Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments

Jonny in Indonesia writes:

Symbolism is important for Asia and what you are doing by visiting Asia showed a very good symbol to Asians that albeit U.S. is an absolutely big and strong country yet you do care about Asians. Remember when you do good things for Asians, they will never forget them in their entire life and they will even try to pay them back twice or more. You are very "smart" with your "smart power" approach. Asia has already seen a new and better approach. When Asia is more developed, U.S. will be more secure.

Congratulations.

Posted on Fri Feb 20, 2009

J in California writes:

Secretary Clinton must demonstrate to the Chinese that the U.S. is committed to promoting equitable trade with the rising superpower. She must also express her interest in supporting Chinese efforts to be a responsible stakeholder in world organizations and peace efforts, etc.

Posted on Thu Feb 19, 2009

Wendy in Canada writes:

Maybe if the terrorists within stopped pumping the Pacific Rim of Terror full of U.S. dollars by supporting open source software in the production of Hollywood films and home videos, we could resist the temptation to get angrier. Delta.

Posted on Thu Feb 19, 2009

Bumbac in Romania writes:

Madam Secretary Clinton, Despite all the World Economic Crisis, the World Nations tight related against terrorism, poverty and... corruption!!! I welcome your Nomination as a State Secretary of U.S., since you have a strong experience as you and President Clinton, ruled in White House. We are looking forward you to visit us in Romania this year. Sincerely, Bumbac

Posted on Thu Feb 19, 2009

Kay in California writes:

I believe the key to better understanding with Asia or other parts of the world is people diplomacy. The International Visitor Leadership Program ought to be expanded in order to have more future leaders of other countries visit the U.S. and witness first hand why we do things the way we do as well as where we are coming from. When the foreigners truly understand us and the U.S. becomes a part of their personal memory, I think that they would do everything in their power to be a good ambassador of the U.S. in their own country.

A great example is how many returned Peace Corps volunteers become very attached to the countries they served and continue to promote causes related to the countries for the rest of their lives. It takes personalized experiences to understand and take to their hearts what seems so foreign to them.

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

ha-ha, the previous post is funny:) on one hand, i too thought we ought to boycott those olympics, and by the way, what happened to their grandiose Stadium is a shiny example of fakiness of today's China. on the other, i don't hink anyone's dying in U.S.A. because of not having 'healthcare', after all no hospital can lwafully refuse to treat anyone for an emergency in this country, regardless of their citizenship or insurance/lack thereof, so the author must've meant something different. and in any case, this is not the Surgeon General's blog ;)

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Laura in Texas writes:

Will you help the people who petitioned the Gov. in China during the Olympics? They all went to hard labor camps after the Olympics for protesting that they lost their homes for the games? These are elderly people who will not survive hard labor .This is genocied! Please bring up human rights in China and these poor elderly people sentenced to hard labor camps for protesting peacfully .I want to know their fate? Don't you? Americans should of boycotted these games. These are the invisable people who no one cares about ,just like the 500 people in the U.S.A. who will die TODAY all beacuse they have no health care.

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@ Ann in Colorado -- It's a little presumptous of you to assume how I see things, since you really know nothing about me.

That said, here's a "lesson from history" and an "exit option" that will help educate you.

http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_afghanistan_and_pakistan/

This was an Afghan/American effort from get-go, and the letters I included in this thread were a distillation of a month long, almost non-stop discussion between myself and a long time friend who just happens to be the late Zahir Shah's Godson. A fusion if you will of common purpose in extreme crisis for both our peoples.

We live in a world that defies probability, satellites collide in orbit, subs bump into each other in the open ocean, and a few letters may seem improbable to change the course of human events, but stranger things have happened.

When you've walked a mile in my shoes dear, then you may start to really understand what this is all about, so too I think a path with heart is best travelled with a receptive mind.

enjoy...

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

well, somehow when U.S.A. finally starts standing up for its values, acting in consistence with them and actively espousing them throughout the world, the same people that previously accused us of hypocrisy, start accusing us of imperialism, rather than supporting us in trying to expand the sphere of freedom. instead of 'better late than never', its 'blame America, whether it's too heavy-handed, or not involved enough'. we sure must do our part, but our 'partners' need to do theirs, as well. we need to seek common ground with China, for instance, but also remind China that it needs to seek common ground with us, perhaps even more so, for we can find a replacement for their cheap products, but they hardly can replace American market. and they also need to wake up to the climate change issues, to which they contribute like no other country, but still refuse to address it. at some point, tougher stance not only on political, but on purely economic and ecological issues, may be needed, if softer one doesn't land fruits.

as for pro-peace, sometimes, unfortunately, the more hard-line stance is truly pro-peace, while the more conciliatory one encourages aggression. just look at Axis Powers in WW2, or Russia this past August. contrary to what, for instance, Mr. Buchanan says, i believe western democracies' mistake was not to confront Germany or Japan, but to not do it sooner. same with Russia today, same with Iran, North Korea, and quite possibly with China

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Ann in Colorado writes:

@ Ole, President Obama is the one I voted for and continue to support, and I still do not agree with the bombing of the border areas. No, I do not believe that killing is ever the answer, so I guess you and I will have to agree to disagree on that issue. My mother grew up in Germany during WWII; she lived through the fear and the bombing and the horror of the Nazi regime. My German grandfather was a resister and risked his own life to defy the regime. My father was a U.S. army soldier and was wounded in France. So I am not from a family that runs away from a fight. I did, however, grow up in the 60's, and I have read enough since then to know that the U.S. was as wrong to go into Southeast Asia as it was to go into Iraq. The U.S. has made many mistakes since 9/11 and I am fearful that Obama will continue some of the wrong-headed policies of the previous administration and Afghanistan will continue to suffer.

As for Pakistan, they are in a fierce competition with India to develop energy security and strategic partnerships with China and Iran and the United States. U.S. policy cannot achieve its goals with bombing and soldiers. More and even more resources must be put into helping Afghanistan and Pakistan and India and the rest of South Central Asia solve its trans-national political, economic and energy problems. There is so much distrust among all the nations in that region, and in spite of your optimism, I do not believe there is much trust of the United States either. Nor do I believe that the history of United States foreign policy in my lifetime gives us much to be optimistic about. I don?t believe in war, bombs, killing, and force. There are better, more sane ways to do business. I do appreciate your point of view, Ole, and I sense from your comments that you might appreciate mine, or at least tolerate them. Thanks.

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

A.J. in Canada writes:

I think it essential that we forgo the perpetual American practice of do as we say not as we do. To foster a better relationship with Asia we must be able to find common ground on challenging and increasingly complex issues such as climate change and the economic crisis. The hardships of these challenges are compounded by the fact that they are far reaching and will require the cooperation of not only Asia and United States but of the international community as whole. In addition, America approach towards Asia shouldn't include the anti- war stratergy but the pro -peace.

