Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments

Wendy in North Carolina writes:

There are many steps that need to be taken to address the situation in Gaza, but one of the biggest steps is to recognize the democratically elected government of Hamas. We are supporting the destruction of a people--the theft of lands leading to the systematic destruction of a viable country. Students at our universities are beginning to call for divestment in Israel as a result of Israeli activities against Gazans. The time is now to move away from the position of hardline special interests who control the debate in this country and acknowledge the situation for what it is.

Recognize Hamas.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Bonnie P. in Illinois writes:

I am sad seeing and hearing the news on killed children and civilians in Gaza. Israel needs to open the borders and let in food, let out trade. Someone needs to prevent Israel from bombing them over and over with OUR MILITARY AID! This situation is bad for the U.S. in the long run, it only turns people against us for propping up Israel. I am pro Israel but against their actions killing civilians and building settlements on land they have no rights to build on. Stop the wall, get rid of the illegal settlements. Keep Israel to the borders they are supposed to be kept to. When I took a cab home from Ohare after the Inauguration, the cabbie was from Jordan and extremely upset about the killed babies in Gaza. So am I. What about that Palestinian doctor who's daughters were killed? This situation is our making and our responsibility. Think about the consequences for us, if you can't have sympathy for the civilians in Gaza.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Naomi in New York writes:

A truly evenhanded approach would go a long way in the middle east. that has to being by treating hamas in gaza as what it is -- the legitimately elected representative of the people of Gaza. It also means recognizing the ways in Israel has repeatedly been the aggressor, violating cease fire agreements long before Hamas. Mitchell's experience in Ireland prepares him for this challenge, but he must be allowed to operate as a genuine mediator, not as an advocate for Israel.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Abdel I. in Germany writes:

No food, no water, no compassion, no mercifulness, no reconstruction and therefor, there should be no U.S. money for people who don't recognize Judaism and jewish right of existence.

Sincerely

Abdel I.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Gary in Virginia writes:

Get rid of hamas and other groups that kill their own people by hiding behind women and children,if they cared,they would Protect not put them in harms way.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Alice in Pennsylvania writes:

Let the Mid East countries pay for the rebuilding of Gaza::We didn't bomb it so why do we have to rebuild::It is always good old Uncle Sam!! Let the Emerit states, Saudi Arabia, help them out(or help us for a change)!! All of those countries have to have a summit--put constructive plans for Gaza on the table and help their neighbor::Isreal has to show some peaceful resignation!! But with Mr. Net(sp) winning the Isreal election--there goes hope again--look how much money and military support Isreal gets from U.S.A. if they keep the fight going.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Herman in Indiana writes:

The best road forward for Gaza, is for someone, some Nation, to finally convince the Palestinian people, that their best interests lie not with Hamas, and the radical elements, but with sane and responsible representatives who truly care about their plight.

For too many decades now, The people in Gaza, and the West Bank, have been pawns in the game the extremist nations of the region play against Israel. These more powerful countries have no interest in establishing a State of Palestine, and they care less for the senseless death and maiming of civilians, each time Israel is pushed over the brink, and Hamas, or that year's radicals, take cover behind the civilians, as cowards have done throughout history.

Education is one key that can unlock this gateway to peace, but too often, the education given to Palestinian youth, is one of hatred and resentment. It is even difficult for Palestinian students when they get scholarships to study abroad, because radical elements in the host nations are waiting to distract them from their studies with false values, and ancient prejudices.

I have hopes and expectations that Secretary Clinton, and President Obama, can forge a new agreement between Israel, and the West Bank leadership, that can draw the people out of the death-cult of Hamas, and into a 21st Century of growth and peace for this troubled people.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Mark S. in Kuwait writes:

The plight of the Palestinians and Gaza itself is not an Israel problem. It is a regional problem. Egypt, Syria, (trans) Jordan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia all have a shared responsibility (and indeed are historically accountable) to the future of the Palestinians. No peace agreement or Palestinian nation/state building will be achieved without those nations DIRECT (tacit is not satisfactory) support. The political, military and financial leadership of these states must be engaged.

The Mullahs in Iran and Syrian leadership MUST be engaged and marginalized as a disrupting influence, their support for peace is not required, but they must cease the financial and military backing of Hamas and Hezbollah. This requires US and Israeli engagement... complicated by the rhetoric and perceived or not, Iranian development of nuclear weapon capability. State, you have your work cut out for you.

Finally, the Palestinian people need to take responsibility for themselves and not support the undermining influence of the terrorist/insurgency activities of organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah... this will require a multinational coalition engagement and MUST have a solid centralized strategic communications plan.

State will need to coordinate all of the above... until and unless this is accomplished the Palestinians will be mired in the present and past.

Madame Secretary, if you can pull this off over the next 4 to 8 years, my hats off to you.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Richard in California writes:

The reconstruction of Gaza must be accompanied by Hamas renouncing the use of violence against Israel.Otherwise the sick cycle of being rewarded for using the people of Gaza as a shield and a pawn will have succeeded.

There is no reason for a militarized Gaza except to provoke Israel to defend and retaliate while the Hamas leadership hides underground in their bunkers while the people they supposedly represent are left to reap the whirlwind they created. The United States will not win the thanks of Gaza and Hamas by being duped into rebuilding the building that will be used again as missile launching sites for Hamas.

When you have an enemy you defeat it, not try to win their hearts with money.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Mike S. in Alabama writes:

Israel must stop being an occupying force. Discontinue blockade around Gaza and stop the stranglehold of their people. Hamas has just as much right to defend itself as Israel does. Israel needs to follow UN resolutions of the past and present, they are not above the law anymore than Iraq or Iran are. Hamas should be asked to discontinue violence, but they must be recognized as a governmental body. Just because we disagree with their policy does not give us or Israel a right to claim they are terrorist, killing thousands of innocent people who elected them. We need to stop being blinded by our alliances and recognize that we are the only ones in this world powerful enough to stop this bloodshed -- Israel will listen to us.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Keith in Illinois writes:

Regarding Jerusalem: Because Israel & the Palestinians will never come to agreement on Jerusalem, there will never be peace. I think the holy sites in the city of Jerusalem should be set up as a sovereign city-state like Vatican City, ruled by an independent board of Governors. This would remove the biggest obstacle to peace.

