Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments

Glenda in Colorado writes:

Listening. Being Honest. Treating others the way we want to be treated.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

Here's what happens when one man's action moves people to a common understanding towards living life:

http://tiny.cc/QC9iI

enjoy....

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Peter in California writes:

I think the keys are universal primary education in the Muslim countries paired with a strong manufactoring and/or service sector economy driving a sustainable middle class to drive more social moderation to reduce the effect of those whom would demonize external forces to gain strength. Perhaps the U.S. government should subsidize Muslim schools in the middle east as a start along with economic incentives for middle east imports.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Karim in Alabama writes:

I subscribe to the notion that scholors and other world leaders have put forth that the root cause of the issue is a "Clash of ignorances" -- NOT a clash of civilizations -- where each side is dangerously ignorant of the other. And insofar as the chasm is rooted in ignorance, the only way of getting across it, is by building bridges of understanding; bridges that are built upon mutual respect and a sincere eagerness to learn about each other.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Catherine in Illinois writes:

If we can learn to be afraid, and to hate...then we can learn how to be stronger and kinder. So I would say that we should personally learn something positive about Islamic culture. It has to start with us, not a country. Before President Obama got into his speech at Cairo he was able to speak about many of the beautiful things that Muslims have contributed. I would actually try to meet someone and say hello. Go to a restaurant, and taste the food...let the server tell you about the cusine. It will work. Blacks and Whites did it in the 60's. The most important thing is for the people to get along. If we treat each other with respect, no government can come between us. If God be for us, who can be against us?

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

If we all believed the same thing, the world would be a pretty boring place to live.

We all inhabit this suitcase for just a short while, so lighten up, live a little, and stop taking yourselves so seriously...everyone.

Then maybe we can get serious about leaving a better world for our kids to grow up in.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Carl in New Jersey writes:

A good start would be for muslim leaders to speak out and condemn extremist actions. Speak openly against killing of innocent people using specific examples where these actions were wrong. Encourage all muslims to turn against hatred and murder and to seek peaceful coexistence.

How come I feel this will never happen and all effort for peace will be from non-muslims.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Jeffrey L. in Maryland writes:

Why pander to these people? Stop apologizing to the world Obama. We are a Christian nation like it or not.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Tom in Maryland writes:

Positive social contact will bring about better understanding. 2 ways to help accomplish this:

1) Educational exchange. I agree that Fulbright programs and other educational efforts will us understand each other beyond stereotypes.

2) Capacity building. If we help Mid-eastern nations that need aid to become strong, independent nations that can provide for all of their people without imposing our own agenda on them (and risk being seen as imperialist) we will promote good will. A good start would be to help rebuild irrigation systems and the agriculture of Afghanistan.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Peter in Spain writes:

Make a "you've got a friend" programme that obliges everyone in the west to make a real friend in a muslim country. Only the common man can rise above politics and make friendships work. Failing that an alian invasion will make us stand side by side.

Also make a similar programme that obliges each person in the rich countries to befriend and support 1 poor person, or 1 poor child or 1 poor family.

If you really can feed a village for a few bucks a month as the charity organisations often tell us then we should be able to make that work..

But it all has to be green.. cough cough.. i can't breathe on this planet.. Let's open the windows of the world and give it a good airing so we can see it and breathe it!

Buen fin de semana.
Peter
p.s. Nice work Mr Obama. The man who wins is the man who tries.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Doris in Austria writes:

First of all, I'd like to say that I think that this blog is a great idea - this should be an inspiration for other countries!

I'm neither American nor Muslim but I don't think that matters because there are Muslims everywhere in the world, and so the same questions arise in Austria, England or elsewhere.

I think people should be aware of the fact that there is more that the three big religions have in common than what seperates them. People should be informed about other religious beliefs and cultures. This could happen at school and / or at festivals which are organised to promote cultural exchange and for people of different ethnical or religious groups to get together and learn more about each other (and, consequently, about themselves).

It is all, to a certain extent, a matter of language too: if we keep referring to them as "the Muslim world" and we call ourselves "the West", yet another way of seperating people is found. This is misleading, though, because primarily, we're all HUMAN BEINGS. Maybe this is what seperates us from animals - they do not care where other animals are from. Sometimes we are probably not the highlier developed species we think we are...

As for political measures, I think the entry regulations are probably a bit too strict. Maybe some governments (and people who only want to visit their families) would strongly approve of a facilitation.

I also think it would be good to withdraw the American troops from countries where it's not REALLY necessary and support these countries with the knowledge to build their own democracy and re-build their states.

Perhaps it would also be good to invest more money in renewable energy sources and cars that consume less (or no) petrol - no argument (or even war) over oil or gas can arise (and it's probably a good chance to save our planet too) when oil or gas are not needed!

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Christopher in New Hampshire writes:

We need to gain their respect. The way to do this is to not compromise on our beliefs. They certainly won't. Guys like Hannity say we need to make them fear us. That WON'T work. Throughout history people have only attacked what they fear. We need to be a shining example, not a threat.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Suzanne in Texas writes:

Education, education, education -- and providing opportunities for development of personal relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims -- cultural exchanges, small discussion groups, etc.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Shawn in Washington writes:

First off I think it is important that we all remember that it is only a minority of Muslims that have strong enough anti-American opinions to resort to terrorism and violence. It is nearly impossible to change these feelings but if the U.S. backs out of the Middle East militarily and politically I believe it would reduce the frequency of the attacks on Americans.

The difference in religion between the Muslims and the Christians/Jews should not play a role in the actions of our government (because it is unconstitutional). If anything this increase in radical sects is a result of unwanted American involvement in Muslim nations.

