O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

Thanks Fred M.,
So well expressed. I wish Israel and Palestine would cooperate on mutual agricultural projects, businesses. The more they work together the stronger alliance they'd form. They need to substitute war profits and bomb manufacturing with something like medical supply production, energy projects or tourism.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Sulaiman S. in Germany writes:

Hello, my question is as simple as it can be:

As a muslim I would like to know:When do we happen to witness the iron- fist- of- freedom strike against the satanic regime in Iran. The muslim communities worldwide - the muslim community as a whole- is like a patient that has been befallen by cancer. And this cancerous desease needs to be therapied, by way of radiation....So when is the Radiologist (United states and Israel) going to cure the muslm nation and their own interests as well from this cancer? This will be a greater day for the world than the Day of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Why are muslim communities not working with western law enforcement agencies to stop terrorist? Why are they still feeling that this would be a betrayal of any kind whatsoever? Don´t we see that terror is also a danger to us, not only to the non-muslims?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Rebeca H. in Connecticut writes:

What will you do to combat the widespread ignorance about Islam and all the Islamophobic hysteria?

Just look at so many of the comments on this page. People sincerely believe that Islam is not compatible with democracy, that Muslim women are oppressed, that Muslims want to fight people of other faiths, and that they condone terrorism. Muslims know this is outrageous, but it seems their outreach efforts have not been widespread enough. How will you get the message across to Americans who are severely misinformed and therefore unable to make wise policy decisions?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Sulaiman S. in Germany writes:

Dear Mrs. Secretary,

There are a lot of muslims who don´t hesitate to work with the US government everywhere in the world. I for example would love to offer my language skills to fight international terrorism for I see it as a great danger for muslims and the western countries. Why is there still this bright reservance in US government offices to recruit muslims for the Army, the State Dep., the FBI, the CIA etc....

For example there is this big issue that one can not enter the armed forces without a Greencard or a US citizenship....but to obtain a GC for this purpose is not possible because joining in the armed forces is still a non-eligibility criteria to obtain a GC, although US laws have been changed to enable DoD officials to recruit personell overseas who have skills vital to national interests....Why doesn´t anyone make use of this kind of laws and what are your intentions to regualte this better....

Please send me an answer to my Email account as well...

Thank you and may God help your nation in this important but hard fight....

Best regards,
sulaiman

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Flavius,
You just crack me up beyond belief. So refreshing on this drab, overcast day.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Ghida in California writes:

Hello,

This is a great blog. I am really grateful to the opportunity to voice my concerns or/and questions. I am not sure if it ok to ask questions or if this will have the chance to be answered in the broadcast or by e-mail. I approached the US department of state in June through their website regarding this question and I did not get any response yet. I heard that Muslim women who wears head covers in Lebanon are being asked to show their ears and hair tip in the photos when they apply for any US visa. They are also denied interviews if they did not comply. I checked the US embassy website for Lebanon and they don't mention this in their website for photo specification. However, this is being requested when Muslim women go to apply for a visa. They are given a paper written in Arabic which specify these things. This contradicts the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I was wondering if I can have the US department if State response on this issue or if I can be directed to the right person or department to know how to deal with this issue. I appreciate the help and time that will be given to this issue. Thanks.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Fred M. in the U.S.A. writes:

TO BE STRONG ON ISRAEL, YOU HAVE TO BE HARSH TO THE PALESTINIANS.

Wrong, and counterproductive to boot. One popular way for members of Congress to earn their pro-Israel stripes is to come down as hard as possible on the Palestinians, by using economic and diplomatic pressure or giving the Israelis a freer hand for military strikes.

That may satisfy some primal urge to lash out at Israel's foes, but it does Israel more harm than good.

As Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has argued, Israel's survival depends on offering the Palestinians a more hopeful future built on political sovereignty and economic development.

As long as Palestinians despair of a decent and dignified life, Israel will be at war. And as long as the only channel for the Palestinians' ingenuity is building better rockets, not even the Great Wall of China will protect Israel's cities from their wrath.

Helping the Palestinians achieve a viable, prosperous state is one of the most pro-Israel things an American politician can do.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Eric,
Dipnote didn't publish my last reply. Sorry my comment wasn't directed at you personally. You misunderstood my comment. To me, I can't see what years of bombing and wars has achieved in advancing democracy around the world and it doesn't seem to be helping in Afghanistan either. If you want to win the hearts and minds of a people you need to wholeheartedly support them in gaining the freedoms they desire which is usually a good job, good education and healthcare. If we change our foreign policy, as we seem to be doing to help other countries attain these freedoms, we will be succesful. The whole military approach is no longer relevant to the massive disparities that exist in the world today. America is better than its past history. We should be exporting the best of our culture and gently persuading countries to join in and believe in their bright, exciting future.
"Cuteness" is in the mind of the beholder and is a relative concept.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Syed K. in the U.S.A. writes:

USA and NATO forces should pull out from Afghanistan and Iraq. $ 60 billion/month spent there is not worth it. Same money can be used in US to create jobs, in particular on Home Land Security. It will solve two purpose, one unemployment can be reduced from 10 % to normal 4-5 % and our borders will be more secure from any external or internal threats.
USA should use the soft power to improve situations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
A just solution of Arab Israel problem. Israel can pull back to 1967 border and all Arab countries should recognise Israel. Craete a soreign Palestinian state.
This way we in US can live in peace and we will be respected in the world. We can be cosidered as real peace makers and not the bully of the world as the entire world considers us now.
Part of the war money can be spent on energy research, finding alternative sources and in harnessing the sun. That way we will be self sufficient in energy and will not send our young men and women to die in strange lands for the greed of our oil.
Most important is the limit on media. They always associate muslims and Islam with terrorism. Freedom of press is not being used in a responsible way. They should pay some penalty if associating muslims with terrorism. There may not be even one in millions, and if the above steps are taken I am sure there will not be a single terrorist.
US government should pass some laws against irresponsible media reports.
If all that happens, we as well as the world will live in peace and we will progress in our economy, education, social and cultural lfe style.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Judith F. in Oregon writes:

