Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments

Clare in New York writes:

The UN has the potential to be extremely effective but such effectivenes is blocked by over-emphasis on national sovreignty to the detriment of humn rights.
Powerful nations often are too arrogant to listen and truly dialogue with other nations.

The UN requires strengthening and reform but too many nations want to use it for their narrower self-interest and then blame the institution for the lack of action by the member nations to the ideals and commitments they have expressed within the UN.

We must make it work. Global peace and survival of millions is at stake.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Wendy in California writes:

YES, SI, OUI!!!

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

George in New Hampshire writes:

There are many reports of successful efforts by various UN departments that fully support a positive answer to the question. Peacekeeping forces, UN work at educating Afghan children, and protecting children against preventable diseases are but a few worth mentioning.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Martha in Texas writes:

Yes, the UN fulfills its mission.

Yes, it could be better, but when one considers that that many countries are trying to work together, with their own agendas and wants and needs, they do a good job. Without its stabilizing powers and bring-back-from-the-brink influence, this world would be a much scarier and unsafe place.

The Nobel Peace Prize... Again! Millions of children vaccinated against measles and receiving mosquito netting to protect against malaria. The largest number of peacekeeping forces ever deployed. Disaster relief. The highest number of Afghan children ever enrolled in school.

Imagine a world without the United Nations. I can't, and I don't want to.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

James in Michigan writes:

In a word, Yes, the UN performs their mission well. If they received more help from the United States they could do a better job. The United States has illegaly attacked Iraq, Uses cluster bombs ( illegal weapons), Uses depleated uranium shells (illegal weapons), Violates the Geneva Conventions Daily and occupies foreign countries without a United Nations mandate.

These actions make the U.S.A. a rogue nation by United Nations standards. It makes prefect sense to me that the U.S.A. is trying to discredit the United Nations. What elce can they do if they choose not to obey the laws of the world they live in?

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Jacquelin in California writes:

I have supported UNICEF for years because of the help given to the children of the world. The UN is our greatest hope for world peace. I hope the U.S. has
paid it's dues.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Robert in Nebraska writes:

The UN reflects the hope of mankind for a better world without the scourge of hunger, disease, poverty, brutality and war. It is an expression reason asserting itself against ignorance, tyranny and despair. It has many unheralded successes in its attempts to improve education, world health and dialong and understanding among nations.

Is it the answer to all the world's problems? No. Can it rise above the collective will of its constituents torn by conflict. Occasionally and with great difficulty, to be sure.

Is there a better international forum for addressing the greatest threats to world peace (nuclear bombs) and planetary survival (global climate change)? No.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Lynn in North Carolina writes:

Yes the UN fulfills its mission effectively.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Connie in North Carolina writes:

Yes the UN fulfills its mission.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Richard in Iowa writes:

Yes, the United Nations is the most important world organization. It fulfills its mission. It is only kept from being more effective and efficient through the obstructionism of individuals like former US Ambassador John Bolton and by those rouge nations that do not fall into compliance with the General Assembly and the Security Council; States like Israel and the U.S. who use the military option as the first option and often the only option. The UN is also hampered by the capitalist orientated World Bank and the IMF, each of which looks out for the interests of the wealthy investors over those of the people, often the poor and voiceless. The UN is the one strong and consistent voice for humane responses to difficult situations. The UN deserves all the support that the United States can give it and non of the bad mouthing that it has received almost continuously over the past six plus years. I ask the State Department to work through and with the UN to keep it the strong and viable organization it is. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a good example of a vision and a goal that we all should work for, although it needs to be updated to include gender identity issues and reproductive freedom issues. The demonizing of people and nations that the Bush Administration has used makes a mockery of that document.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Steve in California writes:

Yes, the UN does it's job effectively. The thing that often stands in it's way of doing a better job is the United States. The UN are humanitarians. The U.S. are sociopaths.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Kaori in New Mexico writes:

I am so relieved that we have the United Nations--it is so important to have a formal forum for discussion among world leaders and governments; the world's problems cannot be solved in isolation. I hope that the United States will start working towards more peaceful solutions and begin considering the good of the world.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Jean in New York writes:

Dear Friends,
As someone who worked has closely with the United Nations for six years, and had cooperated in UN projects
before that, I wish to testify that the United Nations does fullfil its it Mission effectively. This is no small task given the bad press, the obstacles placed in its way, and rules (the Security Council veto being one) that effectively prevent the UN from working even better.

I am embarrassed to have witnessed, time after time, none other than the United States itself acting. as an obstacle, keeping the UN from really doing its job.

It is time the United States re-learn diplomacy and the meaning of the common good.