Posted on Wed Feb 18, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

Ann, if Obama's too much of a hawk to you, or to those civilians who you presume to support Taliban and distrust U.S., then who would possibly be a real dove and a true diplomat? Kucinich, Ron Paul? who do we need to have as president, who would simply pull American presence out of every hot spot of the world, thus accomodating everyone allegedly dissatisfied with U.S. policies? and most importantly, would it help in any way?

U.S.A. puts India over Pakistan? well, i don't remember U.S.A. protesting Indian nuclear status any less than Pakistan's, moreover there wasn't whole lot we could do about it, anyway. let me remind you that it was USA that helped Pakistan stave off Soviet advances in the region, U.S.A. that hunted after Aidid when his thugs murdered Pakistani peacekeepers, U.S.A. that has provided huge amounts of aid to Pakistani army, etc. noone ever said nuclear India was more acceptable than nuclear Pakistan, it's always been lamented that those countries had to resort to that; but there is surely difference between them and Iranian dictatorship trying to obtain nuclear bomb, for the mullahs have vowed openly to destroy a sovereign, UN-recognized and originated state, execute and/or endorse religious and political violence, and stir trouble in neighboring countries. Pakistan and India, thankfully, have not stooped to such lows, even over their Kashmir rivalry.

yes, i believe U.S. is 'saviour' of the world, and not mythological but quite real. all history of last century or so, shows that when U.S. actively carries out its leadership role, without reservations as to its cost or legitimacy, it succeeds. and actually, the sooner that role is taken up, the lesser the cost. it did so in West Europe post--WW2, in Southeast Asia at the same time, has proven so even in Iraq and Serbia. the answer to South-Central Asia troubles is more, not less of U.S. engagement. when our troops peg back terrorists, and make friends with locals, that will also set up stage for economic, social and other improvements. the problem is, in a country like Afghanistan, it's much easier to overthrow old regime, than establish firmly new one, especially when you try to adhere to values and rules we declare and support. it's a hell of a tough task, but by no means impossible, and rather than run away from it, we need to tackle it. it's very tough, to balance Afghan tribalism, consevratism, traditionalism with democratic values, relative liberalism of new government, market economy etc.-- but it needs to be done. to improve the plight of Afgans, to root out corruption, defeat terrorism etc., a new push is incumbent. whom do you suggest we engage in diplomacy with: Osama himself, Mullah Omar, Zawahiri? yeah, like that will help bring peace to that land, or make life of ordinary Afganis better. see, if police in some place don't do their job too well, the answer is to analyze mistakes, correct them and reinvigorate that police force, rather than just take it out of the 'troubled area' and leave it up to criminals. i see things precisely from the standpoint of ordinary people of Afganistan, Pakistan, India and any other country, who want end to violence and misery around them. But having grown up in USSR, as one such ordinary citizen of a criminal state, I can rather appreciate America that wants to extend me a helping hand, even if it is an armed one, than America that fears to get itself mudded by difficulties and thus refrains from taking active role. there is a way out of the vicious circle you described, but it is not through overcaution, and it does require some forceful action at times.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

Eric, thanks for support, and Onur, I in turn support all that you just said, although it might be noted that personally I have been a little frustrated that Turkey itself has not moved quick enough to take up on opportunities that Soviet Union's collapse had presented, in Caucasus as well as Central Asia. moreofer that U.S.A,'s not been directly present in the region for that long, essentially only after 9/11, and in that time, we already saw revolution in Kyrgyzstan and near-revolution in Uzbekistan, precisely because of its relationship with those people, who mostly are Turkic and all are muslim, it could serve as a great example for them to follow. by the way, it's interesting to note that current leadership of your country is islamist, yet pro-western. that goes to show that political islam may be just as acceptable a movement within demoracy, as Chirtian conservative movement in our country, Christian Democrats, Socialists etc. in Europe, ot Jewish religious parties in Israel. there are enough reasonable people among muslims, including those who base their political philosophy on their faith. nithing suggests that islam is less compatible with democracy than any other religion or ideology. it's those hijacking, perverting and speculating on islam that are our enemies. i have been saying for a while now, that Al-Qaeda, or Hamas, are not Sunnis, nor is Hezbolla a Shiite party-- they're just criminal. Our allies include shiites of Iraq, and Sunnis of Turkey, Lebanon, Central Asia etc. and it should be noted, that such once fashistic entities, as Saddam's Baath, or Slobo's Serbian Socialist party, are today members of democratic political landscape of their countries -- in my opinion, precisely because they once were hit hard, and realized they needed to abandon their criminal past, stop destroying their own countries, and accept a role within projects presented by U.S. had we not bombed Serbia in 1999, or invaded Iraq in 2003, for all the painfulness of those actions, those countries today would've been still under the rule of Slobo and Saddam, two of the most discusting mass murderers of the last 2-3 decades. force needs at least to be made an argument along with dyplomatic approach, then perhaps Iranian mullahs or the North Korean madman will come to their senses before it'll be too late. a thug can be reformed, but only if he realizes that not opting to reform, will cost him dearly. we should not forget about this often-taught lesson of history

if I may express a small point on rather European-related topic, but still concerning a nation traditionally thought of as Asian, namely above mentioned Turkey, i want to call on Secretary Clinton and President Obama to support in every way its current government's bid for EU membership. EU has a chance to be a bridge entity, uniting different faiths, cultures, civlizations and regions all based on common values, and such opportunity must not be wasted. when this topic comes up in near future, in discussions with such leaders as President Sarkozy, who's now rather skeptical to Turkey' bid, I hope US, while not a member of EU, would use its influence in it to lobby for Turley. and for such countries as Ukraine and Georgia, as weel.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Ann W. in Colorado writes:

@ Eric and Ole -- You are not looking through the eyes of the civilians nor the governments/military in Afghanistan and Pakistan when you claim that the U.S. is a "liberator". U.S. foreign policy in the region is of serious concern to both these countries as well as its neighbors, who do not welcome a permanent U.S./NATO force in Afghanistan. The Bush administration did nothing to improve security, governance or justice in Afghanistan, the people do not trust the government or its institutions,and there will be no legitimate elections in December 2009 because of corruption and insecurity.

Pakistan continues to manipulate the Islamic and Pashtun militias in the border areas in order to destabilize Afghanistan because they are most afraid of India and its growing influence in the region, all the while trying to remain allied to the U.S.and NATO. Pakistan sees the U.S. as using Pakistan for its own purposes and they're right: the U.S. has welcomed India as a nuclear partner, while it continues to decry Pakistan's and Iran's nuclear ambitions. U.S. foreign policy is hypocritical and blind to regional realities. President Obama continues to send in bombs and troops when so much more diplomacy, development and nation-building is needed. The U.S. is being played by Pakistan,too, and our soldiers will kill and be killed as a result. But you go right on believing that the U.S. is the mythological savior of the world, spreading peace and democracy like rose petals. You'll see where it gets us: more terrorism and death, less security within our own borders, and a bunch more money down the drain. Like we can afford that.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Onur in Turkey writes:

First of all, they should vigorously decide for enhancing bileteral relations.

