Posted by Robert Wood on Jan 20, 2009 - 11:39 AM
![Acting Department Spokesman Robert Wood types at his computer, Jan. 14, 2008. [State Photo]](http://blogs.state.gov/images/Dipnote/behind_the_scenes/2009_0120_robertwood_welcome_m.jpg)
Welcome to DipNote, the State Department’s official blog. DipNote gives context, clarity and other behind the scenes insights on the foreign policy headlines in which you’re most interested. The information is provided to you by those actually doing the work.
The term “DipNote” refers to a diplomatic note, one of the many means by which governments formally communicate with one another. Aside from the title, we make every effort to minimize the use of jargon and acronyms. When they’re unavoidable, we explain them. We want this blog to be as accessible and user-friendly as possible. This blog represents your opportunity to engage State Department officials, to contribute to the discussion of U.S. foreign policy. We want you to be active participants in a community focused on some of the most important international issues of today.
We live in an age in which there is a greater need for you to be aware of what is happening around the world, and in a time when everyone should be able to contribute to the dialogue. You can join us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and submit your video question on the State Department’s YouTube Channel. I encourage you to explore DipNote and these other resources and to provide us your thoughts and feedback. I look forward to hearing from you.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS
Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments
Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS
Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- That is good advise. We should leave it to the experts. Hope all is well with you. Best regards.
Posted on Sat Sep 19, 2009
@ John in Greece -- That is good advise. We should leave it to the experts. Hope all is well with you. Best regards.
Posted on Sat Sep 19, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Susan in Florida -- QUOTE: For one secure in what they believe in, that's all water off a duck's back. Don't get your feathers ruffled (Susan). END OF QUOTE.
Trust the President, Robert Gates and the Administration. I think that they know all these issues better than us.
Posted on Fri Sep 18, 2009
@ Susan in Florida -- QUOTE: For one secure in what they believe in, that's all water off a duck's back. Don't get your feathers ruffled (Susan). END OF QUOTE.
Trust the President, Robert Gates and the Administration. I think that they know all these issues better than us.
Posted on Fri Sep 18, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- Well, John, here we are again, a thought or two on Russia.... Russia is choosing to sell arms to both Brazil and Venezuela and we are basically "disarming" in Europe to make them happy. What are your thoughts on this? You are closer to the situation then we are, and I always value your opinion. You know how I feel, I just do not trust Russia. I've said it before, their history does not speak well for them. I hope President Obama is making the right choice. I voted for him and do like him. Best regards to you.
Posted on Thu Sep 17, 2009
@ John in Greece -- Well, John, here we are again, a thought or two on Russia.... Russia is choosing to sell arms to both Brazil and Venezuela and we are basically "disarming" in Europe to make them happy. What are your thoughts on this? You are closer to the situation then we are, and I always value your opinion. You know how I feel, I just do not trust Russia. I've said it before, their history does not speak well for them. I hope President Obama is making the right choice. I voted for him and do like him. Best regards to you.
Posted on Thu Sep 17, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- Thank you for your kind words from September 5th. My own faith has been a great comfort to me. It has also been a guide for me in dealing with everyday life. I do think that everyone should have the right to choose who or what they believe in. It really should be a given! Glad all is well with you, and hope that continues for you. Best regards.
Posted on Mon Sep 14, 2009
@ John in Greece -- Thank you for your kind words from September 5th. My own faith has been a great comfort to me. It has also been a guide for me in dealing with everyday life. I do think that everyone should have the right to choose who or what they believe in. It really should be a given! Glad all is well with you, and hope that continues for you. Best regards.
Posted on Mon Sep 14, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Susan in Florida -- And now the elections (LOL). You are right, very hard "semester". I also watched the news with the same agony of yours, concerning California fires.
I'm personally OK. My friends and family too! Thanks a lot again for your interest.
By the way, I really loved your post concerning Religious Freedom. Especially this part: QUOTE: So, when making a choice be sure to know what you have chosen, and ask yourself, does it promote empathy and compassion for others, or hatred and intolerance. END OF QUOTE.
I think that you were misunderstood by someone-s, but that's OK. Go ahead and ask for your 1$ due to this misunderstanding -- if you recall Eric's "PNL of debating" (CHUCKLE). According to my opinion, you are right!
Posted on Sat Sep 05, 2009
@ Susan in Florida -- And now the elections (LOL). You are right, very hard "semester". I also watched the news with the same agony of yours, concerning California fires.
I'm personally OK. My friends and family too! Thanks a lot again for your interest.
By the way, I really loved your post concerning Religious Freedom. Especially this part: QUOTE: So, when making a choice be sure to know what you have chosen, and ask yourself, does it promote empathy and compassion for others, or hatred and intolerance. END OF QUOTE.
I think that you were misunderstood by someone-s, but that's OK. Go ahead and ask for your 1$ due to this misunderstanding -- if you recall Eric's "PNL of debating" (CHUCKLE). According to my opinion, you are right!
Posted on Sat Sep 05, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- I have been reading about the events in Greece. First the fires, then the explosion(s) in Athens. Hope all is well with you, and family and friends. Best regards.
Posted on Thu Sep 03, 2009
@ John in Greece -- I have been reading about the events in Greece. First the fires, then the explosion(s) in Athens. Hope all is well with you, and family and friends. Best regards.
Posted on Thu Sep 03, 2009
Aileen in Scotland writes:
21st August 2009
Dear Senator Clinton
Release of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi
I write as a former resident of Lockerbie, and former pupil of Lockerbie Academy. I have listened with dismay the protestations from the U.S. regarding the release of above. The Justice Minister Kenny McAskill made it clear that Scottish justice had convicted the prisoner accordingly, but his release was now to return home to die. An action I support. However, it has been on my mind for some time that had the U.S. been as open and honest as the Scottish Government, regarding the shooting down of Iran Flight 655, none of us would be in this situation today.
When the bodies of the passengers of Pan Am Flight 103 started to rain down on Lockerbie, the first reaction was shock and bewilderment. For those who witnessed the aftermath, it was hell on earth. My own elderly aunt had five bodies in her garden, one on the roof, and body parts strewn along the road. Friends of my parents had their lives, and their home, blown apart in seconds. The vast fluorescent wedges of debris along the hillsides, the smell of fuel still heavy in the air. Worse still, the child's dress fluttering on the wire fence near the road, a Christmas present, never received, still with the remnants of the festive wrapping. Dollar bills dancing around the grass verges, because no-one had the heart to pick them up. Luggage lying in fields as if abandoned deliberately, their owners, still strapped to their seats apparently sleeping, but dead, miles from their plane.
I know our Justice Minister Kenny McAskill is an honourable and intelligent man, and what he did yesterday was supported by those who also thought Megrahi was properly convicted, yet also held doubts about the reality of his actions. He did not bomb the Maid of the Seas in isolation, and the question for us all has always been, who really perpetrated this crime?
I hope you will reflect on those who washed the victims clothes, who made tea and comforted strangers in a small Scottish town far away from the U.S. Even today, another bride leaves her wedding flowers on the Memorial, as I did in 1991. No photographs, no publicity, just a quiet moment of reflection on an otherwise happy day. But I would also reflect on the 66 children who died on Iran Flight 655 out of the total of 290 civilians, shot down by U.S. missiles. The crew of the USS Vincennes were honoured after their tour of duty. It is a confusing irony to those who see reward and condemnation for the same act.
You are a respected politician, and also a woman in politics, world wide, that is a tough act! But some of the statements yesterday hurt the population here. Scotland is an old and proud country, and the Scottish Diaspora in the U.S. vast, indeed John Paul Jones, the founder of the U.S. Navy was born close to Lockerbie, so the links are still strong with your comparatively young nation. But it was Scotland who bore the brunt of this disaster and if we decide this is the appropriate action, then I think we should receive your consideration and respect in this single act of compassion. It would be comforting to have a visit from someone from the U.S. Government as we seem so often talked of, but rarely spoken to.
Kind regards,
Aileen O.
Posted on Fri Aug 21, 2009
21st August 2009
Dear Senator Clinton
Release of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi
I write as a former resident of Lockerbie, and former pupil of Lockerbie Academy. I have listened with dismay the protestations from the U.S. regarding the release of above. The Justice Minister Kenny McAskill made it clear that Scottish justice had convicted the prisoner accordingly, but his release was now to return home to die. An action I support. However, it has been on my mind for some time that had the U.S. been as open and honest as the Scottish Government, regarding the shooting down of Iran Flight 655, none of us would be in this situation today.
When the bodies of the passengers of Pan Am Flight 103 started to rain down on Lockerbie, the first reaction was shock and bewilderment. For those who witnessed the aftermath, it was hell on earth. My own elderly aunt had five bodies in her garden, one on the roof, and body parts strewn along the road. Friends of my parents had their lives, and their home, blown apart in seconds. The vast fluorescent wedges of debris along the hillsides, the smell of fuel still heavy in the air. Worse still, the child's dress fluttering on the wire fence near the road, a Christmas present, never received, still with the remnants of the festive wrapping. Dollar bills dancing around the grass verges, because no-one had the heart to pick them up. Luggage lying in fields as if abandoned deliberately, their owners, still strapped to their seats apparently sleeping, but dead, miles from their plane.
I know our Justice Minister Kenny McAskill is an honourable and intelligent man, and what he did yesterday was supported by those who also thought Megrahi was properly convicted, yet also held doubts about the reality of his actions. He did not bomb the Maid of the Seas in isolation, and the question for us all has always been, who really perpetrated this crime?
I hope you will reflect on those who washed the victims clothes, who made tea and comforted strangers in a small Scottish town far away from the U.S. Even today, another bride leaves her wedding flowers on the Memorial, as I did in 1991. No photographs, no publicity, just a quiet moment of reflection on an otherwise happy day. But I would also reflect on the 66 children who died on Iran Flight 655 out of the total of 290 civilians, shot down by U.S. missiles. The crew of the USS Vincennes were honoured after their tour of duty. It is a confusing irony to those who see reward and condemnation for the same act.
You are a respected politician, and also a woman in politics, world wide, that is a tough act! But some of the statements yesterday hurt the population here. Scotland is an old and proud country, and the Scottish Diaspora in the U.S. vast, indeed John Paul Jones, the founder of the U.S. Navy was born close to Lockerbie, so the links are still strong with your comparatively young nation. But it was Scotland who bore the brunt of this disaster and if we decide this is the appropriate action, then I think we should receive your consideration and respect in this single act of compassion. It would be comforting to have a visit from someone from the U.S. Government as we seem so often talked of, but rarely spoken to.
Kind regards,
Aileen O.
Posted on Fri Aug 21, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ John in Greece, I would agree that when the Dipnote staff devotes two weeks solid on the Secretary's trip to Africa, it's hard to find an open topic on another subject that's currently making news, or as an ongoing issue with developments (whether that be about Russia or not).
If staff were to uplink the daily briefing to the blog as "topics du jour" that might be the "catch all, be all, end all" to frustrations among readers and commenters alike.
Not like this is the first time I've suggested this, but if they thought it was a good idea, we wouldn't be discussing this on the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog.
Logical, no?
In any case, I suppose we could all spin this conversation about Russia in context with the kinds of diplomatic tools we could use to "leverage" good governance (see question of the week), in the sprit of keeping things on-topic and in format, but that sort of limits the range of public opinion options.
I'll tell you why I went into "self-limiting mode" John, and the reason is simple. I don't like repeating myself and I have nothing more to add after some 50,000 words printed here on this blog on the topic of Russia ( a conservative estimate).
Except this...(chuckle). Consider it well.
The only way the human race will get over the concept of "Us and Them" generating a dysfunctional mistrust that has allowed the building of whole industries devoted to killing everyone off, turning the planet into something that resembles Mars in a few hours time, and fuels preacher's proseletizing of "end times" phrophesies and conspiracies (some actively seeking to create the conditions of apocalypse); Will be when the human race finds life on another planet and we all "get a grip" when we realize there's another "Them" out there, or we have a really tragic event that changes everything, for all of us.
It's hard to undue an education. We don't like change when a mindset has become comfortable.
Comfortably numb more like, to the insanity we as nations and peoples have grown accustomed to.
"Us and Them" ends with "you and me", a radical new diplomatic mindset created within one individual at a time, and it's too bad folks haven't bottled it yet into an "international beverage" served at the local pub.( hat tip to PJ Crowley for a little out of context inspiration).
Regarding something Donald said, we've been there, done that...google "USS Thresher".
Regarding "invitations" John, as you well know from your challenge to me to come up with a solution to the crisis in Somalia (which I did in 24 hours), I don't have a problem challenging the think tank community of PHD's to meet me half-way to the table in debate, and that goes for heads of state as well. I've got a bone to pick with every one of them.
I wouldn't bother to be here if I didn't think I could make a difference, but I'd like to put that to the test.
So let me just speculate what would happen if I got an invitation to speak at next Spring's Nuclear Security Conference for 20 minutes.
The first 5 minutes would be spent expressing my amazement "that we were even having this conversation at all.", the next five minutes would be spent pinning everyone's ears back and telling them to "get a grip", and the next 9 minutes telling them exactly how to go about doing it. And the final minute spent on destroying the concept of "Us and Them", and thanking those that made it possible to get a lot off my chest in a very short time.
I guarrantee two things, I WILL change the nature of the global conversation by presenting a perspective on the history that can't be obtained from anyone else.
Thing is, I'm not convinced folks want to end this insanity as yet. Despite The President's speech in Prague.
Thus I'm not convinced anything I might have to say will make a difference in how folks get along eventually, but I will get folks to think about it, that much is highly probable if not problematic for some.
Perhaps that's simply a "given"...(chuckle).
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
@ John in Greece, I would agree that when the Dipnote staff devotes two weeks solid on the Secretary's trip to Africa, it's hard to find an open topic on another subject that's currently making news, or as an ongoing issue with developments (whether that be about Russia or not).
If staff were to uplink the daily briefing to the blog as "topics du jour" that might be the "catch all, be all, end all" to frustrations among readers and commenters alike.
Not like this is the first time I've suggested this, but if they thought it was a good idea, we wouldn't be discussing this on the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog.
Logical, no?
In any case, I suppose we could all spin this conversation about Russia in context with the kinds of diplomatic tools we could use to "leverage" good governance (see question of the week), in the sprit of keeping things on-topic and in format, but that sort of limits the range of public opinion options.
I'll tell you why I went into "self-limiting mode" John, and the reason is simple. I don't like repeating myself and I have nothing more to add after some 50,000 words printed here on this blog on the topic of Russia ( a conservative estimate).
Except this...(chuckle). Consider it well.
The only way the human race will get over the concept of "Us and Them" generating a dysfunctional mistrust that has allowed the building of whole industries devoted to killing everyone off, turning the planet into something that resembles Mars in a few hours time, and fuels preacher's proseletizing of "end times" phrophesies and conspiracies (some actively seeking to create the conditions of apocalypse); Will be when the human race finds life on another planet and we all "get a grip" when we realize there's another "Them" out there, or we have a really tragic event that changes everything, for all of us.
It's hard to undue an education. We don't like change when a mindset has become comfortable.
Comfortably numb more like, to the insanity we as nations and peoples have grown accustomed to.
"Us and Them" ends with "you and me", a radical new diplomatic mindset created within one individual at a time, and it's too bad folks haven't bottled it yet into an "international beverage" served at the local pub.( hat tip to PJ Crowley for a little out of context inspiration).
Regarding something Donald said, we've been there, done that...google "USS Thresher".
Regarding "invitations" John, as you well know from your challenge to me to come up with a solution to the crisis in Somalia (which I did in 24 hours), I don't have a problem challenging the think tank community of PHD's to meet me half-way to the table in debate, and that goes for heads of state as well. I've got a bone to pick with every one of them.
I wouldn't bother to be here if I didn't think I could make a difference, but I'd like to put that to the test.
So let me just speculate what would happen if I got an invitation to speak at next Spring's Nuclear Security Conference for 20 minutes.
The first 5 minutes would be spent expressing my amazement "that we were even having this conversation at all.", the next five minutes would be spent pinning everyone's ears back and telling them to "get a grip", and the next 9 minutes telling them exactly how to go about doing it. And the final minute spent on destroying the concept of "Us and Them", and thanking those that made it possible to get a lot off my chest in a very short time.
I guarrantee two things, I WILL change the nature of the global conversation by presenting a perspective on the history that can't be obtained from anyone else.
Thing is, I'm not convinced folks want to end this insanity as yet. Despite The President's speech in Prague.
Thus I'm not convinced anything I might have to say will make a difference in how folks get along eventually, but I will get folks to think about it, that much is highly probable if not problematic for some.
Perhaps that's simply a "given"...(chuckle).
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Donald, If the Pentagon is not concerned, neither am I. Fact is, we do exactly the same thing in international waters...on patrol with our nuclear subs.
I wouldn't read a whle lot into it other than the Russians have the capacity to do so, despite having decommissioned 4/5ths of their "boomers" since the fall of the Soviet empire.
They're about to abandon their Bulava missile project due to repeated system failures during testing, and as I said, they can go broke trying to maintain parity with the US if they want to, or think it's neccessary, but that's their choice, isn't it?
End of subject as far as I'm concerned.
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
@ Donald, If the Pentagon is not concerned, neither am I. Fact is, we do exactly the same thing in international waters...on patrol with our nuclear subs.
I wouldn't read a whle lot into it other than the Russians have the capacity to do so, despite having decommissioned 4/5ths of their "boomers" since the fall of the Soviet empire.
They're about to abandon their Bulava missile project due to repeated system failures during testing, and as I said, they can go broke trying to maintain parity with the US if they want to, or think it's neccessary, but that's their choice, isn't it?
End of subject as far as I'm concerned.
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Donald in Virginia -- I absolutely agree with you, concerning the Russians. A couple of days ago, I had taken the decision not to mention my fears, but as long as I see people having the same fears I got, I will briefly add some more bullets in Donald's arsenal:
1. Not only Georgia, but also Ukraine, Poland plus any NATO project in what they think as "their neighbouring danger" and any territory they think that still belongs to them no matter if their "bloodthirsty Empire" expired!
2. They keep on working towards creating a European energy monopoly.
3. Now they also use nuclear "strategy" to make this energy monopoly project even stronger. They are trying to build an electrical nuclear station in Turkey. Obviously, their "KGB" collaboration in providing technology and nuclear materials in Syria, Iran and maybe N. Korea made them decide that it's a good business, with both money and political "influence".
4. Even the Russian Church -- under the new "Head of Priests" -- is all of a sudden attempting to become the "leader" of all the Orthodox Churches. I think this means something too, especially if you think how fanatic Muslims use this "socio-button" (Religion).
Ok! some simple thoughts from me... I could write for hours, but sometimes simple civilians like us may say stupid things. I'll be honest. I understand that Mr. Obama's Administration foreign policy is to make U.S.-Russian relations better and safer. I like this! (Besides, great job from the American diplomatic side!) Nobody of us is a fun of war or "cold war". However, when you deal with people who CANNOT TRUST (Russians), you always must CROSS CHECK.