The world needs the United Nations! It is all we have!

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Phyllis in Colorado writes:

The UN does get the job done!

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Norris in Washington, DC writes:

Not germane to topic but important to note: The red handed protester approaching Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Capitol Hill at a recent hearing was despicable and the protester's action was completely inappropriate. Secretary Rice handled herself with dignity in the face of such incredible disrespect. Keep up the good work Secretary Rice.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Orzu writes:

We are a group of teachers and students from Internet Learning Center in Ayni town as a program of GCE which is funded by the Department of State.To our minds the UN must continue, espessialy at such areas as Ayni to fulfill its mission.So many problems not solved yet...

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Pat in Alabama writes:

I believe that the UN is a necessary force in preserving cultures, ethical societies, and economic balance in the world. If the U.S. would support the UN and provide sound leadership by example, the UN could more effectively fulfill its mission. Unfortunately, world leaders have found the media to be an effective method of manipulating public support. The UN needs a more effective media profile to get its mission and successes recognized by the American public, and to let Americans know that the US is not the world's police force - the UN is.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Sharon in Connecticut writes:

More should be done through the UN because Diplomacy and open dialogue are essential in this global environment. The United States and this administration have totally messed up their position in the world by being bullies and stubborn warmongers and I for one am looking forward to this administrations end. Had they listened to the UN we wouldn't be in this mess in Iraq.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Miriyam in California writes:

The UN is doing it's job effectively. It's effectiveness has steadily risen over the years. The U.S.A.'s effectiveness in the world has gone done as well as the world's respect for the U.S.A. Being a part of the UN and paying our dues on time goes a long way to assuring the rest of the world we are capable, compassionate leaders.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Donna in New Zealand writes:

The world would be a different place without the United Nations. Its many agencies work quietly behind the scenes on weather, labour issues, world health standards, education, and so on in ways that benefit the world's peoples. So many nations need the UN as a forum to air their views that would other wise be ignored. Even the peace keeping efforts that may not always success are better than doing nothing at all. The UN lifts a standard of world behavior that individual nations cannot ignore.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

H.S. in Tajikistan writes:

@ J.N. in U.S.A. -- "The UN is ineffective in it's current form. I support the UN but it need to be more proactive and much more professional." Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

I support the UN but as J.N said it must be much more professional with reliable leaders who do think about their own welfare. Learning about the U.S., I found bribery is a main problem spreading between leaders in the UN. :(

But the UN with great leaders is worth to support for sake of keeping peace and stability in the world.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Samuel in Uganda writes:

Excellent.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@ Kashif in America -- Kashif Wrote: "When mass murders commit murder it is important not to kick them out of the UN but to try to gain some consensus among other nations that their behavior is reprehensible."

Kashif,

It requires a two thirds majority in the general assembly of the UN to revoke or restrict a member state's status as a member. Which would thus require a consensus among nations in order to implement.

My point was that one gains nothing by soveregnity if it is achieved with the blood of the innocent.

The same could be true for the FORMER Soviet Union, (emphasis on former, as herein lies proof my point is well founded)

Ask yourself, have the Palestinians gained anything by blowing up a pizza parlor?

Who is more worthy of respect, a thousand Buddhist monks marching and chanting for freedom without weapons? Or those that cling to their weapons in fear and desperation, seeking only to spread the same, inspired by a twisted vision of Islam?

I would ask Bin Laden, "What have you gained?"

Aminidijad has proclaimed martyrdom to be of the highest artistic achievement (on videotape) and has written America a letter.

My answer to Ahmadinejad's wrong thinking-ness is that raising a family, growing old and watching your kids thrive and prosper in peace, and knowing the joy of this over time, having contributed to its manifestation , having created one's reality , a new generation, ....is the ultimate artistic endeavor.

I stress here the biggest "what if?" is what we might have accomplished as the Human Species had we chosen to live in peace, instead of fear after WW2.

Anyone who has witnessed the birth of one's child can tell you that yes indeed you create your own reality, the question is what do we wish to create for ourselves as reality on this planet, now and for our children's, and their children's future? Not just in this country, but the world as a whole, as an international vision.

Inherently, change is viewed with suspicion, as a threat to culture and ways of tradition and ethical belief systems. As it applies to developing countries in this nuclear age, the post-cold war aftermath presents a vast paradox that present no easy solutions, and has culminated in the reality of the war on terrorism as it exists today.