U.S.A. and the West have to promoto their role throughout the Central Asia where is still Russian effect exist. U.S.A. must sign bileteral aggreement with the Central Asian states on various matters in order to decrease Russian influence. But we observe that U.S.A. has lost its influence in the region day by day. Manas militarybase is closed by Krgzistan. U.S.A. must collobrate her power with Turkey and try to be effective in the region towards Turkey. Turkey has an essential role because they have deep ethnic and racial links with Central Asian states. U.S.A. must use this link and move together with Turkey for being effective throughout the Asia and must decrease Russian influence without resent them.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Valeria C. in California writes:

Madame Secretary Clinton:

Trade between the U.S. and Asia is a good thing for both sides of the Pacific Ocean. Also, the low price of products allow many to afford goods that they might not otherwise be able to buy.

However, given the recent lead and melamine scares in Chinese-made products, I would like to see more crosswalking between FDA regulations and Chinese regulations for products entering the United States.

I look forward to following your trip in Asia and other foreign visits that have yet to come.

Sincerely,

Valeria C.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

@ Ole, I would just add some food for thought to what you said to Ann, and offer a factoid or two:

410 U.S. spec. opps and CIA laying targeting coodinates for the U.S. air force to help the "northern alliance" kick the Taleban out of Afghanistan was not U.S. "liberating" Afghans....that's Afghans liberating themselves with a little help from their friends.

Occupation is a very poor choice of words since the Soveriegn and freely elected government of Afghanistan considers U.S. and NATO allies as invited and welcome guests.

I would further suggest Ann take a walk through Swat valley and discover who Pakistan's real enemy is.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

i'm sorry, but i gotta take issue with Dear Ann W. from Colorado, for we're not occupiers in Afghanistan, but liberators, and we don't bomb civilians on purpose, unlike our enemies who hide among them and set them up to become collateral victims of our actions, subsequently blowing 'american crimes' out of proportion in their propaganda. if anything, we should do better PR with local peoples, but at the same time we must not consider ourselves unrighteous in this cinflict. we helped Afghans fight USSR, then watched on as Taliban came into existence, we were ready to cooperate with them, and what's happened to Afghanistan is wholly their fault, not ours in the least. winning over citizens of Afghanistan and Pakistan is a must, but beating purselves on chest endlessly, begging for forgiveness from entire world, is wrong and counterproductive. I agree that Pakistan's sensitive to India's policieas, and I myself commented in another topic on how to nring end to Indo-Pakistani conflict; but NATO presence is not the problem, it's the answer to it. after all, who else can possibly take on opium empire there, among other factors of instability?

I also don't see last 8 years as especially harmful to our overall standing in Asia. we've had Saddam overtwhorn, Lebanon ridden of Syrian presence, Iranian students taking to demonstrations with "Death to dictator' slogans, referring to their so-called president; nuclear treaty with India; and we're still friends with Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines etc. aren't we? of course Secretary Clinton is not Secretary Rice, and most definitely President Obama is not President Bush, but there's got to be clear understanding on part of those forces that don't cooperate with demands of international community or respect general human values, that they will suffer consequences for their policies, including possible military action. "All options should be on the table". Without clear and present sticj, carrot alone in geopolitics doesn't do much

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

fear has big eyes, especially fear of 'the other side' located beyond iron curtain (or perhaps, today you could call it an aluminum, or stained-glass curtain, or juts iron curtain-light). for all its growith, which may very well have come to a stalling now, China has only 20% or so of its population enjoying the pleasures of civilized way of life, with the rest still miserabel and risking greater miseyr over current crisis, which may by the way create dangers to the regime. let's not make Commie China look stronger than it deserves, and rather approach it realistically. as James Friedman has recently said, for american citizens, crisis means problems with their 401k's, for the chinese, it means malnutrition. if China wants to recover and progress further, if will have to make choice to side with the US, UE, UN on all major international and domestic issues, rather than keep obstructing our agenda and present themselves as supposed beacons of stability and success, which they're not

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Quinn N. in Connecticut writes:

First, I would like to extend my sincere well-wishes to Secretary Clinton as she leads the State Department into a new era. The relationship between Asia and the United States eroded immensely during the past eight years. This relationship can be rekindled through a new program of diplomacy and vast cultural and political exchange. We need to reexamine our relationship and understanding of the Asian continent. America needs to realize that her interests are deeply intertwined with those of the Asian continent. Secretary Clinton is the best qualified person to rekindle and foster a new era of understanding and respect for the Asian continent.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Ann W. in Colorado writes:

The U.S., international community and regional Asian nations must work to bring economic development to Afghanistan and set a time table for ending the occupation of that country. I believe the U.S. and NATO must stop bombing the border regions of Pakistan/Afghanistan because the murder of civilians is only exacerbating radicalism of the general population. We must also work hard to end border disputes between Afghanistan and Pakistan and settle the question of Pashtun nationalism. Pakistan must no longer feel insecure and threatened by India and the U.S./NATO occupation of Afghanistan.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Dennis C. in Indiana writes:

We took that country out of the Stone Age and put our own people in their place. This in my eyes was too many acts of Treason, by too many people that we the People of the United States put our honor, trust and faith into. What happened to the word Honesty, our entire world has lost it I was told. Can you see or identify how we can fix the United States, and not make us think it will be chopped up it to many Republics and small countries within these borders? Do you honestly think China or the rest of Asia cares about the United States?

We have been taught that they have been in existence for more than 3000 years. WE INVENTED PROGRESS. History shows us that we designed unbelievable and unrenowned products in less than 65 years. The U.S. Engineers and Workers and People did and do what was necessary to be the unbelievable, and then we just gave it away. Instead of continuously being the Best at every aspect of Science, Math, Read, Comprehension, and Human Morality, People and Government began to changed all BIG Business OUT and AWAY from America.

I think you know where China and Asia are having the plans and of staying in their biggest ongoing Industrial Revolution. I think that Asia and China will do what ever it takes. I can foresee China and Asia will be on the way to be next going after all the possible Oil and New Weapon Technology like I mentioned thermonuclear power to keep going. I think they will try to possibly take over the world. I think the Asian people like our people do not have the total ability and understanding of how an explosion will ruin the world. We need to try to properly educate the entire world about mass destruction. Nuclear Weapons mean total destruction. They scare me and they scare the entire World.

I gained positive incite to nuclear bomb effects by a simple hand held effects computer, based on data from the booklet of the Effects of Nuclear Weapons. I began reading and leafing through this old book from 1962. It was prepared by the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. This book should have been given to every person, in every school at every level of training, to know how serious these weapons of mass destruction are and can be. I was first exposed to only a book and a movie The Day After, in high school, which I did not believe and thought it was all fake Hollywood. I do not think people have the slightest inclination of the absolute destruction that will occur. Can you present this fact to the World by Video or News Stations World Wide?