That being said, according to Mohammed, Islam stems from the same origins as Judaism and Christianity. He said that the other two are simply misinterpretations of the same original religion and that Islam is the "correct" religion as Mohammed was the final prophet of God and therefore has the purest teachings. In the early days of this new religion, they got accepted that Christians and Jews had separate beliefs and did not persecute them for having a different religion.

Finally, look at China over the past 25 years or so. Despite having a "Communist" government, which previously was considered the biggest threat to American democracy, they have become one of the top economic powers in the world and will soon be the number one economic nation. And because the U.S. allowed the Chinese government to rule without getting involved, the PRC has begun increasing individual rights and introducing new capitalist economic policies. By staying out of Chinese politics the U.S. allowed China to become a leading power and an asset to our country (look at all the money they have leant us).

If you look back at history, it almost always repeats itself and so if the U.S. backs out of the Middle East and returns to the isolationist tendencies like early on in American history, the Muslim leaders in the Middle East could re-establish their own governments and it really would help to improve the United States economically by limiting the money being dumped into foreign engagements (whether economic or militaristic) So if the United States withdraws from the Middle East and avoids entangling foreign involvement, it will help everyone in the long run.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Mary in New York writes:

I don't think any actions will promote understanding between Muslims and Americans until Americans understand that Islam is a peaceful religion. The problem Americans have is that they listen to the media and assume everything the media says is true, Americans tend to forget that news stations are businesses trying to make money so they twist the truth out of proportion. Before any action can be taken to promote understanding between Americans and Muslims, Americans need to first be educated and learn to respect other cultures that are different. Possibly the best way to accomplish this is to get Americans and Muslims to engage in a conversation about the differences in each culture.

Once Americans learn to respect the Muslim community no action will be needed because they will realize that Muslims are people too. And once Muslims are humanized, understanding between Americans and Muslims will naturally follow.

The source of the hatred between Muslims and Americans is ignorance. Get rid of the ignorance and the hatred will disappear as well.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Qadirah in Texas writes:

As a Muslim American I am often frustrated becaue so many people I meet don't have a clue about Islam. Whatever some people may know has been learnt from movies & the news media.Muslims are often painted with a broad negative stroke.I was conversing with a coworker about our beliefs. She was surprised that we believe in the virgin birth of Jesus & we believe that he is going to return.Most important for me is that Islam gave women rights that were not in place 1400 years ago. Women are still fighting to acquire those rights. The first woman to convert to Islam was a wealthy business woman. She was years older than her husband & she proposed to him Learn about Islam so our people can intelligently discern what actions are or are not approved in Islam.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Shilpi in Washington, DC writes:

I believe one of the first things is recognizing the diversity among Muslims---depending on the country, culture and community, the experiences are vastly different as are the individual perspectives on democracy and the U.S.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

SNP in Syria writes:

Maggie in California said - Our interference is not appreciated by the extremists. They don't want positive non-Muslim role models for their children- This quote vividly illustrates what is said at the end of SNP post below. Americans, thanks to CNN and FOX news lives in complete Virtual-FAKE- reality.

Not sure why any people would want other country interference when that interference amounts to invasion and the killing of over a million person, utter and total destruction of the entire economic, social, moral and national interest of those countries Americans decided to interfere. In Iraq case, on a false premise of fighting terrorism, and in other cases, installing and supporting regimes and rulers who will do the same as U.S. invasion forces did such as the case say of, Saddam Hussain and not to forget Moslem AlQaida Leader Bin Ladin who the U.S. Government and its intelligence agencies provided Billions of Dollars in support to them for a decade or more, even from American taxpayer cash.

It is not that progressive, intelligent and educated people in the Middle East (always labeled extremist by U.S. Media) don't want positive non-Moslem role models. It is they learned in the past 60 years that the West seeks no positive changes in the Middle East, and only mayhem and disorder. No Middle Easterner did not and would not appreciate American funding to Saddam and Bin Ladin type of characters to rule over them. So keep living in virtual reality.

Maggie also said: -They will always bite the hand that feeds them as long as that hand is not Muslim- Americans never fed anyone in the Middle East except for perhaps Palestinians in refugee camps. It is has been sixty years of take, take and take by Americans. Trillions of Dollars that are invested in America by Moslem rulers are not only lost on helping other Moslems but lost in the pocket of Americans that are going bankrupt. Few more trillions lost on Weapon sales to the same Moslem rulers. So it is not that Moslems are barking and biting, it is now again, the Americans that are barking peace plan, (they even abandoned their long time ally, the Israeli) only because Moslem rulers cut the cash pipelines to Americans and without it and the Chinese one, you will belly up in weeks time. That day is coming, and it is up to CNN and Fox News to spin Americans out of the virtual reality and into the real world.

Posted on Fri Jun 12, 2009

Jason in New Jersey writes:

Our President has stated clearly: "No system of government can or should be imposed by one nation by any other". "Imposing" a system of government is difficult, if not impossible, but we should not need to "impose". There should be a desperation to be rid of selfish and cruel dictatorships and for us to support their efforts towards freedom. It is time to rise up and declare the illegitimacy of these rulers and recognize that only by vanquishing the true internal enemies -- not the ghost enemies of invention -- will they truly be free.

We may agree or disagree about the beginnings of the war in Iraq but America has never had any interest in colonizing the Middle-East. We are there, now, to assist the Iraqi people in maintaining their status as a free nation. We fought for their liberty as we fought for our own. Our efforts are not appreciated and are framed, always, in the worst possible light. This enables the current regimes to maintain their power and continue to mislead their people.

Over 60 years ago, these same dictatorships, albeit with different dictators at the helm, made a disastrous decision to forgo a UN sanctioned Palestinian State in favor of annihilating the Jewish people who were their neighbors. A permanent scapegoat for the misery of their people had been found; Israel would be to blame for all of the poverty and misery of anyone in the Arab world. It is true, and our President has stated that, it is undeniable that the Palestinian people -- Muslims and Christians -- have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than 60 years they've endured the pain of dislocation. Let us be equally clear, though, that they have endured this pain as a result of their own belligerence and lack of vision.