That my friend is why "In Larger Freedom..." must become manifest by all who sit within the UN.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Dave in Massachusetts writes:

Yes, the UN effectively fulfills its mission, and it fulfills it well. After all, the UN is the reflection of the will of 190+ countries...if the Bush Administration is disappointed with their lack of successes in the UN, it isn't because the UN isn't doing its' job--it's because the UN is doing its job as the representative body of the several sovereign nations of the Earth. People within the Bush Administration need to accept that Mr. Bush's policies just aren't that popular with most people outside this country (excepting Albania, of course), nor are they that popular with many people inside this country (at least those of us who live in the "reality-based" community). If the Bush Administration fails at convincing the UN to do what they want it to do, they should realize that the UN is a representation of the democratic will of the world, and the world has passed its judgment on their policies.

And I would also say that the decision by the Bush Administration to send an ambassador like Mr. Bolton to the UN is counterproductive and ultimately very harmful to efforts to strengthen U.S. positions there. Mr. Bolton's historical call at the World Federalist Society meeting in the mid-90s for the UN building to "lose floors" may have well been a reference to "reducing bureaucracy", but in a world where buildings in New York, on occasion, do "lose floors", it would seem that we need the United Nations more than ever. Sending a UN basher to deal with the rest of the world was a historic mistake.

Unfortunately, we U.S. citizens will have to wait for our next scheduled regime change in 2008 before we get people in to office who actually know how to effectively deal with the rest of the world at the UN, and who actually know that bad policy is bad policy, no matter how well its' spun or how nicely its' packaged.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Evelyn in Washington writes:

The UN is one of our most important organizations. It is effective in preventiong wars, promoting peaceful actions and trying to problem solve in serious disagreements. I would wish our country would strongly support its philosophy and endevors.

Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007

Victor in Connecticut writes:

Yes, the UN continues to fulfill its mission. Unfortunately, The US has forgotten its role in this world body.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Chadwick in Oklahoma writes:

The UN coordinates several police actions in several nations and aids in health care especially for children in many countries so I would say they do good work. I am less confident of the U.S. Department of State under the current administration. This query is just one of the reasons for my concern.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Alexis in U.S.A. writes:

I think the UN is great!!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Bill in Connecticut writes:

Wouldn't a more pertinent question be whether or not the United States Department of State now fulfills any mission effectively at all? We've seen no progress in the pushing a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian question, a collapse of our relationships with Russia and China and the EC, a total nullity in our relationships in the Middle East. Any attention taken away from our State Department's pursuit of its own mission to bother to even ask such an ignorant question represents a theft from the American people. When does the State Department start to earn its collective salary?

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Alice in New Hampshire writes:

The United Nations effectively fulfills its mission given the constraints placed upon it by member nations failing to provide funding and people power but at the same time raising the ante on the tasks submitted to the UN for action.

There is no way that anything approaching peace, humanitarian response to disaster, including the end-products of war, or comprehensive health and education services could be provided to those in need except through an agency like the United Nations.

It is not the United Nations that should be criticized but the member nations, especially mine, the United States, which fail to support the missions that are undertaken.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

LaRoy in Nebraska writes:

What the UN is doing in peacemaking--110 nations providing peace unit personnel this past year--would not have happened without it. It is changing the culture of the world on this matter, but the efforts are still inadequate. The UN can only be what its members allow it to be. Given the limitations that provides (including those the U.S. contributes) it does a fantastic job. And it services us all, not only through peace-making, but in human rights attention, world health concerns, women's rights, anti-poverty efforts and other areas of human need on the world scene.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Carl in Virginia writes:

The UN is worth our full support.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Barbara in San Francisco writes:

Yes, the United Nations is relevant. Who else is recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize? Especially so many times. They also are very good at supporting emergency relief efforts all over the world. And they are our last hope in creating a world of peace.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Erik writes:

Yes! Although UN can do even more, it fills an vital position in international politics. Lead on and hopefully all people, powerful politicians or not will likely follow!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Matt in Georgia writes:

I'm sure it does something good, I'm just not sure what it is. Passing resolutions most nations ignore, and I understand that the diplomats party it up in NYC. Maybe that's their mission?

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Gayle in Ohio writes:

Yes, the United Nations fulfills its mission. Now more than ever, we need the United Nations to help save our world from war and climate change.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Carol in Vermont writes:

The UN works. And if we had honored it and not taken advantage of it, we wouldn't be in a failed war today. It's disaster relief alone makes it a worthwhile agency. UNICEF has helped many. It has place peacekeepers all over the world. We should be paying our fair share and working more through the UN. At least they don't go around bragging about "Mission Accomplished."

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Stan in Oklahoma writes:

The United Nations continues to effectively fulfill it's mission.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Richard in Milwaukee writes:

I think the UN is doing a good job with a few exceptions.

First it needs every counties to pay its full dues both president and back dues including the United States.