I just found a web site that provides people with software for-ipcTv-that has 6,000 TV channels world wide and 12,000 radio stations in all languages spoke in every country, in the world. A person can also get Google translator software for free. It will translate most languages. Through this software link a person with Broadband Internet can take use and see many different people, societies, and cultures at the touch of a button. Why is our government in the stone age with respect to this technology, We are wasting Quadrillions of dollars trying to get this new HDTV up and it is failing to work and it is out dated and a big waste of money. You could use this wasted money rebuilding America. Can't you somehow present the facts that it does mean that Weapons of Mass Destruction (NUCLEAR WEAPONS) can and will destroy Continents and if not the entire Planet Earth.

Secretary Clinton, can you try to go again and slowly see and hear exactly all the true problems and all walks of life in America. I can go on and on. Please, Help us all Secretary Clinton, Tour the U.S.A. cities small and large to the north, south, east and west. Try to even see how hard hit your own country is being hit economically, socially, mentally and physically minute by minute with out even the use of weapons of mass destruction. Thank You, for your time Secretary Clinton

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Dennis C. in Indiana writes:

Secretary Clinton, Do the American people have to be concerned about President Obama's remarks to Asia that the U.S is going to stop imports of foreign goods and start to produce as much of the products it can here in the U.S. Will the America People have to fear for retaliation because the President wants everything to begin to be become American made products? Can you see this is as being true? Due to the availability of easy, fast Internet shopping, I was told all the malls and department stores across the United States are going out of business? Most of the products were all from foreign countries, none produced in us factories. The only electronic LCD TV I found produced in California is a VIZIO flat screen HDTV that is mostly sold at WAL-MART. The Asians will not be very happy with the Presidents plan. They might start more problems; Look how they all of a sudden flashed to the Americans a photo of a NUCLEAR SUBMARINE with a caption under it saying that it could DESTROY A WHOLE CONTINENT. Do you think China should be using such scar tactics against the People of America?

We the People in the U.S. have had enough. WE have had to put up with our government using MODERN MONEY MECHANICS to over tax us since the inception of the federal reserve bank, To high inflation to the point of putting every business that was left in the us to almost bankruptcy, Stealing average hard working families 401k's Now deflation is about to hit this economy 10 fold worse than ever in all time against every American citizen. What do you believe your entire cabinet really knows about the truth of America? Where and what happened to all of are sense of protection? With every President's cabinet past and present turning to War or Blaming other countries for our leaders not stepping up and leading this Great Nation to some kind of better hope of a future here in the U.S. and not thinking or seeing our country is crumbling up before our very own faces. Can you help America lose this feeling and come home and see for your own eyes that we need to fix our own country within and stop thinking that we have to always fix the worlds problems? We need to start at home and begin building new roads and bridges. Not to just sell them out to foreign countries with a 99 year lease. Taking the easy was out by selling our own infrastructures, and then putting a coin operated toll both every 5 miles at double the price. Not to mention the rail roads, steel mills, landmarks, buildings and uncountable land plots to foreigners, everything has been taken over.

Why can't our government see that our basic needs should be fixed and placed here in the U.S.A.? Stop the get rich schemes and put Americans back to work. Stop these day traders that wreck the Stock Markets and Money systems of the world and give people a feeling of comfort again by letting them keep their investments in long term companies and be reassured that their investment will be there when they retire. NOT TO BE RIPPED OFF, and get some sob story to be explained how were sorry but your investment is gone and we can't help you! But the person that had the master plan to separate you from your money, health and welfare will now have to be protected better then The President Of The United States because he has all the money that was hid where even the CIA,FBI,NSA,HOMELAND SECURITY or The Trusted Banks, Central Banks, U.S. TREASURY can or will find a trace because their all getting paid to look the other way, don't ask and don't tell. I think this is the most ridiculous thing our government has allowed to happen to its citizens. They deserve better than that after a long life time of putting extra hours and painstaking savings plans, here and their just to have some happiness for achieving some of their financial goals of doing the right thing saving and thinking about the future. China and Asia was supported by the United States.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Christian in Florida writes:

As with any diplomatic relationship, there must exist understanding for the positions that countries hold. For there to be success and solution to international disputes, there must be room for dialogue. The United States of America under a new administration and a brilliant new Secretary of State have professed to this principle, and will hopefully abide by it.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Aidara in New York writes:

First and foremost, both parties must have a clear understanding of the issues that cause confusion or dischord in the relationship between U.S. and Asia. This requires clear, concise communication regarding what each sides wants, expects, and will not tolerate. Second, both sides need to single out what they want (or don't want) to achieve through their relationship with one another and how their past interactions have undermined or supported the realization of their goals. Both sides should brainstorm better ways of communicating with one another and achieveing their goals. Self reflection is of the utmost importance because we are all figuring things out as we move along in life, we can always do better. Third, while clarifying misconceptions and stating intentions, both sides must be knowledgable of their common goals and rely on this mutual interest as a means of maintaining balance in their relationship. Are both against nuclear weapons? human rights violations? genocide? They must be clear about ways in which both parties can support one another and how one party undermines the efforts of the other to achieve a goal. Instead of directly threatening the other party in response to this set back, each side should offer the other an alternative and state how that alternative would help that country achieve one of their goals. Both sides must inform the other of areas in which they are willing to negotiate and areas in which they are not. By informing the other group of its boundaries, it allows for a more defined relationship in which both parties may interact in a more harmonious manner. Lastly, both parties need to recognize that misunderstandings are normal and inevitable in any human interaction. It's the way in which each party deals with clarifying issues that arise that will either strengthen or weaken the relationship.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Muhammad in Pakistan writes:

I feel the U.S.A. should work to improve the education,health, and justice in Asia. The U.S.A. should work with the people and not with one man in Asia. The U.S.A. congress should pass to allow more visitors from Asia. The U.S.A. teachers should come and teach schools in Asia.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Arnie in New Jersey writes:

The most important actions to take will be to substantially increase diplomatic effectiveness. Through breakthroughs in diplomatic effectiveness we will be better able to gain the cooperation we need on a host of challenges. Ex: Human rights, the Tibetan occupation, the trade imbalance, the PRC-Taiwan issue and the complications with North Korea.

We at the Organization for International Cooperation are advocating the use of extraordinary programs that can make diplomacy infinoitely more effective.

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Leo writes:

I think Hilary should get on the band wagon and tell President Obama, that Nancy Pelosi should stop wasting taxpayers money by not using our government planes for her own personal use!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on Tue Feb 17, 2009

Marcia in Connecticut writes:

The U.S. has the United Nations, Europe NATO, enter into a Global agreement to construct a United Nations East complex which concentrates on Climate and third world issues. The Olympics brought China into our living rooms, we should continue to engage while remembering they are still Communist China. the construction of an international building in China would allow additional foreign press coverage and give china a steak in climate change issues.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Daron in Singapore writes:

Depending on what is meant by Asia, there would be a number of answers to the stated question.