The sorry state of affairs for those living in refugee camps is undeniable. Yet, after 60 years, it is difficult to understand why these "refugees" have not been resettled. In that same time, millions of refugees from all over the world, including from Muslim nations, have been assimilated by the State of Israel. The refugee "problem" continues to be another tool of the current ruling powers to deflect criticism and focus from their own regimes.

President Obama has said that, "Palestinians must abandon violence". I believe we can all agree. We should not, however, equate their struggle against Israel to that of the slaves in America who "suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation." The Palestinian people are not slaves to their Israeli neighbors. They are combatants of a war long past who have yet to lay down their arms and come to grips with the reality of the world around them. They are slaves to their leaders who continue to mislead them in the hopes of maintaining the status quo.

To promote a better understanding between the United States and the Muslims of the world, we must be principled, clear and outspoken about our true beliefs:

1. "Human rights", as defined by our President -- "the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn't steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose" -- are being denied to the Arab populace.

2. There is no place for tyranny in the twenty first century and as much as these regimes would like us to believe it, Israel is not the tyrannical regime that is enslaving the Arabs, Palestinians and Muslims.

3. Issues like Israeli settlements and the "refugee" problem are diversionary tactics used by unstable dictatorships to focus their nations' attention away from the core issues of liberty, freedom and human rights.

4. Naivete and pacification will be taken as signs of weakness. A strong and principled stand will be respected and will ultimately serve as the basis for a true relationship with the Muslims of the world.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jennifer in Minnesota writes:

Declaring that the United States and "Muslims" are separate bounded entities is wrong. Understanding first must come by openly recognizing that promoting nationalism and narrowly focusing on marks of difference between groups (in this case the United States and 'Muslims') only works to separate and create hostility. The question posed, in this sense, is ineffectual and works as a continuous loop back. A more narrow question such as, how can the United States change its foreign policies in a way that will benefit itself and others in a far more just manner?

Personally, I believe the first step the United States must take under this new question is to drastically stop promoting Israel's illegal militaristic and threatening actions.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Marjorie in California writes:

President Obama set the stage with his inspirational speech in Cairo. There must be a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian situation. Peace in the region with a two state solution will certainly promote the better understanding between the United States and Muslims of the world we all want.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Mohammed in Texas writes:

More cultural exchange programs to let Muslims and Arabs specially understand the real American society.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Ralph in California writes:

just let all of the muslim community be able to worship in Jerusalem like dubet and some of those others where there is no one groop or country that owns it. if that were done right next to israel losing all milatary support from the usa more world will respect us and help us out.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jason in Virginia writes:

Backing off the religious rhetoric in politics. Our representatives like any other American has freedom of religion, freedom to express their beliefs and to act upon them. However, freedom to do something does not mean something SHOULD be done.

While I recognize their is common ground between our faiths it is easy to see why Muslims feel threatened when our leaders are publicly pushing Christianity, blaming disaster and war on a lack of faith in God or, as recently as a few weeks alienating their fellow citizens with intolerant speeches.

It is hard to focus on the olive branch of peace when the people behind it are preaching against your faith.

We NEED as a nation to stop expressing our faiths as if it is our policy to spread that faith.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Christina in Oklahoma writes:

Perhaps the question asked should be, "What actions will promote better understanding between Americans/Christians and Muslims of the world?" The original question seems to imply it is the U.S. government versus Muslims. President Obama said, "Recognizing our common humanity..." This is where the action needs to begin, we need to recognize that we are all human, we are all of one world. We must also educate ourselves on our differences, our issues and our pasts so that we can move towards the future with meaningful dialogue. Individuals on both sides need to personally take positive actions in order to promote a better understanding between our worlds.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Tony writes:

Let us first investigate 9/11 and the Bush administration, then we can be sure of what we are saying when we talk to the muslim world

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Bill in Louisiana writes:

I don't think it is a matter of coming to grips with the Muslims of the world. It is a matter of how to appease the radicals and extremists. The Muslim people get a bad rap for what a few self serving individuals with agendas of their own represent as being for the good of the Muslim world.

What we can do to strengthen our position with the Muslim world is to provide them with assistance so that they can build strong societies that are not in need of armed extremists to make them feel as though they are safe when in fact they are being abused and subdued.

This assistance is not in the form of more monies but in having Americans go into thier communities and teach them how to utilize technology they already have access to improve their health services, public health, water, agriculture, buildings, industry, and so on. Giving money has already been shown to be just an opportunity for filling the pockets of those who claim to be in control.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Christopher in Arizona writes:

Demonstrating through our actions at home and around the world our commitment to human rights and equality.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Paxn in Washington, DC writes:

Mutual respect, not looking back but forward. Stop the blame game.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Lorri in Alabama writes:

Definitely, open communications and acceptance of their right to worship as they please.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jamie B. in Nebraska writes:

What I would like to know is why we quit helping Israel. The Bible states Those who bless Israel will be blessed and those who curse Israel will be cursed. Come on guys don't you believe in GOD? If not this is not good. Sorry to come down so hard but this is what I believe to be true.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jennifer K. in Kansas writes:

I think that Americans do not see Muslims as the neighbor next door, but instead an outsider with little in common. Until the U.S. media steps in and helps break down stereotypes, nothing will change. We need to see and hear our Muslim friends regularly, in normal, everyday situations- not in front of the most recent bombing in the middle east.

Unless the majority of the U.S. stop thinking in us and them terms, little progress can be made. We need to continue to be reminded about what makes the U.S. so great. Freedom of religion and freedom to live your life however you want- this is something worth remembering instead of stereotyping a whole region by having someone dance around with a towel on their head while speaking in a bad, fake accent.