Are Muslims told in the Koran to kill Christians and Jews? I have read this in the Koran. Why if God told Cain that he was punished for killing Able; why if God killed almost all of humanity in a flood because they were violent and regretted making man for this reason; why if David was not allowed to build the Temple because of his bloodshed; why if it says not to kill in the 10 commandments and these are also holy texts for you and you believe them; why then would it make sense to you that God wanted you to kill anyone? God made all of us in His image. God created and He did not want us to destroy his creation. He did not want us to kill. He wanted us to love and be at peace with each other. And then next question:

Why if you are going to kill Christians and Jews would America, in good faith, let any Muslim live in America?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Frances B. in New York writes:

My concerns are the status of women and
the lack of religious freedom in many Muslim countries. I generally support our global initiatives but would like to see some progress on these basic human rights as a condition for more collaboration between the United States and Muslim countries. It is distressing to see American women diplomats and journalists swathed in scarves when they visit places like Saudi Arabia. It is not simply a matter of courtesy but rather a very negative message to Muslim women who seek the basic human rights that are their due. They need to see strong professional women who will advocate for progress in all repressive societies and not appear to give a pass to some countries for political reasons.
Thank you for the opportunity to write in.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Ellen R. in California writes:

Wouldn't it help relations with US Muslims as well as with many Muslims globally if the US took Hamas off the terrorist list where it doesn't belong since it has accepted the two-state solution and renounced suicide bombing since 2004 and since it is very good at observing ceasefires with Israel and at convincing the small parties that were shooting Qassam rockets at Israel not to shoot them. Wouldn't it be appropriate to accept Hamas as part of the peace process?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

J.P.M. in Georgia (U.S.A.) writes:

This is in reference to the DipNote broadcast. We are often seen as promoting democracy which to many Muslims in underdeveloped countries is just another world for imperial dominance of peoples and their resources.What strategies are being employed to convince Muslim communities that the US has our mutual best interests at heart?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Eric,
The evil dog reference wasn't a personal response directed at you. You completely misunderstood that point.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Eric,
The cuteness part lies only in your mind. Can you honestly tell me that overthrowing democratically elected leaders has endeared a kind, warm and fuzzy feeling from others we are trying to influence? Your notion of bombing people into submission is old hat and doesn't work. You have to win over people's hearts and minds and be seen as a positive influence on their society. Your gangbusters style hasn't worked in Afghanistan. Why not try a different approach? Honestly, you really should try to chill a bit.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

Oh my.

Certainly you are aware O.C. didn't mean anything by that?

Methinks thou dost protest too much.

"Dont get cute with me again."

Or? You're going to hunt her down and kill her?

It is in posts like that that I don't just think you're wrong, Eric. I think you are a bully.

And you can quote me to the editor on that.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Victoria in Arizona writes:

Why would the Muslems want to build a "cultural center" at ground Zero Isn't one Mosque at a religious historic poiont enough. Do we really have to remember for generations to come as to who brought the Twin Towers down though we don't understand why 3,000 had to die?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@OC, I was busy lighting a sparkler in the Dipnote staff's honor for all they do for us.

Technicly it was a long weekend, and I'm trying to find a different way of thinking about "forced retirement" at the hands of banksters and long term unemployment after 30 years in construction without a vacation...ever.

But I have to say just on a personal level that I'm not here to feed the squirrels OC.

It isn't addiction at work, just my way of giving my gov. some return on its investment in preserving my continuity of being in hard times.

Now I'd like you to take a good close look at how WW1 started and you will find that it doesn't take 2 to start a war, only one. One bullet started that war, and so your premis doesn't hold water in general application.

Did we take bin laden seriously when he declarted war on the US? No, it took 9/11 to convince us he was serious.

Did we start it?, no we didn't. Did it take 2? No, only one with a twisted ideology and others to follow it.

I understand you believe this nation to be so great, all powerful, and influential to the point that if anything bad happens in the world it must be our fault for not having dealt with it properly. But you give the American government too much credit and therefore have some unreasonable expectation that we can just snap our fingers and terrorism will be a thing of the past.

When it involves doing the hard thing for as long as it takes. That doesn't meet with your instant gratification ideals apparently, but that dog lies on your doorstep, not mine.

For the only reason evil exists is that good people like youself fail to do anything about it except whine to people like me that I must somehow be "evil" for trying to get the problem solved the only way it can be with those who are irreconcilable to the concept of peaceful coexistance.

So the next time you imply that about me personally I'm going to register a formal complaint with the editor of this blog.

Don't get cute with me again.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Jay M. in Virginia writes:

How do plan to address the view that Muslim communities worldwide tend to be viewed by non-Muslim peoples as monolithic?