Second the nation of the world must gives more money (not food) so people can buy from local farmers.

Third if there is violence between or in countries, UN troops should be able to stop the fighting without going the Security Council.

Fourth there should be international social reforms, like international free health care, education, daycare,etc.

Fifth the veto power in the Security Council should be eliminated.

The UN has done a wonderful job in keeping peace in the world. American should support the UN and get rid of our military.

I appreciate you letting me comment.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Enjang in Indonesia writes:

I support UN and hopefully,but please to really independent and more brave to take decision under global, inner and sincere of human heart feeling. Good luck UN staff.

Thank you.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Terri in Iowa writes:

The United Nations is the most important organization in our world. All nations need to support and work through this organization especially my country, the United States.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Thomas in Florida writes:

I believe the United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. For example:

The UNICEF and UNESCO continue to conduct vigorous activities on behalf of children and women.

The on-going programs of the UN Millennium Development Goals, promoted by all nations in the United Nations are making significant inroads in the areas of deep poverty, malnutrition, women's empowerment, universal primary education, and improving global health care.

The UN, with the assistance of members of the Security Council, is playing a major role in the Darfur debacle.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Kashif in America writes:

@ Eric in New Mexico -- Late response to Eric in N.M.,

Hey Eric as tragic as the Beslan "terrorist" act was it really in my opinion pales in comparison to what Russia this so called member of the UN has done to the Chechnyan population. After all the Soviet Union was part of the U.N. which you allude to with some respect the same Soviet Union that under Stalin committed mass murder on a large scale especially on the Chechnyans and it was during this time he was nicknamed by the American Time Magazine "Uncle Joe". When mass murders commit murder it is important not to kick them out of the UN but to try to gain some consensus among other nations that their behavior is reprehensible. The small actions of these "terrorists" you seem to despise have done comparatively little compared to these members of the UN who commit atrocities and get barely a slap on the wrist by the international community. When these "terrorists" give them a taste of their own medicine the whole world wakes up from it's lethargic behavior and starts it's hypocritical good vs. evil war. This reality of life is just one of the sick jokes these great members of the UN play on the world.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Gordon in Pennsylvania writes:

Yes, the UN does, indeed, fulfill its mission! But, even more important, the UN is one of the last best hopes for the preservation of civilized behavior among human beings in this barbaric world.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Ellen in California writes:

The United Nations is a remarkable organization in that it is the only organization that was founded to help solve economic, social, and humanitarian problems for All nations. We (the U.S.) can be proud to be a member and proud to meet and discuss problems with other nations!!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

David in California writes:

The United Nations is the best hope of the world. Failure of the United States to fully support it has been it's biggest problem.

As a World War II veteran whose brother was shot down attacking a Japanese warship, I am deeply saddened and most frustrated to see the United States out of step with the rest of the world so many years later, its current leadership thinking it can achieve its best interests through its own military means as opposed to working through the UN.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Darryl in Oregon writes:

Yes, the United Nations effectively fulfills its mission.

During the Reagan administration, the United Nations system received full payment of all dues owed to it from the US for the first time since the creation of the UN in 1945. I found that about the only act carried out by the Reagan administration that I was able to congratulate them on, and I did so, in writing.

During the Clinton administration, the United Nations system received full payment of all dues owed to it from the US for two consecutive years in a row, for the first time in the entire history of the United Nations. That was in 1999 and 2000. Was it a coincidence that the UN System was awarded the Nobel Prize for Peace for the work the UN did during those two years?

No. It was not a coincidence.

When the United Nations organization and its entire System is fully funded, it is the most effective system of international organizations and affiliated NGOs and PVOs this planet has ever seen, and ever will see, bar none.

Unlike the US-based multilateral corporations which want to create a "one world government" where THEY control the majority of the governments of this world, through unregulated monopolies focused on the exploitation-for-profit of the natural resources and undervalued services of the varied Peoples of those nations, the United Nations is engaged in the practice of fostering the co-creation of a world full of peace where all governments are working together, where all nations of Peoples are equally respected.