In Northeast Asia, nothing is of greater importance than the six-party talks. Keep them going. Add more issues. Make everyone feel like they are getting something out of it. Don't take sides.

In Southeast Asia, ASEAN is going to be a very powerful force in the next few decades. They have their own stated issues and objectives. Helping ASEAN to meet their goals can be mutually beneficial.

In South Asia, India is the center. It is comparatively stable and progressive in light of every country it borders. We must help India to be a stronger, cleaner, and more just place. A strong India can help stabilize its neighbors. This isn't about taking sides. This is about helping the people best able to help others.

Further, task forces should be created for the multinational human rights problems of sex workers, North Korean refugees, extreme sweatshop conditions, access to clean water, etc. These are the hearts and minds issues. The Peace Corp can play a role. We should all play a role.

Then there is what the actual governments want: economic progress. China especially is a bit of a hard liner on this. For these we need to see which projects are good for everyone. For instance, my hometown of St. Louis can be hurt by Chinese steel production, but it will benefit greatly if Chinese airlines make a hub out of its airport or partner with its universities.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Hyun-Joo in South Korea writes:

Dear to Secretary Clinton.

i don`t know Secretary Clinton. and you too..

but,

i just say, "welcome to visit to Korea".

Asia? having plenty of opportunity. and also have risk.
(problem is some are lack and not realize of duty)

and thank you...

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Ole in New York writes:

Accomodating enemies of democracy in the long run serves noone--except for those enemies. we've had 'peaceful coexistence' with Soviet Union, that resulted in them invading a country after a country. U.S. needs to take a principled stand on issues of human rights, and make further development of economic cooperation with countries like China, Russia, Iran dependent on those issues. for all problems between U.S.A. and Japan, they are of principially different kind than those we have with China or Russian Federation. i believe it was a blunder, albeit served at the time as a great success of American diplomacy, when Nixon-Kissinger administration 'normalized' relations with Beijing, switching recognition from Taiwan to Commujist mainland regime. without it, that regime would've collapsed in a few years, just like USSR collapsed; but since we didn't have patience or insight in top echelons of our country's elite at the time, and further rushed into every littlest business opportunity when Den Xiaoping's reforms started, we essentially threw a lifeline to what is one of the most criminal regimes in history. China need to free political prisoners, establish multi-party system, stop supporting thugs like Mugabe, Chavez, Karimov of Uzbekistan, Lukashenko of Belarus etc. we should make it clear, that their, as well as Japan's, Vietnam's, Korea's and other Asian countries' economic successes are due to learning and emulating Western model, rather than to sticking to their traditional, or what's passed (often falsely) as their traditional ways of life. Traditions are one thing, corruption, abuse, genocide -- totally different, and we should not turn a blind eye to them, lest people see Americans as utter hypocrites. Secretary Clinton herself put it very well back in 1995, i believe, when she said in a speech, that abuse of women and chikdren, for instance, is not cultural-- it's CRIMINAL. in particular, what is done to Falungong members is criminal -- note that this movement itself originally was an offshoot of Chinese Communist Party, so this just goes to show the cruelty of the regime, if it does such things to its former protegees. for all local diferences, there's more that unifies all of humanity, than divides, and China and other Asian countries should be no exception. once all nations are on the same page politically, sharing same basic concepts, values etc., economic cooperation will work itself out perfectly. I see no problem with economically mighty China, but i see all problems with oppressive regime taking credit for what is not its merit, and moreover using it to further its criminal agenda. And Mr. Kim John Mentally Ill needs to be finally taken to task for starving millions of his countrymen to death, while collecting foreign cars and building nuclear bombs.

We also need to support the push for democracy in still Russian-dominated states of Central Asia. people of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan etc. deserve full democracy, rather than Soviet-bred ideologically bleak reactionary dictatorships backed up by Russian guns, that they have currently. contrary to what some have been saying for years, Russia is not a buffer from islamism in this region-- its the reason for it; and if we extend helping hand to those peoples, aiding them in achieving full democracy, they will undoubtedly be able to build successful states; most definitely, more chance of it in such case, than under continued affiliation with Kremlin.

Speaking of Russia, i believe we should have a plan prepared for every possible turn of events there, including for what looks like a permanent latent possibility, albeit usually balked at by everybody, of that country's disintegration into several smaller entities. the notion that we need Russia to stave off islamism is false, for it creates it. the notion that we need their help bringing peace to Middle East, Africa, solving Iran nuclear issue, is equally false, for Kremlin is interested in those conflicts' continuation ,rather than solution ,especially the longer U.S. fails to succeed in solving them, for every such US failure presents opening for Putin & Co. I believe it was a mistake to unequivocally support Yeltsin when he disbanded Russian parliament in 1993, for it set the country back on its liong-running despotical path, and ultimately produced the headache that we call Vladimir Putin. tyranny at home breeds aggression abroad, and we saw that very clearly last August in Russian-Georgian war. thus, it seems that continued existence of overcentralized Russian political entity is a source of permanent threat to peace in the world, rather than a factor helping bring it. split-up into a dozen smaller, localized states might be lesser of evils, and in any case should be seen as a possibility. shall it happen, we need to be in touch with the local elites in Russian regions, perhaps prepare a plan for bailout of nuclear arsenals they will come to possess.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Ben B. in Alabama writes:

The best way to promote understanding between the U.S. and Asia is for both parties to be aware of and appreciate each others' pasts and cultural differences. American schools teach American history and its ties to several different European countries but for the most part leaves out the Far East, and Africa for that matter. Not only does this cause a breach of understanding but also leaves a hole in Asian-Americans and African-Americans' sense of self.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:

Tax competition between nations is a healthy thing, the same as it would be with trade competition between corporations. Where competition exists, businesses become more efficient and so can governments.

Each nation should compete to have the lowest tax rates and thereby each government would have an incentive to become the most efficient government, which would result in the winner attaining the highest standard of living and the least unemployment.

When the Hong Kong tax rate was 10%, Hong Kong had the strongest growth and a booming economy. Estonia had one of the lowest tax rates in the region and before the current recession had the most thriving economy in Eastern Europe. When people and businesses have more money to spend, they spend it wisely and their economies show growth.

High tax rates are a drag on the economy by removing money needed to do research on new technologies, build new factories, and hire new university graduates.

Increased spending alone cannot help when the increased revenue is quickly removed by increased taxation in the form of a progressive income tax, which forms a feedback loop that renders the economy increasingly unstable as oscillations of higher spending and higher taxes eventually kill off even the most profitable businesses.

Betting one's life savings on the Obama Bailout is the position Asia finds itself today. Japan, China, and other nations buying U.S. debt instruments are taking a terrible risk because our government cannot work its way out of bankruptcy by throwing Asian money at our domestic problems.