Until the media makes a contentious effort to support this peace and understanding by having shows with Muslims in them or on the news being helpful, instead of glorifying bombings and death with thinly veiled accusations, poor relations will remain.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Dorothy S. in California writes:

respect

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Donna in New Jersey writes:

More positive visuals for starters. Outstanding television programing that is all inclusive. The Cosby Show was so influential in pioneering positive change. We could use a show that focuses on positive progresive lifestyles where people invite friends to share in family celebrations to demonstrate the diverse cultural traditions. Perhaps A spin on fashion that suggests a fusion would also gently encourages tollerance and understanding. All inclusive advertising never hurts. More circulation of Barak's acknowledgement and acceptance of all of the diversity in his family and in himself. A great leader who embraces these things freely and fearlessly, demonstrating how they have strengthened him will encourage the same in others.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jude in U.S.A. writes:

Break our "unbreakable" ties with Israel - The Cold War era is over.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Chance in Georgia writes:

it's a religious issue..not a political issue...figure that out and you will start to understand that the United States will never attain an understanding with Muslims.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Wayne in Massachusetts writes:

Patience and respect. Respect that a persons religious beliefs are core to their being. Whether it is how you believe or whom you believe in, it is neither right nor wrong to your belief. It's simply different.

Patience because earning the respect and trust of someone takes much longer than what it takes to alienate or insult them.

As they say in Sales; "It takes years to gain a loyal customer but only seconds to lose one"

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Steve in New York writes:

relationships concerning u.s.& the muslim community- must based on accountability&example;. the u.s. at present time lacks credibility because of serious domestic issues-not only economics-but extreme human&civil;rights issues-in a nutshell-our playground is messed up-hence-we cant be cleaning up the playgrounds of the world!if we focus on domestic issues with extreme priority-everything will work out!the bipoler bickering has got to end-its discusting¬productive!pease

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Maggie in California writes:

Nothing can be done. An extreme element will always exist that believes we are infidels as long as we ourselves are not Muslim and should therefore be eradicated. If you try to "make nice", you will only enable them to receive "goodies" while they continue to hate us and plot our destruction. They will always bite the hand that feeds them as long as that hand is not Muslim. We should consider our own interests first and leave them alone. Our interference is not appreciated by the extremists. They don't want positive non-Muslim role models for their children.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Joan in Pennsylvania writes:

Americans are generally naive as to how Muslims in the East live and what they accept as "good." We give everyone the benefit of the doubt; we want to believe they are "just like us." They're not...the French are not, the Germans are not, Italians are not. With our political correctness we forget that most stereotypes have a bit of truth. There is a reason for some of the old "birds of a feather" sayings -- people are more comfortable and enjoy the company of those that are similar to themselves. That's not a good or bad thing, it's basic nature. It doesn't mean we can't be civil and recognize various points of view.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Farman in California writes:

Promoting better understanding between America and the Muslim world requires substantive action. As a Muslim-American, I feel mutual understanding has for too long been written off as impossible due to our past mistakes. That's a fallacy propelled by generations of world leaders going back on their word. This time we cannot afford to make the same mistake, and the world is looking to America to make the first major move.

President Obama made a good start in his speech, and most of the Arab world responded positively. However, we need to back this up with clear, unmistakable action with regards to Iraq, Afghanistan, and especially the Holy Land. Within the next few months we need American foreign policy orders to follow the ideals laid out by the President. Bring Israel and Palestine to the table, reject violence on both sides, halt settlement and wall building and set forth a policy of no more "blank checks" for anyone. We have an enormous wave of support and goodwill right now, and America must prove that our actions will speak even more directly than the Presidents words.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

James in Washington, DC writes:

Education is the key. Domestically, we must promote tolerance and understanding of Muslim culture. We have to break stero-types and promote the idea of Islam as a peaceful religion while also recognizing that extremists, who wish to harms us, do exist. In the Muslim world we must promote educational programs, women's rights, economic development (all things that the President mentioned in his speech in Cairo) to faciltate Muslim countries' investment in human capital. Augmenting the funds for programs (such as the Fulbright Scholarship program) to bring Muslim students to study at U.S. colleges/universities will help in the educational process. Crucial to any program is not to publicize our campaign as "democratization" - the President's comemnts in the Cairo address carefully articulated our policy as promoting the rule of law, human rights, etc. This sounds a lot like democracy, but he was careful to indicate that democratization was not out aim (this was brilliant as American "democratization" sometimes carries negative connotations on the international stage. As "out of the box" as this sounds, the sooner we can develop a viable alternative energy source, the sooner we will see real progress in the Muslim oil-producing countries. This will force these nations to modernize and really invest in human capital and TRUE economic development in IT/tourism/industry, etc. I believe it is a strategic imperitive for the U.S. to lead the way in alternative fuel research and development so that we may peacefully facilitate the proliferation of new technilogies.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

LaDonna writes:

Kudos to you, President Obama. It is about time that as a nation we realize that we have to respect all of the nations and cultures of the world. The cost of not doing so is far too great for the entire world. To paraphrase Ghandi, we have to be the change we wish to see in the world. Strength allows one to embrace the differences in others.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Sherri in California writes:

Just asking the question is a good start. Perhaps a series of town halls via Skype between Muslims and a group of people of various faiths (or none) in the U.S. They could ask each other questions, clear up myths, learn about each other. NPR did something like this during the campaign, only it focused on race. At the close of the series it seemed to bridge the divide between whites and blacks.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Breda in Ireland writes:

I think in answer to the question Tolerence just start with ourselves first, stop defining us as muslims or christians.

In the last two years I have been lucky enough to vist Egypt taking in Cario , what was obivous was the angrer to the west they feel we dont listen and impose our standards, they dont want our type of demoracy so we must listen accept and be Tolerant

Good Luck

Thank you for trying

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Jonathan in Colorado writes:

Ask the Muslim people:

What is a rock?