The United Nations seeks no profit from the multitudes of contributions the UN carries out on a daily basis for all the People of Earth, as long as all people are cared for, respected and valued, according to the terms of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Pound for pound, dollar for dollar, the United Nations is the most effective, efficient, humanitarian, humane, compassionate, wise, constructive, intelligent, resourceful, responsible and beautiful system of international organizations that have ever existed, and without the United Nations organization, earth and all her Peoples would most assuredly be in utter chaos and crisis.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Rosemary in U.S.A. writes:

Yes, it fulfills its mission.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

J.N. in U.S.A. writes:

The UN is ineffective in it's current form. I support the UN but it need to be more proactive and much more professional.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

N.L writes:

Ahem!!! ......Rwanda

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Barbara in Texas writes:

The United Nations is a great idea, but it needs constant attention to be sure it is doing the work it was created to do. Some things, especially in the area of world health, it has done very well. Some instances of graft and fraud have tarnished its image. There are so many worthy causes in the world that need support, that even a penny wasted in corruption is a disgrace. The qualifications of UN members should be held to the highest standards and those not meeting those qualifications should be rejected.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Jana in Virginia writes:

I believe that the United Nations is our last hope for peacekeeping in our global community. The UN consistently meets their goals or makes progress towards their goals that is substantial. I also think that the UN works very well as an umbrella organization for many other non-government organizations. In short, yes the UN does fulfill its mission.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Andy in Kansas writes:

The UN does great work in some areas, and could improve in other areas such as holding nations accountable who commit massive human rights abuses such as the genocide in Darfur.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Robert in Texas writes:

Yes it is the hope as long as all human kind can have a plate form to speak and solve and idenitify problems even if it is not perfact ant least the UN is there and certenily there are efforits like, The United Nations Foundation's Rapid Response Emergency Telecommunication project works with UNICEF, the World Food Programme, and the UN?s Organization for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) to improve access to life-saving technology and telecommunications tools in natural disasters, conflicts, and famines. We do this through two initiatives. The WHO and many moe areas to think about.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Beth in Washington, DC writes:

Yes the UN does fulfill it's mission but could be even more effective if the U.S. fulfilled it's part of the mission in the UN. We must take care of our obligations to them.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Steve in Washington, DC writes:

The United Nations effectively fulfills its mission in the broad range of activities in which it is involved. Whether dealing with environmental degradation, poverty and development, issues of war and peace, the spread of disease, international terrorism, or the spread of dangerous weapons, among others, the UN is making an indispensable contribution to solving issues that no one country can, or should, deal with on its own. UN member states may not always agree on everything, and it is unrealistic to expect that they would do so. However, we often underestimate the impact that our own country can have on the UN's agenda. It's time for the United States to be a real leader at the United Nations--to offer a pro-active plan for dealing with global problems and taking a leading role in building coalitions in support of aspirations that citizens of all countries share.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Crista in U.S.A. writes:

The United Nations is fulfilling its mission effectively in many areas, despite lack of support and cooperation from the United States and other countries.

Constructive engagement and responsible leadership at the UN would serve the US better than negative demagoguery and short-sighted political manipulation at the expense of one of the planet's most valuable forums for peace.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

MaryAnn writes:

The UN is/should be our moral conscience of the U.S. And we don't even pay the dues - unacceptable by any criterion.

It is doing a 1000 times better than the United States government. I am ashamed of my own government for the first time in my life of 77 years.

You should know better than to go down the path you are going. It is against every moral fiber of any conscionable being. The UN is not greedy; the U.S. government is greedy.

The UN thinks about the good for all nations. The U.S. government thinks only of its rich friends and contributors, of controlling the world. The Republican Party is amoral in its professed Christianity. I am appalled by its lies and terrible actions.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Marlene in Kentucky writes:

The UN is the most important national and international agency every country in the world has. Until we, as human beings with spirit, mind, and body utilize our faculties for dialogue and restrain our desire for brutality and de-humanization in any form, we will never advance as peoples. The UN attempts - without much support from some nations, esp. the USA - to use reason and not force. We cannot proceed individually as a countries, nations, without an empowered "controlling group" - honored and upheld by all nations of the world. The UN does fulfill its mission until very difficult restraints.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Nyla in Oregon writes:

UN Wins Nobel Peace Prize, Again

The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore together won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to educate the world on catastrophic climate change. This is the third time in the past seven years that a UN entity has been recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize. For more information, visit
http://www.unfoundation.org/ipccinfo/.

Highest Number of Afghan Children Enrolled in School in Country's History

Aided by the UN's work in Afghanistan, more children are attending school than ever before in the country's history, most especially girls. This is turning the tide for the educational future of an entire generation of young Afghans. For more information, visit
http://www.betterworldcampaign.org/resources/rebuilding_afghanistan.asp.

Largest Number of Peacekeepers Ever Deployed

In the past year, more than 110 countries sent troops to serve in 18 UN peacekeeping missions in places like Liberia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Haiti, contributing to the largest deployment of UN peacekeepers in history. For more information, visit
http://www.betterworldcampaign.org/price_of_peace/un_peacekeeping.htm#1.