So, I absolutely agree with you Donald. Nevertheless, I don't agree that you "hit" Eric (you addressed him) with a question, although he stated that QUOTE ...this is the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog, not a discussion on Russia, so this will be my last post on the subject here. END OF QUOTE. We must respect this, as long as he stated that he won't answer back right now, concerning this issue. This is a typical, healthy, non-negotiable diplomatic procedure. After all, sometimes, waiting for the appropriate time to talk is not a sign of weakness, but a sign of wisdom (my prediction).
@ Eric in New Mexico -- I won't talk about Russia (Chuckle). I couldn't predict the time we would have a disagreement. But I think that even now that happens it is extremely healthy. I'm talking about the "role" of the "Welcome to Dipnote". I strongly disagree with you. As long as there is no "chat room" and according to my opinion we should not have one in here, I think that we must have a "small back door", for opening discussions. The DipNote posts are extremely important, but you know better than me that news run with even bigger speeds. If readers feel that they cannot breath (expressing their views, fears, impressions, whatever) they will go to other "web-places" to express their interest about issues. And then, instead of having news, facts or arguments "from the source", they will become anti-American propaganda victims.
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
@ Donald in Virginia -- I absolutely agree with you, concerning the Russians. A couple of days ago, I had taken the decision not to mention my fears, but as long as I see people having the same fears I got, I will briefly add some more bullets in Donald's arsenal:
1. Not only Georgia, but also Ukraine, Poland plus any NATO project in what they think as "their neighbouring danger" and any territory they think that still belongs to them no matter if their "bloodthirsty Empire" expired!
2. They keep on working towards creating a European energy monopoly.
3. Now they also use nuclear "strategy" to make this energy monopoly project even stronger. They are trying to build an electrical nuclear station in Turkey. Obviously, their "KGB" collaboration in providing technology and nuclear materials in Syria, Iran and maybe N. Korea made them decide that it's a good business, with both money and political "influence".
4. Even the Russian Church -- under the new "Head of Priests" -- is all of a sudden attempting to become the "leader" of all the Orthodox Churches. I think this means something too, especially if you think how fanatic Muslims use this "socio-button" (Religion).
Ok! some simple thoughts from me... I could write for hours, but sometimes simple civilians like us may say stupid things. I'll be honest. I understand that Mr. Obama's Administration foreign policy is to make U.S.-Russian relations better and safer. I like this! (Besides, great job from the American diplomatic side!) Nobody of us is a fun of war or "cold war". However, when you deal with people who CANNOT TRUST (Russians), you always must CROSS CHECK.
So, I absolutely agree with you Donald. Nevertheless, I don't agree that you "hit" Eric (you addressed him) with a question, although he stated that QUOTE ...this is the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog, not a discussion on Russia, so this will be my last post on the subject here. END OF QUOTE. We must respect this, as long as he stated that he won't answer back right now, concerning this issue. This is a typical, healthy, non-negotiable diplomatic procedure. After all, sometimes, waiting for the appropriate time to talk is not a sign of weakness, but a sign of wisdom (my prediction).
@ Eric in New Mexico -- I won't talk about Russia (Chuckle). I couldn't predict the time we would have a disagreement. But I think that even now that happens it is extremely healthy. I'm talking about the "role" of the "Welcome to Dipnote". I strongly disagree with you. As long as there is no "chat room" and according to my opinion we should not have one in here, I think that we must have a "small back door", for opening discussions. The DipNote posts are extremely important, but you know better than me that news run with even bigger speeds. If readers feel that they cannot breath (expressing their views, fears, impressions, whatever) they will go to other "web-places" to express their interest about issues. And then, instead of having news, facts or arguments "from the source", they will become anti-American propaganda victims.
Posted on Tue Aug 18, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ Donald in Virginia -- I think the book/movie you are thinking of is K-19 The Widowmaker. The book's author is Ret Capt Peter Huchthausen. The book is very good. The movie is not bad. The whole incident was very, very, sad. Hope this is of help. I really hate it when I can't remember the details of something I've read or seen. The movie came out in 2002, I believe.
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
@ Donald in Virginia -- I think the book/movie you are thinking of is K-19 The Widowmaker. The book's author is Ret Capt Peter Huchthausen. The book is very good. The movie is not bad. The whole incident was very, very, sad. Hope this is of help. I really hate it when I can't remember the details of something I've read or seen. The movie came out in 2002, I believe.
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
Donald in Virginia writes:
@Eric in New Mexico -- I would say its difficult for anyone to Judge what the Russians true motives are when they are posturing their Naval Fleet around U.S. waters and still have a stronghold over the country of Georgia. Diplomatic channels need to be addressed to ensure we don't end up with World War 3 in our backyard. I can say from serving in the U.S. Navy this makes me a bit nervous knowing they are getting closer to our coast. Especially, when they are Nuclear Class Submarines. If not mistaken years back, the Russians had an accident with one of it's Nuclear powered submarine on our coast, they even made a movie, or documentary on the incident. I think President Barack Obama might want to read, or watch that movie, then he would get a better understanding about the Russians. Off hand I can't think of the title, but had to do with a "Boomer" which is a ballistic Missile Nuclear Russian Submarine that something went wrong, and No not talking about "The Hunt for Red October" this was something different. A russian sailor saved the boat, and perished from the nuclear radiation by capping off the reactor. I believe it was a true story. That could of turned into something else completely, like an accidental Nuclear Device going off undersea, which should make people think more about the consequences of Nuclear ships or submarines.
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
@Eric in New Mexico -- I would say its difficult for anyone to Judge what the Russians true motives are when they are posturing their Naval Fleet around U.S. waters and still have a stronghold over the country of Georgia. Diplomatic channels need to be addressed to ensure we don't end up with World War 3 in our backyard. I can say from serving in the U.S. Navy this makes me a bit nervous knowing they are getting closer to our coast. Especially, when they are Nuclear Class Submarines. If not mistaken years back, the Russians had an accident with one of it's Nuclear powered submarine on our coast, they even made a movie, or documentary on the incident. I think President Barack Obama might want to read, or watch that movie, then he would get a better understanding about the Russians. Off hand I can't think of the title, but had to do with a "Boomer" which is a ballistic Missile Nuclear Russian Submarine that something went wrong, and No not talking about "The Hunt for Red October" this was something different. A russian sailor saved the boat, and perished from the nuclear radiation by capping off the reactor. I believe it was a true story. That could of turned into something else completely, like an accidental Nuclear Device going off undersea, which should make people think more about the consequences of Nuclear ships or submarines.
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Susan in Florida, I don't know why my post with links to testimony before Congress didn't take, but a simple google search- Bioweapons + Soviet + Programs- should give you links to what I was reading.
Yeltsin ended the offensive bioweapons programs in the 90's that employed some 60,000 , and U.S./ Russian cooperation since has helped re-employ these scientists in more peaceful persuits, as well as funding some clean up of sites, including chemical weapons destruction, and help with monitoring.
It's really hard for me to guage Russian intent, sometimes it seems the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, othertimes it's like they're going through knee-jerk reaction on a political level of evolution , a-la "Spasticus Autisticus".
I would say though that if their subs surface off our east coast, rather than attempt to remain concealed...then there's a certain ammount of transparency going on between our governments, and one must judge intent accordingly.
Anyway...this is the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog, not a discussion on Russia, so this will be my last post on the subject here.
What would be extremely interesting, if not news worthy, would be if Dept. of State sent out a few invitations to heads of state to post blog entry once in awhile, issue specific to their concerns in bilateral relations with the U.S., and see if that helps promote good dialogue.
Just a thought...
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
@ Susan in Florida, I don't know why my post with links to testimony before Congress didn't take, but a simple google search- Bioweapons + Soviet + Programs- should give you links to what I was reading.
Yeltsin ended the offensive bioweapons programs in the 90's that employed some 60,000 , and U.S./ Russian cooperation since has helped re-employ these scientists in more peaceful persuits, as well as funding some clean up of sites, including chemical weapons destruction, and help with monitoring.
It's really hard for me to guage Russian intent, sometimes it seems the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, othertimes it's like they're going through knee-jerk reaction on a political level of evolution , a-la "Spasticus Autisticus".
I would say though that if their subs surface off our east coast, rather than attempt to remain concealed...then there's a certain ammount of transparency going on between our governments, and one must judge intent accordingly.
Anyway...this is the "Welcome to Dipnote" section of the blog, not a discussion on Russia, so this will be my last post on the subject here.
What would be extremely interesting, if not news worthy, would be if Dept. of State sent out a few invitations to heads of state to post blog entry once in awhile, issue specific to their concerns in bilateral relations with the U.S., and see if that helps promote good dialogue.
Just a thought...
Posted on Mon Aug 17, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A. -- Z, things are simple: Russia attacked Georgia (remember?) Now it's proved even more. And it's even more obvious than... the radio transcript that Eric in NM gave you.
Would you like some more?
Susan in Florida writes:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A., SNP in Syria, and Joe in TN. "Putin pledges MILITARY build up in Georgia..." This was in the news today. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention since all of you believe that Russia isn't interested in any type of military build up and are only interested in "getting along" with everyone. I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part.
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
Posted on Sun Aug 16, 2009
@ Zharkov in U.S.A. -- Z, things are simple: Russia attacked Georgia (remember?) Now it's proved even more. And it's even more obvious than... the radio transcript that Eric in NM gave you.
Would you like some more?
Susan in Florida writes:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A., SNP in Syria, and Joe in TN. "Putin pledges MILITARY build up in Georgia..." This was in the news today. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention since all of you believe that Russia isn't interested in any type of military build up and are only interested in "getting along" with everyone. I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part.
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
Posted on Sun Aug 16, 2009
Donald in Virginia writes:
@ Zharkvov in U.S.A. -- When Russia decides to deploy two Attack Submarines off our coast and your saying let's have peace? If Russia truly cared about Peace they would have "Stand-Down" from operations around Georgia and they certainly would not be sending Attack Submarines in waters close to the United States. This does not sound like girl scout's passing out cookies when they are showing off their strength. I seriously doubt Europe trusts Russia either. Russia has to prove themselves and stop their own aggressions. We all want peace, first show me peace, tell me peace but back it up with Peace, not with Attack Submarines.
Posted on Sun Aug 16, 2009
@ Zharkvov in U.S.A. -- When Russia decides to deploy two Attack Submarines off our coast and your saying let's have peace? If Russia truly cared about Peace they would have "Stand-Down" from operations around Georgia and they certainly would not be sending Attack Submarines in waters close to the United States. This does not sound like girl scout's passing out cookies when they are showing off their strength. I seriously doubt Europe trusts Russia either. Russia has to prove themselves and stop their own aggressions. We all want peace, first show me peace, tell me peace but back it up with Peace, not with Attack Submarines.
Posted on Sun Aug 16, 2009
Zharkvov in U.S.A. writes:
Russia seemed content to be a teddy bear until NATO broke the Reagan promise and advanced toward their borders, and before Georgia attacked them. We didn't have a problem until NATO and our "alliance" with Georgia caused one.
While Reagan's promise and NATO threat may have been illusory from our viewpoint, the killing of Russians was not. The State Department parroting the initial Georgian lie that Russia attacked first was the final insult.
As with any other country, if you deceive their leaders and train their neighbors to kill their citizens, they lose interest in our warm regards.
It is astonishing that Russian leaders continue to offer us second, third, and fourth chances at a peaceful relationship while we begin training Georgia's army again, and I think we should try harder to treat Russia fairly and honorably. It is worth repeating that Russians now look to our deeds, not our words, if we want to prevent another Cold War.
It seems some in our government have difficulty deciding who the next enemy should be - Republicans, war vets, patriotic Americans, Iran, or Russia. So many possibilities, so little time. Maybe we should limit our search to the guys who are actually shooting at us?
One thing the State Department could do is to lobby Congress to repeal the now-obsolete Jackson-Vanik Amendment and show Russia that we are willing to put the Cold War in the past where it belongs. There is no reason to exclude Russia from our markets when they do not exclude our corporations from their markets. If the Golden Rule is not part of our foreign policy, then we need a new foreign policy.
Posted on Sat Aug 15, 2009
Russia seemed content to be a teddy bear until NATO broke the Reagan promise and advanced toward their borders, and before Georgia attacked them. We didn't have a problem until NATO and our "alliance" with Georgia caused one.
While Reagan's promise and NATO threat may have been illusory from our viewpoint, the killing of Russians was not. The State Department parroting the initial Georgian lie that Russia attacked first was the final insult.
As with any other country, if you deceive their leaders and train their neighbors to kill their citizens, they lose interest in our warm regards.
It is astonishing that Russian leaders continue to offer us second, third, and fourth chances at a peaceful relationship while we begin training Georgia's army again, and I think we should try harder to treat Russia fairly and honorably. It is worth repeating that Russians now look to our deeds, not our words, if we want to prevent another Cold War.
It seems some in our government have difficulty deciding who the next enemy should be - Republicans, war vets, patriotic Americans, Iran, or Russia. So many possibilities, so little time. Maybe we should limit our search to the guys who are actually shooting at us?
One thing the State Department could do is to lobby Congress to repeal the now-obsolete Jackson-Vanik Amendment and show Russia that we are willing to put the Cold War in the past where it belongs. There is no reason to exclude Russia from our markets when they do not exclude our corporations from their markets. If the Golden Rule is not part of our foreign policy, then we need a new foreign policy.
Posted on Sat Aug 15, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Susan in Florida -- Don't make me feel permanently ill now (LOL). Relax, I AM theoretically OK! Eric in NM "underlined" something extremely interesting, I would love to hear more about:
QUOTE: There are worse things than nukes. END OF QUOTE.
I think that this "guy" in New Mexico (Chuckle) writes something extremely important again !
P.S.@ Susan: Thank you very much for your interest! You make me really happy to know that great women are in the American educational system.
Posted on Sat Aug 15, 2009
@ Susan in Florida -- Don't make me feel permanently ill now (LOL). Relax, I AM theoretically OK! Eric in NM "underlined" something extremely interesting, I would love to hear more about:
QUOTE: There are worse things than nukes. END OF QUOTE.
I think that this "guy" in New Mexico (Chuckle) writes something extremely important again !
P.S.@ Susan: Thank you very much for your interest! You make me really happy to know that great women are in the American educational system.
Posted on Sat Aug 15, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- You stated it very well. We are all friends here. I, too, love Dipnote. I am impressed by the quality and diversity of the daily Dipnote postings. The comments from bloggers, from around the world, are always genuine and thoughtful. They keep me thinking! And, John, thank you for putting it in the proper perspective. I hope you are fully recovered. Best regards.
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Thank you for your response. I was offended to be called "clueless" because I did not believe that Russia had ANYONE'S best interest in mind, including their own citizens. Your post certainly verifies this. Russia does not seem honorable or benign to me. Anyway, I'd appreciate the link, when you have time. Keep up the interesting posts. This is why I love Dipnote... the exchange of information and comments/thoughts is the best! And we can directly communicate with our government. Well done, DoS.
Posted on Fri Aug 14, 2009
@ John in Greece -- You stated it very well. We are all friends here. I, too, love Dipnote. I am impressed by the quality and diversity of the daily Dipnote postings. The comments from bloggers, from around the world, are always genuine and thoughtful. They keep me thinking! And, John, thank you for putting it in the proper perspective. I hope you are fully recovered. Best regards.
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Thank you for your response. I was offended to be called "clueless" because I did not believe that Russia had ANYONE'S best interest in mind, including their own citizens. Your post certainly verifies this. Russia does not seem honorable or benign to me. Anyway, I'd appreciate the link, when you have time. Keep up the interesting posts. This is why I love Dipnote... the exchange of information and comments/thoughts is the best! And we can directly communicate with our government. Well done, DoS.
Posted on Fri Aug 14, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
My appologies Susan, it's been about 30 years since I've had my eyes checked, and I'm either halucinating or I need reading glasses.
Anyway, it is one thing to pledge to do something, it's another to come up with the big bucks to make it reality. If the Russians want to go broke spending their money on hardware and bases for an obsolete Black Sea fleet, ( way things are going with their relations with Ukraine, their lease won't be renewed), then that's their choice.
I think they'd be better off spending it on cleaning up the biological disaster waiting to happen in the Aral sea ( which has shrunk to the point where rodents and other mammals could become infected with the leftovers of the biological weapons testing they did on an island which is soon to be part of the mainland - it may be at this point, the report I read was a few years old.)
They've already had one really close call with smallpox from that site, and the only reason it didn't break out nationwide in the Soviet era after several people died in the closest town was a General's quick thinking to make sure the train to Moscow didn't stop in that town till containment was assured. 100% fatalities among the infected, about half a dozen all told. The family of one researcher who was 15 km away from the island on a ship taking bio samples of the water who became exposed.
If you like, I'll provide the links to the reading material I've been brushing up on of late.
I've said before that I think we're really lucky to be having this conversation at all, and yes, it is still possible to extinct the human race, simply by accident, regardless of whether we point missiles at each other or not.
If I was a Russian, I wouldn't be worried about missile defense, NATO expantion, or the economy. But I'd be scared stiff by my nation's cold war legacy, for good reason.
There are worse things than nukes.
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
My appologies Susan, it's been about 30 years since I've had my eyes checked, and I'm either halucinating or I need reading glasses.
Anyway, it is one thing to pledge to do something, it's another to come up with the big bucks to make it reality. If the Russians want to go broke spending their money on hardware and bases for an obsolete Black Sea fleet, ( way things are going with their relations with Ukraine, their lease won't be renewed), then that's their choice.
I think they'd be better off spending it on cleaning up the biological disaster waiting to happen in the Aral sea ( which has shrunk to the point where rodents and other mammals could become infected with the leftovers of the biological weapons testing they did on an island which is soon to be part of the mainland - it may be at this point, the report I read was a few years old.)
They've already had one really close call with smallpox from that site, and the only reason it didn't break out nationwide in the Soviet era after several people died in the closest town was a General's quick thinking to make sure the train to Moscow didn't stop in that town till containment was assured. 100% fatalities among the infected, about half a dozen all told. The family of one researcher who was 15 km away from the island on a ship taking bio samples of the water who became exposed.
If you like, I'll provide the links to the reading material I've been brushing up on of late.
I've said before that I think we're really lucky to be having this conversation at all, and yes, it is still possible to extinct the human race, simply by accident, regardless of whether we point missiles at each other or not.
If I was a Russian, I wouldn't be worried about missile defense, NATO expantion, or the economy. But I'd be scared stiff by my nation's cold war legacy, for good reason.
There are worse things than nukes.
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
Donald in Virginia writes:
I'm just honored and humbled at the same time! We have been offering a multitude of writings in hope that people will listen, and make the world safer for all people! I admit being away for a period of time working. Sometimes the job has to come first!
I am certainly glad we all share a bond of writing, communicating and making our thoughts known in the Dipnote for everyone to read. I also admit my typing skills get debunked by accident. My brain waves move faster than my fingers can type. (Chuckle)
We are all Dipnote Care Bears -- I would salute everyone, John in Greece, Eric in New Mexico, Zharkov, Joe in TN, Susan in Florida, all those that have promoted ideas, thoughts and were bold enough to stand-up with the comments. We certainly have to formally Salute the State Department by offering this method to express our thoughts.