How do you address the diversity of worldwide Muslim communities? As examples, neither racially or linguistically are Afghani's Saudi, and vice versa. A Bangladeshi friend terms Afghan treatment of young women "nasty." She is unafraid if her head scarf slips while at work. She does not wear a face veil. In terms of educational attainment, the Iraqi population as a general rule, far excels that of the Somali population

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Joyce R. in Florida writes:

When is the US going to realize that we have to effectively deal with the plight of the Palestinian people? Our one-sided total support of Israeal, no matter what they do, feeds the fear and resentment felt by the Muslims in many countries. Just as Israeal has a right to exist and a right to self defense, so also the Palestinians have a right to exist and a right to self defense. Why can't we see that our own middle east policies are alienating people - many of whom used to love America. It's time for us to promote peace, not more wars.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

Ms. Pandith:

Your State Bio lists your birthplace as Kashmir. Why did your parents come to the U.S. (assuming they did)? Did your family face persecution in Kashmir as Muslims under Indian authority in that disputed territory? How has the dispute over Kashmir influenced your thinking?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Ashim K.C. in India writes:

Since thecreation of Israel by the big wigs of second world war, beginnings of problem with Muslim world surfaced. Oil based nationalism in countries of middle east and direct and indirect patronage to authoritarian regimes post second world war have not only compounded issues but have caused huge loss of opportunity for this part ofthe world to be part of free liberal world like Turkey in Europe and many countries of former USSR and East Europe are. It appears there is a case for undoing the creation of Israel and relocate and absorb the Israelis in any country of their choice. I think with their talent, they would be welcome anywhere. As Israelis go, Palestinians must voulunteer to give Israelis virtual dual citizenship as a mark of respect to Israeli religious sentiments.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Mehlam Z. in India writes:

It is strange how we have forgotten the true essence of being a muslim community. A policeman sitting on the gates of the Pasha's mosque in cairo, greeted me by asking "what do you believe in!". I said I believe in love. He was stunned by what i said. although that is the true essence of islam and in fact every religion of the world. islam's literal meaning is peace. In Saudi Arabia in the mosque of Rasulullah SA, one of the so called religious police came to me and tried to enforce upon me what he believes is the right way of prayers. He deliberately kicked the cloth i was praying on saying there is no need for praying over your cloth when these carpets of the prophet peace be upon him are not dirty.
At this juncture i felt so sad that a person who claims to be a religious police kicks someone's' belongings whilst he is praying; something that he has great reverence of. What has happened to us! a religious police knows nothing about religion except oppression. Lets wake up and embrace each other with the love our prophet gave us.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Ernest P. in Connecticut writes:

I am curious to know your thoughts on the emerging Muslim theology for engaging a world which is a growing global village of faiths and faith communities in the 21st century. I recognize that Muslim culture, like that of all faith communities, is evolving into the world of tomorrow, and would just like to know your thoughts on the direction of that evolution.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

John T. in Oregon writes:

Why some of the Muslim Communities around the world persecute other people with different religious beliefs so much, especially those who choose to become Christians?

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Eric,
I thought you were on vacation? I know you couldn't resist us. You're a Dipnote addict just like me. I told everyone on the BBC to write to Dipnote so I hope new people will get a reply from someone so that they will return. Isn't all this traffic just great?
But I digress.
Sometimes the evil dog is lying closer to you than you realize like on your doorstep perhaps. Wars don't just happen in a vacuum. It takes two willing players and America is not above reproach.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

M.A.K.N. in Pakistan writes:

Being the sole super power,and to win the heart and soul of muslims and manage the properly.
*USA should try to make efforts for libration of Palestine,Kashmir and Sinkiang.
* USA should try to make efforts for stabilization and unification of Muslims regions such as Arab World,Unification of Afghanistan and Pakistan.Union of African Muslim countries,Union of Central Asian Muslims countries, so that such states can be made responsible and accountable for stability and progress of their regions, and to utilize their resources for welfare and progress, and for health and education of their people,otherwise small states will never ever be able to control and satisfy to their people and these small amd uncontrolable countries under the rule of Zardari,Karzai,Qadafi,Sadam and Mubarak will reamin a nuisance for the world and USA.

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Pakistan clerics explain 'jihad'

By Aamer Ahmed Khan
BBC News, Lahore

URL: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4711003.stm

(Excerpt)
Circumstances for jihad

Mufti Rafi Usmani heads Darul Uloom Karachi, one of Pakistan's most respected religious schools, or madrassas.

Jihad is not incumbent on all Muslims and a call for jihad can be given only under special circumstances.

Mufti Rafi Usmani; "Islam does not allow killing of innocent civilians and non-combatants under any circumstances," he said in an interview with the BBC News website.

Asked to explain the concept of jihad as expounded in mainstream Islamic thought, Mufti Usmani said it had been laid down in great detail precisely to avoid any confusion.

"To begin with, jihad is not incumbent on all Muslims and a call for jihad can be given only under special circumstances," he said.

Islamic scholars - or ulema - agree that injunctions explaining the circumstances for jihad and the people's conduct during jihad constitute the core principles of the doctrine.

According to three top scholars interviewed by the BBC News website, jihad can only be called in the following circumstances:

a.. If a Muslim community comes under attack, then jihad becomes an obligation for all Muslims, male and female, in that community
b.. If that particular community feels it cannot fight off attackers on its own, then jihad becomes incumbent on Muslims living in nearby communities
c.. If a Muslim ruler of a country calls for jihad, then it is incumbent upon the Muslims living under that ruler to join the jihad.
Jihad 'not obligatory'

Mufti Usmani says that even in such circumstances, jihad is obligatory only on as many Muslims as are required to defend the community under attack.

Mufti Akram Kashmiri: Rising tide of Muslim anger

"If Pakistan is attacked but its army is sufficient to deal with the threat, then Pakistani civilians are under no obligation to join jihad," he said.

The second principle relates to the conduct of the jihadis. Under no circumstances are Muslims allowed to attack women, children, the old and the meek, the sick, those that are praying and civilians, say these ulema.

Muslim militants argue that if innocent Muslims are killed in enemy action then Muslims are allowed to kill innocent people in retaliation.

But clerics strongly disagree with this line of thinking, arguing that Islam does not allow Muslims to respond to "a mistake" by another mistake.

"Islam is absolutely clear on this issue. Two wrongs do not make a right," Mufti Usmani said.