What is a plant?

What is an animal?

What is a person?

What do all people have in common?

Do we all have hope for a better life?

How can politics help us?

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Tico in New York writes:

Finding a common enemy, of course.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Abe in California writes:

Actions I think that would promote better understanding are:

1) Continued admittance of, or acknowledgement of mistakes, injustices, mal-treatments, abuse, etc that our country has made toward the muslim world.

2) "Town Hall", open forum type meetings with people that are Muslim. I imagine this is high risk, but maybe with people that are more trustworthy to be asking questions (non-hostile Imams) of our Secretary of State, or The President.

These are basics, but I think it is important to acknowledge the past wrong doings in order to move forward. I imagine people would not forgive, or "let go" if we just ignored stuff. People tend to hold grudges if they do not receive closure.

Good Luck!

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Michael in Maine writes:

Military withdrawal from occupied Islamic countries. That's a good place to start! Economic withdrawal from petro-dictatorships (like Saudi Arabia); that dependence on dirty energy and dirty politics is more the issue than differences in religion. People claim they worship Jesus or Jehovah or Allah, but seems to me the only thing they really worship is money. And in this case, oil is money.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Ezra in Alabama writes:

More than anything, we need to educate our people that there is no shame in being more than just an American and accepting that we are all citizens of the world. The concept that we should work with, or even respect, non-Americans is lost on so many people. I have had several conversation in the past week in which people have said they don't care about what goes on in other places. And these were educated people in medical school and graduate school programs. Many people have overwhelming insecurities and senses of entitlement when comparing themselves to the rest of the world. Insecurities that make them think the rest of the world is out to get us. And entitlement that makes them think they not only citizens of the greatest country on Earth, but also that they are automatically the greatest people on Earth. You have to educate people about the similarities we have across our ethnic and religious differences.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Patrick in Ohio writes:

U.S. dollars. Nothing says "peace and understanding" like financial investment.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Nathan in Illinois writes:

One-on-one, personal connections; citizen diplomats; promoting interactions between people, which will lead to the realization that we're not all that different.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Pete in Maryland writes:

promote the fact that all crhristians, jews and muslims alike all beleive in the one true god. we must all share this earth. we must all live together.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Charles O. in Massachusetts writes:

You always make exceptions to prejudice for your friends. The best way to engender friendly relationships I've found is in the business world. We need to open and strengthen ties to countries who have been traditionally friendly and stable like Egypt, Turkey, Jordan and even others such as Syria, Lebanon, UAE, even Yemen and Iran. The marketplace is a mainstay of the middle east and we need to enter it boldly, openly and with a willingness to do it honestly. The sooner we can establish and maintain those relationships the more we will be respected and admired in the Muslim middle east.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Daniel in New Zealand writes:

Listen.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Toni in Minnesota writes:

Starting from President Obama's outreach, continued interaction will promote a better understanding between the United States and Muslims. Continue clearing away misunderstandings and collectively taking a stand against any form of extremism, in any country.

The people of the world should make an effort to learn from and appreciate those whose lives and cultures differ from their own. All the people of the world should take the time to learn about other cultures and practices of faith. How narrow minded are those that think, "ours is the only way."

Specific actions like foreign exchange and pen pals between the young people might affect change. If Muslims and Americans had more direct contact, it would be likely that each would see that there are more similarities than differences in dreams and desires.

This practice should not be limited to the interaction of Americans and Muslims, this should be the interaction of the world.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Change, its all about change worldwide, not specific nations or religions.

The evolution of technology, communications, interdependency, education, longer life spans via medical advances have all created an entirely new environment for humanity in every corner of the world and adaptation has to take place.

Polarization through nationalization is not the goal and religion is one of the methods used for such. Enmeshment in some manner, even through acceptance has to be made in every sphere of humanity sooner or later. This is the goal of global markets; but each country has to be realistic in maintaining a labor force to support its base population. Our real problem is greed, which has derailed the actualization of global markets. We need to use money as the tool it was meant to be and the governments of the world have to find some manner to regulate free trade more productively and developmentally for each country with out simply stealing from those less fortunate or in conflict. Religion is simply a tool to control people in the overall picture, no more, no less and we make to much of it in that regard. WE NEED TO EVOLVE; we ate from the tree of Knowledge and need to evolve from the garden, as we were meant to.

We lose important resources by constantly approaching things by looking at it like a puzzle and taking one piece at a time to address. Other than utilizing specific fields of knowledge in a specialized manner, the main goal has to be much broader than looking at problems as we do now. We need developmental goals that preclude religion. When stomachs are full and people are busy developing their families and countries they don't have time for war...and can worship what ever Supreme Being or beings in whatever manner they want in peace...which is what spirituality is all about. Religion is not the problem.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@ Khalil in Eritrea,

Aye, words may be dust, but your's were worth reading, thanks! Well said!

Speaking of sharing truth, have you ever wondered what might happen if bin laden chose to seek the meaning of life from a Buddhist perspective?

I believe there's a certain element of truth inherent in humor, and thus has the potential to lend perspective across cultures and religious thought.

You'll find some here among the comments I think and perhaps an answer to your questions as well.

http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entries/public_affairs_foreign_policy/

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Behar G. in Washington, DC writes:

I think the best way to promote understanding between the U.S. and the Middle East is open dialogue and education. The fact that so many of our leaders make policies regarding the Middle East or even visit the Middle East with little or no understanding of their basic culture and customs (such as when Condolezza Rice tried to shake the hand of Qathaffi last year when in Libya men do not shake the hand of women as a cultural norm) is ridiculous. I think playing both sides of the political game is also problematic, such as funding both Hamas and Israel simultaneously when funding to BOTH should stop. Sure everyone will point out that Hamas is a terrorist group, but the U.S. gave them funding under the pretenses of aid and reconstruction and it was nothing compared to the amount of money Israel gets for its defense budget annually. The Palestinians will not believe in a peace process that remains as biased as it has been these past 20 years. Removing the illegal Israeli settlements, however, is a positive first step, and if the U.S. succeeds in doing so it will give many Palestinians a glimmer of hope that the U.S. is serious about not only giving them a country of their own but truly working on a fair peace process.

If the President continues to do what he's been doing in terms of visiting places in the Middle East and giving speeches that are warm and understanding to the people living there, attitudes may begin to change, but his words must also be followed by action. Letting Muslims in the Middle East know that the U.S. is not anti Muslim is a huge step bc for too long our American foreign policy has focused on that region and has usually had negative consequences on the people living there. Despite our good intentions, the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Palestinian territories are not better off, and its not surprising that they do think that this is an attack on their religion and way of life bc we've been so disrespectful towards it. However, by changing our rhetoric to truly include everyone, and to make changes that highlight the beauty and wisdom of the words that make up the foundation of this country in our founding documents, it isn't too far fetched to believe that the people of different Middle Eastern countries may one day embrace them too. But they have to do it in their own time, not our time, and we have to remain respectful of that. In the mean time, we educate ourselves about the people we're coming into contact with because believe it or not, they know a heck of a lot more about us. It's time we let them know that they're worth getting to know too.

Posted on Thu Jun 11, 2009

Alonso in California writes:

I think that some students that are in college sould be sent to muslim ruled places to learn in their schools and their way of life. For exsample if I really know what it is like in Iran for two years, when I come back to California I will be a good souce of information about the muslim world and will be more able to break the wrong think between us and the muslim world.

Posted on Wed Jun 10, 2009

Klaus in U.S.A. writes:

I find that SNP in Syria write very interesting comments. I find with so much dis-information awash in the commons it is hard for any to know what is true. It is widely admitted that here in the U.S. that if the Media had not been so overtly FOR Obama, he could not have been elected. True or not? I really can't say and I've tried hard to know the truth. One thing I ask myself, "If I am an atheist with a desire to settle somewhere in the world, where would I choose?"

My answer would be that as an atheist (or a Muslim, as so many Muslims here in the U.S. have chosen) I would live in a Christian country. Why? Well, it seems to be the safest and the most free. Atheist (even those who activetly hate Christians) and Muslims (most, it seems, DO NOT hate Christians) all, are left in peace to go their own way. Now, none of this is based on anyone's propaganda, it's based on my reading of history and in that early history of early America it is stated in their founding documents that All religions will be welcome. There are real, and truly acid propaganda efforts being made to disturb that peace. It is on each of us to see through the fog of propaganda, and it's possible especially with the internet.

I can say to you in Syria, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Palestine, and everywhere Muslims live, I truly wish you and your family, and countrymen, peace and prosperity.

I will one day face my God and I will have to account for any evil I do to anyone. I want there to be nothing of evil to my fellow man to that I need to account for.

From a Christian to all, people of all religions, I wish you peace.

Klaus

Posted on Wed Jun 10, 2009

Klaus in U.S.A. writes:

Christian relations with the Muslims troubles me very much. In reading the Qur'an I find only the Muslim justification for war on and against the Christians. Logic might dictate that Christian's only response is to fight against the Muslims in self defenst. Personally, I find that to be not acceptable unless it is shown Muslims can find some way to say, in public, no, we will not wage war on the Christians simply because they are Christians. I fear that very soon we are going to find we both have drifted into something I think the majority of Muslims and Christians do not want. But, something must be done or we will find ourselves drifting.

Posted on Wed Jun 10, 2009

Khalil in Eritrea writes:

Truly, words are dust.

How can you change the heart of those in power? Power corrupts. How can there be peace when those who are drunk with power take the peace?

Should a Mosque be filled with guns or prayer?

Truly, I tell you to act on peace, for a little knowledge that acts is worth infinitely more than much knowledge that does nothing to heal our lands.

We can start by sharing the good gifts of truth.

Truly, it is easy to do evil, to pick up a gun, but infinitely harder to follow the straight path of light, to peacefully share truth with your neighbor when your heart is broken by them.

Yes, we must act. We must first fill of our hearts with truth. Look down your path - where are you going?

If Kaaba is truly in our heart, we have no need of weapons.

How little is known of Mohammad when the sword is known best What can I offer my neighbor that he would wish to follow me, a sword or the truth?

President Obama you speak from your heart.

Thank you.

We must simply act with our hearts.

Posted on Tue Jun 09, 2009

Brian in South Korea writes:

The key is going to be economic partnerships. Trade and globalization are the best ways to reduce conflict and increase prosperity for both the Western and the Muslim world. Friedman's "McDonald's Theory" is a great example: no two countries have ever gone to war when both countries have a McDonalds. While I'm not arguing for American cultural hegemony, I AM arguing for expanded trade. If the Palestinians were engaged in the world economy rather than being marginalized, the culture of poverty and resentment would slowly vanish. Rising tides raise all boats. There's a reason the U.S. and China aren't exchanging bullets. Despite the areas of the Chinese government that are personally distasteful, the dangers of a war with China are minimal.. why? Trade. A similar model would work in the Muslim world (as it has with Turkey, Jordan and Morocco. This rift isn't about religion, as is popular wisdom, it's economic.

Posted on Tue Jun 09, 2009

Donald in Virginia writes:

THE BLOOD OF MAN

Everyday, we hear on the news how people on earth just cannot live together in Peace. We hear the suffering, the sounds of war, the anger that exists between two races of religion, which cannot stand each other, to live next to one another on earth. It has been written by God himself to learn to love thy neighbor, not destroy thy neighbor! Yet both sides continue the violence, continue fighting over a piece of land, the blood which flows deeper than the Red Sea, proving the fact that we as people are not civil people on earth. We have become Animals in nature fighting for survival, identifying one religion is greater than the other. When will we ever learn that God is the master of all races, God is the creator of life and the end of life. Who are we to Judge what God does, or why people continue figting over a cause which cannot be won. The lesson in this message is that in life you don't need a military protecting your borders, you need to open your hearts, find a truce between your neighbors and end all wars, all violence and learn to live with each other, drink wine, party and put away those desires for war. One side buys more weapons, more devices to destroy mankind, as the other does the same, and it has proved we cannot see "eye to eye" when it's the most simple thing to do in life, FORGIVE THY NEIGHBOR, GOD FORGIVES PEOPLE ON EARTH, FIRST YOU FORGIVE AND THEN GOD FORGIVES YOU FOR THE ACTS OF VIOLENCE YOU SPREAD.

Both sides need to learn this valuable lesson of "Forgiveness" before Peace can exist between Arabs and Jews" How do I know this for a fact? Angels exist!

Godbless and Peace on earth for all MANKIND/WOMENKIND and Children who will show you the light!

ANGEL OF LIFE!!!

Posted on Tue Jun 09, 2009

Ron in New York writes:

Obama's State Department appears on popular TV shows, with Muslim and Arab guests and audiences to create new forums for education, awareness and stigma reduction....Go-Bama, Go-Hillary, Go-Oprah!

Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

One major thing I failed to mention, which also creates insecurity, is the fact of dependency on oil by the Middle East as its mainstay and, while demand is already diminished, with few exceptions as Egypt, they have not integrated infrastructure into any variables as manufacturing and internal self sufficiency. Over the long haul, they will have to face their people and offer an alternative to distribute wealth to; especially given the increased educational levels of many Middle East countries. The mass exporting of citizens now for general labor is a significant sign of forth coming problems.

The Middle East is facing many changes and external fiscal investments alone will not support the changes within their societies. So, unfortunately, the present regimes of power will continue to use religion and separation to control their perspective societies, unless they are educated realistically and in a productive passive light externally.

Religion is not the problem at all, it is about change which is inherently forthcoming by economics alone and insecurity.

Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

It is the perception of the word Problem and separation by religion is not realistic. We can impose the words- ideological differences- instead.

Our own democracy is a good place to view the inherent problems of change which lead to insecurity, which, for the most part is the realistic problem. The use of religion is simply a fence to hide behind and a control function which is especially dominate and well used by control systems in any society which is non democratic. Regardless of the religion, almost any orthodox version is impossible to live under today, unless we go back to residing in caves.

In short, as Ms Rice so often stated in the past and repeated by Mrs. Clinton: "Democracy is an evolving process." Today we have internal differences which evolve from traditionalist moralist views vs. change. While I personally feel that States rights supersede those of a Federal Legal Statue on moral issues, as the law is supposed to reflect the moir鳠of the represented society in a democracy, we have a much divided house. The referendum vote of the people would be more representative; but, the legal system and overall views as to the rights of citizenship as a U.S. citizen are under scrutiny and change which supposedly benefits all citizens within the democracy. We have a democracy with problems resulting from our own in house perspectives, so imagine the use of moralistic views to a society which has never known democracy.

The implied differences are not in reality religious by nature; but, reflective of Change. Everything from the power base within a household to the control by present governmental administration are made insecure by the general idea of democracy and equal rights; which, the United States, for all our imperfections, still represents better than any other major country worldwide.

What we simply need to do is take the idea of religious rhetoric away by not forcing change, educating the Middle East cultures as to the idea of democracy and how representative government does not take away power from anyone; but, enhances the overall culture of any country and its people.

Most Faiths are premised on a Supreme Being a loving and compassionate God who wants peace as a primary base for the regeneration of humanity. Muhammad wrote after eight years of fighting with the Meccan tribes: Never again shall brother fight brother, nor the infidel, we shall show by example now that our way is the right way..unfortunately, after he fell ill and passed the Rashiduns, along with his cousin, found this not beneficial to maintain power . In essence, it does go with his personal belief that we are all one with God and God is One.

That ideology, perhaps forgotten, is best for everyone: By Example and with Respect toward God, which is all.

Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009

Zharkov in USA writes:

If anyone was serious about changing our relations with muslim countries, we would have a real investigation of the attack on the World Trade Center to determine, among many other questions:

1. Why military-grade thermite residue was found by scientists on the interior steel columns of the collapsed buildings; and

2. How 19 tourists with boxcutters managed to get NORAD to stand down while they flew into the buildings; and

3. Why there was a practice exercise attack scheduled on the same day as the real attack; and

4. Why the investigation into who shorted airline stock before the attack on 9/11/2001 was summarily dropped and the results of the investigation not revealed to the public.

In fairness to the muslim world, we should have spent more time investigating before immediately placing blame on muslims.

Posted on Mon Jun 08, 2009

Khalid in Bangladesh writes:

Obama has started the journey. It is not the end but a very bold and courageous drive. Drive agains terrorists within U.S.A. and beyond. But some one will have to open the truth, the reality. How long we will play hid and seek game. The relations between Muslims and U.S.A. is declining since the Bush regime. There are majority of the Muslims who are true friends of U.S.A. and the poeople. They want peace and peace only. But Bush took the strategy of "compartmentalization" betwen Muslims and the west. There are many good Americans who want to have friendly and brotherly relations with the Muslims and vice versa. There is no reason to brand muslims as Ladens or talebans.

I strongly believe, it is the time to move forward hand in hand; muslims and christians and the jews and the hindus and the buddist ...

Otherwise, we will destroy our planet, more severely than the climate change or any man-made disaster.