I was truly blessed by the United States Navy having served onboard two United States Warships, qualified Surface Warfare and managed to attend the best Navy Fire Fighting Schools in the Country.
I continue to teach people about techniques and skills that help them in case of fires, floods or natural disasters. Today I thought about those that are in a flood situation. If people can remember the simple letters of H I K they will have a greater chance of survival. This method is shoring. You make the 4x4's from wood or steel to shore up your home or buildings. The H and I beams are used for ceilings, the K is used for doors or hatches. This provides more strength to your structure. The walls of the structure just place 2x4's or 4x4's in a slant position. Ensure you nail these studs down. This technique is not new, was first used onboard the German Battleship Bismark during world war two. You plug holes in pipes with shoals. Being creative you cut a round piece of wood, then simple enough take a hammer and plug the wood in the hole. If you ever have a fire and flood at the same time, remember the Fire is the higher priority. Always stay low more oxygen, use blankets, fire extinguishers, and when evacuating "USE THE BACK OF YOUR HANDS" especially in the dark. If you use the open part of your hands, grab electrical cable you will get zapped. The back of your hand you pull away quickly. Giving you a 2nd chance on life.
One of the greatest achievements I think looking back was an accident that happened, I was the first on the scene to respond. Years back a bus carrying shipyard workers, the bus flipped over coming off an overpass. I was just on the highway heading to the store, when I witnessed the entire accident. I stopped my van, put my emergency blinkers on, then quickly went to the bus. I was successful at removing 5 passengers that were hurt from the flipped bus. Few minutes passed and others came and helped get the rest of the passengers out and safe! When the Ambulance arrived, the first question the EMT asked, "How did everyone get off the bus so quick? We simple said, "We did" and then I departed, knowing they were all in good hands with EMT. The news reported headlines next days paper, the bus driver had been drinking, and recieved a DUI. All the passengers and driver was safe and got the medical treatment needed.
Good Day Everyone! and Godbless!!!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
I'm just honored and humbled at the same time! We have been offering a multitude of writings in hope that people will listen, and make the world safer for all people! I admit being away for a period of time working. Sometimes the job has to come first!
I am certainly glad we all share a bond of writing, communicating and making our thoughts known in the Dipnote for everyone to read. I also admit my typing skills get debunked by accident. My brain waves move faster than my fingers can type. (Chuckle)
We are all Dipnote Care Bears -- I would salute everyone, John in Greece, Eric in New Mexico, Zharkov, Joe in TN, Susan in Florida, all those that have promoted ideas, thoughts and were bold enough to stand-up with the comments. We certainly have to formally Salute the State Department by offering this method to express our thoughts.
I was truly blessed by the United States Navy having served onboard two United States Warships, qualified Surface Warfare and managed to attend the best Navy Fire Fighting Schools in the Country.
I continue to teach people about techniques and skills that help them in case of fires, floods or natural disasters. Today I thought about those that are in a flood situation. If people can remember the simple letters of H I K they will have a greater chance of survival. This method is shoring. You make the 4x4's from wood or steel to shore up your home or buildings. The H and I beams are used for ceilings, the K is used for doors or hatches. This provides more strength to your structure. The walls of the structure just place 2x4's or 4x4's in a slant position. Ensure you nail these studs down. This technique is not new, was first used onboard the German Battleship Bismark during world war two. You plug holes in pipes with shoals. Being creative you cut a round piece of wood, then simple enough take a hammer and plug the wood in the hole. If you ever have a fire and flood at the same time, remember the Fire is the higher priority. Always stay low more oxygen, use blankets, fire extinguishers, and when evacuating "USE THE BACK OF YOUR HANDS" especially in the dark. If you use the open part of your hands, grab electrical cable you will get zapped. The back of your hand you pull away quickly. Giving you a 2nd chance on life.
One of the greatest achievements I think looking back was an accident that happened, I was the first on the scene to respond. Years back a bus carrying shipyard workers, the bus flipped over coming off an overpass. I was just on the highway heading to the store, when I witnessed the entire accident. I stopped my van, put my emergency blinkers on, then quickly went to the bus. I was successful at removing 5 passengers that were hurt from the flipped bus. Few minutes passed and others came and helped get the rest of the passengers out and safe! When the Ambulance arrived, the first question the EMT asked, "How did everyone get off the bus so quick? We simple said, "We did" and then I departed, knowing they were all in good hands with EMT. The news reported headlines next days paper, the bus driver had been drinking, and recieved a DUI. All the passengers and driver was safe and got the medical treatment needed.
Good Day Everyone! and Godbless!!!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece and Donald in VA -- My concern with Russia has always been the same. Their history does not reflect a desire, or a resolve, for freedom and human rights. I agree with you... I do not trust them, and I believe that our government should trust them with scepticism.
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Eric, I read your posts with interest, and find them informative. I always appreciate your comments. That said... my comments about Russia were not directed at you. They were directed at SNP, Zharkov, and Joe in TN. I was responding to comments made that I was "clueless" about Russia and Putin's intent. It was to point to what is going on in that part of the world, right now.
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
@ John in Greece and Donald in VA -- My concern with Russia has always been the same. Their history does not reflect a desire, or a resolve, for freedom and human rights. I agree with you... I do not trust them, and I believe that our government should trust them with scepticism.
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Eric, I read your posts with interest, and find them informative. I always appreciate your comments. That said... my comments about Russia were not directed at you. They were directed at SNP, Zharkov, and Joe in TN. I was responding to comments made that I was "clueless" about Russia and Putin's intent. It was to point to what is going on in that part of the world, right now.
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Eric in NM, Susan in Florida and Donald in VA.
You know me guys, sometimes (regularly) I write with my heart. Let me offer some "help". We are all friends here. ALL!
@ Eric (you know how much I respect you) -- Susan never asked you something, because she did "ask" SNP, Joe and Zharkov, who -- from time to time -- "underline" Russia's new role. I think that her comment was extremely right and you know that she loves you and respects you. All of us? I mean she is a friend -- you know that! (I apologize if I have not understand correctly)
@ Thanks for the "thank you John", but I think that I do not deserve this. I have not done a thing. You are the guy that deserves a great "thank you" for being here and sharing your ideas with us. Of course, you know that I cannot help you with them, but the fact that you are thinking, dreaming and imaging a better world means a healthy brain and a man I admire.
THE MOST IMPORTANT GUYS:
We are not so special as we think. It's not only me and you, Eric and SNP, Susan and Zharkov, Joe and Ann, Donald etc. It's the platform: DipNote! And I see too many great new ("old" too) voices saying important things to make us continue this great "debate"/international diplomatic conversation. I mean we are a universal team (within our different approaches)! We could call it DipNote amateur "diplomats", who often can be heard by people we could not imagine at all that would listen to us (as Eric wisely has stated: you never know who is reading).
--
Anyway, I'm working on a new comment that Susan and Eric brought to table without knowing that they did. That's why, I strongly believe that all of you guys in this Blog are spiritual and healthy. Because, sometimes, we don't initially understand how much important a pure dialogue can become, but it is!
Thank you all for your extremely kind words -- KEEP ON BEING HERE!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
@ Eric in NM, Susan in Florida and Donald in VA.
You know me guys, sometimes (regularly) I write with my heart. Let me offer some "help". We are all friends here. ALL!
@ Eric (you know how much I respect you) -- Susan never asked you something, because she did "ask" SNP, Joe and Zharkov, who -- from time to time -- "underline" Russia's new role. I think that her comment was extremely right and you know that she loves you and respects you. All of us? I mean she is a friend -- you know that! (I apologize if I have not understand correctly)
@ Thanks for the "thank you John", but I think that I do not deserve this. I have not done a thing. You are the guy that deserves a great "thank you" for being here and sharing your ideas with us. Of course, you know that I cannot help you with them, but the fact that you are thinking, dreaming and imaging a better world means a healthy brain and a man I admire.
THE MOST IMPORTANT GUYS:
We are not so special as we think. It's not only me and you, Eric and SNP, Susan and Zharkov, Joe and Ann, Donald etc. It's the platform: DipNote! And I see too many great new ("old" too) voices saying important things to make us continue this great "debate"/international diplomatic conversation. I mean we are a universal team (within our different approaches)! We could call it DipNote amateur "diplomats", who often can be heard by people we could not imagine at all that would listen to us (as Eric wisely has stated: you never know who is reading).
--
Anyway, I'm working on a new comment that Susan and Eric brought to table without knowing that they did. That's why, I strongly believe that all of you guys in this Blog are spiritual and healthy. Because, sometimes, we don't initially understand how much important a pure dialogue can become, but it is!
Thank you all for your extremely kind words -- KEEP ON BEING HERE!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
Donald in Virginia writes:
13 August 09
Thanks @ John in Greece
I have always enjoyed this blog. Great way to communicate and make people aware of what to expect. I totally agree John what doesn't kill ya makes you stronger. Ofcourse I'm still plugging away trying to get our Government involved in making Emergency Escape POD's to save lives! The plane accidents and helicopters, people dying for what? The FAA and NTSB always promote the same examples of what went wrong, but I disagree because we should be able to survive any accident from a vehicle. Thats why I continue pushing my EE POD's. This idea that I came up with, has been sent to the FAA/NTSB and other places and gets no attention. A silver bullet and nobody cares. When I think of all the accidents around the world, and if the people were safe inside a protective shell, had a parachute in a plane, and survival equipment. Pressurized Emergency Escape Pod, with a static line, would save hundreds of thousands of lives. I guess I will continue trying to push the issue, hope someone with sense will get onboard before the next serious plane, helicopter, train, bus, or even cars, or trucks on the road today have deadly accidents, peoples lives are important, cost of health care when getting emergency treatment. The average EMT Medical evacuation at the scene of an accident is thousands of dollars, even just a pickup with an ambulance can cost upwards of a thousand dollars. Something to think about!!!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
13 August 09
Thanks @ John in Greece
I have always enjoyed this blog. Great way to communicate and make people aware of what to expect. I totally agree John what doesn't kill ya makes you stronger. Ofcourse I'm still plugging away trying to get our Government involved in making Emergency Escape POD's to save lives! The plane accidents and helicopters, people dying for what? The FAA and NTSB always promote the same examples of what went wrong, but I disagree because we should be able to survive any accident from a vehicle. Thats why I continue pushing my EE POD's. This idea that I came up with, has been sent to the FAA/NTSB and other places and gets no attention. A silver bullet and nobody cares. When I think of all the accidents around the world, and if the people were safe inside a protective shell, had a parachute in a plane, and survival equipment. Pressurized Emergency Escape Pod, with a static line, would save hundreds of thousands of lives. I guess I will continue trying to push the issue, hope someone with sense will get onboard before the next serious plane, helicopter, train, bus, or even cars, or trucks on the road today have deadly accidents, peoples lives are important, cost of health care when getting emergency treatment. The average EMT Medical evacuation at the scene of an accident is thousands of dollars, even just a pickup with an ambulance can cost upwards of a thousand dollars. Something to think about!!!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Susan in Florida wrote:
"I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part."
Susan, you really need to stop making assumptions about what I think, it's more polite to simply ask.
The only "excuse" that would have come close to justifying Russia's actions last year, or now...would be the nightmare scenario involving the deliberate attempt to access a former Soviet bioweapons research lab/production facility by either non-state actors or a state actor such as Georgia that posed a direct and imminent threat to the Russian people in their eyes due to the long standing hostility between these two nations.
In fact, if you do the research, those sites exist.
If Russia did not want to panic its own people, or the rest of the world with the potential opening of "pandora's box" and a global pandemic, they'd need a convienient cover story for the actions nessesary to secure those sites.
The separaratist issue may well have provided that cover story, if, and I emphasize the word "IF", the Russian government was faced with an imminent outbreak of weaponized smallpox, virulent hemoragic fever, or a biotoxin coctail in the region.
If that was the case, their only option may have been to seal it up tight, and guard it like Fort Knox, permanently.
Too dangerous to move the contents or access it to destroy.
John in Greece may remember a post of mine on this subject around that time.
---
@ John in Greece,
What hasn't killed you has only made you stronger I suspect, and I see you came "loaded for Bear"...(chuckle)
Good to have you back!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
@ Susan in Florida wrote:
"I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part."
Susan, you really need to stop making assumptions about what I think, it's more polite to simply ask.
The only "excuse" that would have come close to justifying Russia's actions last year, or now...would be the nightmare scenario involving the deliberate attempt to access a former Soviet bioweapons research lab/production facility by either non-state actors or a state actor such as Georgia that posed a direct and imminent threat to the Russian people in their eyes due to the long standing hostility between these two nations.
In fact, if you do the research, those sites exist.
If Russia did not want to panic its own people, or the rest of the world with the potential opening of "pandora's box" and a global pandemic, they'd need a convienient cover story for the actions nessesary to secure those sites.
The separaratist issue may well have provided that cover story, if, and I emphasize the word "IF", the Russian government was faced with an imminent outbreak of weaponized smallpox, virulent hemoragic fever, or a biotoxin coctail in the region.
If that was the case, their only option may have been to seal it up tight, and guard it like Fort Knox, permanently.
Too dangerous to move the contents or access it to destroy.
John in Greece may remember a post of mine on this subject around that time.
---
@ John in Greece,
What hasn't killed you has only made you stronger I suspect, and I see you came "loaded for Bear"...(chuckle)
Good to have you back!
Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2009
Donald in Virginia writes:
12 August 09
Thought I would revisit and offer my opinion, it has been awhile.
My foresight tells me that Russia will invade Georgia again.... They will invade Czech Republic and Polond right off the start once they think President Barack Obama is too busy or doing other things. It's not the Russian people, it's the Government of Russia will make these big bold moves into Europe, to Conquor and divide Nations. Once they have Europe under it's throne, then they will eventually turn its force on the United States, then it also dawned on me that they could try a "Double Whammy" try and take Europe and the United States on in battle. While were still working on the withdrawl from Afghanistan and Iraq, would make the United States very vulnerable. What does President Barack Obama do when Russia attacks Europe, especially after he received a warm welcome from these people? Hence, better have a plan. Before the acts of war happen. I would never trust the Russian Government on anything. Which is ironic because most of the Russian people are probably very nice and want peace!
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
12 August 09
Thought I would revisit and offer my opinion, it has been awhile.
My foresight tells me that Russia will invade Georgia again.... They will invade Czech Republic and Polond right off the start once they think President Barack Obama is too busy or doing other things. It's not the Russian people, it's the Government of Russia will make these big bold moves into Europe, to Conquor and divide Nations. Once they have Europe under it's throne, then they will eventually turn its force on the United States, then it also dawned on me that they could try a "Double Whammy" try and take Europe and the United States on in battle. While were still working on the withdrawl from Afghanistan and Iraq, would make the United States very vulnerable. What does President Barack Obama do when Russia attacks Europe, especially after he received a warm welcome from these people? Hence, better have a plan. Before the acts of war happen. I would never trust the Russian Government on anything. Which is ironic because most of the Russian people are probably very nice and want peace!
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Susan in Florida -- You are absolutely right: I would never trust the Russians.
Archive:
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Joe in Tennessee, regardless of Putin's, or should I say the entire Russian Gov.'s (given their parliment's calling for the recognition of the separatist region's independance from Georgia. Which will be vetoed in the UN Sec. Council if an attempt is made by Russia to alter existing UN resolutions on territorial integrity), actions and planning , what I see is them desperatly trying to save face and trying to justify remaining in Poti and other soverign Georgian territory outside the disputed regions not so much as a point of negotiation, but as misplaced pride in their actions, and it won't fly with the UN.
As I said, they've bitten off more than they can chew.
I don't know whether the reports of Russian nuclear missles moved into S. Ossetia are true or not, but if confirmed....the Russians have apparently violated the very agreements you speak of regarding their end of things from a non-aggression standpoint.
I think the only rational way to solve the underlying issues that lead to violence is to put the issue up for international arbitration. The parties themselves are too close to the problem to have the proper perspective to solve this themselves, obviously.
It's going to take a real clear eyed, independant, non aligned negotiator to lead that process.
Japan perhaps could, even China.
But without a peacekeeping force that has no vested interest except to keep the peace, this situation will flare up again in violence. Especially if the Russians don't withdraw completely from Georgia proper.
Eventually they will be facing a situation of armed insurgency otherwise.
And there's nothing that the west could do to prevent that, because the Georgian people won't put up with any Russian occupation very long. Protests have already begun.
There's a very limited time to put a lid on this for good and all, and the Russians need to understand this for their sake.
The backlash has already begun.
Posted on Mon Aug 25, 2008
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
@ Susan in Florida -- You are absolutely right: I would never trust the Russians.
Archive:
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Joe in Tennessee, regardless of Putin's, or should I say the entire Russian Gov.'s (given their parliment's calling for the recognition of the separatist region's independance from Georgia. Which will be vetoed in the UN Sec. Council if an attempt is made by Russia to alter existing UN resolutions on territorial integrity), actions and planning , what I see is them desperatly trying to save face and trying to justify remaining in Poti and other soverign Georgian territory outside the disputed regions not so much as a point of negotiation, but as misplaced pride in their actions, and it won't fly with the UN.
As I said, they've bitten off more than they can chew.
I don't know whether the reports of Russian nuclear missles moved into S. Ossetia are true or not, but if confirmed....the Russians have apparently violated the very agreements you speak of regarding their end of things from a non-aggression standpoint.
I think the only rational way to solve the underlying issues that lead to violence is to put the issue up for international arbitration. The parties themselves are too close to the problem to have the proper perspective to solve this themselves, obviously.
It's going to take a real clear eyed, independant, non aligned negotiator to lead that process.
Japan perhaps could, even China.
But without a peacekeeping force that has no vested interest except to keep the peace, this situation will flare up again in violence. Especially if the Russians don't withdraw completely from Georgia proper.
Eventually they will be facing a situation of armed insurgency otherwise.
And there's nothing that the west could do to prevent that, because the Georgian people won't put up with any Russian occupation very long. Protests have already begun.
There's a very limited time to put a lid on this for good and all, and the Russians need to understand this for their sake.
The backlash has already begun.
Posted on Mon Aug 25, 2008
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A., SNP in Syria, and Joe in TN. "Putin pledges MILITARY build up in Georgia..." This was in the news today. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention since all of you believe that Russia isn't interested in any type of military build up and are only interested in "getting along" with everyone. I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part.
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
@ Zharkov in U.S.A., SNP in Syria, and Joe in TN. "Putin pledges MILITARY build up in Georgia..." This was in the news today. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention since all of you believe that Russia isn't interested in any type of military build up and are only interested in "getting along" with everyone. I am sure you will find some excuse for this action on their part.
Posted on Wed Aug 12, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ WW in Holland -- Secret Service? OK! Can you define what you mean by Iraq SS? Actually you cannot. I will tell you why you can't:
It's because, when you accept the fact that there is a "bath" party, Kurds etc. you automatically accept another fact: that there are at least two "parties" and plenty of "factions". So, it's getting much more complicated than your "Secret Service" accusation of yours.
It's the tenth time I write this. I DO NOT KNOW THE AREA and according to my opinion, Middle East is Hell. Too many groups, without a common socio-political id, plus a complicated religion puzzle, without a final "portrait" to reach, even if you could make it to the puzzle icon.
Any sober guy can understand how difficult this BIG/STRANGE area is for the American Diplomacy. (If there is one thing I could wish for me is that: I would never like to be a Middle East analyst: Believe me, these guys are really genius and heroes!)
OK! No more silly "poetry" of mine. The reason I answered back to your post is the fact that Secret Service in the U.S. of America is something HOLY! They are the BEST of the BEST! So, when we use this term: we better respect the term.
No other country has a Secret Service. U.S. ONLY. So, define your position, because it's getting propagandistic.
@ Susan in Florida -- We never left the building (Chuckle)! We are all here. You, me, Joe and Eric. By the way (again), where is this "hotel boy" Kirk? I wish him the best anyway. I miss his posts though.
Posted on Mon Aug 10, 2009
@ WW in Holland -- Secret Service? OK! Can you define what you mean by Iraq SS? Actually you cannot. I will tell you why you can't:
It's because, when you accept the fact that there is a "bath" party, Kurds etc. you automatically accept another fact: that there are at least two "parties" and plenty of "factions". So, it's getting much more complicated than your "Secret Service" accusation of yours.
It's the tenth time I write this. I DO NOT KNOW THE AREA and according to my opinion, Middle East is Hell. Too many groups, without a common socio-political id, plus a complicated religion puzzle, without a final "portrait" to reach, even if you could make it to the puzzle icon.
Any sober guy can understand how difficult this BIG/STRANGE area is for the American Diplomacy. (If there is one thing I could wish for me is that: I would never like to be a Middle East analyst: Believe me, these guys are really genius and heroes!)
OK! No more silly "poetry" of mine. The reason I answered back to your post is the fact that Secret Service in the U.S. of America is something HOLY! They are the BEST of the BEST! So, when we use this term: we better respect the term.
No other country has a Secret Service. U.S. ONLY. So, define your position, because it's getting propagandistic.
@ Susan in Florida -- We never left the building (Chuckle)! We are all here. You, me, Joe and Eric. By the way (again), where is this "hotel boy" Kirk? I wish him the best anyway. I miss his posts though.
Posted on Mon Aug 10, 2009
William W. in the Netherlands writes:
This morning heavy attack with 2 trucks in Bagdad! at least 50 dead! Possible reason: Would the kurds atttack the kurds? NO! Would the baath party attack? NO! Only explenation: The secret service of Irak!!!
Posted on Mon Aug 10, 2009
This morning heavy attack with 2 trucks in Bagdad! at least 50 dead! Possible reason: Would the kurds atttack the kurds? NO! Would the baath party attack? NO! Only explenation: The secret service of Irak!!!
Posted on Mon Aug 10, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- It was so good to see your posts today. I was getting very concerned about you. When I first started posting last year, all of you, Kirk, Eric, Joe in TN, and you, John, really were encouraging, even when we did not agree! I have missed your always gracious voice. I have been checking, at this site, hoping to find that you are all right. I am glad that you are "back". And you are wrong, John, we do need you. Take care. Best regards.
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
@ John in Greece -- It was so good to see your posts today. I was getting very concerned about you. When I first started posting last year, all of you, Kirk, Eric, Joe in TN, and you, John, really were encouraging, even when we did not agree! I have missed your always gracious voice. I have been checking, at this site, hoping to find that you are all right. I am glad that you are "back". And you are wrong, John, we do need you. Take care. Best regards.
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
Cutter in New York writes:
What do you mean by "reforming some of our entitlement programs?"
Fareed Zakaria/08.09.09
Please respond.
Regards,
Cutter
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
What do you mean by "reforming some of our entitlement programs?"
Fareed Zakaria/08.09.09
Please respond.
Regards,
Cutter
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
John in Greece writes:
At least, I'm trying!
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
At least, I'm trying!
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
Lev S. in Israel writes:
Hi, Please pass my open letter to President Barack Obama.
Dear Mr. President,
Over the past few months we are ever more frequently hearing about the US State Department's objections toward Israeli building in existing settlements (even those that have been established three to four decades ago) in general and in Jerusalem as well. In particular the negative commentary given in regards to building of a new house in East Jerusalem on private land owned by a private citizen who has received all the necessary municipal permits because of strange explanations to the effect that it would "upset the demographic character of the area".
Was it not just over one year ago on June 4, 2008 that you (at the time a senator and presidential candidate) delivered an inspiring speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in which you declared to all present that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided"?
What has happened in that short time since? In addition you and your staff from the State Department are continuously speaking about Israelis settlements as the main obstacle to peace. as if they did not exist then peace would instantly reign in this area. In your speech to AIPAC the word "settlements" is mentioned only once with your advice to Israel "to refrain from building new settlements -- as agreed with the Bush administration at Annapolis".
Personally I can attest to have been captivated by you during your presidential campaign. Your speeches were deeply inspiring, and gave a message of hope to many throughout the USA and indeed the world. "Yes we can" is a simple statement, a hope and a belief in a better world, and our individual and collective ability as nations to bring about much needed change to the good. But implicit in "Yes we can" is also the promise that "Yes we will do what we promised to do". Now is the time to convert those presidential campaign promises into action, in recognition to the words of Benjamin Franklin "Well done is better than well said".
Your strong promotion of the idea of two states for two nations may be commendable as a purely theoretical solution; however the reality of the situation is that today three states are needed for two nations if Hamas which is the de facto power in the Gaza strip is taken into account.
Having the U.S. object to building in Jerusalem and inside existing settlements to account for natural growth is sending to our adversaries precisely the very wrong message, and it practically guarantees greater intransigence and belligerency in the future. In searching for the solution to peace in our area it is of key importance to understand the internal thinking of Islam, and in particular radical Islam from their perspective, in order to avoid repeating some of the tragic mistakes made by the West in dealing with Iran before and after the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
In conclusion, I would like to recall a story about the Russian woman who asked Mr. Gorbachev: "Who invented communism -- Politicians or Scientists?"
Mr. Gorbachev replied that he was not sure but he thought that it was Politicians. The woman responded that she thought so as well, as scientists would have first experimented on mice, frogs, and only then tried it out on live people.
We should learn the lessons of history here, and tread slowly and cautiously so that we do not create irreparable damage with our very good intentions.
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
Hi, Please pass my open letter to President Barack Obama.
Dear Mr. President,
Over the past few months we are ever more frequently hearing about the US State Department's objections toward Israeli building in existing settlements (even those that have been established three to four decades ago) in general and in Jerusalem as well. In particular the negative commentary given in regards to building of a new house in East Jerusalem on private land owned by a private citizen who has received all the necessary municipal permits because of strange explanations to the effect that it would "upset the demographic character of the area".
Was it not just over one year ago on June 4, 2008 that you (at the time a senator and presidential candidate) delivered an inspiring speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in which you declared to all present that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided"?
What has happened in that short time since? In addition you and your staff from the State Department are continuously speaking about Israelis settlements as the main obstacle to peace. as if they did not exist then peace would instantly reign in this area. In your speech to AIPAC the word "settlements" is mentioned only once with your advice to Israel "to refrain from building new settlements -- as agreed with the Bush administration at Annapolis".
Personally I can attest to have been captivated by you during your presidential campaign. Your speeches were deeply inspiring, and gave a message of hope to many throughout the USA and indeed the world. "Yes we can" is a simple statement, a hope and a belief in a better world, and our individual and collective ability as nations to bring about much needed change to the good. But implicit in "Yes we can" is also the promise that "Yes we will do what we promised to do". Now is the time to convert those presidential campaign promises into action, in recognition to the words of Benjamin Franklin "Well done is better than well said".
Your strong promotion of the idea of two states for two nations may be commendable as a purely theoretical solution; however the reality of the situation is that today three states are needed for two nations if Hamas which is the de facto power in the Gaza strip is taken into account.
Having the U.S. object to building in Jerusalem and inside existing settlements to account for natural growth is sending to our adversaries precisely the very wrong message, and it practically guarantees greater intransigence and belligerency in the future. In searching for the solution to peace in our area it is of key importance to understand the internal thinking of Islam, and in particular radical Islam from their perspective, in order to avoid repeating some of the tragic mistakes made by the West in dealing with Iran before and after the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
In conclusion, I would like to recall a story about the Russian woman who asked Mr. Gorbachev: "Who invented communism -- Politicians or Scientists?"
Mr. Gorbachev replied that he was not sure but he thought that it was Politicians. The woman responded that she thought so as well, as scientists would have first experimented on mice, frogs, and only then tried it out on live people.
We should learn the lessons of history here, and tread slowly and cautiously so that we do not create irreparable damage with our very good intentions.
Posted on Sun Aug 09, 2009
Nate in California writes:
The black ground makes it very difficult to read this site. Can't you use a white ground and black print???
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
The black ground makes it very difficult to read this site. Can't you use a white ground and black print???
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
That's a heck of a long time to be running a fever, John.
Good to see you kicked out the infection, and that you're feeling better.
Generally antibiotics or acyclaveres tend to destroy all the good bacteria in your gut along with the infection, so if you've been on them and finished the course, I'd recomend yogurt w/ acidopholis culture to restore digestive balance.
By the way, the quote was "Less thinking...more sitting."
I have this tendancy to over analyze the path to enlightenment...(chuckle).
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
That's a heck of a long time to be running a fever, John.
Good to see you kicked out the infection, and that you're feeling better.
Generally antibiotics or acyclaveres tend to destroy all the good bacteria in your gut along with the infection, so if you've been on them and finished the course, I'd recomend yogurt w/ acidopholis culture to restore digestive balance.
By the way, the quote was "Less thinking...more sitting."
I have this tendancy to over analyze the path to enlightenment...(chuckle).
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Susan in Florida -- Coming Soon 2 DipNote (LOL!). Once again, thank you Susan for making me feel so special. However, Eric in NM is right, we are too old to get a "health clearance".
July was not a great month for me. For more than 20 days I had a fever problem. So, during my illness, I thought of his teacher's old saying: less writing, more sitting. Basically, I did it for security reasons. I wouldn't like to write something stupid due to my "fever illusions". So, I had to play "safe", as we say in billiards. Call it a respect for our great Blog. (You know, when you are ill, you may misunderstand things, especially if English is not your native).
I really appreciate your personal interest and I love you all in DipNpote. I will also attempt to catch up on the Bog postings and soon -- I wish -- I'll be back with more posts, although you do not need me, as long as DipNote's "writing-voices" are so spiritual anyway, with or without me.
Thanks again Susan.
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
@ Susan in Florida -- Coming Soon 2 DipNote (LOL!). Once again, thank you Susan for making me feel so special. However, Eric in NM is right, we are too old to get a "health clearance".
July was not a great month for me. For more than 20 days I had a fever problem. So, during my illness, I thought of his teacher's old saying: less writing, more sitting. Basically, I did it for security reasons. I wouldn't like to write something stupid due to my "fever illusions". So, I had to play "safe", as we say in billiards. Call it a respect for our great Blog. (You know, when you are ill, you may misunderstand things, especially if English is not your native).
I really appreciate your personal interest and I love you all in DipNpote. I will also attempt to catch up on the Bog postings and soon -- I wish -- I'll be back with more posts, although you do not need me, as long as DipNote's "writing-voices" are so spiritual anyway, with or without me.
Thanks again Susan.
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
Jaclyn in Pennsylvania writes:
This is such a great resource! Thank you all for your work on this. I particularly appreciate your tweets that have short summaries of what's going on and that don't necessarily link to articles. Keep up the good work!
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
This is such a great resource! Thank you all for your work on this. I particularly appreciate your tweets that have short summaries of what's going on and that don't necessarily link to articles. Keep up the good work!
Posted on Sat Aug 08, 2009
Michael in U.S.A. writes:
A Final Rule was posted in the Federal Register of 22 July 2009 with a new definition of what constitutes an 'immediate family member' for the purposes of issuing visas to foreign government officials. It looked like the U.S. Government was preparing to offer reciprocity to those foreign states that provided Vienna Convention privileges and immunities and employment authorization to unmarried opposite-sex and same-sex partners of U.S. Government officials assigned to those states, in accordance with Secretary Clinton's announcement of 18 June 2009. Is this the case? Or will State extend privileges and immunities only to unmarried opposite-sex partners (as it does now) and Homeland Security extend employment authorization only to those lawfully married and of opposite sex (as it does now?
Posted on Tue Aug 04, 2009
A Final Rule was posted in the Federal Register of 22 July 2009 with a new definition of what constitutes an 'immediate family member' for the purposes of issuing visas to foreign government officials. It looked like the U.S. Government was preparing to offer reciprocity to those foreign states that provided Vienna Convention privileges and immunities and employment authorization to unmarried opposite-sex and same-sex partners of U.S. Government officials assigned to those states, in accordance with Secretary Clinton's announcement of 18 June 2009. Is this the case? Or will State extend privileges and immunities only to unmarried opposite-sex partners (as it does now) and Homeland Security extend employment authorization only to those lawfully married and of opposite sex (as it does now?
Posted on Tue Aug 04, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ John in Greece -- Missing your posts again. I took a short vacation and am now catching up on the blog postings. I hope all is well with you. I miss your thoughtful voice. Best regards.
Posted on Thu Jul 30, 2009
@ John in Greece -- Missing your posts again. I took a short vacation and am now catching up on the blog postings. I hope all is well with you. I miss your thoughtful voice. Best regards.
Posted on Thu Jul 30, 2009
Cynthia in Oregon writes:
Dear Mr. Wood,
Thank you and everyone at State who maintains the encyclopedic, invaluable resource that is state.gov and DipNote.
Sadly, I do not read DipNote except when a particularly pertinent note is posted -- or when it's forwarded to me -- because reading white type on a black background is terrible on the eyes, especially if you must read all day, which I do.
Would you please consider switching to the more traditional black type on white, or perhaps a subtle gray background? Or, as some bloggers do, make it possible to select the b-on-w version.
Thanks again
Posted on Mon Jul 27, 2009
Dear Mr. Wood,
Thank you and everyone at State who maintains the encyclopedic, invaluable resource that is state.gov and DipNote.
Sadly, I do not read DipNote except when a particularly pertinent note is posted -- or when it's forwarded to me -- because reading white type on a black background is terrible on the eyes, especially if you must read all day, which I do.
Would you please consider switching to the more traditional black type on white, or perhaps a subtle gray background? Or, as some bloggers do, make it possible to select the b-on-w version.
Thanks again
Posted on Mon Jul 27, 2009
Jary in North Carolina writes:
I just read an article by Fox News regarding the Islamic Supremacist group "Hizb-ut-Tahrir". It states how the group actively recruits terrorists and advocates terrorist acts. Additionally, the article states that the group is not even on the terror watch list. I'm in disbelief and completely apalled that such an organization like this one is permitted to operate so freely on our own soil. I can only hope that our government is taking measures to protect us from this threat. As a member of the military, it sickens me to think that my friends die overseas fighting terrorism simply to have terrorists freely operating and recruiting on the homeland.
Posted on Sat Jul 18, 2009
I just read an article by Fox News regarding the Islamic Supremacist group "Hizb-ut-Tahrir". It states how the group actively recruits terrorists and advocates terrorist acts. Additionally, the article states that the group is not even on the terror watch list. I'm in disbelief and completely apalled that such an organization like this one is permitted to operate so freely on our own soil. I can only hope that our government is taking measures to protect us from this threat. As a member of the military, it sickens me to think that my friends die overseas fighting terrorism simply to have terrorists freely operating and recruiting on the homeland.
Posted on Sat Jul 18, 2009
Robert in North Carolina writes:
Please read Mary Anastasia O'Grady's commentary on the Opinion Page of today's Wall Street Journal. It seems that Honduras did not have a Military Coup as all the news journalist wrote on the front page of our local newspaper and on the front page of the WSJ. The Military was simply carrying out an order from the Honduran Supreme Court.
Posted on Mon Jun 29, 2009
Please read Mary Anastasia O'Grady's commentary on the Opinion Page of today's Wall Street Journal. It seems that Honduras did not have a Military Coup as all the news journalist wrote on the front page of our local newspaper and on the front page of the WSJ. The Military was simply carrying out an order from the Honduran Supreme Court.
Posted on Mon Jun 29, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@John in Greece--
I was just going to say the same thing to you that you said to Kirk in KY! I must be missing your posts. I was concerned about you. It was so good to see your post to Kirk from yesterday. I always appreciate your comments. I hope all is well with you. Best regards. What has become of Kirk?! I hope he is okay, too.
Posted on Sun Jun 28, 2009
@John in Greece--
I was just going to say the same thing to you that you said to Kirk in KY! I must be missing your posts. I was concerned about you. It was so good to see your post to Kirk from yesterday. I always appreciate your comments. I hope all is well with you. Best regards. What has become of Kirk?! I hope he is okay, too.
Posted on Sun Jun 28, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Kirk in KY -- What has become of you KY? I miss your excellent posts and analysis.
I hope you are dong fine! I wish you the best!
Al's voice: we need you here! (although 4-5 staff... great brains though)
Best regards my dear friend Kirk!
Looking forward to "read" from you.
Posted on Sat Jun 27, 2009
@ Kirk in KY -- What has become of you KY? I miss your excellent posts and analysis.
I hope you are dong fine! I wish you the best!
Al's voice: we need you here! (although 4-5 staff... great brains though)
Best regards my dear friend Kirk!
Looking forward to "read" from you.
Posted on Sat Jun 27, 2009
David in Wisconsin writes:
Dear Madame Secretary:
You're doing a fantastic job and I wish you a speedy recovery.
Kind regards.
Posted on Sat Jun 20, 2009
Dear Madame Secretary:
You're doing a fantastic job and I wish you a speedy recovery.
Kind regards.
Posted on Sat Jun 20, 2009
Ari in Hawaii writes:
Dear State Department Peoples et al,
ShALOHA from Hawaii.
Thanks for inviting me into the discussions herein.
They're great fun!
G-d Bless Team Obama, Sec. Dr. Clinton and let's CHANGE the World for the better- AMEN,
Ari, BS, MD, MPH, MPA/MC
Harvard '08 & YAle '95
Kailu-Kona, Hawaii
Posted on Sat Jun 20, 2009
Dear State Department Peoples et al,
ShALOHA from Hawaii.
Thanks for inviting me into the discussions herein.
They're great fun!
G-d Bless Team Obama, Sec. Dr. Clinton and let's CHANGE the World for the better- AMEN,
Ari, BS, MD, MPH, MPA/MC
Harvard '08 & YAle '95
Kailu-Kona, Hawaii
Posted on Sat Jun 20, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
Wanted to send a "get well soon" card to Sec. Clinton, but I'll just post it on the blog.
Dear Madame Secretary,
I hear you broke your funny bone and it's no laughing matter. I wish you speedy and full recovery from surgery and I have a couple suggestions that might make life easier.
a) Don't eat the hospital food, have your friends smuggle in something edible if your there overnight.
b) Think of this as a long weekend where your priorty is making you better rather than making the world better, as it will be definately be here waiting for you as surely as the sun will rise this morning.
c) There will be the customary cast signing event when you come back in to work Monday, but ask the employees to leave some room on the plaster for signatures of heads of state who will most certainly wish to pay their respects.
Sorry to hear about this unfortunate accident, I wish you all the best, and thanks for serving.
EJ
Posted on Thu Jun 18, 2009
Wanted to send a "get well soon" card to Sec. Clinton, but I'll just post it on the blog.
Dear Madame Secretary,
I hear you broke your funny bone and it's no laughing matter. I wish you speedy and full recovery from surgery and I have a couple suggestions that might make life easier.
a) Don't eat the hospital food, have your friends smuggle in something edible if your there overnight.
b) Think of this as a long weekend where your priorty is making you better rather than making the world better, as it will be definately be here waiting for you as surely as the sun will rise this morning.
c) There will be the customary cast signing event when you come back in to work Monday, but ask the employees to leave some room on the plaster for signatures of heads of state who will most certainly wish to pay their respects.
Sorry to hear about this unfortunate accident, I wish you all the best, and thanks for serving.
EJ
Posted on Thu Jun 18, 2009
John in Greece writes:
Some minutes ago, I watched on local TV news Mr. H. W. Bush's skydiving. Even this, in his 85, proves why he is still one of the most intelligent brains in the globe.
He is not only sharp, he is always ALIVE!
Happy Birthday Mr. President!
In God I trust (and I wish) that I will also watch you skydiving in 2014, 2019, 2024!
Posted on Sat Jun 13, 2009
Some minutes ago, I watched on local TV news Mr. H. W. Bush's skydiving. Even this, in his 85, proves why he is still one of the most intelligent brains in the globe.
He is not only sharp, he is always ALIVE!
Happy Birthday Mr. President!
In God I trust (and I wish) that I will also watch you skydiving in 2014, 2019, 2024!
Posted on Sat Jun 13, 2009
Angie in Wisconsin writes:
I am writing about those two female journalists in North Korea and their sentence to long years of hard labor. I read a book about labor camps that sent chills down my spine. It is titled, "The Great Divide" by T.Davis Bunn. Granted, it is fictional BUT the author is an intelligent and well-educated man: "taught international finance in Switzerland, worked in Africa and the Middle East, and was named managing director of an international business advisory group Based in Dusseldorf..." I have to believe he knows what he's talking about and this book gives "fictional" insight into labor camps eg "factories" in China and what happened to a Georgetown student doing an investigation. This is situation is sooooooooooo not good. I just wanted to share this book in case people would like to get some insight into what these women may face. What a mess.....Prayers to ALL...Angie
Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009
I am writing about those two female journalists in North Korea and their sentence to long years of hard labor. I read a book about labor camps that sent chills down my spine. It is titled, "The Great Divide" by T.Davis Bunn. Granted, it is fictional BUT the author is an intelligent and well-educated man: "taught international finance in Switzerland, worked in Africa and the Middle East, and was named managing director of an international business advisory group Based in Dusseldorf..." I have to believe he knows what he's talking about and this book gives "fictional" insight into labor camps eg "factories" in China and what happened to a Georgetown student doing an investigation. This is situation is sooooooooooo not good. I just wanted to share this book in case people would like to get some insight into what these women may face. What a mess.....Prayers to ALL...Angie
Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009
Oreste in Arizona writes:
this state says one can learn to do most anything in a few short months(3/4); not years of college. sincerely pat...ciochetto
Posted on Thu May 28, 2009
this state says one can learn to do most anything in a few short months(3/4); not years of college. sincerely pat...ciochetto
Posted on Thu May 28, 2009
Oreste in Arizona writes:
by the time i found a place to post a comment to any government official, i forgot what the comment was
Posted on Thu May 28, 2009
by the time i found a place to post a comment to any government official, i forgot what the comment was
Posted on Thu May 28, 2009
Ronaldo in Brazil writes:
Congratulations! Keep going. You doing well.
I'ts a pleasure to be here to.
I would like to know,if i'ts possible to have a official America flag? I need to post in my international company, here in Brasil.
Thank's.
Best Regard.
Posted on Sat May 16, 2009
Congratulations! Keep going. You doing well.
I'ts a pleasure to be here to.
I would like to know,if i'ts possible to have a official America flag? I need to post in my international company, here in Brasil.
Thank's.
Best Regard.
Posted on Sat May 16, 2009
Bill in Washington writes:
First, Kashmir! There should be significant signs of progress towards resolution within six months. Let's see, shall we?
BH
Posted on Fri May 15, 2009
First, Kashmir! There should be significant signs of progress towards resolution within six months. Let's see, shall we?
BH
Posted on Fri May 15, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
Just a quick note to say thanks to Mr. Robert Wood for his informative sense of humor he brought to the briefing room.
All the best in your future assignments.
And welcome to Mr. Ian Kelly, The new spokesman for DoS.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Dipnote, sir!
Posted on Mon May 11, 2009
Just a quick note to say thanks to Mr. Robert Wood for his informative sense of humor he brought to the briefing room.
All the best in your future assignments.
And welcome to Mr. Ian Kelly, The new spokesman for DoS.
Welcome to the wonderful world of Dipnote, sir!
Posted on Mon May 11, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
To: State Dept/OBO division
RE: How to earn OSHA's amazement on construction projects, and save a buck.
One of the primary pollutants on any construction project will be gyspsum dust from sanding sheetrock mud in the surface finishing of walls, ceilings, etc..
Little trade secret I learned working around stuff that was worth more than my salary for a year...
Take a scotchbright pad, sponge backed, and a bucket of water and use a damp pad to "wet sand" the walls instead of sandpaper and the typical dry method.
Your contractor will have just saved 90% of his cleanup time, from airborn gypsum on site.
OSHA will love you for it.
EJ
Posted on Wed May 06, 2009
To: State Dept/OBO division
RE: How to earn OSHA's amazement on construction projects, and save a buck.
One of the primary pollutants on any construction project will be gyspsum dust from sanding sheetrock mud in the surface finishing of walls, ceilings, etc..
Little trade secret I learned working around stuff that was worth more than my salary for a year...
Take a scotchbright pad, sponge backed, and a bucket of water and use a damp pad to "wet sand" the walls instead of sandpaper and the typical dry method.
Your contractor will have just saved 90% of his cleanup time, from airborn gypsum on site.
OSHA will love you for it.
EJ
Posted on Wed May 06, 2009
Patricia S. in New York writes:
Like the "green theme" for Earth Day. Hope more color will be incorporated on the site. Good to see Mr. R. Wood on television the other night. This site is wonderful and keeps winning new fans daily. Thank you.
Posted on Wed Apr 22, 2009
Like the "green theme" for Earth Day. Hope more color will be incorporated on the site. Good to see Mr. R. Wood on television the other night. This site is wonderful and keeps winning new fans daily. Thank you.
Posted on Wed Apr 22, 2009
John in Greece writes:
Great change of colors Dipnote staff! Fresh and good balanced, in great accordance with the black background in order to give some "light" to all these art suggestions in the past, concerning black.
However, let me be honest, black and white was great too, on the ground that people who really know "DipComputers" can understand what black&white; "means" for those who use white code on a black screen, all of which is a mysterious platform for creating the perfect art balance for a diplomatic intellectual dialogue. Designers cannot understand this "code" artistic feeling.
Anyway, our "green" now is good too. The only thing I strongly disagree with (design/art/communicational wise) is the selected image concept of the central Dipnote "Logo" at the Home Page. DipNote is not an ecological site, but a diplomatic one. The impression I first got is like visiting "Greenpeace" by mistake.
-I mean, this is certainly something that has nothing to do with the spiritual, founding "co id" of the Blog (of course we love "Eco", though). But, the Blog is Dip? and I think that the head logo should also be "diplomatic".
Except if this is a "special event Blog logo" due to the topic: "Climate change", which I would find it extremely clever then -- I mean special banners -- some times, but not this one permanently. Of course then, you'll have color problems to bring "green" in accordance with the special subjects.
I wish I won't be misunderstood again on this too, 'cause it's getting "fashion". (Chuckle)
@ Susan in Florida -- I absolutely agree with you that Robert Wood and DOS Dipnote staff are doing a GREAT JOB!!! state.gov too, I really loved this "call the Sec idea", among others. Both sites are extremely better than before. That's why I'm trying to "help" (my way), although I may be wrong.
REALLY GREAT JOB guys!
Posted on Wed Apr 22, 2009
Great change of colors Dipnote staff! Fresh and good balanced, in great accordance with the black background in order to give some "light" to all these art suggestions in the past, concerning black.
However, let me be honest, black and white was great too, on the ground that people who really know "DipComputers" can understand what black&white; "means" for those who use white code on a black screen, all of which is a mysterious platform for creating the perfect art balance for a diplomatic intellectual dialogue. Designers cannot understand this "code" artistic feeling.
Anyway, our "green" now is good too. The only thing I strongly disagree with (design/art/communicational wise) is the selected image concept of the central Dipnote "Logo" at the Home Page. DipNote is not an ecological site, but a diplomatic one. The impression I first got is like visiting "Greenpeace" by mistake.
-I mean, this is certainly something that has nothing to do with the spiritual, founding "co id" of the Blog (of course we love "Eco", though). But, the Blog is Dip? and I think that the head logo should also be "diplomatic".
Except if this is a "special event Blog logo" due to the topic: "Climate change", which I would find it extremely clever then -- I mean special banners -- some times, but not this one permanently. Of course then, you'll have color problems to bring "green" in accordance with the special subjects.
I wish I won't be misunderstood again on this too, 'cause it's getting "fashion". (Chuckle)
@ Susan in Florida -- I absolutely agree with you that Robert Wood and DOS Dipnote staff are doing a GREAT JOB!!! state.gov too, I really loved this "call the Sec idea", among others. Both sites are extremely better than before. That's why I'm trying to "help" (my way), although I may be wrong.
REALLY GREAT JOB guys!
Posted on Wed Apr 22, 2009
Karen S. in New York writes:
Please do all that you can for Roxana Saberi. It is important that she be freed as soon as possible.
On an unrelated note, I'm so glad that you're our Secretary of State but I miss you as our NY State Senator!
Posted on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Please do all that you can for Roxana Saberi. It is important that she be freed as soon as possible.
On an unrelated note, I'm so glad that you're our Secretary of State but I miss you as our NY State Senator!
Posted on Fri Apr 17, 2009
Susan in Florida writes:
@ Robert Wood and DOS Dipnote staff -- You have done an outstanding job with the blog. It is better than ever! Thank you for the informative and interactive postings. Love the question of the week! I look forward to it each Friday. Your hard work is appreciated.
Posted on Thu Apr 16, 2009
@ Robert Wood and DOS Dipnote staff -- You have done an outstanding job with the blog. It is better than ever! Thank you for the informative and interactive postings. Love the question of the week! I look forward to it each Friday. Your hard work is appreciated.
Posted on Thu Apr 16, 2009
Kathy in Virginia writes:
Great job Secretary Clinton. I am so proud of your efforts for the U.S.A. Your statements are always thoughtful, intelligent and reflect what American is about -- cooperation and leadership. Plus you look like you are really enjoying the job. P. S. I am a registered Independent.
Thank you.
Posted on Thu Apr 16, 2009
Great job Secretary Clinton. I am so proud of your efforts for the U.S.A. Your statements are always thoughtful, intelligent and reflect what American is about -- cooperation and leadership. Plus you look like you are really enjoying the job. P. S. I am a registered Independent.
Thank you.
Posted on Thu Apr 16, 2009
Olayinka in Belize writes:
I am very interested in volunteering my time to serve this Great nation.
Thanks.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
I am very interested in volunteering my time to serve this Great nation.
Thanks.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Irina in FYROM -- I also wish that Madame Secretary Clinton will visit FYROM and Greece soon. After all, hopefully, we should reach a final decision concerning the naming dispute.
Of course this means that all sides (Greece, FYROM, UN and U.S.A.) will accept a common decided name that will open the road for new collaboration horizons.
I do not personally feel like engaging in this childish -- according to my opinion -- "name discussion", but I honestly wish that both sides will soon reach a positive level of common understanding that will peacefully and civilized lead them to the new millennium within NATO and the other International Organizations.
Nevertheless, this vision has prerequisites: less nationalism and fanaticism from both sides and more dialogue and collaboration, especially when we discuss with the international mediators.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
@ Irina in FYROM -- I also wish that Madame Secretary Clinton will visit FYROM and Greece soon. After all, hopefully, we should reach a final decision concerning the naming dispute.
Of course this means that all sides (Greece, FYROM, UN and U.S.A.) will accept a common decided name that will open the road for new collaboration horizons.
I do not personally feel like engaging in this childish -- according to my opinion -- "name discussion", but I honestly wish that both sides will soon reach a positive level of common understanding that will peacefully and civilized lead them to the new millennium within NATO and the other International Organizations.
Nevertheless, this vision has prerequisites: less nationalism and fanaticism from both sides and more dialogue and collaboration, especially when we discuss with the international mediators.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
Mike in Virginia writes:
What is the average waiting period for a secret security clearance?
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Mike in Virginia -- Civil Service positions in the U.S. Department of State require at least a secret security clearance. Investigations usually take two to four months.
For those applying to the Foreign Service, candidates who pass the oral assessment must apply for the security clearance required for appointment to the Foreign Service.
You can read more about becoming a Foreign Service Officer and the Civil Service selection process at careers.state.gov.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
What is the average waiting period for a secret security clearance?
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Mike in Virginia -- Civil Service positions in the U.S. Department of State require at least a secret security clearance. Investigations usually take two to four months.
For those applying to the Foreign Service, candidates who pass the oral assessment must apply for the security clearance required for appointment to the Foreign Service.
You can read more about becoming a Foreign Service Officer and the Civil Service selection process at careers.state.gov.
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
Irina in Macedonia writes:
Dear Maddame Clinton, are you going to visit Macedonia soon, maybe this year?
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
Dear Maddame Clinton, are you going to visit Macedonia soon, maybe this year?
Posted on Tue Apr 07, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
To Robert Wood, and Sec. of State Clinton:
The State Department has made a decision to make an Iraqi translator, Jasim, wait another three years for a visa. One of the reasons that the denial was issued was that, Jasim, as part of the Kurdish Peshmerga, infiltrated Uday Hussein's organization to steal data and then stole Uday's car to escape. He was captured, tortured, and then released six years later when Saddam let all the prisoners go on the eve of the Invasion in 2003.
The theft of Uday's car is looked upon as criminal and not political.
"On several occasions while our guys were putting rounds down range, Jasim put himself in harm's way to pull the wounded out and treat them," Keene said. "Jasim is a hero to everyone he has ever met."
After the invasion, Jasim became a legendary translator, assisting above and beyond.
"I owe my life to Jasim ... hands down," said Master Sgt. Jason Krieger, who went on over 200 combat patrols with Jasim. "I consider him a brother, not only in arms, but in love as well."
For six years, Jasim has put his life on the line to help our troops. His stepbrother paid the ultimate price for Jasim's heroism.
Jasim said his stepbrother, in fact, was captured in the fall of 2007 and was tortured to death in an effort to get to him. The U.S. Army officer who received and processed the report on the murder, Major Leslie Parks, told FOXNews.com that Jasim's stepbrother was tortured with an electric drill through his eyes.
So his application had letters of recommendation;
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/040209_translator1.pdf
, awards and certifications from soldiers;
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/040209_translator2.pdf
, and the DoD and DHS approval.
Full story here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512422,00.html
---
Madam Secretary, Mr. Wood,
There are times when exceptional valor requires exceptional recognition and I strongly suggest you look into this personally with the intent to nominate the above individual for this nation's highest civilian award, the Medal of Freedom.
If it requires direct approval by the President himself to issue a visa to the man at this point, then it should be granted in parallel to the award. Not just a visa, but full citizenship in my opinion. Jasim has certainly earned this.
Thanks for your consideration in this matter.
EJ
Posted on Sat Apr 04, 2009
To Robert Wood, and Sec. of State Clinton:
The State Department has made a decision to make an Iraqi translator, Jasim, wait another three years for a visa. One of the reasons that the denial was issued was that, Jasim, as part of the Kurdish Peshmerga, infiltrated Uday Hussein's organization to steal data and then stole Uday's car to escape. He was captured, tortured, and then released six years later when Saddam let all the prisoners go on the eve of the Invasion in 2003.
The theft of Uday's car is looked upon as criminal and not political.
"On several occasions while our guys were putting rounds down range, Jasim put himself in harm's way to pull the wounded out and treat them," Keene said. "Jasim is a hero to everyone he has ever met."
After the invasion, Jasim became a legendary translator, assisting above and beyond.
"I owe my life to Jasim ... hands down," said Master Sgt. Jason Krieger, who went on over 200 combat patrols with Jasim. "I consider him a brother, not only in arms, but in love as well."
For six years, Jasim has put his life on the line to help our troops. His stepbrother paid the ultimate price for Jasim's heroism.
Jasim said his stepbrother, in fact, was captured in the fall of 2007 and was tortured to death in an effort to get to him. The U.S. Army officer who received and processed the report on the murder, Major Leslie Parks, told FOXNews.com that Jasim's stepbrother was tortured with an electric drill through his eyes.
So his application had letters of recommendation;
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/040209_translator1.pdf
, awards and certifications from soldiers;
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/040209_translator2.pdf
, and the DoD and DHS approval.
Full story here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512422,00.html
---
Madam Secretary, Mr. Wood,
There are times when exceptional valor requires exceptional recognition and I strongly suggest you look into this personally with the intent to nominate the above individual for this nation's highest civilian award, the Medal of Freedom.
If it requires direct approval by the President himself to issue a visa to the man at this point, then it should be granted in parallel to the award. Not just a visa, but full citizenship in my opinion. Jasim has certainly earned this.
Thanks for your consideration in this matter.
EJ
Posted on Sat Apr 04, 2009
John in Greece writes:
Once again West has to face a N. Korea threat. This time they called it a ""com-sat"". Can anybody help me out with my query. Where do they find this kind of tech and IT materials?
Which are the countries helping them by providing knowledge and ""silicon accessories""?
Because, I suspect that some countries (China?, Russia?) play a double role.
By the way, I hope that they do not watch my computer, as the recent news revealed about this strange ""IT base"" in China which had buged people and embassies around the world. However, in case they do, I have to say to them: ������������ (You will never obtain it) -- wishing the free internet translator worked OK (Chuckle & LOL)
Posted on Sun Mar 29, 2009
Once again West has to face a N. Korea threat. This time they called it a ""com-sat"". Can anybody help me out with my query. Where do they find this kind of tech and IT materials?
Which are the countries helping them by providing knowledge and ""silicon accessories""?
Because, I suspect that some countries (China?, Russia?) play a double role.
By the way, I hope that they do not watch my computer, as the recent news revealed about this strange ""IT base"" in China which had buged people and embassies around the world. However, in case they do, I have to say to them: ������������ (You will never obtain it) -- wishing the free internet translator worked OK (Chuckle & LOL)
Posted on Sun Mar 29, 2009
Marla M. in Washington writes:
President Obama, The crisis in Darfur is dire. We need you to take swift action. Please discuss the following with Special Envoy Gration:
1. Support the ICC and the indictment of al-Bashir
2. Ensure the protection of the innocent civilians of Darfur and provide adequate support to the UNAMID Peacekeeping mission.
3. Work with other nations to create a road map for peace in Darfur and Sudan with multilateral pressure points and incentives.
4. Prepare a credible range of options for the use of military force to protect civilians and ensure the unobstructed delivery of humanitarian assistance.
Posted on Thu Mar 26, 2009
President Obama, The crisis in Darfur is dire. We need you to take swift action. Please discuss the following with Special Envoy Gration:
1. Support the ICC and the indictment of al-Bashir
2. Ensure the protection of the innocent civilians of Darfur and provide adequate support to the UNAMID Peacekeeping mission.
3. Work with other nations to create a road map for peace in Darfur and Sudan with multilateral pressure points and incentives.
4. Prepare a credible range of options for the use of military force to protect civilians and ensure the unobstructed delivery of humanitarian assistance.
Posted on Thu Mar 26, 2009
George in Hungary writes:
We seek partners in engaging with Islamists in Eastern Europe and beyond.
Posted on Tue Mar 24, 2009
We seek partners in engaging with Islamists in Eastern Europe and beyond.
Posted on Tue Mar 24, 2009
Scott in New York writes:
Ending the war in Afghanistan on our own terms:
The recent surge in poppy production has to be dealt with in new and novel ways that play to our strengths and not to the Taliban's.
As NATO contemplates a renewed attack on the embedded Taliban -- a surge which has already cost hundreds of innocent Afghan lives as well as those of our own troops -- it's worth asking if there is not another way; another way to curb the Taliban influence that does not involve killing people.
History is helpful. In the 1970s, Turkey was the largest supplier of heroin in the world. Then the United States got smart and started buying the poppy crop -- we still do. The government sold it to U.S. pharmaceutical firms to make legitimate drugs -- after all, there are no bad plants, only bad uses for plants. The drug cartel lost control of Turkey and today Turkey is one of our staunchest allies in the Middle East. We later tried a similar approach in India with good results.
From the CIA world fact site we know that the GDP of Afghanistan in 2006 was something under $40 billion. Today, over half the GDP of Afghanistan is tied up in poppy production in some way, and is controlled by rogue warlords who channel profits directly to the Taliban -- some $100 million a year. This is an extremely lucrative business and there is nothing even remotely comparable in that region of the world. Sixty percent of Taliban income comes directly from poppy production.
On the other hand, growing food is either uneconomic for the average afghan farmer, or is outright forbidden -- at the point of a gun -- by the Taliban militia who control the rural regions.
Instead of fighting the Afghan farmer, who is caught in an impossible position, we should buy the crop -- all of it -- from him. This would:
A. End 60% of Taliban income immediately.
B. Put us on the side of the Afghan farmer instead of making us just one of his several enemies. Hearts and minds...
C. Put a serious dent in the heroin trade - a concern also for Russia and Europe, who blame us for the escalation of their drug problem.
D. Allow us to influence the Afghanistan people by becoming their respectful partner instead of their bullying enemy (there is something extremely unseemly about a country of our size, might, and moral stature, going around burning fields and dropping bombs on subsistence farmers in a desperately poor country. Obama may recognize this intuitively, but mollifying words have to be backed up with concrete action).
Eventually, we need to encourage Afghans to grow food instead of Poppy plants. We should pay a 10% premium over the market price for poppy, for food staples. By finally establishing a middle class of farmers, shopkeepers, and other distributors, supported by microloans, we would cut the Taliban off at the knees. And by supplying a profit motive, the new middle class would be encouraged to form militias or to finally build up the Afghan army to protect themselves against the Taliban -- who, despite popular perception, are largely loathed by the average Afghan citizen. As President Obama has publicly stated, you build a Democracy from the bottom up, not from the top down. We have a chance to do this in a way that is cheaper, far less violent, and far more effective than the shoot and burn approach we've tried thus far.
There are other answers to the Afghan situation, if people are willing to examine history and to break out of idealogical molds. We need to play to our strengths, not to the Taliban's. In a game of attrition, history shows that those who try to forcefully bend Afghanistan to their will, eventually lose.
Posted on Mon Mar 23, 2009
Ending the war in Afghanistan on our own terms:
The recent surge in poppy production has to be dealt with in new and novel ways that play to our strengths and not to the Taliban's.
As NATO contemplates a renewed attack on the embedded Taliban -- a surge which has already cost hundreds of innocent Afghan lives as well as those of our own troops -- it's worth asking if there is not another way; another way to curb the Taliban influence that does not involve killing people.
History is helpful. In the 1970s, Turkey was the largest supplier of heroin in the world. Then the United States got smart and started buying the poppy crop -- we still do. The government sold it to U.S. pharmaceutical firms to make legitimate drugs -- after all, there are no bad plants, only bad uses for plants. The drug cartel lost control of Turkey and today Turkey is one of our staunchest allies in the Middle East. We later tried a similar approach in India with good results.
From the CIA world fact site we know that the GDP of Afghanistan in 2006 was something under $40 billion. Today, over half the GDP of Afghanistan is tied up in poppy production in some way, and is controlled by rogue warlords who channel profits directly to the Taliban -- some $100 million a year. This is an extremely lucrative business and there is nothing even remotely comparable in that region of the world. Sixty percent of Taliban income comes directly from poppy production.
On the other hand, growing food is either uneconomic for the average afghan farmer, or is outright forbidden -- at the point of a gun -- by the Taliban militia who control the rural regions.
Instead of fighting the Afghan farmer, who is caught in an impossible position, we should buy the crop -- all of it -- from him. This would:
A. End 60% of Taliban income immediately.
B. Put us on the side of the Afghan farmer instead of making us just one of his several enemies. Hearts and minds...
C. Put a serious dent in the heroin trade - a concern also for Russia and Europe, who blame us for the escalation of their drug problem.
D. Allow us to influence the Afghanistan people by becoming their respectful partner instead of their bullying enemy (there is something extremely unseemly about a country of our size, might, and moral stature, going around burning fields and dropping bombs on subsistence farmers in a desperately poor country. Obama may recognize this intuitively, but mollifying words have to be backed up with concrete action).
Eventually, we need to encourage Afghans to grow food instead of Poppy plants. We should pay a 10% premium over the market price for poppy, for food staples. By finally establishing a middle class of farmers, shopkeepers, and other distributors, supported by microloans, we would cut the Taliban off at the knees. And by supplying a profit motive, the new middle class would be encouraged to form militias or to finally build up the Afghan army to protect themselves against the Taliban -- who, despite popular perception, are largely loathed by the average Afghan citizen. As President Obama has publicly stated, you build a Democracy from the bottom up, not from the top down. We have a chance to do this in a way that is cheaper, far less violent, and far more effective than the shoot and burn approach we've tried thus far.
There are other answers to the Afghan situation, if people are willing to examine history and to break out of idealogical molds. We need to play to our strengths, not to the Taliban's. In a game of attrition, history shows that those who try to forcefully bend Afghanistan to their will, eventually lose.
Posted on Mon Mar 23, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ DipNote Bloggers -- Thank you very much for your reply that actually was proved "added value." I surfed a bit the local U.S. Embassy's official site and I found a new great link, I did not know about it until recently.
http://www.buyusa.gov/home
Of course this has nothing to do with FSN positions, but I think that people from all over the world can trace "golden" -private sector- commercial ideas, concerning successful products, services etc.
You "co-DipNoters" who are interested in doing successful new business, I strongly recommend you to seize the opportunity and hit the above link. You will find great business ideas!!!
Posted on Wed Mar 18, 2009
@ DipNote Bloggers -- Thank you very much for your reply that actually was proved "added value." I surfed a bit the local U.S. Embassy's official site and I found a new great link, I did not know about it until recently.
http://www.buyusa.gov/home
Of course this has nothing to do with FSN positions, but I think that people from all over the world can trace "golden" -private sector- commercial ideas, concerning successful products, services etc.
You "co-DipNoters" who are interested in doing successful new business, I strongly recommend you to seize the opportunity and hit the above link. You will find great business ideas!!!
Posted on Wed Mar 18, 2009
Sarah A. in Virginia writes:
secretary clinton:
around february 23, 2009, you, secretary clinton, pledged $900m to the palestinians to rebuild gaza after the israeli invasion. what is wrong with this picture? we sell weapons to israel to use to invade gaza, then we turn around and give the palestinians $900m to clean up the wreckage. to say the least, economically, this is crazy. morally, this is wrong because this only perpetuates war and killing. as secretary of state, i would hope that you would have a better solution. palestine does need aid, but this is a short term and bad solution.
please rethink your position on israel and palestine. israel is wrong to continue to harass, demean, kill, and take the palestinian lands. simply put, look at this scenario, if i make my neighbor angry because i tell him to quit parking in the middle of my back yard, he refuses and says that i have a shady back yard, which he wants, so i let the air out of his tires. he then burns my house down. my two children are hurt in the fire and put in wheelchairs for life. the state department feels sorry for me and fixes my house. the neighbor sees that i have a new house and the back yard is even more inviting so the neighbor decides to use the parking again. what can i say? i let the air out of the tires again and on and on and on, is this a "grown up" solution to a problem? i don't think so.
i will also be sending a letter to my senator and congressman to ask them to do more than give $900m to the palestinians. we need a solution, you are covering for a spoiled child (israel) by paying off the damaged party (palestine). we need a better solution.
thank you for rethinking this problem in the middle east.
Posted on Tue Mar 17, 2009
secretary clinton:
around february 23, 2009, you, secretary clinton, pledged $900m to the palestinians to rebuild gaza after the israeli invasion. what is wrong with this picture? we sell weapons to israel to use to invade gaza, then we turn around and give the palestinians $900m to clean up the wreckage. to say the least, economically, this is crazy. morally, this is wrong because this only perpetuates war and killing. as secretary of state, i would hope that you would have a better solution. palestine does need aid, but this is a short term and bad solution.
please rethink your position on israel and palestine. israel is wrong to continue to harass, demean, kill, and take the palestinian lands. simply put, look at this scenario, if i make my neighbor angry because i tell him to quit parking in the middle of my back yard, he refuses and says that i have a shady back yard, which he wants, so i let the air out of his tires. he then burns my house down. my two children are hurt in the fire and put in wheelchairs for life. the state department feels sorry for me and fixes my house. the neighbor sees that i have a new house and the back yard is even more inviting so the neighbor decides to use the parking again. what can i say? i let the air out of the tires again and on and on and on, is this a "grown up" solution to a problem? i don't think so.
i will also be sending a letter to my senator and congressman to ask them to do more than give $900m to the palestinians. we need a solution, you are covering for a spoiled child (israel) by paying off the damaged party (palestine). we need a better solution.
thank you for rethinking this problem in the middle east.
Posted on Tue Mar 17, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Luke, thanks for the feedback. I was intending to go beyond the interactive aspects of "public followup" to daily briefings.
Basicly when I wake up in the morning, I grab a cup of joe and brouse the news like so many others, then I turn to Dipnote and the daily brief to see what we're doing about it.
Now being that the daily brief is a slice of daily life, dipnote will stay "up to the minute" with current events, and will be more readable and generate more readership when folks realize they can get their info directly from the source, as well as interact with it.
As a citizen trying to make sense of it all, the daily brief has been an invaluable asset to my understanding for the last decade on a daily basis.
And it is an essential part of creating " A well informed public ".
It's inclusion on Dipnote just seemed to me to be a natural evolutionary step in Dipnote's public role to this effect.
Best Regards,
EJ
Posted on Sun Mar 15, 2009
@ Luke, thanks for the feedback. I was intending to go beyond the interactive aspects of "public followup" to daily briefings.
Basicly when I wake up in the morning, I grab a cup of joe and brouse the news like so many others, then I turn to Dipnote and the daily brief to see what we're doing about it.
Now being that the daily brief is a slice of daily life, dipnote will stay "up to the minute" with current events, and will be more readable and generate more readership when folks realize they can get their info directly from the source, as well as interact with it.
As a citizen trying to make sense of it all, the daily brief has been an invaluable asset to my understanding for the last decade on a daily basis.
And it is an essential part of creating " A well informed public ".
It's inclusion on Dipnote just seemed to me to be a natural evolutionary step in Dipnote's public role to this effect.
Best Regards,
EJ
Posted on Sun Mar 15, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Luke Forgerson -- Dear Mr. Forgerson, are there any similar links/pages for non-American citizens' openings who would like to work for an American Embassy or a U.S. military base around the world?
How can someone without a U.S. citizenship -- interested in working for an American Embassy or a military base in his country (locally) -- learn the job offerings and the application/requirement procedures?
Is the local Embassy site the only way? And, who are eligible -- what are the minimum criteria -- for such "jobs"?
Have a nice weekend Sir!
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ John in Greece -- Thank you for your questions. Foreign Service Nationals -- individuals without U.S. citizenship who work at U.S. embassies and consulates -- play a vital role in the practice of American diplomacy. Individuals without U.S. citizenship who are interested in working at an American embassy should contact the respective embassy directly. Here's a list of U.S. embassies, consulates and other diplomatic missions.
Posted on Sat Mar 14, 2009
@ Luke Forgerson -- Dear Mr. Forgerson, are there any similar links/pages for non-American citizens' openings who would like to work for an American Embassy or a U.S. military base around the world?
How can someone without a U.S. citizenship -- interested in working for an American Embassy or a military base in his country (locally) -- learn the job offerings and the application/requirement procedures?
Is the local Embassy site the only way? And, who are eligible -- what are the minimum criteria -- for such "jobs"?
Have a nice weekend Sir!
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ John in Greece -- Thank you for your questions. Foreign Service Nationals -- individuals without U.S. citizenship who work at U.S. embassies and consulates -- play a vital role in the practice of American diplomacy. Individuals without U.S. citizenship who are interested in working at an American embassy should contact the respective embassy directly. Here's a list of U.S. embassies, consulates and other diplomatic missions.
Posted on Sat Mar 14, 2009
Deborah Y. in Texas writes:
Love the new website. I especially like it that I can comment on policy, events and my country's relationships around the world. I have been so embarrassed these past 8 years. We shall overcome.
Posted on Fri Mar 13, 2009
Love the new website. I especially like it that I can comment on policy, events and my country's relationships around the world. I have been so embarrassed these past 8 years. We shall overcome.
Posted on Fri Mar 13, 2009
Chad in Minnesota writes:
I'm wondering what types of internships or jobs available in the state department. This is a test
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Chad in Minnesota -- We encourage you to look at careers.state.gov to read more about what jobs and internships are available at the State Department. You may also contact a Diplomat-in-Residence to address any questions you might have about State Department careers.
Posted on Thu Mar 12, 2009
I'm wondering what types of internships or jobs available in the state department. This is a test
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Chad in Minnesota -- We encourage you to look at careers.state.gov to read more about what jobs and internships are available at the State Department. You may also contact a Diplomat-in-Residence to address any questions you might have about State Department careers.
Posted on Thu Mar 12, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
To Acting Secretary Robert Wood, Dipnote Editors and Staff:
Dipnote used to post news items of the day, but dropped them I think because they didn't recieve a whole lot of public comment.
Dipnote has the "Question of the Week", an inside look at travel and ceremony, special events like International Woman's Day, specialized topic areas like diplomatic security, and specific issue related posts on areas of conflict globally.
But what's lacking on Dipnote is a general forum for current events where Dipnote gets married to "Briefing 2.0" by placing the State Dept.s daily briefing up on site for public followup.
Give you an example here Robert....in the brief of the 11th, a fellow with blond hair (I didn't get his name)was following up on a question of verification (North Korea) and your answer to him left me wanting to ask specificly whether the 5 parties had agreed on the exact nature of the protocols verification must look like to be effective, and does North Korea as the 6th party understand that in order to be true to its word, it must follow the outlined steps to the letter of the 5 party's understanding and intent, which North Korea signed onto as well?
See I'm not sure everyone is on the same page with this given the "war talk".
Anyway, just a thought on how to make this a better blog...
Best,
EJ
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Thank you for your comment. We are currently considering ways to make DipNote more interactive. We are constantly seeking to improve DipNote and will take your suggestions into consideration. We are glad to count you among our readers.
Posted on Thu Mar 12, 2009
To Acting Secretary Robert Wood, Dipnote Editors and Staff:
Dipnote used to post news items of the day, but dropped them I think because they didn't recieve a whole lot of public comment.
Dipnote has the "Question of the Week", an inside look at travel and ceremony, special events like International Woman's Day, specialized topic areas like diplomatic security, and specific issue related posts on areas of conflict globally.
But what's lacking on Dipnote is a general forum for current events where Dipnote gets married to "Briefing 2.0" by placing the State Dept.s daily briefing up on site for public followup.
Give you an example here Robert....in the brief of the 11th, a fellow with blond hair (I didn't get his name)was following up on a question of verification (North Korea) and your answer to him left me wanting to ask specificly whether the 5 parties had agreed on the exact nature of the protocols verification must look like to be effective, and does North Korea as the 6th party understand that in order to be true to its word, it must follow the outlined steps to the letter of the 5 party's understanding and intent, which North Korea signed onto as well?
See I'm not sure everyone is on the same page with this given the "war talk".
Anyway, just a thought on how to make this a better blog...
Best,
EJ
DipNote Blogger Luke Forgerson writes:
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Thank you for your comment. We are currently considering ways to make DipNote more interactive. We are constantly seeking to improve DipNote and will take your suggestions into consideration. We are glad to count you among our readers.
Posted on Thu Mar 12, 2009
Glenn in France writes:
I have travelled extensively through India, Nepal, Tibet and China and have spent 10 years reading about Tibetan history and culture. I find it reprehensible that the United States allows China to continue to claim that Tibet is an integral part of China when historically and geographically, that is not the case.
It is very simple. Tibet was the most isolated place on earth until very, very recently. It is simply inaccessible. The U.S. could not even ship weapons from India through China to fight the Japanese in WW2 because it was logistically impossible. What existed for centuries in Asia and Central Asia were various treaties between Mongols, Manchus and Tibetans. And much later, treaties between these same peoples and the Han Chinese.
It was a mistake not to stand up to China in the United Nations when they invaded Tibet in 1950. But it is not too late. The world is at a turning point. We know we need to take drastically new decisions in many domains. Knowing that, and knowing the 5-point plan for peace set forth by His Holiness the Dalai Lama to the United States Congress in 1987, I urge you to change American policy on Tibet and recognize Tibet as a distinct and separate entity from China. This is radical, I know, but the option is even worse: China will systematically destroy the Tibetan language and culture in a generation with our approval. We have nothing to lose and the Tibetans have everything to gain.
As the Dalai Lama said in his statement yesterday, "China has made life for Tibetans a hell on earth." We need to react.
Thank you,
Glenn B.
Paris, France
Posted on Wed Mar 11, 2009
I have travelled extensively through India, Nepal, Tibet and China and have spent 10 years reading about Tibetan history and culture. I find it reprehensible that the United States allows China to continue to claim that Tibet is an integral part of China when historically and geographically, that is not the case.
It is very simple. Tibet was the most isolated place on earth until very, very recently. It is simply inaccessible. The U.S. could not even ship weapons from India through China to fight the Japanese in WW2 because it was logistically impossible. What existed for centuries in Asia and Central Asia were various treaties between Mongols, Manchus and Tibetans. And much later, treaties between these same peoples and the Han Chinese.
It was a mistake not to stand up to China in the United Nations when they invaded Tibet in 1950. But it is not too late. The world is at a turning point. We know we need to take drastically new decisions in many domains. Knowing that, and knowing the 5-point plan for peace set forth by His Holiness the Dalai Lama to the United States Congress in 1987, I urge you to change American policy on Tibet and recognize Tibet as a distinct and separate entity from China. This is radical, I know, but the option is even worse: China will systematically destroy the Tibetan language and culture in a generation with our approval. We have nothing to lose and the Tibetans have everything to gain.
As the Dalai Lama said in his statement yesterday, "China has made life for Tibetans a hell on earth." We need to react.
Thank you,
Glenn B.
Paris, France
Posted on Wed Mar 11, 2009
Annie in France writes:
Thank you for this very interesting and transparent initiative !
Posted on Sun Mar 08, 2009
Thank you for this very interesting and transparent initiative !
Posted on Sun Mar 08, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Catherine in New York -- I think that an Eric's in NM recent comment will be helpful concerning some of the security questions you made.
"As we noted in Part 1, Dipnote is in a unique (and unenviable) position of being prohibited by law from setting cookies to collect information about users of the blog. This denies its editors important information like how many individuals view which posts, whether the audience is diverse or primarily a recurring group, whether particular kinds of posts increase its audience, and so on. In short, they can't get information that bloggers normally use to improve their offerings. This information is available to some extent through analysis of comments, but few users post comments.
We're not lawyers, so we don't know the specific legal constraints on what the blog can do. However if the limitation is that the government cannot set cookies and collect individual data, perhaps an alternative is to use a third party for this purpose. Analytic services like Google Analytics and SiteMeter provide html codes that bloggers embed in their pages. The analysis server -- not the blog's server sets the cookies and collects the user information.
Reports provided back to the clients, to our knowledge, do not contain information about individual users but only aggregated data (for example, about the number of unique users who viewed a particular post). These services are commonly used on blogs and other web sites. Visitors can even disallow the cookies from these analytic services if they don't want to have their data collected. Perhaps this offers a way for the State Department to learn more about Dipnote readers without actually collecting individuated data about them."
Of course, I'm sure that DipNote staff will give you a more detailed answer concerning all the components of your queries. I wish I helped you a bit! Best Regards Catherine!
Posted on Wed Mar 04, 2009
@ Catherine in New York -- I think that an Eric's in NM recent comment will be helpful concerning some of the security questions you made.
"As we noted in Part 1, Dipnote is in a unique (and unenviable) position of being prohibited by law from setting cookies to collect information about users of the blog. This denies its editors important information like how many individuals view which posts, whether the audience is diverse or primarily a recurring group, whether particular kinds of posts increase its audience, and so on. In short, they can't get information that bloggers normally use to improve their offerings. This information is available to some extent through analysis of comments, but few users post comments.
We're not lawyers, so we don't know the specific legal constraints on what the blog can do. However if the limitation is that the government cannot set cookies and collect individual data, perhaps an alternative is to use a third party for this purpose. Analytic services like Google Analytics and SiteMeter provide html codes that bloggers embed in their pages. The analysis server -- not the blog's server sets the cookies and collects the user information.
Reports provided back to the clients, to our knowledge, do not contain information about individual users but only aggregated data (for example, about the number of unique users who viewed a particular post). These services are commonly used on blogs and other web sites. Visitors can even disallow the cookies from these analytic services if they don't want to have their data collected. Perhaps this offers a way for the State Department to learn more about Dipnote readers without actually collecting individuated data about them."
Of course, I'm sure that DipNote staff will give you a more detailed answer concerning all the components of your queries. I wish I helped you a bit! Best Regards Catherine!
Posted on Wed Mar 04, 2009
Jack in Florida writes:
Madam Secretary,
Do not earmark $900 million dollars for Gaza. The majority of the money will be filtered and funneled to Hamas. To rebuild Gaza will only give Hamas more places to hide and launch rockets into Israel. Let Iran, they support Hamas, wholeheartedly, rebuild Gaza. And when that doesn't happen the Palestinians might think twice about allowing terrorist to setup rocket launchers next to schools etc. If we must help out the Palestinian people, let it be with food, medical and clothing not money. Money will just make matters worse.
Posted on Mon Mar 02, 2009
Madam Secretary,
Do not earmark $900 million dollars for Gaza. The majority of the money will be filtered and funneled to Hamas. To rebuild Gaza will only give Hamas more places to hide and launch rockets into Israel. Let Iran, they support Hamas, wholeheartedly, rebuild Gaza. And when that doesn't happen the Palestinians might think twice about allowing terrorist to setup rocket launchers next to schools etc. If we must help out the Palestinian people, let it be with food, medical and clothing not money. Money will just make matters worse.
Posted on Mon Mar 02, 2009
Mellissa P. in Georgia writes:
I am very impressed.
Posted on Mon Mar 02, 2009
I am very impressed.
Posted on Mon Mar 02, 2009
Catherine in New York writes:
Dear Mr. Wood,
This is an important initiative but I share Zharkov's grave concerns about the erosion of our civil rights under the First Amendment that are contained in the blogging comment policies that were lifted right out of the typical Silicon Valley platform provider's unconscionable TOS for a MMORGP, blog, social media, or virtual world. I realize you want to have a civilized conversation and not turn into YouTube here, but I think you might borrow some better practices from the better TOS like blogger.com and Raph Koster's Metaplaces where the devs have spent a lot of time getting user input to craft better TOS.
I'd be interested to know if the posts put here by contributors are saved, with their IP addresses and other identifying information, and kept in any USG databases for intelligence purposes.
Finally, I'd like to ask if you could please publish the names of the officials of the U.S. government who are operating the @dipnote on Twitter. Obviously you'll have to have a variety of staff performing this function but it's important that we understand who these officials are, what departments they are in, etc. with a notice somewhere on this site.
Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009
Dear Mr. Wood,
This is an important initiative but I share Zharkov's grave concerns about the erosion of our civil rights under the First Amendment that are contained in the blogging comment policies that were lifted right out of the typical Silicon Valley platform provider's unconscionable TOS for a MMORGP, blog, social media, or virtual world. I realize you want to have a civilized conversation and not turn into YouTube here, but I think you might borrow some better practices from the better TOS like blogger.com and Raph Koster's Metaplaces where the devs have spent a lot of time getting user input to craft better TOS.
I'd be interested to know if the posts put here by contributors are saved, with their IP addresses and other identifying information, and kept in any USG databases for intelligence purposes.
Finally, I'd like to ask if you could please publish the names of the officials of the U.S. government who are operating the @dipnote on Twitter. Obviously you'll have to have a variety of staff performing this function but it's important that we understand who these officials are, what departments they are in, etc. with a notice somewhere on this site.
Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Jose in Cuba -- Right Jose! It's a great thinking tool and I am so happy to see that many many authors (bloggers) are coming in to our DipNote society. Keep on "hitting" guys.
Welcome Jose!
I also have a "content suggestion" inspired by your post. Why don't we propose to DipNote staff some topics -- of a more general foreign affairs perspective -- for further discussion?
What I mean is: which debatable issues we would suggest for more discussion? Please suggest some co-bloggers...
Best Regards!
Posted on Tue Feb 24, 2009
@ Jose in Cuba -- Right Jose! It's a great thinking tool and I am so happy to see that many many authors (bloggers) are coming in to our DipNote society. Keep on "hitting" guys.
Welcome Jose!
I also have a "content suggestion" inspired by your post. Why don't we propose to DipNote staff some topics -- of a more general foreign affairs perspective -- for further discussion?
What I mean is: which debatable issues we would suggest for more discussion? Please suggest some co-bloggers...
Best Regards!
Posted on Tue Feb 24, 2009
Jose in Cuba writes:
DIGNOTE IT IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO THINK, TO SUGGEST OR TO KNOW ANY TOPIC AS FOR FOREIGN POLICY. PERSONALLY I AM A SUPPORTER FROM THE CAMPAIGN OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON.
REGARDS,
JOSE
VETERAN'S GRAND SON OF THE OFFICER ARMED FORCES.
MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE
Posted on Mon Feb 23, 2009
DIGNOTE IT IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO THINK, TO SUGGEST OR TO KNOW ANY TOPIC AS FOR FOREIGN POLICY. PERSONALLY I AM A SUPPORTER FROM THE CAMPAIGN OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON.
REGARDS,
JOSE
VETERAN'S GRAND SON OF THE OFFICER ARMED FORCES.
MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE
Posted on Mon Feb 23, 2009
Faith in Virginia writes:
Please, please change/remove the black background on this site. It discourages readers. Consult professionals graphic design professionals.
Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009
Please, please change/remove the black background on this site. It discourages readers. Consult professionals graphic design professionals.
Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009
John in Greece writes:
Another wonderful new idea from http://www.state.gov. This is called REAL Democracy: everyone can participate, offer and have a feed back even with the Secretary of State. Right Here!
http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/question2_state.php
Congratulations Mrs. Clinton for the innovations in the site. Congratulations guys in state.gov. I wish you all the best!
Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009
Another wonderful new idea from http://www.state.gov. This is called REAL Democracy: everyone can participate, offer and have a feed back even with the Secretary of State. Right Here!
http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/question2_state.php
Congratulations Mrs. Clinton for the innovations in the site. Congratulations guys in state.gov. I wish you all the best!
Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009
Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:
This blog is a sychophant magnet and all of you need to try harder to match the others. At the moment, the foreign contingent is beating the U.S. team in praising the first three hours of the administration.
Do we need some sort of a visual indicator, a "fawning gauge", to rate each post as to sweetness and official propaganda value?
Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009
This blog is a sychophant magnet and all of you need to try harder to match the others. At the moment, the foreign contingent is beating the U.S. team in praising the first three hours of the administration.
Do we need some sort of a visual indicator, a "fawning gauge", to rate each post as to sweetness and official propaganda value?
Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009
Terry in Connecticut writes:
@ Secretary Robert Wood, your title says acting state dept. spokesman. Is there a replacement spokesman waiting to be confirmed or will you fill this post for the forseeable future? You do a good job by the way.
Posted on Tue Feb 10, 2009
@ Secretary Robert Wood, your title says acting state dept. spokesman. Is there a replacement spokesman waiting to be confirmed or will you fill this post for the forseeable future? You do a good job by the way.
Posted on Tue Feb 10, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Kirk in KY -- I thought like you were interested (you "love" to?) in working for the State Dept: AMERICA! Here is a poor "advice" from an e-friend:
I am not experienced, I do not work for SD, but I felt like answering to you, on the ground that I like the fact that you have plans to apply for a DoS career. Please do not misunderstand me!
Dr. Rice stated (a month ago) that "she is not a partisan". I loved this statement of hers. Same counts for the new Secretary of State. Mrs. Clinton serves U.S.A., Freedom and the People; not her micro-party egoism. And I think that this is fantastic! This is U.S.A.! That's why I do not agree that Mrs. Clinton "shot for the stars and at least got the moon". She's in SPACE too! And space has no real estate values determining if the stars are more important than the moon.
Do you think (if you follow a diplomatic "job" path, as you have stated in the past that you love to do so) you'll ever have the chance to "decide" who the President will be, or the Secretary of State, in order for you to service U.S.A. in a better way? You will have to do it anyway...
And now back to our silly game:
(Al's voice): Then, Kirk, you are a "a NO GO SD officer'! WE do not choose the "upstairs". More experienced people decide if WE are good for "downstairs" or "upstairs". And some day, all of "US" can (maybe) make it to the tops. All of which means: if today you were within SD, would you resign on the ground that you do not "approve" THE 67th SECRETARY of STATE or the PRESIDENT? If you have a "No answer" to this question, then you "remain", but then RESPECT the 67th Secretary of State and the President!
(Al's voice with echo): ONLY UNITED WE STAND! PEOPLE DECIDED! SERVE!
Of course, my comment is just a "game". I wish I helped you a bit...
Posted on Tue Feb 10, 2009
@ Kirk in KY -- I thought like you were interested (you "love" to?) in working for the State Dept: AMERICA! Here is a poor "advice" from an e-friend:
I am not experienced, I do not work for SD, but I felt like answering to you, on the ground that I like the fact that you have plans to apply for a DoS career. Please do not misunderstand me!
Dr. Rice stated (a month ago) that "she is not a partisan". I loved this statement of hers. Same counts for the new Secretary of State. Mrs. Clinton serves U.S.A., Freedom and the People; not her micro-party egoism. And I think that this is fantastic! This is U.S.A.! That's why I do not agree that Mrs. Clinton "shot for the stars and at least got the moon". She's in SPACE too! And space has no real estate values determining if the stars are more important than the moon.
Do you think (if you follow a diplomatic "job" path, as you have stated in the past that you love to do so) you'll ever have the chance to "decide" who the President will be, or the Secretary of State, in order for you to service U.S.A. in a better way? You will have to do it anyway...
And now back to our silly game:
(Al's voice): Then, Kirk, you are a "a NO GO SD officer'! WE do not choose the "upstairs". More experienced people decide if WE are good for "downstairs" or "upstairs". And some day, all of "US" can (maybe) make it to the tops. All of which means: if today you were within SD, would you resign on the ground that you do not "approve" THE 67th SECRETARY of STATE or the PRESIDENT? If you have a "No answer" to this question, then you "remain", but then RESPECT the 67th Secretary of State and the President!
(Al's voice with echo): ONLY UNITED WE STAND! PEOPLE DECIDED! SERVE!
Of course, my comment is just a "game". I wish I helped you a bit...
Posted on Tue Feb 10, 2009
Yoo in South Korea writes:
@ Mr. Robert Wood -- Hello, I am a teacher in South Korea. I found this blog in the state Department site.
Welcome to our Country.( Mrs. Secretary Clinton)
Our people always thanks for U.S.A., because especially America helped us for Korean War. We know that your young people were killed in many battle for protecting our Country from north Korea's invasion. Now U.S.A. have been helping us against broking out war by North Korea. I hope we have nice relations more friendly with Mrs. Secretary Clinton's visiting our Country
I hope Mrs. Secretary Clinton have a nice time for staying in Korea.
Sincerely
D. Yoo
Posted on Mon Feb 09, 2009
@ Mr. Robert Wood -- Hello, I am a teacher in South Korea. I found this blog in the state Department site.
Welcome to our Country.( Mrs. Secretary Clinton)
Our people always thanks for U.S.A., because especially America helped us for Korean War. We know that your young people were killed in many battle for protecting our Country from north Korea's invasion. Now U.S.A. have been helping us against broking out war by North Korea. I hope we have nice relations more friendly with Mrs. Secretary Clinton's visiting our Country
I hope Mrs. Secretary Clinton have a nice time for staying in Korea.
Sincerely
D. Yoo
Posted on Mon Feb 09, 2009
Kirk in Kentucky writes:
Secretary of State Clinton? What a sham. This was totally her prize for dropping out of the presidential race. She wasn't qualified to be president, what would make her such a good leader for directing the entire foreign policy division?
Congratulations anyway, I guess. She shot for the stars and at least got the moon.
Even Rice, despite her collaboration and contribution to such horribly flawed doctrine that led us to the state we're in now, managed to secure a degree of respect by the end. Surely Clinton can do better.
On a further note, let's see more interaction with the posters from the Dept. of State, please. Otherwise it's just another blog of people spouting their rhetoric like anywhere else.
Posted on Sun Feb 08, 2009
Secretary of State Clinton? What a sham. This was totally her prize for dropping out of the presidential race. She wasn't qualified to be president, what would make her such a good leader for directing the entire foreign policy division?
Congratulations anyway, I guess. She shot for the stars and at least got the moon.
Even Rice, despite her collaboration and contribution to such horribly flawed doctrine that led us to the state we're in now, managed to secure a degree of respect by the end. Surely Clinton can do better.
On a further note, let's see more interaction with the posters from the Dept. of State, please. Otherwise it's just another blog of people spouting their rhetoric like anywhere else.
Posted on Sun Feb 08, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
@ Dipnote bloggers: I appreciate you helping Zharkov get with the program. I'd hate to see him booted off site for consistantly being himself, as he offers me seemingly unlimited opportunity to make valid points in debate.
On the other hand,
How obsequious can I get? Let me count the ways...AHA! here's one!
I will certainly be most happy to be of service to the Dipnote bloggers of the world and take Zharkov out back to the woodshed to teach him some manners any time you'all like.
Please can I, Huh? Pretty please? PLEEEEEEEZE say YES,....LOL!
But go ahead if you must. Launch him to the moon, see what I care..,..(chuckle).
Some things are best addressed with mirth.
If you've blogged as long as I have on Foreign Affairs subjects, one becomes perpetually ammused by inane commentary directed on a personal level.
And that's all I have to say about that....
Posted on Sun Feb 08, 2009
@ Dipnote bloggers: I appreciate you helping Zharkov get with the program. I'd hate to see him booted off site for consistantly being himself, as he offers me seemingly unlimited opportunity to make valid points in debate.
On the other hand,
How obsequious can I get? Let me count the ways...AHA! here's one!
I will certainly be most happy to be of service to the Dipnote bloggers of the world and take Zharkov out back to the woodshed to teach him some manners any time you'all like.
Please can I, Huh? Pretty please? PLEEEEEEEZE say YES,....LOL!
But go ahead if you must. Launch him to the moon, see what I care..,..(chuckle).
Some things are best addressed with mirth.
If you've blogged as long as I have on Foreign Affairs subjects, one becomes perpetually ammused by inane commentary directed on a personal level.
And that's all I have to say about that....
Posted on Sun Feb 08, 2009
Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:
One suggestion I have is that when a post is to be omitted or censored because it raises embarrassing questions or discloses some inconvenient facts, it would be nice to have that post acknowledged in some manner to show it had been read but rejected.
A simple entry would do, such as,
@ Eric in New Mexico, post rejected as too obsequious for publication.
This way, we can learn the boundaries of our 1st Amendment on the blog.
DipNote Bloggers write:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A. -- We appreciate your participation on the blog. This is an open forum. Please review the blog's comment policy.
Posted on Thu Feb 05, 2009
One suggestion I have is that when a post is to be omitted or censored because it raises embarrassing questions or discloses some inconvenient facts, it would be nice to have that post acknowledged in some manner to show it had been read but rejected.
A simple entry would do, such as,
@ Eric in New Mexico, post rejected as too obsequious for publication.
This way, we can learn the boundaries of our 1st Amendment on the blog.
DipNote Bloggers write:
@ Zharkov in U.S.A. -- We appreciate your participation on the blog. This is an open forum. Please review the blog's comment policy.
Posted on Thu Feb 05, 2009
Kelly S. in Texas writes:
Hi Robert,
We just posted an article, "Top 50 Foreign Policy Blogs" (http://www.mastersincriminaljustice.com/blog/2009/top-50-foreign-policy-blogs/). I thought I'd bring it to your attention in case you think your readers would find it interesting.