"If they feel that the US or the UK are killing innocent civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan, it does not give them the right to kill innocent citizens in London or New York," he said.

(End Excerpt)

Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@Muhammed J.

The short answer to your question is that it's a lot less than the Muslims killed by fellow Muslims for an interpretation of Islam.

I think your namesake long ago would have considered this no "jihad", but a twisting of faith by apostates. And he'd (PBOH) probably tell the Taliban and al-quaida to go home and take care of their mothers as he once told a young boy who was eager to die.

Now who actually threatens Islam as a community on a global level?

America? I don't think so...

I would suggest you review the Petraeus confirmation hearing, as he did note the toll on our Pakistani partners, publicly in recognition of their efforts, along with Afghan forces who suffer five times our losses.

See folks got things backwards like Abdul A. in Illinois, the trick is to know who your enemy is and then declare Jihad on the terrorists.

Then the "long war" will not be so bloody long, now will it?

I suppose who or what one owes alliegence to is a matter of priority...

I'll place freedom above faith any day of the week, and since more Muslims live in Democracies than not, I'm pretty sure they do too.

That's why bin laden's call for holy war went unanswered by a billion Muslims.

That and folks know that the reason he doesn't seek out 72 virgins personally is that he has nothing to offer them satisfaction with.

Kind of puts a crimp in a terrorist's romantic fantasies now doesn't it?

Nobody explained to these fools that if you blow the family jewels up along with yourself, paradise won't be any fun at all.

And it could only take a eunic to start a holy war with that destination in mind for the idiots he recruits.

1.Terrorists, in their methodology have been killing innocent Muslims, In Iraq, London, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kashmir, USA, (9/11), Kenya, Lebanon, and a host of other nations in many attacks over the years.

2. These attacks against civilians.innocents, regardless of any so-called intended target or purpose, political or otherwise are in direct violation of the Islamic code of conduct of Jihad. (Defined above.)

3. These attacks have placed Muslim communities at risk, both directly and indirectly, taking innocent life, and causing political unrest within the religion of Islam.

4. The targeting of Mosques, the creation of ethnic and religious conflict between Sunni and Shiite sects of Islam the attempt to start a nuclear war between Pakistan and India, as well as the direct threat to the teachings of Islam, also represent a threat to "the community" as a whole.

5.a.. If a Muslim community comes under attack, then jihad becomes an obligation for all Muslims, male and female, in that community
b.. If that particular community feels it cannot fight off attackers on its own, then jihad becomes incumbent on Muslims living in nearby communities
c.. If a Muslim ruler of a country calls for jihad, then it is incumbent upon the Muslims living under that ruler to join the jihad.

6. The community is under attack. Jihad is an obligation.

7. It is self evident that all communities are being attacked, all peoples, all civilization. Jihad becomes incumbent on Muslims living in all communities.

8. Muslim rulers of Afghanistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, and many others have joined the "war on terrorism" the global jihad against terrorists which includes as it's allies, and brothers in arms those nations that are not Muslim, but have significant Muslim populations within their sovereign boundaries.

9. These non-Muslim nations, recognizing the risk to all peoples in their lands, including Muslims, have called for solidarity in this fight from all Muslims of true heart and mind.

10. Let there be no ambiguity in this logic. Let their be no hiding place, no sanctuary given, no sponsor of terror, no terrorist left once this jihad is justly called for by all Muslims of true faith, and finished.

Perhaps it takes a Buddhist infidel like myself to place objective logic in its proper perspective, without bias toward Islam, or cultural tradition.

Folks know what you have to do to preserve their religious values, so let's get busy.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Gabriel writes:

I do not see what you are fighting about. You are the grandchildren of Abraham. You should be best friends and stand united as one.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Muhammad J. in Maryland writes:

how many muslim civilians..total... have been killed and their deaths denegraded under the label 'collateral damage' by our direct actions, in Iraq, Afghanistan and tribal areas of Pakistan? Also, how many Pakistani soldiers have shed their blood along with our boys in Pakistan/Afghanistan so far? Why is there no public recognition of these lost lives? Such absence of the numeric recognition (of losses of life of Muslims)makes our interests suspect in the Muslim countries.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Heather writes:

I respect your faith. Does your faith respect mine and everyone Elsie's faith in this world of ours?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Tina H. in Vermont writes:

My greatest international concern, and I have a number of them, is the recent disclosure and release of information about the abundance of mineral wealth in Afghanistan. The U.S. government is appearing to be concerned about making sure Afghanistan has control over the mining and management of this vast wealth. It could, indeed, mean the end of widespread poverty, the beginning of widespread education that isn't funded and controlled by insane extremists, the restoring of a stable and thriving economy and society. However, what I am not hearing anything about from our corporate media is that there are already transnational corporations, "government representatives", security companies, and many others in various venues setting themselves up for the strategic opportunity to manipulate and "do business" with the government of Afghanistan. Why haven't we taken a firm stand with the current corrupt leadership? I suggest that it is because they will not be able to hold us off as effectively as an honest, principle-based one would. Mixing corporations with government is destructive and anti Democracy. Corporations do not have a social conscience, this has been proven many times over. The people of Afghanistan will be enslaved and their country and it's resources stolen, only to line the off-shore bank accounts of the very wealthy. The U.S. must do better than this. I want to know if this vital topic will even be discussed in your forum? Dialogue with the Muslim world? We don't deserve their valuable time until we come clean with our intentions. We haven't done much for Sudan. What are we really doing in Afghanistan? If our intentions are good, how do we intend to protect them from these invisible transnational organized criminals? As a U.S. citizen, I demand to know! With the lack of jobs and a deteriorating way of life here at home and billions being spent there, I deserve an answer! I want to peacefully co-exist with the Muslims and everyone else. Most of us who aren't extremists feel the same way. Transnationals are extremists, they are extremely corrupt and greedy. Maybe I am an extremist, after all I am extremely upset with my country's behavior when it rolls over for the corporations like an abused dog. We need to reverse the Supreme Court decision to give corporations the rights of an individual citizen as well as the right to donate unlimited money to the people's representation. All these topics are interdependent.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Montedoro in California writes:

Why is it that ALL 56 members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference subscribe to the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam which establishes the legal superiority of Muslims over non-Muslims, and which states that ALL human rights must be in accordance with Sharia law? What is it about our Universal Declaration of Human Rights that Islam finds unacceptable?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Abdul A. in Illinois writes:

By engaging in a "dialog with the Muslim world" we implicitly recognize the legitimacy of the Islamic division of the world into Muslims and non-Muslims instead of into nation states.This doctrine means that Muslims everywhere owe their allegiance to the worldwide Islamic community and not to the nation state of which they are citizens. It also means that if a Muslim anywhere is attacked by a non-Muslim (such as Iraq or Afghanistan), then all Muslims everywhere are bound by Islam law to come to their defense. This means that American Muslims, if they are religious, are a fifth column because their loyalty is primarily to the Muslim worldwide community and NOT to the American constitution. The most outstanding recent example of this is the Times Square bomber, Shahzad, who considers himself a Muslim soldier. The most notorious example before that was Major Hasan of Ft. Hood. America should not be in the business of legitimating the division of the world into Muslims and non-Muslims.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Francis E.E. in Tennessee writes:

What is the purpose of this dialogue with the Muslim World? It should be in line with the Christian Communities of the World. Not just exclusively Musilim. This makes for many Americans a very uncomfortable atmosphere.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Eric in New Mexico writes:

The man from "Down Under" raises a good question.

I suppose it to be perfectly logical that if one has the right to their beliefs, one has the right to die for their beliefs as well.

To determine the legitamacy of any belief system, it can only be taken only as valid as it is practiced in truth.

Now I've been asked by the moderator to moderate the "courseness" of my words in a post that will never appear on this blog, since I don't think "huevos" was an acceptable substitute I offered when it was suggested to me perhaps "guts" could be an acceptable substitute for a certain word that I can only infer here apparently.

But I honestly don't know a better way to castrate bin laden's belief system than to refer to a particular body part he seems to lack, as his inability to blow himself up for his beliefs seems to prove beyond any shadow of doubt, as he has useful idiots do that for him.

"guts" I told the moderator, is instinctual in nature and his cowardice is by design, so it would not reflect an accurate statement if I approved its use.

So, I hope this is an acceptable workaround to leave nothing to the imagination or interpretation.

Someone asked me the other day, "How evil do we have to get to kill every terrorist on the planet?"

So I'd like to ask the Muslims here what they do with rabid dogs running amock in their neigborhood?

And is it "evil" to put the dog out of its misery since it is terminally ill and dangerously contagious?

If America is going to do things right, let's understand each other as far as what it takes to get the job done so we all can get on in peace.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Donald
That's a plausible theory and an inventive one too. I know organized criminals use this same method for their drug and smuggling enterprises. I alerted the FBI about this happening in Los Angeles before I realized that the harbor patrol and the FBI may have been part of the same racket. The problem with justice in America is that you never know who you're dealing with. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors and you have to dig deep to understand it all. It's political and confusion is part of the game. Good Luck!
You must be an honest to goodness, dyed in the wool, true American. Something we've been missing of late.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Muhammad I. in Indonesia writes:

QUESTION: Why is it difficult for some Indonesian people with Arabic names to get U.S. visa? Thank you in advance.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Abubaker in Iowa writes:

D0 you consider the Shary'aa laws pertaining to communities adaptable in the present time, specially the laws about women and non-muslims in the Courts?

Do you consider Democracy is part of the Sharyaa Laws?

Do you consider the Sharyaa laws are constitutional?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Ian R. in Australia writes:

How is it we are allowing religion to determin how we get on with each other around the world. That's cool our beliefs are different but does that justify killing each other?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Brad T. in West Virginia writes:

Question for Mr. Farah Pandith:

Muslim countries often do not allow freedom of conscience. Why?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

John W. in Pakistan writes:

what about resentment in muslim world about drone attacks afghanistan,palestinian flotilla issue n feeling in certain segments of muslim world that usa is not doing enough 4 muslim causes?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Johannes S. in Texas writes:

Why should I trust a muslim if so many of this religion believe that the infidel should be convinced by force if not in a normal way - or for that matter be eliminated by terrorist means.

I am not interested in any such fanatic or fundamentalist religeous faiths.

Thank you
Js

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Norman R. in Ohio writes:

QUESTION. WHY IS THERE NO RESPONSE FROM ANY PART OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY TO TERRORIST ATTACKS BY MUSLIMS? WHY DO MUSLIM IMMANS PREACH HATRED IN THEIR MOSQUES TOWARDS CHRISTIANS AND JEWS AND NOT REACH OUT TO WORK FOR PEACE AND UNDERSTANDING?WHY DO MUSLIMS IMMIGRATE TO THE USA IF THEY HATE AMERICA AND AMERICANS ?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Yasser J. in Syria writes:

Why does America have a successful management of the diplomatic and intelligence does not know how to build good relations with Islam and the relationship stronger with the Arab countries
We love America and we want America to love us and are more of us close to

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Gerald S.D. in California writes:

It seems that any Mullah or Imam can issue a FATWAH to his followers. Is there some way that the Grand Ayatollas of all Muslim nations/communities can unite and effect a level of moderation by all Mullahs/Imams?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Kasim K. in New York writes:

I think this is very important project, i believe also thta USA engagement with Muslim world needs to be done more at the grassroot levels, such norishing culture of democracy, respect for different opinions, spirit of civic engagement for public goods betterment of public life. All these needs to be done with genuine resepct for local cultures with highligt of universal aspects of those local cultures (I believe, every local cultures have some universal aspects to it, once that is highlighted people would be able to feel connected and engaged with larger world).
I wish the best for you
Kasim K., Imam

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Agim in Serbia writes:

Respect and your commitment your joined my pleasure engagements to prove the truth is the greatest cooperation in all respect of the Muslim community resources without contribution limits,wich almays helped to calm America is one of the main traiditions and peaceable of all past and present time and hard tireless readiness that included the entire panet to unite Agim-...

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Owais R. in the United Kingdom writes:

I just want to know how U.S. Government will engage with Muslims in Britain and Europe on grassroots level. As so far whatever strategies tried (E.g. Current Prevent Program in UK) by the upper house policy makers, majority failed to understand needs of local Muslims in UK & Europe. What I found during research that majority of Muslims in UK & Europe want to stay loyal with countries they living in and with the governing law. Then why still misunderstanding between U.S. Government, Governments in Europe and Muslims living in UK & Europe? From security (national & international) point of view I think we really try to understand needs of Muslims living in UK & Europe and their local needs so we can way forward to community cohesion to win fight against terrorism & war on trans-national crime.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Ogoubi K.W. in Togo writes:

what do the muslim communities do for giving peace to the wordl and to themselves when they know well Islamists're a real danger for the world?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Ervin K. in Israel writes:

The core issue with the Muslim communities worldwide is the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
May I suggest that the way to solve this problem is by applying the solution that received the blessings of the two prominent late leaders :Y. Rabin and Y. Arafat (1994)- a political condominium as follows:
Preface This document summarizes a research project that proposes a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The research which ,was carried out by a joint American/Palestinian/Israeli professors, is based on the following assumptions: Any reasonable political solution must:
1) Ensure, Israeli’s and Palstinian’s Independence and security
2) Be acceptable by the majority of Israelis and Palestinians
3) Be democratic
4) Create a socio-economic integration between the two peoples
5) Defuse the Iranian danger.
Introduction Israel’s government and the Palestinian Authority must address their peoples’ expectations for peace and security. Thus, the leaders of both nations must formulate a plan to cater for both nations’ political, economic, security and social needs. This plan calls for the establishment of two political entity west of the Jordan River, which will include the State of Israel and the State of Palestine, two separated governments and parliaments, and a joint sovereignty over the whole Holy Land , from the sea to the Jordan river,without internal borders, for the sake of mutual coexistence in one homeland. This new plan replaces policies of territorial partitioning the “Two States …plan” with a model of a “Political Condominium “ a functional compromise. The entire country should be open to both Israelis and Palestinians, enjoying equal rights and rejecting any discrimination. This political entity should be a Condominium, i.e. joint sovereignty and be titled :.
USIP - The United States of Israel and Palestine ,
and Jerusalem a mutual capital.
The Political Goal To ensure a plan that is acceptable by the majority of Israelis and Palestinians, based on democratic principles and leading to a socio-economic integration of both nations, in the framework of a functional compromise that will create a new Israeli/Palestinian National Charter.
The Nature of the Condominium
1) Citizenship The Israelis will keep their Israeli citizenship and ID cards, while the Palestinians, who will vote for their own house of representatives, will be Palestinian citizens and carry their own ID’s, obeying the Palestinian Law;
2) Governmental Departments Both governments will have their autonomous: treasury, interior, agriculture, police, religion, labor, welfare, education and other departments and a joint foreign and defence department - as desired.
3) The Law of Return Since the territory of USIP is extremely poor in natural resources, and the only valuable resource is the human one, immigration of people to USIP will be encouraged, and the Palestinians in exile will welcomed back to their homeland, without any restrictions.
4) The Judicial System Each citizen will be handled by his or her national court, or by a local or district court, as decided by the USIP Condominium Council.
5) Language and National Symbols The USIP will be a bi-national condominium, thus Hebrew and Arabic will be its official languages. Both peoples will keep their national anthems until a mutual anthem is accepted by the USIP.
6) Settlements and Community Life The whole territory of the USIP is recognized as the legitimate homeland of both the Israeli and the Palestinian nations. Coexistence is the law of the land. Accordingly, all individuals will be allowed to build their homes wherever desired, without any limitations, providing all settlements and buildings are built with a legal permit, issued by the legal authorities.
7) Water and Land Resources Each citizen of the USIP will have equal rights to use these resources, based on purely economic considerations. Economic feasibility will be the only basis for water and land development. Resources owned by Jewish Israelis will remain their property, and those which belong to Arab-Palestinians will be kept by them. Transfer of ownership will be based on the free market principles of purchase and sale.
8) National Guard In addition to separate Israeli and Palestinian police forces, whose task will be to enforce law and order inside each community, A joint Israeli-Palestinian National Guard will enforce the policies .
The USA, the EU, Japan and the Arab states will prepare plans for the rebuilding of the Condominium, allowing for massive construction work for the rehabilitation of the refugees.
3) Both nations’ ministers of finance, agriculture and industry will start building an infrastructure of defense and hi-tech industries. Markets will be developed throughout the neighboring Arab countries, with the Condominium serving as the economic, industrial, social and cultural center of the Middle East and Northern Africa.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Simaya in Illinois writes:

How is the US 'engaging' african muslims? It seems like there is much emphasis on arab muslims and their countries, but there are many African muslims. Does the Special Representative focus on this region of the world?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Sarah M. in Michigan writes:

It is a mystery to me why Muslims, American born or legally emigrated, cannot adopt the American culture: language, dress, schooling, etc. A young man I know, born and raised in Dearborn, MI, recently returned for a visit. Everything was written in Iraqi; storefronts, advertising, and so on. I am sure that if I were to move permanently to another country I would need to learn the language, the social etiquette, the methods of doing business, and whatever was expected of the local residents.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

John I.W. in Virginia writes:

How can the peace loving and tolerant tenets of Islam be reconciled with its aggressive tenets?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Karen in Michigan writes:

Do we even Want "globlization"? Seems like all the U.S. keeps doing is financing all the rest of the world's needs on the back of the US taxpayers. Ask the Muslim Communities worldwide what it would take for them to take care of themselves, to govern and protect their own citizens so we can bring our troops home. We have enough people and enough needs here in the U.S. so how about we just close All immigration and if you aren't a U.S. citizen get out.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Bilal C. in New York writes:

I beleive it is essential to understand each nation in it's bound and to reach a critical decision to conclude warefares. Reconciliation is upmost neccessary to promote peace admist nations. I wish new foregin and domestic policy shape U.S. relations globally.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Jerry D. in North Carolina writes:

America is predominately Christian. Has any progress been made to allow Christians freedom from persecution and freedom to worship as they see fit in predominately Muslim nations?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Richard W.M. in New York writes:

As former US Foreign Service Officer specialized in the Near East, I have tried to answer the criticisms from the arab countries about our policies towards Arab-Israeli issues. Are you finding a comparable virulence in the reactions to those policies in South and East Asian Muslim communities?

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Donald M. in Virginia writes:

July 7th, 2010

By international law if Osama bin laden is dead, there still has to be a corps. If the CIA already captured or killed him fine, but my hunch is that long as we have a Taliban, we will have Osama bin laden and his networks. I don't question the CIA but merely try to make people think about all the possbilities. Some people claimed he was in Crawford, Texas with President Bush, others claimed he is hiding in New York, and yet Pakistan always seems to keep coming up. However, since my intent for years to be of service to help my country, keep in mind we assume Osama bin laden is in a bedwin camp or a cave deep in Pakistan. I believe he is moving around onboard a ship in the Indian Ocean. Which would have given him the access to the Arab ports like in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, and others. It would also give him the mobility to move to Asia and other countries, possibly even Somalia with the pirate situation. The key is to find the ship and the end of Osama bin laden. All of which is being looked at today. When you think about the high seas, keep in mind also that weapons, illegal drugs, pass through. Hopefully, the net will bring in the big fish.

Have a good day!

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

Samah A.J. in Syria writes:

We need to know each other to stop fighting! As the universe secret is like reflects like, we should start people-to-people meetings, tours, activities to promote peace and reconciliation.

Posted on Wed Jul 07, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Donald,
Even Flavius says he's vacationing in Italy.

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Donald,
Good job! But don't you find it a bit strange that the CIA had Osama in their rifle sight at one time and were called off the chase? Personally, I feel they would have had him by now. I think he's dead but I hope you prove me wrong.

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

@Flavius,
Very cute and funny! Emperors who speak in riddles are highly intelligent. One wonders what your IQ is?

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

Tulay in New Jersey writes:

How can the U.S Administration work towards in promoting a positive diologue about Islam, when Conservative news and talk radio constantly uses radical Islam as a tool into injecting fear into Americans who have developed an anti-Muslim sentiment in the society?

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

Donald M. in Virginia writes:

July 6th, 2010

@O.C. I have passed on my concerns and possibility of the location of Osama bin laden to the Secuirty Agencies, so they have an opportunity to find out if my theory is correct. I have personally spent countless hours, days, and even years trying to find the Most Wanted Terrorist Osama bin laden. I have shared my intel with the right people. Only time will tell if it proves itself. There is no evidence that supports Osama bin laden is dead, if so where is it? There is no solid physical evidence data that supports this theory. If so then it needs to be proved or dis-proved otherwise the Hunt continues. Show me a body and I will quit the hunt. In short of him vaporizing in the Tora Bora cave, but that is even doubtful. I will add another clue, Osama bin laden is a person on the move, not someone pinned down in a cave. The brightest minds are working this issue. I will standby and wait for the results of what they find. I support the United States Constitution and took an oath 27 years ago and together will all be happy once Osama bin laden is caught, brought to justice.

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

Flavius in Virginia writes:

I have consulted the sheep's liver and the dove entrails. Here, then, is the message of the gods:

A blood vessel breaks
Dialysis awaits
The kidneys of the west

Purple blotches fester
On the eastern jester
We vacation in Trieste.

North and south divide
By equator thrice denied
The tsunami's peerless crest

In the center shall remain
A swollen ankle sprain
And pizza, undigest.

So speaketh the gods. Ignore them at your peril.

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

Oh Donald,
I think I finally got it. S-O-U-T-H, as in South Waziristan. Osama Bin Laden, if he's not dead as a doornail is living in South Waziristan. R---I---G-H-T!

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

Donald
No. the agent plainly stated that it was Osama Bin Laden and not his brother. A stool pigeon is used in organized crime circles which involves people who are aware of an organization's guilt, in a variety of illegal activities.

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

DearDonald,
Here's my cryptic reply, " The warm, fresh donut scent wafts gently across the Eastern sky, before the fat one eats it."

Posted on Tue Jul 06, 2010

Donald M. in Virginia writes:


@O.C. in the USA

The FBI still lists Osama bin laden as the most wanted terrorist in the world. The surrounding area and where his Egyptian number 2 right hand man is at the same location. I cannot give details on here where the exact spot because of security aspects of the case. The CIA operative that informed the media most likely meant the "Son of Bin Laden" was killed during an airstrike in Pakistan. Since no body has been identified as Osama bin laden or pathologist made a positive I.D., he is still alive, and still the most hunted person on earth. One clue I will give away, "The winds in the south brew a heavy storm to the east and when the next full moon, a pigeon will leave the nest."

Have a good day!!!

Posted on Mon Jul 05, 2010

O.C. in the U.S.A. writes:

I thought Osama Bin Laden has been dead for many years now or at least, that's what a CIA operative stated on national television. Let's be true and transparent with the American people. Is Osama Bin Laden dead or not?

Posted on Mon Jul 05, 2010

Saman B. in Iran writes:

Whenever you find a crowd queue in praying don't receive that they are pure people and trusty person, especially in the Middle East, hardly you can find a real Muslim, if anyone want search out of true normal Muslims have a look at the Egypt or India and Malasia, vice that moderation, the Taliban and extremists of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, etc, matters in hand; undoubtedly these anarchist terrorists aren't agents of Muslim.
Everybody in time of quote at issue, should be know to distinguish between the Shiites and the Sunnites; About hundreds years ago in the ancient Iran, the gray-bearded men prescribed to make a scheme and found a forged Islam religion, in collate to the true Islam and confront against Arab's rush, then they established Shiite branch, their God and the prophet is a man (master's time) who disappeared and he'll appear too, anyway.
Also person's birthplace not a criterion to impute for their religion; (in truth I've got the acquired rule, mixed with Islam,Christianity,Judaism, and other true...);
the new Conversations with America is a real act, to prove the world this solemn initiative.

Thank You

Posted on Mon Jul 05, 2010

Donald M. in Virginia writes:

July 4th 2010

I finally figured out the making of Osama bin laden. I have passed this info off to the right people. The days and hours of Osama bin laden are numbered. If I'm right about this latest theory, he should be in custody very soon.

Have a wonderful 4th of July Holiday!

Posted on Sun Jul 04, 2010

Mohammed E.A.S. in Algeria writes:

Dear All,
Thanks for giving me this opportunity to participate in this conversation.
First of all, I would like to clarify one important point that all the religions focus on PEACE and TOLERANCE. This is why , I think the " conflict " is not between Moslems and Americans. In my point of view ,the real obstacles to reach globlization are deeply shown in three obstacles which are : Homeland Security in both sides , minorities and terrorism.
I mean how our political leaders are failing to protect us from terrorism ? And because of their negative engagements to resolve this problem ?
To go toward the problem is between Arabs and Israel in the Middle East .
My suggested question : Could the Rich Political Leadears avoid to double standards "faire deux poids deux mesures "

I mean to Judge differently the same thing, different people, circumstances, interests ...

Posted on Sun Jul 04, 2010

Mohammadullah M. in Afghanistan writes:

salam to all

Posted on Sun Jul 04, 2010

Doug P. in Oregon writes:

My question would be... Since Christians, Jews and Muslims all worship the same GOD from the old testiment what would be a agreeable way to unite all religions through the understanding of Gods laws not the interpitation of those laws by man? The Universe is a big place good is good, love is love and jeaulosy and hate are just what they are. Cannt we come together and show God how much beauty and forgivness the human race has and live up to mankinds true potential to make this planet a great place to live not just for humans but for all of gods creatures and creation? How is the best way to pose such a question that it would touch the hearts and minds of all? God and good Bless this planet. Douglas James P.

What are you ideas for bringing gods will to this planet? What actions can the muslim community as a whole unite on to show the world how to be better by example? Are there community actions that can be taken say in europe like a day of doing good will and gods will on the planet? Maybe as simple as cleaning u the streets or helping poor people to show even the hardest of hearts a smile. After my travels of the world I have come to a conclusion. It is not the color of a mans skin, the slickness of his tongue or the shape and size of his eyes or body...but it is the color of your soul and your very GOD heart that matters. The real living angels from God on this planet are alone only surrounded by sick twisted freaks...is this what we as humans want to show GOD? Is there even one who will stand up for justice rightiosness and show GOD that mankind is not a failed race, a disease ir parasite to this planet? The last question is for Hillary Clinton hopeing she will free me of the chains that bind...

The theme of this thread I thought where questions for the Muslim community? What would it take to create a war free zone as a experiment in the middle east? I would think Israelis could help turn some of the palastinians land into a food bascket and show a good and God heart to muslims and the muslims could help with the land and all europe and usa could come together with ideas to transform a patch of the desert into a beautiful oasis with all mankind pulling together to make a little one world community for the people by the people without the governments ideas for division in the way? A new garden of eden so to speak! Does anyone like this idea? Please respond. Then by example Israelis muslims and christians ... Buddas also.. Could unite and try to see if we as a species can make this world happen!

Posted on Sat Jul 03, 2010

Mark F. in Iowa writes:

I suggest the following question:

Do you support recognition of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and as a democracy?

Do you believe that the Muslim countries can offer explicit recognition of Israel as a nation-state of the Jewish people and as a democracy, given the probable Islamic religious prohibition of offering such recognition? [The thrust of the question tests the prohibition of recognizing any non-Islamic sovereignty over what would be arguably considered an Islamic wakf.] Thank you.

Posted on Sat Jul 03, 2010

Arelis J. in Florida writes:

How can we as part of the west culture, participate with our goverment in changing the perception about us from the Muslin Communities. Should we, as regular citizens, be part of any program to open up to the Muslin world and allow them to learn about the qualities we cater as a country.

Posted on Fri Jul 02, 2010

Pamela G. in West Virginia writes:

Keeping an open line of communication with the Muslim world will keep all the world a safer place.

Posted on Fri Jul 02, 2010