Millions of Children Protected Against Preventable Disease the Measles

Initiative [http://www.measlesinitiative.org/index3.asp], which includes the World Health Organization, the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the UN Foundation, has helped vaccinate over 372 million children -- reducing measles deaths in Africa by 75% (compared to 1999). By partnering with campaigns like Nothing But Nets
[http://www.nothingbutnets.net/], they also distribute life saving mosquito nets that protect children from malaria.

New Technology Enables Disaster Relief to Arrive Faster in Humanitarian Crises

In partnership with the UN's disaster relief organization (OCHA), the UN's Children Fund (UNICEF) and other UN agencies, the NGO Telecoms Sans Frontieres (TSF), also known as Telecoms without Borders, deployed seven times this year to support emergency relief efforts in places like Darfur's refugee camps, and coastal areas of Peru devastated by the 8.1 magnitude earthquake this summer. For more information, visit
http://www.unfoundation.org/vodafone/rapid_response_emergency_tele.asp.

Yes the UN effectively fulfills its mission.


Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Pamela in Colorado writes:

Yes, the UN continues to effectively fulfill its mission. Perhaps if the U.S. would work hard to cultivate a diplomatic mission, it might work better with the UN.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Siayi in Tanzania writes:

It is true that UN System has changed since then and much have been tried to improve, but there is still things that UN should take into consideration in any of its member countries.

While the needy are increasingly poor the rich are increasingly poor, the governments are not aware of what is going with their needy people as well as the Children in the remote African communities, however I admit that something have taken place.

Considering the situation of the indigenous children and the education they deserve. Countries have been careful with their large population and know how have been in practice.

Thank you in advance.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Roger in Pennsylvania writes:

The UN has done and still does a far better job than the people in Washington, overfilled with self esteem, have managed to do, particularly recently.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Felix in Germany writes:

The United Nations has various missions. It is very effectively fulfilling some, but often not able to fulfill others. Much has been achieved, much remains to be achieved. Above all, the United Nations requires the support of its member states, and especially the full support of the more influential of its member states. Ask not what the United Nations can do for you; ask what you can do for the United Nations.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

John in Texas writes:

The UN does a lot of good with famine, health and education initiatives in poor undeveloped countries. This in itself is a very important and necessary role but the UN could and should be playing a larger role in the world. It unfortunatley lacks the full backing of countries like our oun which is too afraid to relinquish any control for the greater good of the world. We need to redesign the UN to be able to give it more control and not just to a couple of countries but all members to deal with world issues.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Sarah in Iowa writes:

The UN, for all its flaws, is an essential institution in our world. It needs and deserves our support.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Jill in New York writes:

The United Nations, while imperfect (as are all our institutions) does a good job under very difficult circumstances. We should be supporting and strengthening their efforts to make it even more effective.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Vickie in Texas writes:

I think the UN has absolutely fulfilled it's mission. The fact that the UN recently shared a Nobel Peace Prize (the 3rd time in 7 years) indicates how effective they are in the work they do. They have assisted in Afghanistan to open more schools which will have a positive effect on the next generation in that country. They have played a crucial role in improving children's health around the world. They have deployed more peace keepers than ever before in attempting to help maintain global peace. The UN is more needed and more relevant than ever before. The U.S. needs to support the UN and pay it's dues. It's embarrassing that we are behind in making payment on our dues. What does than say about our committment to this important effort?

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Davis in New York writes:

I think the United Nations has fulfilled its purpose to the best of its ability with the cooperation of its member states. As a fellow New Yorkers, I am proud to have the UN and its agencies hosted in the United States. Even though at times, it may seem as if the UN is taking a long time to respond to a situation - it is partially due to the member states not reacting. The United Nations can only be strong as its member states. I think the United States should continue its support of the UN and its programs.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Carol in New York writes:

We need a forum for nations to communicate, as well as an organization to try and correct unacceptable conditions in the world at large.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Huguenot in France writes:

Freedom and peace with acts, not with words and wars!

Yes,the UN can continue to futfil its mission,even better without the help of the U.S.A. government

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Helen in Virginia writes:

I believe that the United Nations most definitely does continue to fulfill its mission. In today's complex world, it is more necessary than ever to have an entity comprised of many nations that allows for discussion and concerted efforts to provide aid and facilitate change. Examples of this include various peacekeeping forces that have been deployed over the past several years and the lifesaving vaccination and disease prevention programs in Africa.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Victoria in Vermont writes:

The world we live in is changing more repidly than ever which makes it harder to keep up. But I believe that the UN does fulfill its mission and is a necessary safeguard when nations, including our own USA, go beserk.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Ronelle in Georgia writes:

I believe in the United Nations - they have helped children thru their vaccination program and malaria tents - they have deployed UN personnel to areas of necessity - considering the attitudes and lack of cooperation they run into - especially with the U.S. - I think they are doing remarkable work.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Derryke in Sri Lanka writes:

I really like to serve to people through UN service. In the meantime UN service world perfect service for every individual. I was studied in England a bit after that I came to Sri Lanka to do class three navigating officer exam. In the meantime after that I am willing to serve mercy ship what I can so there have any possibility to work through UN so I am always ready because UN has done a marvelous service to globe. Thanks for UN legends. God bless (Jesus we trust in you).


Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Thomas in Pennsylvania writes:

@ Brian in Kentucky --- When was the last time a President of the U.S.A. won the Nobel Peace Prize???

Five years ago for a President. This year for a Vice-President.

(info from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_peace_prize)

U.S. Presidents

1906 Theodore Roosevelt - brokering the Treaty of Portsmouth ending the Russo-Japanese War
1919 Woodrow Wilson - foremost promoter of the League of Nations.
2002 James Earl (Jimmy) Carter, Jr. - for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development

Other U.S. Government Officials

1912 Elihu Root: U.S. Secretary of War and Secretary of State
1925 Charles Gates Dawes: U.S. Vice President
1929 Frank B. Kellogg: U.S. Secretary of State
1945 Cordell Hull: U.S. Secretary of State
1953 George Catlett Marshall: U.S. Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State
1973 Henry A. Kissinger: U.S. Secretary of State
2007 Albert Arnold (Al) Gore, Jr. ? US Vice President

UN Agencies and Individuals
1954 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
1965 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF)
1981 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
1988 United Nations Peace-Keeping Forces
2001 United Nations & Kofi Annan
2005 International Atomic Energy Agency
2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
1950 Ralph Bunche
1957 Lester Bowles Pearson
1961 Dag Hammarskj?
Each have 10 prizes and the most recent for each are this year. It is good to look critically at our country. Every nation or organization makes mistakes and anything can be improved. But it is bad, dishonest intellectually and self-defeating, to ignore the good we have done as a nation in order to highlight those mistakes.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

David in U.S. writes:

The U.S. should support the UN substantially and in a spirit of cooperation, despite its problems.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Nancy in Massachusetts writes:

I greatly admire and support the work of the UN - I wish the U.S. would really start to take what they are doing seriously and follow their path.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Regina in Texas writes:

I believe that the UN fulfills it's mission as effectively as it is possible, when the richest countries with the most military power won't truly be bound by it's authority. In the areas of improving world health, the situations of women and children, and curtailing violence within the militarily weaker countries, the U.N. performs wonderfully. If the wealthiest countries would consistently put in the amount they've committed to support UN efforts, just think of what more they could accomplish!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Richard in Nebraska writes:

While the UN may have faults and shortcomings it has been and continues to be very effective in several of its programs, doing jobs that no other entity could do.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Jean in Illinois writes:

The UN is the answer to the world's questions. It gives countries the opportunity and the obligation to work together instead of competing.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Charles in Washington writes:

The UN is doing a fine job. Now if only the U.S would pay it's share!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Sjors in The Netherlands writes:

The UN indeed continues to effectively fulfill its mission. There's no alternative to the UN. It's indispensible, even when the USA government weakens it by not paying its financial contribution.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Kim in Massachusetts writes:

The UN is our best hope for balancing global power, reducing aggression, greed, and fear. The UN continues to improve, in spite of weak US support, and should do much better with proper U.S. support. The cost comparison and need for renovating the building at once versus in stages should be thoroughly reevaluated.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Carolyn in Maryland writes:

Yes, I believe the U.N. follows its mission.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Chris in Spain writes:

Yes. To paraphrase Churchill, 'many forms of international cooperation have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that the UN is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, some would claim that the UN is the worst form of multilateralism, except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time'. Like all large administrations the UN has its weak points, but - more importantly - it's the amalgam of all its Member States, and on matters of war and peace reflects the smallest common denominator acceptable to all five permanent members of the Security Council. It is also true that the more powerful a Member, the more influence it has on the workings of the UN. Hence, the U.S. currently being the most powerful of all 192 members, no country would be in a better position to improve the Organization where it has been found wanting. Yet, over the past few years we have seen precious little of that spirit. How gratifying it would be if the U.S. returned to the old values expressed by Roosevelt with regard to the UN, which might lead also other Member States to adopt a more constructive and positive stance. Only then will the UN be able to fully live up to the rightful aspirations of the populations of its Member States. Till then, we have what we have, and under the circumstances the UN fulfills its mission more than adequately.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Edward in Italy writes:

Is the UN relevant today -Yes as the only Global International body which can and does address issues of global significance which can bring 'all voices'to the table.