Posted on Sun Mar 01, 2009

Sam in New York writes:

First, destroy Hamas and the other terrorist organizations operating in Gaza. As long as these dangerous criminals exist Gaza will be under constant threat of damage when the military response the terrorists provoke is unleashed.

Second, close down UNRWA and all related operations. It is a useless sinkhole of corruption, and they "divert" more money to support themselves than they pass along for the terrorist organizations to steal.
Once that is done, the real work of building Gaza can begin. Those efforts must focus on two primary areas.

First is education. Not the absurdity currently engendered by UNRWA where textbooks teach that Israel does not exist and Jews are apes and dogs, but real books that teach real reading, math, science, and law.

Second is industry. Without industry there will never be sufficient employment available within Gaza for the Palestinians. By giving them jobs within what could be their country they will become self-sufficient, as well as have a greater motive not to permit any terrorist groups to threaten a very real livelihood that is raising their standard of living.

What absolutely must not be done is to throw money at the area, along with a bunch of speeches and platitudes about how everyone is friends. Everyone knows the speeches are nonsense, and without the same kind of accountability being promised for the Recovery Act, the money might as well be given directly to the terrorists for all the good it will do.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Jeremiah in California writes:

Hey, instead of letting them blow others and themselves up, lets bring our people in there like we did Iraq and regulate their lives, albeit respectfully. Lets govern them as we govern ourselves in this chance for concentrated change in the right direction. Once the people of that area can control their fears and anguish, we'll leave them be. Sometimes leadership in situations like that compound in the innappropriate direction and hate mongering is developed instead of live for life! Lets make their community a wonderous green community with GREEN environments priority over industrious, commercialized civility. Where roads are well kept but unnattached to the environment. Where living is graceful on their lives rather than harsh and construde. Get the power out of corrupt hands and let us lead these people the AMERICAN way! Thank you President Obama for rising to the occasion and thank you Mrs. Clinton... by the way, how can I simple Airman like myself get a chance to hang with the big dogs. I really would appreciate the oppurtunity. Currently enrolled in Airman Leadership School working on getting Staff Sergeant and be the best Air Force Member (Air National Guard Joint Force) I can be. Please forward me an oppurtunity to rise to an occasion of leadership!

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Dan writes:

The first question at hand is how US aid money should go to Gaza, and, the extent we influence it, how Israeli aid money and materiel should go to Gaza.

As you at State no doubt understand, we have a conundrum in Gaza: No right-minded human being wants to watch the people of Gaza suffering as they do. Similarly, very few outside of some sectors of the Muslim world want to see Hamas emboldened and rewarded by their provocations against Israel, or by their bloody purges of Fatah supporters.

The most sensitive part of the problem is that dealing with Fatah risks marginalizing that grouping in the eyes of the quickly radicalizing Gazan street. For my money, that is a risk we must take, if we have any hope for progress in Israeli-Palestinian coexistence.

I do not know the constitutional nuances of the PA government; my last recollection was that Hamas won, then started killing all the Fatah members they could find. Is there a constitutional vote of confidence measure that could be encouraged within the PA? Then by all means, encourage it. America needs to know who represents the people of Gaza. If the answer is Hamas, we and any other party rendering aid should insist it be distributed by Fatah, Egypt, or some other responsible party.

If Hamas refuses, and the people of Gaza indeed march in lockstep behind Hamas leadership, I would provide only as much financial aid as is absolutely necessary to provide the most basic existence for the people of Gaza. Another amount of money should be held in escrow against the day that Gaza is able to deal with the remainder of the world through a responsible government. Simultaneously, the U.S. initiative should focus on rapproachment between Hamas and Fatah before the subject of Israeli-Palestinian coexistence is on the table.

All parties to a peace talk should understand they are bound to consider one anothers' national aspirations legitimate, insofar as they concern self-determination. If Hamas is to be party to such talks, it must do so through Fatah representation, or amend its charter and rhetoric to allow for the coexistence of Israel and a Palestinian state.

Under no circumstances should the U.S. encourage Hamas in its current form.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Anne writes:

donate as are not via hamas. do much more with fatah so is stronger. get nehatanyu not to be in the way and "slap" his face as needed. get more true aid from saudi arabia and see if way to get rest in middle east to grant citzenship to their palestenians. think about 1 state solution. i don't believe hamas will/wants to help so ignore them, as far as can diplomatically. can UN do anything about their hate-filled education system?

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Mary in Michigan writes:

Dear Secretary Clinton,

The borders need to be opened to begin the process of providing for the Palestinians needs. They have been abused and neglected too long. Money needs to be brought in to Gaza for a multitude of reasons. Nations need to lend support to rebuild Gaza. Israel killed thousands of innocent suvillions including children. It is very sad. Please help the Palestinian people work toward peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Leo in Missouri writes:

I hope the Obama Administration and the State Dept. will take a more even-handed approach to Middle East problems. The U.S. must insist that Israel honor its commitments to the peace process, i.e. abandoning the settlement construction on the West Bank, refraining from dehumanizing actions against both their indidengous and neighboring Arab citizens, and questioning their 100-to-one-eyes-for-an-eye military policy in the region. Additionally, the U.S. should insist that other Arab nations back U.S. efforts, which are clearly in their own interests, to insure peace in the Middle East. Good luck!

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Paul in California writes:

The people in the area have to commite to peaace. People must not tollerate violence from anyone. Evil will be replaced with more evil, Hatred with more haterd. The people in Gaza need to take a lesson from Ireland. When the people stop pointing the finger and demand the killing stops, that is when they will have peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Stacey in Louisiana writes:

The best hope in resolving this age-old conflict is the education of Israel's and Palestine's children. The international community should support and help fund independent, non-partisan, non-governmental programs that bring Israeli and Palestinian children together. Two examples include Kids with Cameras and Summer Camps for Sport and Peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Shirley in California writes:

Negotiate for the allowance of the Palestinians to complete the rebuilding with NO VIOLANCE

With the thousands of Palistinians and Israelites that work and live together, it is time for a lasting peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Redda in Texas writes:

I have a good deal of 'distaste' for Hamas and its 'Muslim Brotherhood organization' based mentality. I can't see why they should be shooting rockets at civilian complexes, when there are plenty of military targets available to them.

That said, starving the people of Gaza to death because they chose Hamas as their governing party is not a solution that 'encourages democracy' or rewards the people for speakkng their mind. The Zionists don't need a 'peace treaty' with Hamas, they don't need Hamas to 'recognize their right to exist', all they need is a 'cease fire' agreement like they had -- which they violated 156 plus times' and both parties can continue to agree to disagree and the people can 'go on with their lives'. Why starve the people out because they chose Hamas to represent them. You / we want peace, it doesn't have to be by way of a peace treaty. We have a DMZ of almost 50 years of peace with the North Koreans in the Korean penninsula. We can have the same in Palestine and all its occupied territories.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Rosemary in New Jersey writes:

Rebecca in Indonesia's 4-point plan: The One State Solution. I echo her question: Can you imagine if we pulled that off? It would change everything!

But the One State Solution can work only if all citizens are treated as equals in all ways. There can be no second-class citizens.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Sue in U.S.A. writes:

The best path would be a form of truth and reconciliation as has been done in other places with a long history of mutual violence and mistrust. The leaders of Hamas need to be pressured to think about the future of Palestinian children and the leaders of Israel need to be pressured to think about the future of Israeli children- if they can't act like grown ups, then the children of Israel and Palestine need to demand that their parents elect new leadership. The U.S. needs to stop giving Israel American tax dollars which are then used for weapons, bombs, and military invasions and the nations of the middle East need to stop giving Hamas funding for weapons, bombs and rockets-as long as weapons are being funded by outside interests who don't have to suffer the consequences of seeing their own children killed, their schools and hospitals bombed, etc, then the conflict will continue. Any nation, including the U.S. that funds weapons is not an honest broker in this situation.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Emman in Illinois writes:

The best path forward for Gaza has long been overdue. First and foremost, the Israeli seige, merciless and inhumane in nature must end. Israel has purposefully choked Gaza, starving its inhabitants and making life miserable for the 1.5 million Palestinians living in this open air prison. As important is Israel's illegal occupation of the West Bank. Israel must leave the West Bank, take their crazed settlers with them so that Palestinians can have a viable contiguous, autonomous Palestinian state. So many U.N. Resolutions have been issued demanding that Israel go back to the 1967 borders, and in response Israel continues to speed settlement building. It has now built an apartheid wall, caging in Palestinians, choking them with ridiculous checkpoints that serve only to harass and humiliate the Palestinian population. Enough is enough.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Donald in Virginia writes:

Gentlemen and Ladies

When you have two parties not even willing to discuss peace living at each others doorsteps, both are angry, unhappy, unrestful to even consider about growing business between them. That is like if President George W. Bush lived next door to Saddam Hussain anyone have any clue what would of happened?

I think the best foot foward is to start over only move the people of Gaza and build a brand new State Government for them so they can conduct business and live in peace.

Otherwise all the good intentions you might have will be washed away with the current disagreements between the two parties. Should the people of Gaza have a new State Goverment, sure they should. The problem is having it right next to Isreal, bad choice for both sides.

I hope this new Administration can speak with the Egyptian Prime Minister, King of Arabia and all the other Arab Leaders to discuss a brand new home for the Palestinians and Hamas. If Syria is so concerned about the people of Palestine then allow them to build in that country then move all the refugees from Gaza to Syria. This would ease tensions and then the Arab families would be all in one place surrounded by its own people.

Problem solved and this would help end the violence between the two once and for all.

Godspeed!!!!

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

George B. in New York writes:

I would like to see an effort to work with Hamas toward a long-term truce which brackets the Israel recognition issue in order to find common ground. This would allow exploration of Hamas's interest in peaceful coexistence. Such an agreement could in it self open new possibilities for future exploration of common interest and, perhaps, change the dynamic.

In addition, I believe it's necessary to seak common ground on the issue with both Iran and Syria.

Without these considerations real progress is a deceitful mirage.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Henry in California writes:

i wish you luck solving this intractable problem. one thing that may help is a more even-handed approach. currently it seems the official/media position is that israel can do no wrong & the palestinians can do no right. that can't be correct. plus look where it has gotten us.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Justin W. in New Jersey writes:

The best path forward for Gaza would be to talk with the Hamas dominated government along with international donors, Business groups, and Labor groups in order to build up investment in Gaza and along with using the social programs that Hamas already provides to its people along with Non-Profit NGO's and micro credit from around the world. The fact is Hamas is a democratically elected government of Gaza and we must recognize that. Also we should push Israel to talk directly with Hamas and allow them to open the corridors to allow goods and services to go through under U.N. peacekeepers watch. The Israelis must not be allowed to control the corridors and airspace of a soverign Gaza along with military incursions like we saw 4 months ago. If Israel will not comply, the we must have the courage and political will to stop sending them U.S. foreign and military aid, and worse comes to worse maybe implement sanctions.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Imree in Oregon writes:

Reunite families in Gaza with extended family members in neighboring Arab countries and provide a stipend for relocation to said Arab states. Let Israel extend its borders by purchasing the land/homes of families moving out of Gaza. The people of Gaza were deliberately cut off from their extended families when the Arab countries closed their borders to fellow Arabs when Israel became a state.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Ward in Washington writes:

The U.S. must engage with Hamas. In principle, its armed resistance to Israel's illegal occupation and now blockade is entirely legitimate. The U.S. must do its best to encourage the political wing of Hamas, the de facto authority in Gaza. Giving oxygen to a political solution including Hamas should, we can hope, make the military wing whither over time (as we saw in Northern Ireland). This will be messy, but the U.S. current policy of effectively unconditional support of Israel's acts of war against Palestine, including Gaza, are not helpful.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Richard in Pennsylvania writes:

I think the best way forward is to focus on the people of Gaza instead of Hamas. The recent round of Israeli attacks on Gaza may have destroyed Hamas' ability to fire rockets, but they also (I would imagine) created a lot of anger amongst Gaza residents. I understand fully Israel's desire to stop the attacks, but I think their strategy will only result in more people joining Hamas' cause in the end; it's self-defeating.

What we need to do is stop attacking the people of Gaza and start showing them kindness. Perhaps it's naive, but I feel that the best way forward is to get the people of Gaza to reject Hamas on their own. How? Show them that Israel is not the enemy. Reach out to them. Help them. Show them that Hamas is an impediment to their long term well-being, not an ally. Undermine Hamas in their own land, help reform Fatah so that it's more effective and give the Palestinians fewer reasons to hate.

Unfortunately, that is a long path to peace. I fear the damage has already been done to current generations, so it might take decades of "kindness" before you see a result.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Marisa in Colorado writes:

Confining myself to the question I believe is being asked, as opposed to the broader question of resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, I would hope that some consideration be given to funding projects that have yielded positive results for disadvantaged youth in other areas, such as the classical music initiative in Venezuela and cottage industries in Vietnam and organized volunteer-effort trips by our own very poor kids to even more impoverished parts of the world (similar to those with which Chris Rock's wife is involved). It seems to me that more hopeful, more positive, more "connected" young people are the best path forward everywhere.

Thanks to all of you for your service.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Mary in Tennessee writes:

Both sides are committing atrocities, both sides are at fault. I feel that any financial aid given to either side will create more problems than it solves. We need to keep in mind that this is a holy war and if we take a side we will effectively be condoning the actions of a militant religious group. If we involve ourselves it should be as mediators, and we should continue to set an example for others in the separation of church and state. In a good compromise everyone feels like they got a raw deal, and nobody feels like the mediator is their friend.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Floria in California writes:

The best ways to stop the misery of the people of Gaza is to stop Israel's atrocities; to stop U.S. military and financial aids to that country, and to stop U.S. hypocritical "friendship" with Israel.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Adil in Georgia writes:

The United States needs to get fully into competition for the hearts and minds of the Islamic World with the Islamists. This is true in Palestine as it is in Sudan. The issues are one and the same.

The Islamists exploit the lack of government attention to the social needs of the majority impoverished Muslim populations within their societies. They cater to those social needs and endear the poor to themselves.

The need to empower Moderate Muslims in the Islamic World should be the driving agenda in the United States Foreign Policy in the Middle East not only through requesting liberalization of press, education and governance, but also through the provision of critically needed foreign assistance into these highly impoverished societies in the Middle East, such as the one in Gaza - both physiologically and awareness wise through scientific education.

This is where the U.S. foreign policy needs to focus.. Aid provided directly to Gaza need to be administered through the USAID. Even though the USAID in its top echelon should be purely American, its mid management should be chiefly hired from the locals who are best positioned to identify need and administer aid and reconstruction free of any political influences-capital for the Islamists.

Even if some of the assistance funds will need to be given to the PA, hereto from now onwards will mean a Hamas-led one in Gaza, not all the funds need to be channeled through the PA.. Simply because this means that Hamas will now advance its Islamist agenda through Western donation.. A real stupidity in my mind.

Beyond the immediate assumption of a role in the lives of the Palestinians in Gaza in the administering of aid, the U.S. should be clear to insist on the recognition of Israel as a state, as a prerequisite for final settlement negotiations in Palestine/Israel. The question of violence/resistance is one that should be settled as part of the negotiations.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

It will be like pouring money into a sinking ship and as the last fiscal effort, the monies will be redirected to purchase more arms and rearm.

This problem cannot be solved externally and decades have more then premised this fact; due to the misuse of aid. Without absolute control of some stable force of authority, it will be a wasted effort and another one of Washington DC mentality of the past, noted rather well by Ross Perot: Doing something for the sake of doing something and getting nothing accomplished besides throwing money at the problem to say you did something. ..

They are not stable politically, that is the problem and if Egypt is so concerned, why is it extending it's fence to keep refuges out? Why not provide a safe haven for the citizens to reside until an established peace and government is formed, or at least rout out the fanatical elements?

If the U.S. could simply hand the government FM 3-07 and the International community could provide stable authority to apply what we know will work, only then will any difference be made.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Joshua in Florida writes:

It has been said elsewhere, but I think the best solution is one that both sides have a reason to work together towards. If Israel shares a portion of tourism revenue with Gaza, there will be a great amount of pressure on the Palestinians to reduce violence. It's something that would be self enforcing, and it could start working immediately. Every time there is violence tourism suffers greatly, and the Palestinians could use that money to rebuild.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Julie in Illinois writes:

I think responsibility for the borders should be removed from Israeli control. The Palestinian and and Israeli business leaders floated an idea to the Israeli government in 2007 to privatize security at the crossings. It went nowhere. Resurrect that idea. Israel should have control ONLY of people who enter Israel proper (the 1967 borders) not the West Bank. Israel should have NO control over who enters Gaza. If they are not occupying the country, as they say, they should not attempt to control movement. Palestinians should have freedom of movement between Gaza and the West Bank. Yes they must cross over the settlements, but they are illegal, so dismantle them. Problem solved. Israel should have NO control over visas for Gazans or any Palestinians. The country of destination can refuse entry if they so please. Rebuilding Gaza is the perfect opportunity to utilize green technology and get the Palestinians off of dependence on Israel for their energy needs. When the Israelis are planning to attack, they cut off the phones and electricity in the area targeted. They should not have such control. This would solve that. Israel should be required ot give full rights to ALL of its citizens to qualify for US Aid. Their actions in Gaza should be investigated under the terms of the Arms Export Control Act. These actions are doing NOTHING to ensure the security of ordinary Israelis, it actually makes them less secure. Lift the banking restrictions on Palestine. You are punishing the people for democratically electing an unpopular government. So did we for the last 8 years, but no one punished us though Bush was voted the greatest threat to world peace. Let's stop being so hypocritical. If we're going to promote democracy, unpopular people will get elected sometimes. Learn to work with them instead of shunning them. It is counterproductive and accomplishes nothing. If these unpopular people fail as leaders, they will be voted out. That's how democracy works. We must stand up for a people that exercised their newly found democratic rights, not demonize them for their choices. You must include Hamas in negotiations as we included the IRA and UDF in Ulster. They live there, they advocate for their people, they were elected, unlike the IRA and UDF, they won't go away. If given the opportunity and the resources, they may even surprise you. Stop promoting one group over the other to create divisions, it didn't work in El Salvador or Nicaragua and it won't work here.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Peter in New Hampshire writes:

If the amount of money spent on the war in Iraq for only two months had been spent on nation building in GAZA and providing for the dignity of the palestinian peoples, I suspect that much of our image problem at least would have vaporized a long time ago in the middle east. At this point, it is hard to find the money for such a venture although the venture is not really dissimilar to the one our president is currently engaging in at home. For me it's a questionn of "pay me now or really pay me later". The best way to disarm Hamas is to make it unattractive to the common people of the zone by giving them an alternative with substance. Do that with real opportunity, not by propping up an impossible situation with Southern Israel. Ultimately, Israel will get what it wants- peaceful coexistence , when the people of palestine have some hope, not before.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Paul C. in Indiana writes:

We saw an end to Apartheid in South Africa and the Berlin Wall fall. It's time for us to demand no less of Israel. The Zionists may have Biblical claims, but that gave them no right to borrow on the whole world's guilt at the end of the Holocaust, which guilt they've banked into bankruptcy, and displace a people from the only land they had known as their home for millenia, whose only guilt lay in where they lived. Israel as the occupier needs to come out to meet the Palestinians, not the other way round, and we as their ally need to make this very strong demand of them. Speaking as a member of the Diaspora.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Skip in Massachusetts writes:

Talk with Hamas. Talk with organizations working in Gaza, such as the American Friends Service Committee. Ask whether Israel should share -- perhaps be wholely responsible -- for repairing the damage it did. Inquire about war crimes, by various parties.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Maureen in Illinois writes:

- Immediately embargo U.S. arms to Israel (which human rights groups document were used to commit war crimes in Gaza) and make any further shipments conditional on Israel ending the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

- End the U.S.' collusion in the collective punishment of 1.5 million persons in Gaza and end the boycott of the democratically-elected Hamas government

- Stop using the U.S.' veto at the UN Security Council to shield Israel from accountability for its massive violations of Palestinian rights and its rights abuses against other peoples

- Respect Palestinians' right to self-determination and recognize the right of refugees to return to their land and property in what is now called Israel -- half of the population of the Gaza Strip are refugees.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Dustin W. in Missouri writes:

I believe the way forward with this crisis, comes through working directly with the people of Palestine and of Israel. I believe their governments and ruling factions are out of touch with the real needs of the people. This conflict has become a childish game of mine vs. yours. If you want real peace in the middle east, you have to move beyond the squabbles of the Israeli government, who have a hard enough time deciding who their leader should be, much less how to get past the conflicts of the past and to focus on new solutions. You must begin to see Hamas as irrelevant. They only come to power through violent means. They only gain support when they provoke violence on the people of Gaza. For out of fear and anger, the Palestinian people turn to Hamas to defend their homes and schools from being bombed, and supplies being stopped from ever reaching them. What choice does that leave them? If tanks rolled through my neighborhood and bombed my home, I'd be wanting revenge as well.

The way forward is through reaching the people. I truly believe after decade after decade of continued violence and continued suffering, that the best way to resolve this conflict is by putting it in the peoples hands. I believe the United States can take a leading role in drafting agreements that both the Palestinian and Israeli voters can decide on, and not their elected officials. Put a 2 state solution with a map of the well-thought out borders, a plan for complete sovereignty for Palestinian people, an agreement that Israel will be a major help in rebuilding Gaza and other areas, while providing humanitarian aid as they begin the transition into self-government. Provide the Israeli people with a guaranteed security agreement, that prevents Palestine from establishing a military for a period of time, and most importantly that any faction of Hamas, will be eradicated and punished and that the United States and the world must provide that guarantee. Put this on a ballot for the people to see and decide. Give the people the choice.

I believe that if the President were to personally go to Gaza, to make a speech to the people. And proclaim to them, "stand against Hamas, and we will stand with you" Along with a demand that Hamas disband and leave for good or face action, will incite the people to rally against the terrorists who rule their land. It puts the power in the hands of the ones who need it. It gives those who are suffering a glimmer of hope to change for the better, and end once and for all, the struggle that has gripped their homeland for so long.

I hope you will listen to what I have to say and perhaps it will make you think about the situation in a new way. Thank you.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

John C. in New York writes:

I am all for a Palestinian State, but not a State run by Hamas. I would like to see some guarantees by the United States, assuring Israel's security.

As for humanitarian aid, I am all for it, if it really gets to the suffering people.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

John in California writes:

I think the people of Gaza have been terribly abused by Israel. As much as I hope a fatah/hamas unity coalition will help moderate the more radical side of hamas, I would think that there needs to be incentive to show that violent action will not help, and a way to be sure that any aid really helps the people there. I hope Israel is pressed to concede on settlements and will take real action to dismantle them.

With the recent Israeli elections, I'm not hearing that any peace process interests them. They have to be pushed to the table

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Susan J. in Illinois writes:

We need a two state solution. The current situation is untenable and will lead to an unending cycle of violence, fear, and strife. Gaza should be returned to the Palestinians and the Israelis should end their blockade which prevents people in Gaza from getting to their jobs in Israel or elsewhere, blocks much needed humanitarian aid, and allows Israeli settlers to effectively steal the land of Palestinians and set up illegal settlements.

The people of Israel have a lot to fear. Having the living memory of the holocaust as an example, it is understandable that they fear giving an inch and believe that violence is the solution to most, if not all, of their problems. However, in trying to avoid a repeat of the holocaust they have turned Gaza and the West Bank into Palestinian ghettos and the only way forward is to end this.

My family suffered during the holocaust -- we lost family members and my father's family was only able to seek safety in the U.S. because my grandfather was a renowned scientist so he, and his family, were invited to come -- instead of being turned away as were so many others. I tell this story to say that I feel I do understand the fears the Israelis confront every day. But whatever the past, the only way forward is the way of peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Patricia in New York writes:

$900 Million - money already ill spent - the only thing certain will be more loss of life - on both sides.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Rebecca in Indonesia writes:

1) Educate the U.S. public about the complexities of this problem. Stop calling all Palestinians "gunmen" in the press and describe the "Israeli Defense Force" as what it is: an occupying army

2) Stop funding the IDF

3) Begin to rebuild support for a ONE state solution. Only unity can solve this. There was momentum for this at one time, and you might find large numbers of ordinary citizens on both sides would be in favor. But the powers that be in both factions have succeeded in pulling the wool over everyone's eyes as the on-going conflict with the chimera of the two-state solution (wouldn't it have happened already if it were going to) serves their egos and pocketbooks better.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Rebecca in Indonesia writes:

There are some things that are really clear:

1) We need a well-financed education campaign, supported by and pursued by our very own government, to teach Americans how the modern state of Israel came into being and to give our population as a whole a more nuanced understanding of this amazingly complicated puzzle. A majority of Americans need to understand that this is a situation where neither side is ever categorically in the right or categorically in the wrong. When you ask the question whose land is it, the answer is, it is the land of all of the people currently living on it, just as is the case in Zimbabwe, just as in the case of Lebanon, just as in the case of post-Apartheid South Africa. Once this is understood, our ability to mediate with neutrality based on a mandate grounded in understanding, rather than the current overweening ignorance, will increase exponentially....we will stop implicitly teaching large swathes of our population that every Palestinian is a "gunman" (why are they NEVER referred to as freedom fighters) and that every Israeli is divinely inspired, pure, and blameless for any of the violence that occurs. This in turn will make it slightly less easy for lobbying groups from either side to hold any immense political sway (as the pro-Israel lobby currently does).

2) If we are going to go on providing monies to the region (and arguments could be made that we ought not), we should do so in equal measure. Anything less weakens our ability to be an honest broker of peace.

3) We should build a "coalition of the willing" (oh, sorry Mr. President, but the phrase applies here) to pursue a one-state solution across the territory currently inhabited by "Israelis" and "Palestinians". I think the Europeans would agree and we might convince some of the moderate Arab regimes, with work. The two-state solution JUST WILL NEVER WORK. Unification is really the holy grail of a lasting peace, whether the world is ready to recognize that or not. There is also a fair chance that the extremely weary people of the region (not the governments) would actually welcome and support such a modest proposal. And can you imagine the look on the faces of the Al Qaeda leadership if we ever ACTUALLY pulled such a thing off? I mean, what poster child would they then find to hide behind to continue their worldwide terrorism plotting?

4) We need to support and move to signature a UN treaty on the sale and traffic of arms...and once it's ready for signature, we need to sign it. All of this slaughter is making someone a pretty penny somewhere and we need to put whatever it takes internationally in motion to make all of the bickering a good deal less lucrative.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Andrea writes:

the way to fix gaza is to educate the people that israel has a right to exist and stop hating jewish people. jews have suffered long enough. you must make it clear to the plo and hamas jerusalem will never be divided and they are lucky to have gotten gaza land in the first place. in 1948 the israeli arabs would not take the land annexed for them by the british they wanted it all and started a war that continues today. with a shift to the right in parliment the israelis will never give up anymore land nor should they. israel is smaller than rhode island now. anti semitism has increased and escalated as of today. did you read what is going on in canada at the universities? it is appalling. growing up in america i have always had to pretend i was not a jew. this was ingrained into me by my mother. as a result i feel i have never felt a part of anything in this world much less the united states. this is what it is like for being a jew in america.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Lisa in Kentucky writes:

I don't think anyone knows the best path for Gaza. The U.S. should ONLY support a solution (not a country or regime). How can we expect either side to change if no one wants compromise? They're going to have to learn to respect each other because at the end of the day it has to be about saving lives, not who is right or wrong.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Cain in U.S.A. writes:

You both should continue to pay lip service to the occupants of Gaza. Please, continue talking about a two-state solution which will probably never come. Considering that the likud is coming into power, just tell Netanyahu not to get too trigger happy. Let us be honest and serious, nobody really cares about the Palestinian people.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Diane in Illinois writes:

Until the U.S. concedes that Hamas is more realistically representative of the Palestinian people, we won't make any progress in the quest to resolve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Israeli leadership is showing a militancy equal to or greater than that of Hamas. They should be personae non grata rather than receive encouragement from our leadership.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Dirk in Belgium writes:

Thank you for the efforts already undertaken.

Would it not be more practical to have one nation, in one area for the Palistinian people?

I know this would be a difficult task to complete, but adding a Gaza size pice of land to the West Bank, would allow all Palistinians to have one country, not one split in two ...

It would probable also help for them to feel as a nation, ans not as a region in another country.

With sincere appreciation of all the good and constructive steps already undertaken by the President and Secretary Clinton,

Dirk

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Donald in Virginia writes:

@ SNP in Syria -- It's obvious to myself the reason why there will be no peace for either side is because it's like mixing apples and oranges. They will only continue to fight for a piece of land for nothing. When our country has spent millions already on both sides its quite pathetic.

I know this is probably one of the hardest things to recongize but maybe the best move for Gaza Strip is to be MOVED from it's current location to a brand new area where they can build, live and breed in peace, quiet and without wars. I don't think anyone on this earth wants to see two neighbors continue to duke it out over a piece of land. When the solution is right in front of them. Pack up and move out to an area where they can have security, and build on new lands. Besides even if they created the new state, it will also be in turmoil and yes more fighting will exist, so in the end what has been truly accomplished, NOTHING! Think Smarter for the people. If you truly care about helping people, help them in the right way! Otherwise, they will only continue destroying each other and yes more money will be provided in aid, but that doesn't solve the problem. The root of the problem has not been addressed, "How can Jews and Arabs live together without war?" What can both sides do in future to prevent war? How can they live together if there not prepared to make the first steps towards peace? Because someone doesn't want peace. Think about that? Just like when Prime Minister Sadot was killed in Egypt? Some people on earth just do not want PEACE!

Godspeed and let's hope this can all be worked out for everyone!

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Nina K. in Indiana writes:

I feel that a balanced approach to the situation in Gaza is best for everyone concerned. By balanced, I mean the recognition that both sides have the right to exist, and to basic human liberties. I also mean that both sides have done wrong. In the case of hamas, I refer specifically to the their intractable position on the right of Israel to exist and the rocket attacks. In the case of Israel, the blockage of Gaza, the failure to pursue the extension of the ceasefire, and the incursion of troops most recently causing so many civilians deaths and human misery. I think that the U.S.A. should stop giving military aid to Israel. As a taxpayer, I am stunned that my tax dollars are going to fund the asymmetrical warfare conducted by the state of Israel. I think humanitarian aid to Gaza is okay, but we should definitely sit down and talk to Hamas about their rhetoric and their position on the state of Israel. Recognizing that Israel has acted in violation of the 1967 accords by allowing settlers to establish settlements in Palestine would be a big step towards peace.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Caleb in Ohio writes:

I think the most efficient way to help both Israelis and Palestinians acheive the peace that most of their people want is to incentivize peace.

Take the amount of money we would give to both sides for arms or humanitarian aid and pool it. Whenever one side attacks the other, the attacked side gets a portion of the money put aside for them and the dollar amounts go up so escalating violence only helps the "enemy". Everything gets paid in one lump sum at the end of the fiscal year.

If they cross a threshold of violence we support neither side financially and if they co-exist peacefully for the whole year they get paid out equally.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Khurt W. writes:

Stop the fighting. Heal the wounds. Create one country with Palestinians and Isreali's as full citizens.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Albert in Pennsylvania writes:

Egypt created the refugees and the Gaza strip. Returning the Sinai without the Gaza strip to Egypt was Begin biggest mistake. Let Gaza get all of it's electricity, water fuel, work from Egypt. Egypt then will not be able to let Hamas lob Kassams on Israeli schools.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Peter in the Netherlands writes:

My idea is to make a peace plan for all the Palestinians in the Middle East, in Gaza, West Bank but also in Lebanon. All the Palestinians must live as normal people with normal rights. When the rights are not regular there won't come peace in the middle east.

My plan is based on the plan of Jimmy Carter from 2006, after the war in Lebanon.

Lots of succes with it.

With Regards,

Peter R.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Tony T. in Australia writes:

The perception outside the U.S. is that both Republicans and Democrats place good relations with Israel before the welfare of what remains of the Palestinian people. Hillary Clinton has only one chance to show that the new aministration is even handed. Israel has committed war crimes with the aid of U.S. weapons, a fact that is obvious to all who have followed the latest conflict in Gaza. The failure to grasp this fact and deal with it will further lower U.S. standing in the eyes of the World. The eyes of the world are upon you.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Terry in Connecticut writes:

Ok guys. I am ready to follow another one of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's travels like you all. The Mideast is a dicey bogged down problem. I think Secretary Clinton will show more even handed approach to the Isreali/Palinstine issue than the Bush Administration.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Muhammed in Florida writes:

President Obama laid out a vision for America -- as we recover from a recession we are also investing in our future. We should use the same principle in Gaza. The funds should not go to the PA or Hamas. Significant amount should be spent on education, infrastructure and health care. The young in Gaza must see there is a future for them, that even though they were born in a refugee camp, ruled by gunmen, and occupied by a foreign enemy; they must be given hope that one day they too will enjoy freedom, and self rule; that their lives matter, that they will grow up and be doctors, engineers, scientists or actors. We must not let them fall into despair. Please build schools, libraries, museums, and parks and roads. Do Not give any funds to PA. Let NGOs distribute or manage the projects. Hire local professionals. Like the president says, treat them with 'respect'.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Patrick in Virginia writes:

I feel for the innocent victims that have had to deal with a turmultuous situation that they have little to no control over. The actions of the Hamas militants makes it apparent that they have no regard for the Palestinian people, they are only concerned with furthering their personal agenda. The Hamas have also abused and hampered any attempts of helping the citizens of Gaza with their interference of UN operations and the theft of UN supplies.

Because of the way Hamas militants conduct themselves and the support they receive from the Islamic Nation I do not support sending money to Gaza in an attempt to rebuild. Until the Hamas leaders are removed from power and their desire to kill all Israelis is eliminated rebuilding Gaza will be an act of throwing good after bad. The Israelis will rightfully continue to defend themselfs from the cowardly acts of terrorism by launching future attacks on Gaza. With the cowardly acts of hiding behind civilians there will be continued destruction in Gaza. Eventually the Palestinian people will tire of the quality of life the Hamas militants has forced upon them, eventually they will realize that they need to stand against their oppressor if they are to experience a life of peace. At this time I feel it should be the responsibility of the UN, EU, and Islamic Nation to finance the rebuilding of Gaza. The U.S. has financed the majority of the war on terrorism, we should not be apart of rebuilding Gaza. Another reason we should not send $900 million to help rebuild Gaza is a fairly basic concern. Where is the money coming from? This country is broke and going further behind on a daily basis. It is time to let other nations step up to the plate and help the poor, needy, oppressed people of the world.

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Kate in Pennsylvania writes:

Let's just imagine, for a minute, that the rest of the world decides that America should be given back to the Indian tribes. The nations band together, and fight a war to occupy the United States, during the course of which we are forced into refugee camps in Mexico, along the border, and told that once hostilities end, we'll be able to return to our homes, if we choose to submit to Indian rule, or at the very least, we can pack our things and sell our homes. But they never let us do that. For years, we are kept in the refugee camps, not allowed to become Mexican citizens, not allowed to have our jobs back, while other people move into our homes and take over our land. Certainly not allowed to have our own army. This goes on for more than 50 years, and we become very bitter. A few of us manage to move elsewhere to make new lives. Many of us do not give up hope that one day we can return to our homes and towns. We somehow eke out a living in desert camps. Our children grow up, stateless, helpless, frustrated. From time to time, the new "Americans" shell us, shoot at us, throw those of us who speak out in jail. Sometimes they embargo our food and we begin to starve. Our furious children lash out from time to time in horrible ways, but in the only way they can -- strapping bombs to themselves, sneaking into their homeland, and blowing themselves and others up.

Eventually, other countries help us to hold democratic elections, and we elect a party which refuses to recognize the sovereignty of the new "Americans", and is willing to continue the fight let us go back to our homes. And then those same countries which helped bring about that election reject our choice and refuse to help us further. They turn their backs when one day, the new "America" decides to further punish us by invading our camps, destroying our dwellings and gardens.

THAT IS THE PLIGHT OF THE PEOPLE OF GAZA.

WE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS THE ISRAELIS WHO ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS, AND WE ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE ALWAYS ARMED THEM!!!

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Josh in Arizona writes:

This obviously is a highly complicated and personal, not to mention a highly politicized matter. Concessions from both side, and not just small ones, are required as is some sacrifice.

1) Israel must relinquish control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip as defined by the Wye Accords modified to reflect a 24 month time frame with all Israeli citizens and military units removed from Palestinian areas 2 years from date of approval.

2) The Palestinian Authority (hereto reffered as the PA) will not be able to declare statehood until 24 months and 1 day from the time of implementation begins.

3) The PA must denounce ALL acts of terrorism, arrest and adjudicate any and all citizens of PA lands who has or have committed acts of Terrorism from the time of implementation forward. In addition, the PA/Palestine must extend full diplomatic recognition of the State of Israel and Israel must extend full diplomatic recognition of the PA/Palestine.

4) All members of the Arab league must provide assistance toward the new Palestinian state (whether it be medical, financial or judicial among other types of assistance).

5) All members of the Arab league, if not already, must fully and unconditionally recognize the State of Israel and it's right to exist and extend full diplomatic recognition to Israel. Israel must also extend full Diplomatic Recognition to all Arab League nations. All Arab league nations must also denounce all terrorist groups, cease financial and military aid to said groups and prosecute all persons who commit acts of terrorism pertinent to the laws of the sovereign nation

6) A military peacekeeping force comprised of Arab League nations that have recognized the State of Israel (initially, Egypt and Jordan but other nations will rotate in and out as deemed appropriate) will provide border security for the new Palestinian state for a period of 24 months at which time, unless agreed to by all signatories, the Palestinian government will assume control of all border crossings.

7) Israel will work with the nations of Egypt and Kingdom of Jordan to initially provide Water, Sewer, Natural Gas and Electricity to the PA and assist the PA in development of their own pipelines and non nuclear power plants

8) Israel will release all political prisoners currently being held in Israeli prisons to PA authority within 120 days of time of implementation. Any prisoners who are being held on capitol crimes as determined by international law, will continued to be held, however a task force from the world court will examine each case and make determinations as the disposition of individual cases.

9) In the case of Jerusalem, Western Jerusalem, with the exception of the Old City, will be deeded to the State of Israel. Eastern Jerusalem, with the exception of the Old City, will be deeded to the PA/Palestine. The Old city of Jerusalem will be declared an open city, governed by a troika consisting of an Rabbi, a Mullah and a Priest. Each representative must have 25 years of experience and be accepted by the United Nations, Vatican, Israel and the PA/Palestine. Security will be provided by the Swiss Army or other neutral sovereign nation acting as a police force.

10) Israeli citizens currently living in settlements that are scheduled to be turned over to the PA would be encouraged to leave and return to Israel proper. Any settler who does, would be entitled to compensation as determined by the Knesset. However, any Israeli citizen that does not leave settlements that are to be turned over the PA/Palestine would be subject to Palestinian Laws when the PA/Palestine assumes control of said lands without protection or compensation from the State of Israel except for those provided by International Law. (In other words, the Palestinian Government could seize lands and expel the occupants forthwith and if they refuse or resist they would be held accountable under Palestinian and/or International Laws.

I am sure there are many many many other issues worth discussing. Please note that I am Jewish and I believe that most American Jews feel that this has gone on long enough and the United States needs to pressure Israel, especially with a right wing government under Mr. Netanyahu seeming more likely. While we are very supportive of Israel, we all want peace and the opportunity for Israel to prosper.

Thank You

Posted on Sat Feb 28, 2009

Andrea M. in Florida writes:

I agree, Gaza needs to be split between Israel and Egypt. It will always be a hot bed for Hamas terrorists and should never be part of a Palestinian State.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

SNP in Syria writes:

QUOTE-Secretary Clinton will participate in the donor's conference for Gaza recovery-END QUOTE

Why the Israeli destroyed Gaza in the first place, what did accomplished other than genocide and war crimes by Israeli and Egyptian leaders with Saudi financing. When will all realize that the Middle East political, economic and social problems are hopeless? When will the 2 millions Palestinians refugee vacate camps in Syria and Lebanon and live happily in a Palestinian State. It has been more than 60 years. When a donor conference for the 3 millions Iraqi refugees be held. Cocktail parties want do, LEADERSHIP DO IT. Obviously none around, just the wannabe leaders.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

David in Texas writes:

They should be free to form their own state....but, they need to stop the violence in their own country and against Israel or they need to be completely occupied.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

Jared in Oregon writes:

Reduce U.S. military aid to Israel. We do not need to sponsor a terrorist regime any longer.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

Robert M. in California writes:

I'm reluctant to say it, but Gaza needs to be split between Egypt and Israel; with a sovereign Palestine becoming the West Bank. It is untenable to have a divided Palestinian state; and it would be a near impossible situation to make all of Gaza Israel.

There is what appears to be a dry riverbed north of Nuseirat. Dividing the strip there causes minimal physical disruption to existing structures or populations. This would result in about 2/3 of the area of Gaza going to Egypt, but around half the coastline and 2/3 (or more) of the population reverting to Israel. I fully understand the political issues involved with either the movement of the people living there; but it palls in comparison to the task, and repercussions, of what was done in 1949.

$1 billion to repair what will surely be bombed back into the ground seems to me a waste. A substantial amount of that money would also go toward the same type of behavior that exacerbates the cycle of violence. Send luggage, transportation, food, and money to build only on the West Bank.

I've floated this to friends that are politically left, and those on the right. They both disagree with me. They call this a "never gonna happen". Perhaps, but there's been no sign of Middle East peace since before I was 7, and I'm a year older than the President.

Thank you for the moment of your time,

Bob M.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

M. in Maryland writes:

It is a horrible injustice to release $900 million to the UN or any other agency in HOPES it will stay out of the hands of the Hamas or any other terrorist regime. Our country's leaders will fail us if this happens. Our men and women of our U.S. Military are in Iraq and Afghanistan fighting terrorism......all along we will be handing out money to fund them in the Gaza. The Middle East has several countries who support the Palestinians ( so they say ) so get the money to rebuild from them. Stop thinking our country has to be "liked" by everyone! And by the way, Iraq, as most of you either are too young to remember or too blind to understand, needed to be taken out of the hands of Saddam Hussein before we could EVER approach the issue of fighting terrorism in that area of the world. Please give the $900 million to FEMA to protect and comfort our own country during hardships. It would make more sense.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

Lindsay in Florida writes:

The people of Gaza must stop supporting Hamas terrorism. As long as the people of Gaza support terrorism, support the bombing of Israel, and support the notion of the destruction of Israel, it's hard for me to sympathize.

The Palestinian Authority and the people of Palestine and Gaza must denounce terrorism and those who agitate and perpetrate.

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

Donald in Virginia writes:

I heard the State Department will be sending them 900 Million dollars in aid. I hope this money does not end up in the hands that will only cause more problems. You know as bad as things get in that area of the world, I'm surprised that Egypt or Saudi Arabia hasn't just opened its doors and allow them to move in. This way the fighting would end, the people can be around people they enjoy being around. If they stay in the same place, history will only dictate again, more wars, more deaths. The land then could be used for something else other than a battling ground. Then instead of trying to rebuild Gaza just rebuild on the new location in Peace! This would end the wars and bring upon stability in the region. Besides I seriously doubt they really want to live next to Isreal in the first place. Sometimes moving might be the smart choice.

Gaza strip could be turned into a Monumential grounds with a Museum showing the history for the public.

Godspeed hope it all works out for everyone!

Posted on Fri Feb 27, 2009

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2