I am happy to let you know that your site has been included in this list.
Either way, thanks for your time!
Posted on Thu Feb 05, 2009
Hi Robert,
We just posted an article, "Top 50 Foreign Policy Blogs" (http://www.mastersincriminaljustice.com/blog/2009/top-50-foreign-policy-blogs/). I thought I'd bring it to your attention in case you think your readers would find it interesting.
I am happy to let you know that your site has been included in this list.
Either way, thanks for your time!
Posted on Thu Feb 05, 2009
Eric in New Mexico writes:
To Robert Wood,
Here's a Sit. Rep. that ought to be posted in neon in the briefing room(*).
Pulled this off of Blackfive.net. While I may be taking liberties reposting (unedidted) an already public email by not confirming authenticity directly, I have no doubt the Public affairs dept @ State can do so without much trouble. And when and if you do, please send this citizen's thanks and warmest regards to Gen. Kelly and Marines everywhere.
To the folks at State that helped make this happen, please do continue to anticipate miracles while you enjoy this one. Well done to one and all!
EJ
-----
Author: Major General John F. Kelly
I don't suppose this will get much coverage in the States as the news is so good. No, the news is unbelievable.
Something didn't happen in Al Anbar Province, Iraq, today. Once the most violent and most dangerous places on earth, no suicide vest bomber detonated killing dozens of voters. No suicide truck bomber drove into a polling place collapsing the building and killing and injuring over 100. No Marine was in a firefight engaging an Al Qaida terrorist trying to disrupt democracy.
What did happen was Anbar Sunnis came out in their tens of thousands to vote in the first free election of their lives.
With the expectation of all of the above (suicide bombers) they walked miles (we shut down all vehicle traffic with the exception of some shuttle busses for the elderly and infirm) to the polling places. I slept under the stars with some Grunts at Combat Outpost Iba on the far side of Karma, and started driving the 200 miles up the Euphrates River Valley through Karma, Fallujah, Habbiniyah, Ramadi, Hit, Baghdad and back here to Al Asad. I stopped here and there to speak with cops, soldiers, Marines, and most importantly, regular Iraqi men and women along the way. It was the same everywhere. A tension with every finger on a trigger that broke at perhaps 3PM when we all began to think what was almost unthinkable a year ago. We might just pull this off without a bombing. No way. By 4PM it seemed like we'd make it to 5PM when the polls closed. At 4:30 the unbelievable happened: the election was extended an hour to 6PM because of the large crowds! What are they kidding? Tempting fate like that is not nice. Six PM and the polls close without a single act of violence or a single accusation of fraud, and nearly by early reports pretty close to 100% voted. Priceless.
Every Anbari walking towards the polling place had these determined and, frankly, concerned looks on their faces. No children with them (here mothers and grandmothers are NEVER without their children or grandchildren) because of the expectation of death. Husbands voted separately from wives, and mothers separately from fathers for the same reason. In and out quickly to be less of a target for the expected suicide murderer. When they came out after voting they also wore the same expression on their faces, but now one of smiling amazement as they held up and stared at ink stained index fingers.
Norman Rockwell could not have captured this wonderment. Even the ladies voted in large numbers and their husbands didn't insist on going into the booths to tell them who to vote for.
One of the things I've always said was that we came here to "give" them democracy. Even in the dark days my only consolation was that it was about freedom and democracy. After what I saw today, and having forgotten our own history and revolution, this was arrogance. People are not given freedom and democracy -- they take it for themselves. The Anbaris deserve this credit.
Today I step down as the dictator, albeit benevolent, of Anbar Province. Today the Anbaris took it from me. I am ecstatic. It was a privilege to be part of it, to have somehow in a small way to have helped make it happen.
Semper Fi.
Kelly
---end---
(*) Or simply handed to Matt with my best regards, as he's looking like he's about to have a coronary in the middle of your briefing the next time you tell him that policy is under review...(chuckle).
I know you usually would defer him to the Pentagon for such things, but in this case it simply comes through a concerned Dipnote contributor who does his research.
Figured the press would appreciate getting the details.
I know I did.
Posted on Wed Feb 04, 2009
To Robert Wood,
Here's a Sit. Rep. that ought to be posted in neon in the briefing room(*).
Pulled this off of Blackfive.net. While I may be taking liberties reposting (unedidted) an already public email by not confirming authenticity directly, I have no doubt the Public affairs dept @ State can do so without much trouble. And when and if you do, please send this citizen's thanks and warmest regards to Gen. Kelly and Marines everywhere.
To the folks at State that helped make this happen, please do continue to anticipate miracles while you enjoy this one. Well done to one and all!
EJ
-----
Author: Major General John F. Kelly
I don't suppose this will get much coverage in the States as the news is so good. No, the news is unbelievable.
Something didn't happen in Al Anbar Province, Iraq, today. Once the most violent and most dangerous places on earth, no suicide vest bomber detonated killing dozens of voters. No suicide truck bomber drove into a polling place collapsing the building and killing and injuring over 100. No Marine was in a firefight engaging an Al Qaida terrorist trying to disrupt democracy.
What did happen was Anbar Sunnis came out in their tens of thousands to vote in the first free election of their lives.
With the expectation of all of the above (suicide bombers) they walked miles (we shut down all vehicle traffic with the exception of some shuttle busses for the elderly and infirm) to the polling places. I slept under the stars with some Grunts at Combat Outpost Iba on the far side of Karma, and started driving the 200 miles up the Euphrates River Valley through Karma, Fallujah, Habbiniyah, Ramadi, Hit, Baghdad and back here to Al Asad. I stopped here and there to speak with cops, soldiers, Marines, and most importantly, regular Iraqi men and women along the way. It was the same everywhere. A tension with every finger on a trigger that broke at perhaps 3PM when we all began to think what was almost unthinkable a year ago. We might just pull this off without a bombing. No way. By 4PM it seemed like we'd make it to 5PM when the polls closed. At 4:30 the unbelievable happened: the election was extended an hour to 6PM because of the large crowds! What are they kidding? Tempting fate like that is not nice. Six PM and the polls close without a single act of violence or a single accusation of fraud, and nearly by early reports pretty close to 100% voted. Priceless.
Every Anbari walking towards the polling place had these determined and, frankly, concerned looks on their faces. No children with them (here mothers and grandmothers are NEVER without their children or grandchildren) because of the expectation of death. Husbands voted separately from wives, and mothers separately from fathers for the same reason. In and out quickly to be less of a target for the expected suicide murderer. When they came out after voting they also wore the same expression on their faces, but now one of smiling amazement as they held up and stared at ink stained index fingers.
Norman Rockwell could not have captured this wonderment. Even the ladies voted in large numbers and their husbands didn't insist on going into the booths to tell them who to vote for.
One of the things I've always said was that we came here to "give" them democracy. Even in the dark days my only consolation was that it was about freedom and democracy. After what I saw today, and having forgotten our own history and revolution, this was arrogance. People are not given freedom and democracy -- they take it for themselves. The Anbaris deserve this credit.
Today I step down as the dictator, albeit benevolent, of Anbar Province. Today the Anbaris took it from me. I am ecstatic. It was a privilege to be part of it, to have somehow in a small way to have helped make it happen.
Semper Fi.
Kelly
---end---
(*) Or simply handed to Matt with my best regards, as he's looking like he's about to have a coronary in the middle of your briefing the next time you tell him that policy is under review...(chuckle).
I know you usually would defer him to the Pentagon for such things, but in this case it simply comes through a concerned Dipnote contributor who does his research.
Figured the press would appreciate getting the details.
I know I did.
Posted on Wed Feb 04, 2009
Louise in Connecticut writes:
Can State Department, consider making the TPS (Temporary Protected Status) eligible for adjustment for Permanent Residence Status if they have been hear in the U.S.A. for numerous years and paying taxes? I think it would be fair to those hard working individuals to be able to adjust the status especially if they have worked hard for it. There are many U.S. Citizens abusing the laws and not paying their dues to society. Why not allow people with TPS status the same opportunity as us. Thank you for your time.
Posted on Wed Feb 04, 2009
Can State Department, consider making the TPS (Temporary Protected Status) eligible for adjustment for Permanent Residence Status if they have been hear in the U.S.A. for numerous years and paying taxes? I think it would be fair to those hard working individuals to be able to adjust the status especially if they have worked hard for it. There are many U.S. Citizens abusing the laws and not paying their dues to society. Why not allow people with TPS status the same opportunity as us. Thank you for your time.
Posted on Wed Feb 04, 2009
Romma in Florida writes:
i know the world is busy and in chaos, but whats happening in east african countries is alarming and scary! american government seems to be slowly packing out of east africa, particularly kenya, citizens of kenya are starving to death due to drought and famine, Government is obviously not helping them out in any way whatsoever, the leaders always making false promises and fattening their wallets while the ones who voted for them are living a miserable life! yet kenyan government is leasing the most fertile lands and areas in kenya to china, sudan, qatar, for monetary kicks and china is actually selling weapons, ammo, tanks etc to sudan, kenya, zimbwabwe. its looking like we are being set for a bigger mess. china is getting payment from kenya for the weapons etc by allowing chinese control and use of our waterways! to me it smells ratty, china has never had any interest in africa up until now. united states of america is abandoning them same as europeans did. kenyan young people are very angry at what is happening while others sleep, play golf etc. we need help getting rid of communist related countries and nazi like mugabe and slave runners in sudan. help help! i dont want to have to go through beijing first to get a visa to go to kenya! and its unacceptable to see kenyans die like ants due to hunger. hello!! anyone looking at this or even aware of it?
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
i know the world is busy and in chaos, but whats happening in east african countries is alarming and scary! american government seems to be slowly packing out of east africa, particularly kenya, citizens of kenya are starving to death due to drought and famine, Government is obviously not helping them out in any way whatsoever, the leaders always making false promises and fattening their wallets while the ones who voted for them are living a miserable life! yet kenyan government is leasing the most fertile lands and areas in kenya to china, sudan, qatar, for monetary kicks and china is actually selling weapons, ammo, tanks etc to sudan, kenya, zimbwabwe. its looking like we are being set for a bigger mess. china is getting payment from kenya for the weapons etc by allowing chinese control and use of our waterways! to me it smells ratty, china has never had any interest in africa up until now. united states of america is abandoning them same as europeans did. kenyan young people are very angry at what is happening while others sleep, play golf etc. we need help getting rid of communist related countries and nazi like mugabe and slave runners in sudan. help help! i dont want to have to go through beijing first to get a visa to go to kenya! and its unacceptable to see kenyans die like ants due to hunger. hello!! anyone looking at this or even aware of it?
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
John in Greece writes:
@ Edith in France -- End the Boycott of Tourism to Myanmar! END QUOTE. Do you think that this country is safe for traveling? I do not!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nygus/2971522319/
I wouldn't go there even for a 1M$ prize.
State Department must keep its fundamental "traveling" policy: securing travelers through alerts and warnings. After all, it's the only credible source of info in the world concerning where and how to travel.
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_1764.html
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1077.html
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
@ Edith in France -- End the Boycott of Tourism to Myanmar! END QUOTE. Do you think that this country is safe for traveling? I do not!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nygus/2971522319/
I wouldn't go there even for a 1M$ prize.
State Department must keep its fundamental "traveling" policy: securing travelers through alerts and warnings. After all, it's the only credible source of info in the world concerning where and how to travel.
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_1764.html
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1077.html
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
Edith in France writes:
Mr. Wood,
In view of recent media reports on the terrible situation of prostitutes from Myanmar (Burma) and the inhuman treatment of Rohingya refugees by the Thai Military I send you an appeal I wrote after having visited Myanmar extensively to end the boycott that has become a humanitarian boycott. It has been going on for so long and the situation has gotten just worse politically, socially and economically.
In the light of what President Obama has said about working with Developing Nations and the caring and pragmatic approach of Mrs. Clinton I hope U.S. Policy towards this country where people (not the Junta !) suffer tremendously from the boycott. Myanmar is the country that receives the least aid of all countries in the world.
Edith
Lyon, France, January 2009
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
Mr. Wood,
In view of recent media reports on the terrible situation of prostitutes from Myanmar (Burma) and the inhuman treatment of Rohingya refugees by the Thai Military I send you an appeal I wrote after having visited Myanmar extensively to end the boycott that has become a humanitarian boycott. It has been going on for so long and the situation has gotten just worse politically, socially and economically.
In the light of what President Obama has said about working with Developing Nations and the caring and pragmatic approach of Mrs. Clinton I hope U.S. Policy towards this country where people (not the Junta !) suffer tremendously from the boycott. Myanmar is the country that receives the least aid of all countries in the world.
Edith
Lyon, France, January 2009
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
Edith in France writes:
End the Boycott of Tourism to Myanmar!
Before deciding to go on our five-week trip to most of the accessible regions of Myanmar in November 2008, we, like the other tourists we met, discussed at length whether it would be right to do so. The trip convinced us all that the boycott against Myanmar is meaningless.
The boycott is supposedly directed against the military government, but the generals dislike tourism anyway and have done little to promote it since the mid-nineties. They loathe tourists running around with cameras and video recorders and it suits them just fine that the population of Myanmar does not have contact with western thought.
Tourism produces distributed income and is one of the few opportunities for a large number of the population to earn much needed money and to have some contact with the outside world, especially outside of Yangon. The junta earns enormous amounts on trade with China (precious stones/gold, teak and more) and even more with Thailand (i.e. natural gas - from fields operated by Total). The junta's income from tourism is relatively modest. To a certain degree tourists can avoid state hotels and travel agencies, limiting the amount of funds falling into the hands of the junta.
People in Myanmar need tourists, both to avoid total isolation and simply to survive economically. This is in particular true of the people who do not belong to the "Bama"=Burmese (65%) ethnicity, but to one of the many other ethnic groups (35% of the population) who mostly live in remote areas that are partly accessible to tourists today. The boycott does not hurt the junta in a significant way; it punishes the people already suffering from the junta?s brutal means of repression and lack of will and/or capability to improve the country's infrastructure and thereby the standard of living.
Aung San Suu Kyi, the Lady, has called for the boycott. She is an admirable person, but one ought not disregard the fact that she is living in a golden cage in Yangon. She admits herself that she does not know the conditions under which the non-Burmese ethnic groups live. She has not had the opportunity to travel in the country and therefore there is serious doubt as to whether she understands the impact the boycott has on ordinary people. The people, on the other hand, do not know that she is the one who has called for it. She is very much admired by the population of Myanmar at large for her courage to confront the junta, but also because she is the daughter of General Aung San, assassinated in 1947. He remains a hero in Myanmar.
In order to improve the situation and to create a basis for real democracy, Myanmar is in desperate need of better infrastructure, communication, education, clean water and hospitals. It is simply not true that the people in Myanmar have access to CNN and BBC. That is only the case for a few locations at certain times in Yangon and also on occasion in a few other bigger cities.
The generals perceive the Army and not Myanmar as their country. It is a State in the State, an imperial power, like the British not too long ago, who consider themselves entitled to exploit the country's resources to their own advantage. The people are also seen as a resource to use and abuse. The generals believe they were put on the throne by the workings of karma. Their underlings are punished for their sins in earlier lives.
The International Community should do more to assure that human rights are respected, that political prisoners are given their liberty and that personal freedom and access to objective information are firmly and widely established. In order to achieve results, eastern countries, like China, Thailand and Singapore, must take part in these efforts. Without them it will not be possible to put real pressure on the Generals.
The boycott of tourism ought to cease immediately as tourism is the only possibility for a large part of the population to improve their living conditions, whereas the boycott has proved completely ineffective with regards to the junta. Rather it plays right into their hands. One can and should only hope that as many tourists as possible will travel there in the future with open and critical eyes. It is such a breathtaking country with wonderful people who most certainly do not deserve to be boycotted for no good reason.
Edith
Lyon, January 2009
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009
End the Boycott of Tourism to Myanmar!
Before deciding to go on our five-week trip to most of the accessible regions of Myanmar in November 2008, we, like the other tourists we met, discussed at length whether it would be right to do so. The trip convinced us all that the boycott against Myanmar is meaningless.
The boycott is supposedly directed against the military government, but the generals dislike tourism anyway and have done little to promote it since the mid-nineties. They loathe tourists running around with cameras and video recorders and it suits them just fine that the population of Myanmar does not have contact with western thought.
Tourism produces distributed income and is one of the few opportunities for a large number of the population to earn much needed money and to have some contact with the outside world, especially outside of Yangon. The junta earns enormous amounts on trade with China (precious stones/gold, teak and more) and even more with Thailand (i.e. natural gas - from fields operated by Total). The junta's income from tourism is relatively modest. To a certain degree tourists can avoid state hotels and travel agencies, limiting the amount of funds falling into the hands of the junta.
People in Myanmar need tourists, both to avoid total isolation and simply to survive economically. This is in particular true of the people who do not belong to the "Bama"=Burmese (65%) ethnicity, but to one of the many other ethnic groups (35% of the population) who mostly live in remote areas that are partly accessible to tourists today. The boycott does not hurt the junta in a significant way; it punishes the people already suffering from the junta?s brutal means of repression and lack of will and/or capability to improve the country's infrastructure and thereby the standard of living.
Aung San Suu Kyi, the Lady, has called for the boycott. She is an admirable person, but one ought not disregard the fact that she is living in a golden cage in Yangon. She admits herself that she does not know the conditions under which the non-Burmese ethnic groups live. She has not had the opportunity to travel in the country and therefore there is serious doubt as to whether she understands the impact the boycott has on ordinary people. The people, on the other hand, do not know that she is the one who has called for it. She is very much admired by the population of Myanmar at large for her courage to confront the junta, but also because she is the daughter of General Aung San, assassinated in 1947. He remains a hero in Myanmar.
In order to improve the situation and to create a basis for real democracy, Myanmar is in desperate need of better infrastructure, communication, education, clean water and hospitals. It is simply not true that the people in Myanmar have access to CNN and BBC. That is only the case for a few locations at certain times in Yangon and also on occasion in a few other bigger cities.
The generals perceive the Army and not Myanmar as their country. It is a State in the State, an imperial power, like the British not too long ago, who consider themselves entitled to exploit the country's resources to their own advantage. The people are also seen as a resource to use and abuse. The generals believe they were put on the throne by the workings of karma. Their underlings are punished for their sins in earlier lives.
The International Community should do more to assure that human rights are respected, that political prisoners are given their liberty and that personal freedom and access to objective information are firmly and widely established. In order to achieve results, eastern countries, like China, Thailand and Singapore, must take part in these efforts. Without them it will not be possible to put real pressure on the Generals.
The boycott of tourism ought to cease immediately as tourism is the only possibility for a large part of the population to improve their living conditions, whereas the boycott has proved completely ineffective with regards to the junta. Rather it plays right into their hands. One can and should only hope that as many tourists as possible will travel there in the future with open and critical eyes. It is such a breathtaking country with wonderful people who most certainly do not deserve to be boycotted for no good reason.
Edith
Lyon, January 2009
Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009