Posted on Sun Jun 07, 2009

Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:

The Middle East situation is much worse because the U.S. government funds both sides of the dispute.

Aid to Israel and to Hamas should end immediately to remove the profit from maintaining the dispute. As long as both sides collect money for fighting each other, why should they stop?

Reverse the situation and if they had to pay us to help negotiate their dispute, would it not end quickly?

Posted on Sat Jun 06, 2009

Patricia S. in New York writes:

I agree 100% with Yael, in West Virginia. The U.S. will make no progress with the Muslim World, unless and until it stops funding Hamas. I doubt the President made much progress during his latest trip abroad. Let's see how the administration spins "this successful trip" next week. The administration is no real, true friend of Israel and its leaders and its people are well aware of this - sad indeed.

Posted on Sat Jun 06, 2009

Yael in West Virginia writes:

Maybe the President and Secretary of State are right to demand that Jewish families in the terror-tories be denied their right to any "natural growth" in their population. But somehow it's hard to believe that the births of Jewish babies or houses for Jewish families are truly the "obstacle to peace" that our government makes them out to be.

To my mind, man-made disasters (such as terrorist attacks) and the intractability of the pan-Arab goal to eradicate all Jewish life in the Middle East seem more of an "issue." But maybe that's just me. After all, Israel's ethnic cleansing and surrender of the Gaza strip in 2005 was a great success... for Hamas.

Ah, but I forget. The United States now funds that terrorist organization, in spite of the fact that it's illegal to do so. No wonder so many Americans are confused when it comes to issues in the Middle East.

For instance, one week we see the President entertaining a Holocaust denier (Abu Mazen) in the White House, and then the very next week he's standing at Buchenwald with Eli Wiesel, decrying Holocaust denial as "baseless, ignorant and hateful." And at the same time, the State Department spokesman refuses to tell the American people where our government now stands in relation to our previous commitments to our previous ally, the state of Israel -- as per the April 14 2004 exchange of letters between George Bush and Ariel Sharon.

Lastly, I want to thank you for this interactive website. It may be that it's merely a placebo, given to replace the real democratic power that once rested with "We the People," but it sure is better than nothing!

Posted on Sat Jun 06, 2009

Connie in California writes:

We must create a dialogue about the equality of women. We must get behind the women MPs in Kuwait and support them when two of them choose not to wear hijab. We must educate ourselves that gender parity in government gives women power. And when women have representation and accountability in government, women's and men's and children's lives are better. When women have opportunities and are safe in their homes, life is better.

In short, healing our world starts with empowering women.

Posted on Sat Jun 06, 2009

SNP in Syria writes:

The damage to U.S.-Moslem relation in general and in particular to its relation with Middle Easterners is permanent and irrevocable, especially when it comes to gaining respect of the people. The U.S. will always find self installed ruler who seeks U.S. lordship to keep him in control of the Nation treasury, army and resources. This will suite the U.S. as well, since all Americans really wants from Moslems is oil, cash (Dollar reserves and sovereign wealth), weapon sales contracts, and a ruler that can keep the populous illiterate, bogged down and a net importer even of basic food supply to keep his country weak and reliant.

The U.S. can also find a naive Diplomat or person that provides leads in various directions that will all prove a false hope and a naive attempt. But here is an honest free advice: The U.S. lost it and lost itself as well. The U.S. did damage before in the 50-73 but that pale in comparison to what it did from 1990 and now still ongoing horrors. Give it up, maybe, just maybe, if we ever made it peacefully that far, a new generation will forgive you. Even that is a very remote possibility, because Moslems and Middle Easterners tend to carry the vendetta for millenniums and teach the children to follow the father's way of thought.

The U.S. understands the power of modern Technological Media, as this blog is accessible since its inception to more than 5 million readers, other media, such as You Tube and Google will wield few hundred millions readers in the Moslem world to find information that is very damming about U.S. deeds to Moslems since 1990 Desert Storm War for profit. To many Moslems, Israel has moved from the number One position that held for Sixty years and down to perhaps enemy number 54th on a long list topped by The U.S., British, French, Australian and Shia Governments, the United Nations Criminal Organization, and it ends with abhorred characters that are nothing more than supported puppets, the like of Mubarak and Abdullahs (all of them). In fact, to many Moslems, Israel is slowly rising as a possible good will power that can be dealt with and leveraged against the diabolically evil treatment Moslems received from the West.

If the U.S. is serious about better understanding why not start by exposing those films, photos and secret facts you are keeping under top secret. The Moslems knows those facts already, thanks to You Tube and Google, but who really need to know is the American and Western people, they need to know, so they can start the healing process, now there is disconnect between the genuine reality and the virtual reality that Fox news and CNN present to them daily.

Posted on Fri Jun 05, 2009

Lisa in Ohio writes:

I listened to Iran's spokes person Armadijihad (sorry spelling). I agreed, I also caught the thinly veiled threat he made. His speech at NY.last yr. said no gays in Iran, blah, blah. It's the exportation of vices that are enraging the elders. They see thier children at risk, don't you? Our freedom of speech is something that resembles a double edged sword. Also Isreal's high-handedness with our full backing is not helping matters. You at most can acknowledge, but the law protects good and bad depending on thier bank account bal. So seek a balance with the exportation of this nation destructiveness. I find to deny is to anger. P.S got a low-paying job 4 me? willing to travel!

Posted on Fri Jun 05, 2009

Rose P. writes:

I believe President Obama's speach was very constructive even to those who did not want to show it out of fear of loosing power or suspicious minds. Next step is what we have spent 12 years of doing which is the constant dialogue with the people through all medium to come together on a Universal Culture accepted to all based on Universal Laws of Human Rights and not Hollywood's old eastern men's perversion! Then is the mass knowledge poured from rose p.!

Posted on Fri Jun 05, 2009

Page 1 of 1 pages