Does it continue to effectively fulfill its mission - only partially as individual member countries withold adequate funding for its effective operation and unfairly use their financial muscle to influence the effectiveness of UN operations and agencies. Countries too often focus on their narrow political agendas rather than seek a global vision. Sacrificing national self interest in favour of global concensus and global gain will make the UN more effective. Funding by the richer nations is a duty and should not be seen as a burden which is often the case.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Ampa in Ghana writes:

The UN is an essential organization for addressing and solving a host of problems affecting everyone around the world. It helps bring and maintain peace with its peacekeeping forces, protects millions against diseases with vaccination and other programs, and is committed to addressing the global climate crisis. As bad as the state of the world is presently, it would be a lot worse without the UN.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Vincent in Ghana writes:

Yes, is the simple answer. The UN needs to be allowed to do it's work, not just used as a leverage tool against nations who won't give in to the big global oil, energy and weapons corporations interests. The US needs to remember that this charter we have signed on to in 1945 is part of our national laws per the U.S. Constitution. Also we must support it to the best of our ability to help it resolve disagreements and all manner of international contention. We must always try to be a part of the solution not the problem. Compromise is always cheaper than combat and better for all people, not just the few who profit the most from wars.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Yousef in Jordan writes:

Yes it does, but review and reform is needed after this long history. Things change...

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Fernanda in Italy writes:

If the UN would not exist they should be created. However the possibility for the UN to fulfill effectively its mission depends very much from the member countries. These do not give the UN all the tools to achieve the expected results. When I say tools I also include the guidance, attention, commitment and political support the UN would require. It is not only matter of financial resources but credit and recognition of the crucial UN role are equally important. Finally considering all the above limitations I believe the UN are doing a very good work.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Patricia in Indiana writes:

The UN does effectively fulfill its mission. They actually believe in assisting others rather than destroying countries, and bombing anyone in their way.They care about healthcare, food, assisting in disasters and a multitude of other programs that are compassionate and humanitarian. They do not attack other countries for their oil. They decry genocide and support Human Rights. If the United States government would genuinely and effectively support the United Nations, as it has NOT done in the last 7 years, the UN could be even more proactive than it is now.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Peter in New York writes:

Nothing as idealistic as the "founded to..." words above can ever hope to FULFIL its mission, but that the United Nations has done a very great deal towards achieving that fulfilment is indisputable, in my estimation. If the great powers did not use (abuse) it as much and as often as they do, the chances would be greater for its being successful in its mission; but realpolitik is still a principal factor in what happens in this world. How else to explain the fact that the U.N. was helpless to prevent the invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq in March 2003? We must continue to hope that its mission will come closer and closer to being fulfilled as the years roll along, and do whatever we can to assist in its work.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Gordon in Oregon writes:

The United Nations is our best hope for a more peaceful world, a more just world with human rights for all, a more sustainable world protecting the environment. It is the most effective and efficient way to work multilaterally for a better world. It's not perfect but it's our best hope for worldwide progress!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Bob in Alaska writes:

The United Nations has been recognized for its many accomplishments, in spite of the failure of the United States to pay its full share and to really help the organization carry out its many tasks. Rotary, in this country, the first and the most effective service organization in the world, has been and continues to be involved and to fully support the U.N. because it is the best example of the ideal of service on the international level.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Yoshio in California writes:

I support the United Nations and the USA's participation in it. The UN and the USA can do more to maintain or restore peace, prevent abuses of human rights and restore more accountability. I am a member of the UNA and have been for numerous years.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

VR writes:

The short answer might be that if one needs to ask this question about proclamation the first place, then it's logical to conclude there's vast room for improvement on the implementation side of the UN.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Mark in Massachusetts writes:

Yes, the United Nations continues to fulfill its mission effectively. What could you possibly propose as an alternative?

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Rick in New Mexico writes:

Yes, is the simple answer. The UN needs to be allowed to do it's work, not just used as a leverage tool against nations who won't give in to the big global oil, energy and weapons corporations interests. The US needs to remember that this charter we have signed on to in 1945 is part of our national laws per the U.S. Constitution. Also we must support it to the best of our ability to help it resolve disagreements and all manner of international contention. We must always try to be a part of the solution not the problem. Compromise is always cheaper than combat and better for all people, not just the few who profit the most from wars.

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Whitney in Washington writes:

The UN is the world's cohesive meeting place. Without this vital instrument, we could have chaos. We need to continue this problem solving forum without fail!

Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007

Page 2 of 6 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »