posted on this site. I know the reasons why we "can't" do it. I reject those reasons. It is the best solution for Haiti, if the Haitians would go along with it. And, more importantly, if Americans would go along with it.

Eric, it is not that I have to eliminate the word "cant" from my internal dialogue. This has nothing to do with MY internal dialogue. It is merely my assessment of the internal dialogue of others.

I have spent over forty years here in the DC area. My father worked for the government. I have worked for the government. I could tell you about people at the Department of State and the government in general whose entire internal dialogue consists only of the word "can't." The culture at State may be changing for the better. It may change back.

I am not suggesting that because there is parochialism and stupidity and avarice in government that ALL government is parochial, stupid and avaricious. There are many people in government who do this for all the right reasons.

There are also people who DON'T. As I said, I speak from long experience.

I am truly sorry that everyone has found such fault with my statements. I have never said that this website is for "the chosen few." Neither has Eric.

Our difference relates to what this website's first purpose is. My initial posting was in reaction to Eric's complaint that...

"it strikes me as totally illogical to tell us the public that anything we post here will not be considered "official" communication to our government, when in fact promoting solutions is a two way street...and I don't like roadblocks to getting there from here."

So, Eric doesn't like roadblocks to promoting solutions, and he is asking the State Department to explain why there are roadblocks. They never have, at least in the comments section.

My first posting was simply to state that this blog isn't really a "two way street" at all. Which is what Eric was saying to begin with. Then, Eric jumps on me for saying that it ISN'T a two way street.

I could call this Stockholm syndrome, but that would be unfair of me. Eric, your argument is with the DEPARTMENT OF STATE, not with FLAVIUS.

I could have handled this exchange more diplomatically, which is why we're all probably better off without me at State (which was my father's fervent wish for me btw, full disclosure: my father worked for Education).

Those are my last five hundred or so words on the subject.

Eric. If you haven't taken the exam, you ought to. My health won't permit a career overseas. But you are one of the top two or three posters on this blog (imho) along with Zharkov (and where did he go?), and you might have a real shot at it. And you do seem to love it so.

Posted on Tue Feb 02, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Oyster, I don't know what prompted your complaint, but you asked a fair question and I thought it deserved an answer. May not be the one you were looking for though...(chuckle).

Look, they say "Washington is a place where good ideas go to die.", if there's an exception to that urban myth, it's evident here.

Welcome aboard.

To be completely accurate in my opinion, if Pat Robertson were posting comment on this blog then I would probably have written proof by now that your claims are well founded, but you'd still have to ask him that question, not me...(chuckle).

The notion that members of our government are separate from us is an illusion held by both the government and the citizen to mutual detriment and lasting dysfunctionality and loss of trust.

This then is simply a means to address that problem, and used wisely it may serve that purpose.

Again though, this all depends on what we citizens make of it, and by making too much sense to ignore, officially.

If Bob Gates' words can be taken on faith that "Washington is the only place where you can wallk down the street and see folks holding their own hand." then I suppose what you have are a bunch of separatists, by definition of attitude towards dialogue with their peers.

I take the Bill Mauldin approach, "When you see a stuffed shirt, poke it. When it's really stuffed, punch it."

It's especially effective on illusions of grandure.

I'm not Bill Gates with millions to throw at a problem if I want to solve it, so needing all the help I can get to put an idea in motion, I appreciate the opportunity to solicit that help from the highest office.

But it's someone else's decision to implement or not, and a citizen can only suggest a course of action.

Posted on Tue Feb 02, 2010

OysterCracker in California writes:

I'm really shocked and appalled at the 'holier than though' attitude of the participants on this blog. How could America raise such elitist idiots? What they really mean is that they do believe in the "Foggy bottom" and this website is just for the chosen few. Glad I figured it out soon enough.

Posted on Mon Feb 01, 2010

Tim S. in Ukraine writes:

Hi. Just noticed that the headline and question toward the bottom of the blog need to be changed. It currently reads: "How Best Can People Pool Knowledge To Develop Solutions to Global Challenges?" You should simply get rid of the word "best." Good luck. Tim

Posted on Mon Feb 01, 2010

Brielle J. in New York writes:

The gigantic screens positioned about the city would act as a focal point to aid supply and information. Other smaller traffic like devices could be placed at stategic traffic nodes about field hospitals and hospitals, whether they're filled to capacity or not and the alternative hospital to take the survivors to.

Posted on Mon Feb 01, 2010

Oyster Cracker in California writes:

Here's another idea,

As there aren't enough tents to house everyone in Haiti in the short term, I wrote to President Obama and suggested that they get 1000,s of used heavy duty sewing machines and have the Haitians churn out tents. This could be the beginning of a cottage disaster products industry. Take existing ideas in disaster relief like house in a box,school in a box etc. modify the idea using less expensive materials and voila Haiti becomes the biggest producer of disaster related products in the world. You could do the same for green industry products once Haiti better recovers. Some of the money generated could be used to help orphanages or child welfare programs that teach about quality child care.

If you get an industry that knows the best practices of child care, life for aHaiti's beautiful children will quickly improve.

Posted on Sun Jan 31, 2010

Oyster Cracker in California writes:

Okay here's one idea. In regards to Haiti or the next major disaster that deals with the flow of emergency information. It would be great to see numerous, gigantic, blow up information screens that people could text or call to that would immediately give details about survivors and the missing. I wrote to Bill Gates about this idea but got a very lukewarm response. The gigantic screens positioned about the city would act as a focal point to aid supply and information. Other smaller traffic like devices could be placed at stategic traffic nodes about field hospitals and hospitals, whether they're filled to capacity or not and the alternative hospital to take the survivors to. One big criticism is signage and information. In the event of a disaster people need immediate information to save lives, setting up a system like is cheap and low maintenance and could help save more lives. What are your ideas?

Posted on Sun Jan 31, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Re; The notion of Dipnote being a "Political Tool";

To quote the Secretary, “On their own, new technologies do not take sides in the struggle for freedom and progress, but the United States does. We stand for a single Internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas.”

As a tool to unlock human potential this blog goes far beyond the mere political in nature, and to try and label it such is to place unworthy limitations on your own expectations of it.

I'm not just saying this to Flavius, but I'm probably preaching to the choir in reminding the folks that created and run this site that we have no physical limits as to what may actually result from this social experiment as the years go by.

If we can think it, we can probably get it done if we want to badly enough...and that would be a healthy attitude to lead off with.

Otherwise, why bother to solicit ideas in the first place?

Posted on Sun Jan 31, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Oyster,

I think folks pretty well know what to do, it's pooling and utilizing available resource in a more efficiant manner of delivery in the short term critical hours that lives have the most chance of being saved that is where the "bottle-neck" lies, as well as getting walking wounded treated before infection kills them needlessly.

http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/entry/multilateral_efforts#Comments

Posted on Sat Jan 30, 2010

Ron in New York writes:

WWW.$$$.Govs.......

USG State should take the lead on using the web to track, trace and capture illicit billons and other global assets stolen. Seize the monies and repatriate them for
global goods ( MDG's)....the money is out there, the technology can find it....all we need is the shared political will to get it done. If we do not met this challenge, we will
surely lose the CyberWars ahead.

Posted on Sat Jan 30, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

"Please accept my apologies and if you've got another glass of that kool aid, I sure would appreciate some. ;)"

Accepted, and you can make it yourself Flavius, just delete the word "can't" from your internal dialoge.

...helps in anticipating miracles.

Come to think of it, that's generally how things get done most of the time anyway.

Posted on Sat Jan 30, 2010

Oyster Cracker in California writes:

Emperor Flavius and Eric

How would you pool our collective knowledge to help Haiti?

Posted on Sat Jan 30, 2010

Oyster Cracker in California writes:

If the State Department wants to improve and pool global knowledge to find effective solutions they could first improve viewership of their website by linking it to bigger websites such as the BBC. If they could field a question a la 'Have Your Say' they would get some very interesting responses. No one really visits this site because it seems closed, unapproachable to most people. The State Department needs some young computer geek to get them hooked up to the world wide web and to the 21st century if they are truly serious in generating and exploiting new ideas.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Oyster,

They should feel special working for us, most take it as a distinct privilage in fact.

Trust in one's government shouldn't involve the illusion that it knows all, sees all, end all, be all... to be sure to err is human and complacency a risk in dangerous times.

That is not elitist mentality, just an aspect of the human condition when it collides with beaurocracy.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

All I've ever said is that the primary purpose of this blog is to reach directly to the public without the filter of the media, which is all they say themselves. Primary purpose, not the only purpose. Without that purpose, there wouldn't be a Dipnote. It wouldn't justify the expense. This is a POLITICAL TOOL.

I'd also like to remind everyone that this was set up in Secretary Rice's State Department. Hillary did not come up with this idea. With all the hosannas raised up to Mrs. Clinton on this blog, I wonder sometimes...

Be that as it may, I think the Secretary is doing the best job of anyone in the Cabinet right now, including the man at the top.

I did not intend my comments to raise such a ruckus. I guess that's just my nature. Please accept my apologies and if you've got another glass of that kool aid, I sure would appreciate some. ;)

What a brave new world we live in.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Gillian in United Kingdom writes:

Great. I love a challenge!

Let's see if we get everyone on the internet collaborating to effect the production of low cost eco-villages to help the world's poor.

The designs are available for FREE download: the-alternative.org.uk

Blog: brillsville.livejournal.com/

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

OysterCracker in California writes:

Emperor Flavius,
Is that how the State Department refers to the hoi polloi citizenry as the "foggy bottom"? Your name befits your ignorance!

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Oyster Cracker in California writes:

The State Dept. shouldn't be so elitist as most good ideas that they have used have come from the Hoi Polloi, such as fish farms, agricutural intiatives etc. If you speak of equality, it should include a true global perspective of the world's problems which the State Dept. can always use and exploit to their advantage. Not all of us come from Ivy League colleges or had wealthy parents but interestingly enough, our ideas make the world run. The State Dept. could actually learn something of value if they listen and want to effectively implement their policies.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Flavius,

Here's some reading material...since you wanted some tangible proof apparently.

blogs.state.gov/index.php/archive/entry/in_response_to_question_of_the_week

Herin you'll find the chief instigator of this blog describe what this blog is all about, as well as giving one a fair idea of it's potential.

---

blogs.state.gov/index.php/archive/entry/cambodias_war_era_debt

U.S. Ambassador to Cambodia Joseph A. Mussomeli writes

@ Eric in New Mexico -- Eric, I just saw your entry, and I wanted to thank you for the well thought out suggestion you made. With the current world food crisis, your idea is an intriguing one to add to the mix. Although I can't predict what the final resolution will be -- whether it be full repayment by Cambodia or a form of debt-for-assistance like an education fund -- you have certainly given everyone something new to think about.

Posted on Mon May 05, 2008

---

blogs.state.gov/index.php/entries/pacific_partnership_vessels/

It has always been my experience that more change can result from a single question asked of the right people at the right moment, than all the op-ed's ever written, or speeches given.

When a post is created and published on this official blog from a citizen's comment which posed the question that became topic of the post, is that because no one officially listened? Or no one officially commented, nor was that an official post in response to an official idea?

Now I would hope the staff here will understand the quandry I'm seeking to resolve, by illuminating how effective this blog has the potential to be, if only this medium is taken seriously by the public as a portal to creating a more effective government.

And that starts with us posting things that make too much sense to ignore, officially.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

You missed a very important part of that mission statement Flavius...

"DipNote is the official blog of the U.S. Department of State —a place to share stories, discuss experiences, and inspire new ideas on the important foreign policy issues of the day."

Now I can understand why someone's personal account of doing their job @ state could not be construed as a statement of official policy or anything discussed in public be taken as "official" communication from the dept. itself, and that the employee that blogs a post here is speaking in his personal capacity in sharing knowledge and ideas, even to the extent of explaining US policy, it still is a personal interpretation, even by senior officials.

It allows them to speak their mind without reflection on the Dept of State as a whole, in the sense that an open forum is a pretty informal meeting place to begin with, has to be in order to bounce ideas off each other.

But I have yet to see someone from the public try to give some kind of "legal notice" ....and vice versa I take it that this would not be the place to submit a resignation letter..(chuckle) if you worked for State.

But what bothered me was "or comment" in context with this, and thus left I think an aspect of free speech twisting in the wind...and should be striken from said policy and that's my official opinion on the matter.

Now I might write a letter and that could be considered a more formal meathod of communication, traditional if one might call it that, but what's written here is no less tangible in aspect and I've had plenty of "official communication" via email with various government officials , elected and otherwise, included among various agencies over the years.

When this blog first started, and a comment was not published for some reason, I'd get this email from the staff with an explanation...I would certainly take that to be "official notice" of some sort...

But maybe things have changed during the site makeover that just took place, because this policy is news to me and I've been here since just about day-1 this blog came into existance.

So as the blog itself represents a tool to pool knowlege and resources, an ongoig social experiment in interactive government...it is only proper to put the basis for such discussion on the firm footing of mutual understanding of how this comment policy supports the mission statement.

And as yet, I figure folks are probably still thinking about whether the wording makes any sense.

Take all the time you want I say, just get it right.

Susan in Florida has it right, Flavius.

"Never before have we been asked for our thoughts and opinions. This blog is proof that our ideas count."

I'm of the opinion that when one submits solution along with complaint it's generally better recieved as such, giving the recipient the choice to focus on the solution or the nature of the complaint.

And if there is no official comment to be had, I don't suppose we'll arrive at official solutions.

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

Eric and Susan. May I direct you to the mission statement of this blog?

"The mission of the U.S. Department of State is to create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.

Through its websites and other online resources, the Department offers broad public access to a wide range of information. Blogs.state.gov offers the public an alternative source to mainstream media for U.S. foreign policy information. This blog offers the opportunity for participants to discuss important foreign policy issues with senior Department officials."

I think the key sentence here is the one that refers to this blog as an "alternative source to mainstream media for U.S. foreign policy information." If that isn't PR, please tell me what it is? I could call it "spin," you know, which might be less nice but more accurate.

It is not out of the realm of possibility that an idea here might be picked up and run with by our friends in Foggy Bottom. It is unlikely, however, because we don't know the whole story behind every crisis. Few of us have an understanding of how things work on the ground. There are political realities which, no matter how inconvienient and stupid, must be considered. I submit that few to none of us in the hoi polloi have an understanding of and/or access to this important information.

Most of us mean well and that's all to the good. Moreover, this blog is a way for people to become interested in and discuss foreign policy. There aren't very many of us and there need to be more.

I would appreciate more feedback from people at State, however. Most of the time the bloggers post but do not respond to comments. There are very few high level responses to comments if any (I make that statement anecdotally. I cannot read everything on this blog). That's hardly unusual nor is it "wrong." These people are BUSY.

So go on and keep making suggestions. There's nothing wrong with that. And maybe, just maybe, you might come up with an idea that is new and fresh and, by golly, might just work. I'm all for that. Keep on pushing!

Posted on Fri Jan 29, 2010

OysterCracker in California writes:

P.S. After Haiti and numerous other disasters we should be better prepared through pre-planning for the next coming disaster rather than scrambling around like a chicken with its head cut off.
It would be nice if every country had 50,00 gas powered concrete saws, stretchers , field hospitals, water bladders, tents and provisions, heavy lifting equipment prestored that could be delivered anywhere on the globe and delivered within 2-3 hours after a major disaster. Also, we need systems in place to secure children and take care of the elderly. Personally, I feel we need a disaster relief corps that is mandatory. Everyone should be able to dress wounds and do their best to stabilize patients and organize themselves like the army in the event of a disaster. If systems were in place to evacuate women and children from the affected area and they had tents, supplies and temporary schools and childcare available when they arrive it would greatly reduce stress and the burden people feel and end some of the initial chaos. Men can stay to rescue people and remove the rubble. In a disaster things have to occur like clockwork so there is no guessing. The plan is laid out and people know what their role is.

Posted on Thu Jan 28, 2010

OysterCracker in California writes:

One extremely underutilized talent are students. Students are always yearning to show the world their talents. If you opened a competition or just had an online project something like HDTV Blog cabin among architects, urban, transportation planners to add on-going ideas for the reconstruction of Haiti and allow people worldwide to present plans, make recommendations etc. you could get a very good, well planned solution. The web site could get ideas from a broad swathe of the public like nurses,teachers, plumbers etc. Also Haitian students should have a say or part to play in the design of their new city. People like to make their mark on the world. Seeing a new city emerge from Haiti's rubble would be very satisfying to every participant. Having the world participate is very inspiring. Once and general direction agreed upon. Communities should be built and advertized to the world. This is the power of humanity. We just need to tap into it.

Posted on Thu Jan 28, 2010

Susan C. in Florida writes:

@ Eric in New Mexico -- Well said. Never before have we been asked for our thoughts and opinions. This blog is proof that our ideas count. We can not expect that every thought/idea will be considered, after all we are not policy makers. However, I have read thoughtful responses to our comments and questions that have been posted on DipNote, from the people of the State Department. I am impressed that there are individuals reading our comments, and who knows, some of our "very good" ideas may be passed along to the right people. I am ever hopeful, and like Eric in NM, I will continue to try.

Posted on Thu Jan 28, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Well good Flavius, there's book learning and then there's experience that offers perhaps the most complete education of all... simply because it's only when you screw-up enough times that you actually get it right for once, and so the theories from books are often modified by the instigator or circumstance to create/adapt a working program to fit the times...some call that progress, I tend to call it process...

...Of getting people to think, for all the good it might do. Against all odds perhaps...

Thus it isn't about getting noticed, but about noticing the human condition.

Ergo urban mythology.

Folks like myself that arn't available for world-wide service, nor perky, bright eyed college grads on a carreer track, nor family members of FSO's are plumb out of luck huh?

I beg to differ.

I'm actually a little perplexed by the policy since I've had the pleasure of interacting with folks that run desks and embassies and they don't seem to mind if I get them to think once in awhile...been thanked for it occasion.

A well informed citizen is the better half of the public/private partnership in my opinion and it may well be shared by certain public officials, that job 1 is getting this government to be all that it can be, and less dysfunctional...one might think of it as a long-term social experiment...rather than an ego trip...

Maybe it's got something to do with "...,ask what you can give to your country.", and anticipating miracles.

If my fellow citizens consider me crazy to try...I'm already glad I did.

And thanks for what I'm sure you wrote as a well meaning dose of reality, but we all serve in the same capacity that in bringing food for thought to the table in an open public forum it is "officially" a pot-luck/stone soup incident...and my government should be good enough to blog with such policy's intent, bold as this may sound...are the employees of which free to speak their mind?

Barring uttering the classified, I would hope they excercise their will to do so...as frequently as possible, in town hall or in private, network on this blog and other media not as a PR stunt, but if nothing else simply to be keeping up with us "jones'" out in the real world and to the cubicled, office bound civil servant, we the public are a source of fresh ideas, generally having way too much time on our hands to think about things...

I believe you should invite your friends at the think tanks to come put their Phd's on the line...

We can put political probability theory to test. And see if we can achieve critical mass.

Could be fun..a circus you say?...and who knows,...who reads these things anyway?...(chuckle).

Posted on Thu Jan 28, 2010

Susan C. in Florida writes:

To pool knowledge one must listen to the everyday men/women who are experiencing the very things that you are talking about. Global warming, economic "problems", job loses, lack of good educational opportunities... the list goes on and on. It has been too long since we, the public, have been considered or listened to. Stop talking, start to REALLY listen, and ask us to help you. As Americans we have "stepped up" many times to face and deal with many challenges. We can do it again if given some concrete help and some direction from you all in our government. PLEASE, stop the us against them mentality. We are weary of it "out here". Regardless of party, democrat, republican, or independent, please start listening and working for the very individuals who sent you to Washington,D.C.. It would be greatly appreciated.

Posted on Wed Jan 27, 2010

Patrick in Maryland writes:

Hi, My Special Friend, She Knows Who She Is :)
LOL...Hillary...

"Your Doing A Pretty Good Job" and you guys
too. I like Dipnote ....:)

On the subject ,we need to take it slowly,
Baby steps are better than a leap.
Or i'v heard ...:)

Posted on Wed Jan 27, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

I meant to write SAIS (the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins), not SAIC. Mea culpa.

Posted on Wed Jan 27, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

This blog has never been about anything other than PR. If you want to have input at State, the best way to do that (short of getting elected) is to go to SAIC or Georgetown, take the exam, apply for a job at State and get hired there. Various other positions in academia/thinktanks/media will also get you access. Money will always get you access (think businessmen willing to invest overseas where we need a strong American economic presence). But to think that making random blog posts to the State Department website might actually get one NOTICED, well, you know what Mr. Barnum said...

Thus, the ever whimsical nature of my posts!

Posted on Wed Jan 27, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Maybe it's relevant and maybe not, but I have a question for folks regarding the following as to how this policy can be in any way conducive to pooling knowledge, sharing ideas, and debating solutions...with the Dept of State.

"Communications made through the blog’s e-mail and messaging system will in no way constitute a legal or official notice or comment to the U.S. Department of State or any official or employee of the U.S. Department of State for any purpose."
- Blog Comment Policy

Now I'm no legal expert, but let's for the moment pretend logic prevails in disclaimer...(chuckle)...anything posted here is "off the record"???

Mmmm, well that's usually the realm of the mysterious "senior official"...from my recollection...but whatever...Who am I to presume.

Seems to me this here blog is "The official Blog" of the US dept of State...a public agency beholden to the laws that govern such institutions and as such is now part of State's official public outreach through policy and congressional approval...and thus being approved by the people as an official meathod of communication it strikes me as totally illogical to tell us the public that anything we post here will not be considered "official" communication to our government, when in fact promoting solutions is a two way street...and I don't like roadblocks to getting there from here.

Lot of good folks with good thoughts and good will out there posting it here, but if nobody's officially listening ( and by implication responding and interacting with those that take the time to try and make some sort of official difference by posting our thoughts here), than all this effort is never going to ammount to a hill of beens on a public diplomacy level...or on a practical level either.

So either this comment policy is poorly worded or I'm wasting my breath.

Gotta call it like I see it, 'cause it don't leave a whole lot of room for misinterpretation, sorry to say it appears that plausable deniability is still the status quo.

I invite a proper explanation of said policy by those that created it, as well as my peers among the masses so inclined to opine on its worth.

I'm trying to bust a certain urban myth that opinion matters not to those it should.

Posted on Wed Jan 27, 2010

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Use Haiti as an example. It is an opportunity as well as a sad problem.

Right now the people should be working and organized in stages. The reason the military seems so successful in these situations should be noted: they are organized. Control stems from Organization.

Move toward resource development predicated on needs. People will need to eat; they have plenty of good land to farm. People need to be housed. They have land which can be developed by homesteading. Combine the two.

Farming areas should have been chosen as the people will need to eat. Why should such a country even have to import or depend on any products which can be grown well there?

There is no realistic reason they cannot homestead in Haiti instead of having the people of a proposed democracy live UNDER the Wealthy of other countries citizens who buy their land at exuberant prices.

Energy: Why not start on alternative energy on the island as an example? They lack neither for wind nor sun.

Develop necessary resources with the people in mind first, not golf courses. Dependency on an economic upper class or outside aid is not democracy; especially, when that class comes from the outside. This is what weakens Democratic Governments to begin with. Kind of like some lobbies in DC. Not all, but when collectively they work for profit against the betterment of the People, the very Constitution and laws developed for them to profit has been violated.

While Russia may not be the prime example of democratic development, there is much to be learned from Putin’s Methods. Everything the man did was for development on a Nationalistic basis. Not Socialistic, but for the overall betterment of Russia as a Nation. If he is so wrong, why is Russia where they are and America where it is economically?

Take the best Organizational methods which lead to development which were the control elements, then apply technology….

It is sad when it's not the people; but, the Leadership of a Nation which ruins productive development is it not? Be it in non-negotiation, compromise, graft, corruption, using political lines...it is not Science or Technology which has inhibited Mankind; but, poor leadership, misuse of Science and Technologies and false Philosophies.

Posted on Tue Jan 26, 2010

Eva A. in Germany writes:

Visioning Need for Emergency Registration of Disaster Victims in Haiti

While I believe the Haitian government itself needs to track victims in need since the earthquake catastrophe, they need all the help in the world to be able to do it swiftly and simply. That means building a web site database coordinating data all the victims being helped in the hospitals, orphanages, camps, reunification centers, etc. between all major organizations helping. I have ideas but looking for the right people to share them with - primarily Haitian officials and Haitian Americans helping who can understand English.

Posted on Tue Jan 26, 2010

Michael T. in Florida writes:

The past two weeks has shown that the ordinary citizen, given the tools, is able to assist both individually and collectively toward a common goal to help each other in times of dire circumstance. This is a defining moment in history for information technolgy/social media.

Posted on Tue Jan 26, 2010

Ron in New York writes:

World Wide Waziristan?

With all this connectivity......

You would think we would have Bin Laden By Now?

Posted on Mon Jan 25, 2010

Jesús T. N. in Mexico writes:

Felicidades a la Sra. Clinton y al Presidente Obama por el impulso que están dando a la difusión de las ideas, las experiencias y las inquietudes en todo el mundo, para lograr una visión global cada día más amplia, así como una mayor participación en la búsqueda de soluciones globales a los problemas económicos por los que actualmente pasamos
Resulta de la mayor importancia para todos los países y de manera muy particular para México, que en los EEUU se aprueben las reformas financieras de "sentido común" que el Presidente Obama propone, porqué representarían un avance enorme hacia la construcción de las necesarias reformas financieras globales y de la implementación de un nuevo orden económico mundial que proteja a los consumidores, fomente la libre competencia y estimule la creación de empleos en todos los países, principalmente en los países en desarrollo, pues no debemos permitir que, en el futuro, se vuelvan a presentar crisis económicas a causa de la irresponsabilidad de los grandes banqueros, de los poderosos consorcios globales y de gobiernos corruptos que anteponen sus intereses a los superiores intereses generales del desarrollo social global

Posted on Mon Jan 25, 2010

Lee in California writes:

This site and the Question of the Week potentially can be a nice aggregating tool to find new ideas about world problems -- but it needs to have a MASS following. It could be posted by well-subscribed contributors to Twitter and the like, in various languages, if it is to become better known, something like what the US embassy press and cultural sections are already doing with Twitter at many posts.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Lee in California writes:

Wiki systems have an enormous potential power for collaboration among people around the world. People can participate in the writing and editing of themes related to global problems of interest to them. And this is already happening. Take for example the English-language wikepedia.org: there are 42,300 pages that refer to "economic" and "development". The wiki need not be organized as an encyclopedia but can serve as a peer collaborative environment for contribution and perfecting ideas.

Here's a specific example about how "pick-up teams" are already working on global challenges with tech tools for social collaboration:

Asst Sec for WHA Arturo Valenzuela tweeted a story by AP reporter Frank Bajak about how hundreds of tech volunteers spurred to action by Haiti's killer quake are adding a new dimension to disaster relief, developing new tools and services for first responders and the public in an unprecedented effort. It is inspiring

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Lee in California writes:

An example of a "knowledge exchange" to deal with common global challenges is zunia.org. Zunia was launched by the World Bank's Development Gateway. It is a space for professional learning and knowledge-sharing among development practitioners worldwide.

Users can access and post news, events, best practices and publications that are searchable online and receive e-mail alerts on topics of their interest. Main areas include Governance, Economy, Sectors, Environment, Education, Health, Society, Culture, Science & Tech.

I read the section on Poverty and every day I receive a "push" email that goes to registered members with interest in this area. It has new postings related to the theme, and I go to the site to search when I am looking for ideas from a particular country region.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Margarita Q. in California writes:

My colleagues and I at the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab (http://captology.stanford.edu) have been working on this very problem.

Our first step in this direction is http://ideas4haiti.org

Ideas4Haiti's tagline: A platform that lets you donate something more than money; knowledge. A @manorlabs and @peacedot Innovation.

Our vision is to create a combination of bottoms up innovation + challenge prize + persuasive technology because many of the big global problems can't be solved top down, or with technology alone. The big problems will be solved from lots of experimentation, trial and error and through behavior change.

PeaceDot is a Persuasive Technology Lab initiative
Manor Labs is our municipal PeaceDot partner that is focused on open governance and open innovation.

http://peace.stanford.edu
http://manorlabs.org

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Lee in California writes:

Along the lines of the saying, "think globally, act locally," check out how DoD, USG and NGOs are all coordinating their efforts in Haiti. Example: An underutilized, non-damaged hospital in Haiti put up its info and availability on the site and now 250 patients have been transferred there by US helicopters. ** Also see how http://www.nationallabday.org/, the National Lab Day site, is helping implement Pres. Obama's vision of teachers, engineers, scientists helping other teachers develop science and technology curricula and visits for their students. Teachers post kinds of science modules they would like to use to get responses from technical experts and other teachers. ** Both examples mobilize the power of an expert mob who don't know each other to help solve common problems.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Nancy M. in Kuwait writes:

Education, if improved in the developing countries then we can see a great change in the whole world, terrorism will be less, money will be spend in other categories other than fighting against terrorism and there will be improve in many other fields

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Jonathan S. in Hong Kong writes:

The problem isn't knowledge so much as cooperation. Knowledge about best practices, true information about issues or cultures, etc. is easier than ever to come by now.

But how do we structure the discussion of global problems so that it's participatory, cross-cultural, enlightening, and tends to converge to some sort of agreement that is seen as legitimate? How do we filter the good ideas to the top, and deal fairly with the spoilers, ideologues, and trolls?

Although access is certainly a challenge, in my mind it's the process that needs developing. Wikipedia is an example of a successful collaborative global knowledge system. How do we produce a successful collaborative global decision-making system?

- Jonathan

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Normita in California writes:

Freedom of expression helps the world to achieve mutual understanding, expand knowledge and build friendships between people. Internet, though not perfect, has allowed us to make this a smaller and better world; it has to be allowed to grow without intervention.

For example, through the internet, Facebook and other communications technology developed and grew. They provide us with the ability to search and find friends and colleagues we have lost touch, to reach out, to share knowledge, reach common ground and expand our horizon. Businesses continue to thrive from the speed of information delivered to their suppliers and customers from moment to moment. In my opinion, internet control will take us back from what we have accomplished.

I commend Secretary Clinton for standing up to protect the progress and benefits from this far-reaching technological progress.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Lucy in Georgia writes:

1. ALWAYS Supporting freedom of information
2. Making information available globally through an “open and free model”
3. Bringing information to all but specifically to women mainly in places where they are highly discriminated against.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Harvey C. in Kentucky writes:

I have a wonderful "Comprehensive Economic Planning" tool that can be used at the local, reagional level to develop governments.
If intrested email me and I will share it with you.

I try to post from time to time in the Discussion board to help with projects. I sure would like a "real job" with the State Department. You can email me for that as well...
Thanks,
Harvey C.

Posted on Sun Jan 24, 2010

Andrew B. in Florida writes:

My opinion on the matter is this, if the so called “oppressive governments” of the world actually knew what was going on with the people, they could spend more time doing something about by solving real problems and keeping the peace, hence serving the people and maintaining their power, instead of sitting around speculating on who or what is going to push them out of power. Secretary Clinton is correct on this issue on so many levels, you just can’t imagine how profound and bold this is. The reality being, problems that have plaque this planet for centuries may actually get resolves and government may actually serve its actual purpose.

Posted on Sat Jan 23, 2010

R. in Texas writes:

I submit ideas to http://whatidchange.com, and vote for the world-changing ideas I think are the best.

Posted on Sat Jan 23, 2010

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Population control does not necessitate simply lowering birth rates where overpopulated; but, using human resources more effectively.

Would it not be more beneficial to use people productively and more resource valued than simply pumping money in a wasted effort to change and restructure the multitude of problems faced by many nations? If we get the people organized to develope, they develop a sense of developement, which will lead to a constructive government and citizen base.

A skilled and even unskilled workforce which has an end to its efforts seems the most underutilized solution for many problems worldwide, even in Haiti right now. I honestly believe that there are too many vested interest and replication of functions which try to aid that ultimitely create the very problems which they are trying to resolve.

Knowledge is plentiful, application is too diversified...

We must understand that a Capitalist system cannot be in place in the productive manner it should be with continued instability any longer. While division was a tool of the past, the landscape has changed considerably and we have lost the very foundation that democracy has been built upon. Freedom without opportunity, even here in America, has no true value except in words. Our wonderful system was predicated on the People first, not last.

Posted on Sat Jan 23, 2010

Mandy in China writes:

With the helps from internet, We can get whatever we want,it makes us keep thinking what are good for people in the earth. We must responsible for our future generation.

Posted on Sat Jan 23, 2010

Armstrong in the United Kingdom writes:

Hope this ties in with "help rebuild the global economy". As I sit here from the other side of the pond. I do marvel at the spectacle of observing through the media..Question: Why do you have so many geriatrics in all layers of government? Don't you think it is time to start weeding out the "stuck in the mud" types and start encouraging fresh blood into the veins of government. After all, how can we all move forward with fresh ideas (workable) when there is a dotage on nearly every pew, who does not seem the want for change or even listen to any ideas for change. Don't they want to retire?

I don't think of you as a geriatric, but I am sure you feel like one sometimes with the hussle and bussle of the work you do. Noticed the President is going slightly gray. Anyway, I just thought I would share my observation from across the pond. After all, this is the time to magnify freedom of speech.

Well, it is nearly February..that is a strange month, but it can be a positive month if we all unite to kick start the global economy.

Posted on Sat Jan 23, 2010