America's economic problems were created by America's government - our tax structure invites our most productive companies to leave the country and produce elsewhere; our environmental regulations hinder new companies wanting to build factories; our labor regulations make it impossible to compete with unregulated labor overseas. We have committed national financial suicide by our own hands.

It is up to Congress to fix this, not Asia, and thus far, Congress isn't interested. When our Asian friends see us fix our problems, they will listen to us. Normal people do not take financial advice from bankrupts. Once we are solvent again, if that ever happens, that action alone will convice Asian leaders that we know what we are doing.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Adam in Illinois writes:

While upholding human rights is something to which every nation should aspire, the definition of this concept is highly subjective and determined within the context of a nation's social and cultural norms. To apply a blanket definition and standard to all cultures is both obtuse and counterproductive. Using the cause of human rights as leverage against Asian nations such as China, whose legitimately differing interpretations of the concept may spring from practical and logistical limitations, does nothing to further our interests, nor those of China nor the cause of human rights in general.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Zod in Canada writes:

I wonder who is manning the local press pool feed here in T2 where we get glimpses of Hill disembarking the plane and watch as Kenobi-san or whomever is lined up radioing Bayjang with the triple and quadruple nods. 9Mhz 12:14.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Teri B. in Alabama writes:

International Women's Day is March 8th. Women around the world have celebrated this day since in the early 1900's, yet in the U.S. women have hardly heard of it. We are hardly equal, but too many of us take for granted the strides we have made, and do not show enough support for the struggles of our sisters around the world.

I encourage the Pres. Obama, the First Lady, and Secretary Clinton to bring attention to International Women's Day, so that women around the world can unite in celebration of women and in common purpose for women's equality, safety, and opportunity.

http://www.internationalwomensday.com/about.asp

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

T.J. in the United Kingdom writes:

I did not finish my comments for the last topic.

Dear Joe;
Re:-

5. There is no Cultural War in reality. There are only differences established in perspective from culture and the histology. The change has begun: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ixeFBxfLzaSjs8Mb8cuFmtPOT6-wD96A27HO2

It is good to read the News and be aware of the goings on. However, please be aware that, the News from Iran is very very far from the truth. There is a constant Cat and Mouse game to distract the masses in process with no end in sight.

Khatami is a Mullah and part of this game in essence. There were many crime against the Iranian people committed during his previous terms in office. The covert Nuclear activity was started during his time too. All he did was to sweet talk and deceive the people by his empty promises.

I hope you have heard of "Punch and Judy show". That is exactly what takes place in Iran.

In reality, the President has no power. He is the mouthpiece of the regime led by the Supreme leader -- Khamenei. The voting system is a farce and the winner pre- elected and the whole show is to occupy the minds of the Democratic World and ease and distract the likely pressure from a tyrant and corrupt regime.

The Economy is in the hands of a Mafia like Clan of Mullahs and their proxies.

The Iranian people ARE the real victims while the free World is watching the show.

I must remind you that, while the U.S. has been exerting pressure on the Mullah to behave itself, the Europeans have been busy trading with the Mullahs regime and ignoring its conduct.

Finally, in my opinion, a good Mullah is a **** Mullah.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Chul-hong in South Korea writes:

In the Cold War era, Washington and Moscow competed over holding the hegemony in Asia.

Big Two attempted expanding their "influence" (a diplomatic word for pressure) in every corner of the world, especially in Asia.

The collapse of Soviet Union appeared to be the end of the Cold War era, however, the termination of Vietnam War and the Washington's diplomatic establishment with Beijing should be considered, I think, as the ultimate end of the Cold War era.

In my opinion, Washington's major role in Asia has shifted from the greatest "influence" to [the competent mediator] since the Cold War era passed.

Washington has kept initiatives (or key mediator) in 6 party-talks comprised of Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul, Pyongyang and Moscow.

The peaceful solution over territorial dispute between New Delhi and Islamabad is partly dependent on Washington's mediation.

In order to keep its status as a mediator, Washington had better embody its [transparent] policy -- for example, promoting human rights and democracy -- on Asia, which would give its [trust] to reasonable Asian nations.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Zod in Canada writes:

From one Hill's Angel to another, I'd like to see local Telco authority squashed in favor of some real police movement on phony charge and swipe card operators. Where is the money going if it just appears in Chinese currency on the street and then disappears into the pocket of sex traffickers, business software pirates and those who upend the authority of the Food and Drug Administration.

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Kenneth in Michigan writes:

I just hope that the US does not turn it's back on and old and trusted friend like Thailand, after 175 years of Solid support for the US. They are feeling slighted after not being included in your Asia trip. (Bangkok Post Article in Opinion section dated Monday February 16 2009. What are friends for?)

Posted on Mon Feb 16, 2009

Howard in New York writes:

With regards to China, we need to do a better job of making sure that Chinese citizens understand that we don't mean them any insult when we criticize their government. We're obviously not doing a very good job of communicating this, as it seems to offend individual Chinese citizens when we question the practices of their government.

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

William in Maryland writes:

The 'Asian development miracle' occurred to no small extent because of the contributions of Peace Corps Volunteers who were able to bring to thousands of small villages and towns through-out Asia the real face of American culture and spirit.

I am concerned, although very early in the administration that has created hope for changed US policies all over the world, that the role of PEACE CORPS is receiving so little mention.

Secretary Clinton, please begin to actively promote and advocate for 16,000 PCVs in the field by FY11. This will require a new, bigger, bolder, better model for recruitment and volunteer placement than has been used for the last 48 years. Not that a 24 month placement, combined with a 3 month orientation hasn't been effective. It has!

Look to the long-list of countries that frequently requested PCVs, but have not been able to get them fielded because of internal PC budget shortages.

Look to the technology improvement and access to the internet that field volunteers need to have. Many technologies developed on US university campuses with DOD funding have civilian applications that can save lives and bring prosperity, health and educational improvements. Give PCVs access to these in cooperation with State and USAID.

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

Terry in Connecticut writes:

China is a country with over a billion people so any country that big needs a good relation with us. Keep us posted on Secretary Hillary Clinton's travels. Looking forward to more videos and pics of her trip.

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:

If one reads the question in connection with Mrs. Clinton's current travel schedule, it will make more sense.

China is not the only part of Asia investing in the U.S. and none of them want to lose their investment.

Maintaining the exchange value of the dollar is their primary concern. If they lose their dollars through hyper-inflation in the U.S., all the respect in the world will not improve our image in their eyes.

Talking nicely while stabbing Asians in the back by destroying our dollar along with our economy doesn't win friends.

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

Eric in New Mexico writes:

I too am puzzled by the nature of the question's generality, when this question has already been answered:

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/02/117333.htm

I suppose we could debate specific actions targeting common issues affecting nations, but in the broad context what I see as developed policy has resulted in some very positive trends and the actions taken to produce them are not what's up for debate (as they have worked) within the review process the Obama admin. is in process of conducting now in all aspects of foreign policy.

We can discus "best practices", with approach to specifics, but if you want a simple answer to the broad question in question, I'll just add to the Secretary's comments that:

"Attitude is everything."

Li in China has one that is conducive to better understanding, and will no doubt be reciprocated on the official level within U.S. government.

So, proceed accordingly.

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

Wendy in California writes:

There is no way to overstate the meaning of respect everywhere of course, but especially perhaps in Asia. 20 years ago a friend told me that in Japan there were seven levels of respect, courtesy, formality and added wryly that he was always on the wrong one, tho he was forgiven because he was trying.

I think every diplomat in State (& everyone in Defense & in the U.S.A.) should be issued or re-issued that old but timeless little treasure, *The Silent Language* by Edward T. Hall. It demonstrates how often we blunder like bulls in cultural china shops busting up the crockery, oblivious.

Having the discipline to maintain respect shows maturity and strength. Our beloved country is still learning this.

I think 98% of focus should be on what mutual challenges and solutions we both share and intra-share regionally. I would cite and re-cite their triumphs or progresses in any direction which leads to a more beautyfull & bountyfull planet. (I think we will in some centurys chuck the notion of nations and talk of neighborhoods instead. We are all kin under the skin.)

Posted on Sun Feb 15, 2009

Li in China writes:

I want a friend of america.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Economic: Since President Obama has recognized this is our number one priority even here in the U.S.:

Japan, in the late 90s made the first open negative statements regarding the U.S. in more than one symposium. They blamed the downfall of the "lost decade" on U.S. trade with China; thus, resulting in great economic loss which they felt violated our many trade agreements. South Korea took the same stance. Other than the Auto trade agreements, our outsourcings to countries which are not in the smaller Asian Theaters have had a negative overall economic impact. Japan is especially hit hard right now:

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-business/economic-gloom-to-test-tokyo-stocks-20090213-8782.html

How the U.S.A. can offset their situation with a more secure economic outlook would come first.

The Russian-Sino Accord. The economic and military threat that it represented to the region put immense pressure on the area which the US addressed by increasing the Nuclear umbrella, but did little to address it otherwise. This has resulted in many free trade agreements to both Russia and China. The China-Japan Free trade agreement, which offset the SAARC agreement, out of necessity, is reshaping East Asia economically. This can impact our productivity in the long run with Investments into the US. Why build in America if you can manufacture in China as well?

The list of Free Trade agreements is too long to review individually; but, is the backbone of how we maintained a realistic bond with Asian interest initially. We WERE the benefactor originally.

While I understand it is not the U.S. Government that alienated many of our Asian allies (disregarding the Philippine conflicts), the countries view lack of control over our Corporate investments in the Free Market system as either a weakness of the Government to control, or a direct lack of sincerity by the U.S. Government involving their stability by proxy. This can be found in the many editorials against the U.S. policies throughout Asia.

I dare say, it is the U.S.A. who much attempt to gain support of these countries now as the power structure has changed dramatically. This is well represented by our current economic crisis and externalizing of more Asian investments to China, India and Russia, by many Asian investors versus making American investments now. Just being a military power is not enough, which Russia proved long ago.

If they can now stay in the middle ground and maintain stability to profit their countries, what is the benefit in taking sides with any one country?

We outsourced the life blood of economics to the enemies of democracy and now have the resulting problems. I think we need to identify our priorities and goals first in the U.S.

China is the largest problem in ASIA as Free Trade is not equal or free and Russia has their energy needs.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

1. First and foremost, what are you refering to...the question is too vast.

WHY? The problems and associations are with 44 different countries which incorporate ASIA...Asia:
Afghanistan, Kabul
Armenia, Yerevan
Azerbaijan, Baku
Bahrain, Manama
Bangladesh, Dhaka
Bhutan, Thimphu
British Indian Ocean Territory (overseas territory of the United Kingdom)
Brunei, Bandar Seri Begawan
Cambodia, Phnom Penh
China, People's Republic of, Beijing
China, Republic of (commonly known as Taiwan), Taipei
Christmas Island (overseas territory of Australia)
Cocos (Keeling) Islands (overseas territory of Australia)
Cyprus, Nicosia
Georgia, Tbilisi
Hong Kong (special administrative region of the People's Republic of China)
India, New Delhi
Indonesia, Jakarta
Iran, Tehran
Iraq, Baghdad
Israel, Jerusalem
Japan, Tokyo
Jordan, Amman
Kazakhstan, Astana
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (commonly known as North Korea), Pyongyang
Korea, Republic of (commonly known as South Korea), Seoul
Kuwait, Kuwait City
Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek
Laos, Vientiane
Lebanon, Beirut
Laos, Vientiane
Lebanon, Beirut
Macau (special administrative region of the People's Republic of China)
Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (seat of government at Putrajaya)
Maldives, Mal
Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar
Myanmar (formerly known as Burma), Naypyidaw
Nepal, Kathmandu
Oman, Muscat
Pakistan, Islamabad
Palestinian territories (collectively the territories of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip)
Philippines, Manila
Qatar, Doha
Saudi Arabia, Riyadh
Singapore, Singapore (city-state)
Sri Lanka, Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte
Syria, Damascus
Tajikistan, Dushanbe
Thailand, Bangkok
Timor-Leste (commonly known as East Timor), Dili
Turkey, Ankara
Turkmenistan, Ashgabat
United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi
Uzbekistan, Tashkent
Vietnam, Hanoi
Yemen, Sana'a

Can you be more specific? Many are our Friends, but the culture, economic and security issues vary greatly.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Xander in the Netherlands writes:

Asia works in a different way as the U.S. and Europe. Businesses are run in a very different way and state politics are viewed upon by people in a way we first world citizens have long since abondoned..... For instance the Chinese. It's system is something we might reject, but the country and it's people become to full bloom.

This makes Asia a very powerfull and new "player". The U.S. might try to understand the differences and learn to live with it instead of denounce it.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:

The answer is obvious. China is reluctant to invest further in U.S. debt instruments unless there is a guarantee of maintaining dollar value, because they have already lost billions of dollars and are unwilling to lose any more. Premier Wen Jiabao said last month his government's strategy for investing would focus on safeguarding the value of China's $1.95 trillion foreign reserves.

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu said yesterday that talks with Clinton would cover bilateral relations, the financial crisis and international affairs, according the Xinhua news agency. Yu said, "China should diversify its reserves away from U.S. Treasuries if the value of China's foreign-exchange reserves is in danger of being inflated away by the U.S. government's pump-priming."

So Mrs. Clinton will be expected to offer assurances that the dollar will increase in strength, and if she fails to do so, China will begin to back away slowly from U.S. investment.

Mr. Obama will likely agree to Mrs. Clinton offering some kind of assurance, but can he perform such a miracle in the face of his own runaway bailout debauchery of our currency? I think not. Chinese economists are skeptical and it is Chinese money we are gambling with in these multiple bailouts and panic spending.

Anyway, if we want to remain friends with the Chinese, they gave us the answer -- increase the value of the dollar and reduce our irresponsible spending.

The correct way to "prime the pump" is to reduce taxation, not print more currency.

Businesses spend more on advertising, create jobs, and sell goods and services when taxes are lower. The Chinese know that works because that is how China became a spectacular success.

Hong Kong's tax rate was the model for any country wishing to have a booming economy. It is our pathetic Congress that forgot simple economics. Congress can't bother to read the stuff they vote upon. They may as well be illiterate if they won't read the laws they enact.

It's no surprise that the Chinese are worried. They should be very worried. They've handed their life savings to people who can't save any money themselves.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Reg in France writes:

There is one very powerful action the United States could take to improve understanding with Asia. It would help the United States rebuild its economy, in the bargain:

Start behaving as responsible adults in the upcoming world trade negotiations over the Doha Development Agenda. And, of course, I am referring to what everybody calls the "Doha round."

The conduct of the United States in the Doha Development Agenda talks, within the framework of the World Trade Organization, for the last eight years has been shameful, reckless and appalling. It is time for the United States to stop behaving as a pariah and come to the negotiating table with good faith and credible proposals.

I believe there is now an opportunity for a new beginning. I hope the administration of President Barack Obama will take full advantage of it. But there is not a moment to lose. Swiss Economic Minister Doris Leuthard said off-stage at the World Economic Forum in Davos that WTO ministerial meetings on the Doha Development Agenda could resume in April.

The 2008 round collapsed after the U.S. came to the table with a proposal that was an insult to everyone present.

Susan Schwab, the U.S. trade representative, said the United States would be willing to cap its farm subsidies at $15 billion a year, in return for India and Brazil going along with provisions that the United States wanted.

Because the U.S. agricultural sector has been so profitable in recent years, that would have represented an $8 billion a year INCREASE in actual farm subsidies. At that time the actual U.S. spending to increase U.S. farm production was, in fact, $7 billion dollars a year.

So, to gain important concessions from India and Brazil, the U.S. was asking to lock-in forever the right to INCREASE by $8 billion a year subsidies to U.S. agribusiness companies, including multinational giants such as Archer Daniel Midlands, Bunge Limited, Cargill Inc. and Corn Products International.

The only purpose the United States could have had for making such an arrogant and pathetic gesture was to wreck the negotiations. They succeeded in wrecking them. The talks collapsed.

Don't blame this all on the legendary power of the U.S. farm lobby. The U.S. farm lobby is powerful, as it has every right to be. But it is not stupid to the point of being suicidal.

Fairly soon, possibly as soon as two to three years from now, America's farmers going to be in desperate need of alcohol- and vegetable oil-based biofuels from the undeveloped nations, just to keep themselves in the farming business. This is not the time for the U.S. to pick stupid fights with its trading partners, particularly those with undeveloped and underdeveloped economies.

True, world energy demand and supply are now expected to remain relatively balanced through the end by 2010. But do not be lulled into complacency. After that, the most savage energy crisis the world could possibly imagine awaits us all.

I refer you to the International Energy Agency (IEA) at this URL:

http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/

"World Energy Outlook 2008: Even with demand static over next 22 years, four new Saudi Arabias needed to make up decline in existing oil fields."

You can read it for yourselves. For the sake of itself, and the entire world, the United States must assume a thoughtful and well-considered leadership role in the World Trade Organization's negotiations on the Doha Development Agenda.

Do you think that will be a difficult challenge?

Will it be any easier when, some time after 2010, America's gas pumps are showing $6 a gallon for diesel and $8 a gallon for gasoline?

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Daniel in Arizona writes:

The use of high profile Americans such as Secretary Clinton and special envoys and not low dignitaries will show Asian countries that they are important and not a mere after thought.

Posted on Sat Feb 14, 2009

Deepa in Kentucky writes:

I think that the best way to promote understanding is through the citizens of our countries and not just the leaders. This should be done by promoting cultural exchange, informational exchange, professional partnerships, and other types connections. Asian countries are so rich in culture and thought that America would be missing out if we didn't take the opportunity to connect with them.

So, I think the state department should take a more active role in promoting the free exchange of artists, scientists, professionals, students, etc. between the Asian countries and our own.

Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009

Cara in Kentucky writes:

I love Klint's suggestion of sharing more of our country with visiting foreign diplomats, spreading a wider world view of American Life, as well as the suggestion of broadening the "official" publication of stats to include experiential and interest-based information.

Just sharing my official "second" of Klint's ideas! :)

Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009

Klint in Washington writes:

Promoting understanding is always good but things in regards to corruption, state-less people, and other problems that does occur shouldn't be ignored. Though I guess it's the highlights of things going well not just by themselves but cooperatively that help things a lot better.

Maybe online -- offer a more 'interests' type version of the CIA World Factbook (which is straight basic stats) for each country where there is an Embassy. From general views, things to learn, services that Americans might find useful (similar to the guidebook that the U.S. Embassy in London puts out).

And then...create based on U.S. States, territories that U.S. Dept. of State employees are from...do an interest write up, local fairs, recipes..etc. Perhaps do these in a kind of newsletter blog form (that way when things are added - style isn't too much of a worry) for each country, U.S. state,
- -
Maybe when a foreign VIP is visiting, instead of having them go to DC have them go to some random fair or celebration in whatever State (where a U.S. Dept of State VIP (or semi-VIP muhahaha) would also attend) to give them a different view of actual Americana.

More foreign govt. inter agency training (concentrated through U.S. State Dept/Embassies) in regards to agencies that deal with the pacific rim type countries. Be they military, law enforcement, business, environmental, to even agricultural. Perhaps try to get some training that is normally done in CONUS to be done in Asia (to help reduce cost to interested Asian counterparts) or perhaps offer tele-commute training through Embassies or bases to those in CONUS training sites.
- -
Perhaps try to get U.S. State schools and Pacific Rim schools to communicate and perhaps create local news sharing projects and funnel their works through U.S. State Dept.

I wonder if regional Voice of America is on Twitter also.

Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009

William in Alaska writes:

Actions across a range of issues and among a wide component of our respective communities will benefit our mutual interests. A realisation that we have numerous interrelated concerns and responsiblities will lead us toward solutions that are transnational in effect and interdependent.

A world that is engaged in creative response will better confront challenges that are truly global in scope.

Fortunately, our economic, transportation, communication and cultural capacity provides multiple methods of working together. There is so much to accomplish. There is a public confidence that our new Secretary and her team will find opportunity within crisis.

Look forward to innovation in processes but also look within ourselves for remarkable conditions of mind. It will modify all our thought to solve these vexing community problems.

Posted on Fri Feb 13, 2009

Page 1 of 1 pages