<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Dipnote Comments -  You are Following Comments for </title>
    <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>U.S. Department of State</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T15:54:03+00:00</dc:date>

    


    <item>
      <title>panzy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Panzy in New York writes:<br />
<br />
Seems lately like the whole world is crashing down, but i think the relationships of both countries will live on.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 27,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Houseonahill has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[H. in Illinois writes:<br />
<br />
Education. If we encourage global higher education, disadvantaged young men will seek alternative ways to gain power and money as opposed to terror. Mexico's terror has invaded our homegrown terror and is making for a lethal relationship. <br />
<br />
If we communicate to our neighbors that education uplifts, we can all benefit.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Normita has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Normita in California writes:<br />
<br />
One of the most important aspects of the U.S.-Mexico relationship is the stabilization of the immigration issue.  If both countries do not address this unilaterally, there will be a continuing struggle on drugs, trade, to mention just a few.  <br />
<br />
Madam Secretary, thank you for your service to our country.<br />
<br />
Normita, a proud hillaryvillager]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Adolfo del Castillo has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Adolfo in Mexico writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of the Mexico-United States relationship is the different point of view of both countries for many affairs...I think northamericans sould look at us as partners and not as competitors...workers go to search for a job and are not criminals...the relationships with Mexico sould be seen as a homeland security of the U.S. and in that way, try to understand that mexicans want a better relation with this country, but respecting traditions and development.  thanks a lot]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Lee Jeffrey has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Lee J. writes:<br />
<br />
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:<br />
<br />
I agree with Hillary Clinton that it's our fault concerning the 'Drug Wars' in Mexico. It's our fault in the sense we allow millions of illegals to enter this country each year because we refuse to protect the borders. It's our fault that when the Mexican president can't handle its own people that we allow him to throw them off on the American tax-payer, which drains us with them receiving free healthcare, housing, medicaid, welfare,financial aid for school, and social security. It's our fault that we allow many Americans to lose their jobs just before retirement to low wage illegals. So yes, I agree with Hillary Clinton it's America's fault for allowing this to go one for so many years. <br />
<br />
Proud to be an American,<br />
<br />
Lee J.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Stan has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Stan in New York writes:<br />
<br />
Robert in California writes:<br />
<br />
Madame Secretary: I am glad you have gone to Mexico to show support for Mexico to reduce the drug violence along our boarders, its is time to create jobs and prosperity in Mexico and help their citizens find a better life. <br />
<br />
Posted on Thu Mar 26, 2009<br />
<br />
Debbie in Minnesota writes:<br />
<br />
Ms. Clinton -- thank you very much for beginning this conversation with Mexico -- a direct, respectful and transparent conversation. Al Jazeera reported that "nine out of 10 guns retrieved from crime scenes in Mexico are traced back to U.S. gun dealers." So, by you stating that Americans are at fault for the high demand for drugs from Mexico is just the tip of the iceberg. Thank you very much for standing up for the truth -- by admitting we contribute to drug-violence south of our borders. In this way we can take responsibility for our actions on a national level. You are a great example of an American. <br />
<br />
Posted on Thu Mar 26, 2009<br />
-----------------------------------<br />
<br />
That's right go ahead and blame America for the world's problems. Why should America cater to Mexico's needs and wants when here in America we have our own issues that have yet to be addressed. What about creating jobs and prosperity for the millions of Americans first before we attempt to do this for another country?!?!? Why should America have to build jobs in Mexico? We are losing jobs here!!!! If they can't stand on their own as a nation then maybe Mexico should become a territory of the U.S. not a Commonwealth but give all its power to the U.S. And not all guns come from the U.S. You Liberals on here act as if Mexico doesn't trade with the rest of South America. The U.S. has a very small part -- very small. When are people going to stop blaming others and America for their OWN problems?  What if the Mexican President stop looking for a handout from the America and learn how to enrich and lead his country rather being a puppet to America? If the borders were protected like Fort Knox there's no way the crime would escalate to these border towns, yet no one wants to talk about that.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>joe has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Joe in Tennessee writes:<br />
<br />
Please forgive the sarcasm; but, I'm so sick of the hypocrisy regarding everything from trade, corruption, labor rights in Mexico, human rights in Mexico, distribution of wealth in Mexico and US proposed non involvement both commercially and politically::: how many lies can administration after administration cover up?  How many DEA and FBI agents have paid for this under the table, long surviving sanction with Mexico?   It was OPENLY sanctioned during one U.S. Presidents Administration.<br />
<br />
Amazing how Mexico wins both ways...<br />
<br />
Amazing how the country that is said to create the problem ... pays both ways...U.S.A.<br />
<br />
Amazing, Mexico pays nothing but in lives it does not attempt to democratically support to begin with...<br />
<br />
The Church comment by Ralph: Amazing how the Church wins both ways as well...makes you wonder if there is really a separation between Church and State  except in a protectionist, profit oriented manner does it not?   Then again, it is about choice?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Robert has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Robert in California writes:<br />
<br />
Madame Secretary: I am glad you have gone to Mexico to show support for Mexico to reduce the drug violence along our boarders, its is time to create jobs and prosperity in Mexico and help their citizens find a better life.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Debbie has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Debbie in Minnesota writes:<br />
<br />
Ms. Clinton -- thank you very much for beginning this conversation with Mexico -- a direct, respectful and transparent conversation. Al Jazeera reported that "nine out of 10 guns retrieved from crime scenes in Mexico are traced back to U.S. gun dealers."  So, by you stating that Americans are at fault for the high demand for drugs from Mexico is just the tip of the iceberg.  Thank you very much for standing up for the truth -- by admitting we contribute to drug-violence south of our borders. In this way we can take responsibility for our actions on a national level. You are a great example of an American.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Mar 26,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Gina has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Gina in California writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of the U.S.-Mexico relationship would be to take a less active role in trying to solve all of Mexico's problems, for instance the thoroughly corrupt government, encouraging the most impoverished people to come to America to take advantage of all of the free social, health and educational programs.  We should fortify the border and treat it as any other country in the world would and that is to control who and what comes into our country to ensure our ecomomy, resources, sovereignty and most of all security.<br />
<br />
We have tons of gang criminals here who prey on innocent citizens.  These criminals come and go across the border freely with little concern of capture due to our lax attitude much of it enforced by MALDF, LA RAZA and of course the ACLU.  They comprise a main population in our prison systems and jails. We spend billions a year on illegal aliens and it is simply not fair when California is in such poor shape to have to ask the tax payer to support another country, to subsidise in effect.  Their President has been quick to point fingers at the U.S.  Any time there is failure to make life easier for the people that are illegally here.  The reason he commands so much interest in our relationship is because the "workers" in the U.S. send billions home to Mexico.  He is reliant on finances.  He needs to fix his own country without relying on the U.S. for everything.  He should engage, train, educate, feed, provide housing and employment, teach environmental values to his people maybe then they would be happy to stay in Mexico.  I would gladly buy merchandise from Mexico rather than China and pay more for it too.  Why out source when you can provide jobs, produce a product, market it and export it.  <br />
<br />
It is all so preventible. If we safe guarded the California border and did not let the Mexican president preside and dictate the shape of our relationship with the United States then perhaps our State might have a chance to concentrate on the problems that are abundant here.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Randy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Randy in Virginia writes:<br />
<br />
<br />
What is important to U.S. Mexican relations is for America to stay a dominate force in the world rather than being sold down the river by the blame America first crowd.  Madam Clinton really is diplorable in her comments disparaging the U.S.  Madam Clinton some of us out here still like our country and believe in American exceptionalism.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Chris Martins has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Chris M. in California writes:<br />
<br />
We have to help Mexico in order to help ourselves.<br />
----------<br />
Are you serious!?!?  Anyway, to state that gun control is needed due to the drug wars is insane. So you're saying as an American my right to bare arms ( 2nd Amendment) should be taken away because of some Mexican drug war??!? This has nothing to do with the rights of Americans. So I should lose my constitutional rights here in America because of Mexico? Do you see the justice in that?? Will Mexico change its ways for the U.S? No. Because it wouldn't make sense. It's a sad state the direction this country has turned, and what's scarier is that many of the people who voted are on this blog.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Samm has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Samm in California writes:<br />
<br />
Wow!! I cannot believe these Anti-American and Pro-Mexican rants I'm reading. Please tell me there is a filter on this site that's deleting all the comments that's against blaming America for Mexico's drug wars!?!? I can't believe people are so misinformed, and idiotic.  Blaming the U.S. for troubles of Mexico is ridiculous. Why not blame and punish America for having Democracy that's gravitating these illegals to come here illegally. These drug smugglers come here to the U.S. to run from their debt in Mexico, and the violence follows them. The U.S. has more people on prescription drugs than illegal drugs...so don't blame me or any American for Mexico's drug war troubles. Also, instead of fighting Mexico's war what about the issues here in America? And no we don't depend on Mexico as much as they need us. Most produce except California comes from Florida, and other South American countries...Mexico is about 5%. We only need Mexicans when they arrive here illegally and we then use them for slave wages. Stop blaming America since you have this resentment towards America then leave!!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Lisa Brown has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Lisa B. in California writes:<br />
<br />
What is the most important aspect of the U.S.-Mexico relationship?<br />
<br />
None.<br />
<br />
How about protecting the border against these criminally-minded illegals, and keep American jobs for Americans not illegals?!?!!!!!!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Matt has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Matt in California writes:<br />
<br />
I very much agree with most of the postings below. However, I do have a question? Maybe somebody can elaborate on it a little more...? If the United States were to build the wall along U.S./Mexican border, how will that affect our relationship with our neighbors...? In all aspects? Trade, economically, terms of security...? How will Mexican officials respond? Do we depend on them as much as they depend on us?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>richard skillman has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Richard S. in Washington writes:<br />
<br />
Hillary, you ROCK! You deserve every bit of the adulation and respect you got as a candidate and Senator. The ONLY way we as a global people are going to get through all these issues: drugs, climate, trade, health, poverty etc. is to work from the standpoint of goodwill. You went a long way toward opening the door to Mexico's good will, which we desperately need. Thanks,]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Pete has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Pete in Kentucky writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of relations between the U.S. and Mexico is the drug trade and illegal immigration. It is very true what President Obama and Secretary Clinton have said that demand for drugs in the U.S. is the reason for the problems Mexico is having with the drug cartels. Much like the Oil barons in the middle east we the U.S. are making these people rich and that money gives them power. But one people fail to realze is that our own war on drugs fails on a daily basis because we are too easy on U.S. drug dealers and abusers. If we beef up our enforcement and put stiff penalties with no chance for early release we would maybe do some good. Right now a person is picked up for dealing drugs and may get as little as a fine and at most even after three strikes maybe a twenty year sentence that they get out of in two. Even if they stay in prison they get so many liberties that life inside is easier and safer then what they had on the outside. The other thing is illegal immigration now the tide is stemming because there is no money to be had by the illegals lets take that lesson and take away the incentive to come to the U.S. illegally. Fine companies who hire illegals to the point of putting them out of buisiness or make them pay to get the illegals they employ the documentation necesarry to work in the U.S.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ralph has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ralph in Washington, DC writes:<br />
<br />
Bill in Tennessee writes: About stopping or slowing the supply of illegal (or legal) drugs or anything else: Forget it as long as there is a demand. All the money, time & effort at limiting supply has always been and always will be a total waste. Instead, 100% of money, time & effort directed at minimizing demand will have at least a like dimunition of supply. The best known ways of limiting demand is intervention, rehabilitation, education and any other means possible..<br />
<br />
How will the Chruchs pay for their new additions?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Carlos has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Carlos in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
Ms.Hillary, congratulations on your appointment and I am confident that you are the best choice as Secretary of State   Mexico continues to be an enigma for Americans because most of it's law enforcement departments continue to be underpaid, badly trained, and worst of all picked at random any college graduate in Mexico would never join their ranks unless He (She) had no other option corruption has been rooted since the PRI was in power and can't be instilled today due to the fact that there is no social justice in Mexico the minimum wages are so low that people are desperate to get a good meal and take care of their families no matter what that's why as soon as they are offered a job by the cartels they take it regardless of what happens after they have no faith in the legal system and they know more of what is happening than any American agency I just went to Chihuahua and in conversations with regular folks I was told that there is a Cartel war in Juarez and Chihuahua city due to the fact that Chapo Guzman was let out since he controlled the drug traffic in those cities when he was arrested another cartel took over the drug trade and when he came out he wanted it back but the opposite cartel refused and they started the war killing each others dealers they also own a large part of the business recently in Chihuahua a restaurant owned by Chapo was burned to the ground and also they started the protection rackets to distract the public killing inocent business men to force the business owners to complain to the government to try and focus law enforcement on this crime rather than the drug trade I was told that cartel members were government law enforcement agents at one time or another and keep close contact with their buddy's getting info and putting them on the payroll. I am just an employee and I found all this in 7 days. I feel the most important aspect of U.S. -Mexico relationship would be to hold the Mexican law enforcement agencies accountable for daily activities and monitor all their agents daily to wipe out corruption which is the no 1 reason criminals are active and profitable in Mexico.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Sonny has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Sonny in Massachusetts writes:<br />
<br />
We have to help Mexico in order to help ourselves. It also broadens to help ourselves in home too. If arms trafficking is the problem we should understand first how it gets out from the manufacturers hands to these traffickers. We should first fix the root cause rather than chasing the peak of this pyramid. The very many small problems lies at the bottom of the pyramid which if resolve one at a time may significantly reduce the big ones. Lets try to fix our arms policy of manufacturing and distributing it.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Bill has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Bill in Tennessee writes:<br />
<br />
About stopping or slowing the supply of illegal (or legal) drugs or anything else: Forget it as long as there is a demand. All the money, time & effort at limiting supply has always been and always will be a total waste. Instead, 100% of money, time & effort directed at minimizing demand will have at least a like dimunition of supply. The best known ways of limiting demand is intervention, rehabilitation, education and any other means possible.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Concept Cars has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[C.C. writes:<br />
<br />
Here the major concern will be the drug control and even the homeland security. If these concerns are solved, then we can say that there is way out through the relationship.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ernesto has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ernesto in Arizona writes:<br />
<br />
Get an agreement in which are the priorities in both sides, from either side: Drugs Traffic?; International Commerce?; Security?; Illegal Inmigration?; NAFTA?; Workers Ammensty?; Turism?; Oil Production?; Else?<br />
<br />
Have been themes of discussion for the last 100 years and every 4, 6 or 8 years the topics, views and reviews change to get, sometimes, to "death ends" up to the "next" time.... <br />
<br />
While, both countries, talk to a deaf interlocutor !!!! Will it happen again?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Elizabeth has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Elizabeth in Oklahoma writes:<br />
<br />
The most critical aspect of the U.S./Mexico relationship is the unrealized potential for sustainable economic and community development that lies in wait on the borderlands of two great nations. Divided artificially by a geopolitical boundary, a people seeks unification. Through unification life is worth cultivating, opportunities are sought, and a better life is cultivated by those individuals who can once again dream of a future worthy of their child. Such a vision of the future is etched in the pysche of every American and with that in clear view, we owe it to our neighbors to not taunt them with it but rather model it.<br />
<br />
Standing at the turning point of an unimaginably perilous future if we are to secure anyone's future, we must create, enact and evaluate new forms of cooperation aimed at sustainability connecting policies with the shared purposes of our neighbors and situate these projects in the border region. Rather than reinforce, police and or dominate the boundaries that aritificially divide a people, whey not channel the impulse into something positive that will invariably improve life outcomes among citizens in the border regions. Let's use some of the stimulus dollars to fund strucural projects, that are ultimately co-produced, coregulated. Such collaboration would offer a model for other communities in multiple sites along the border. Imagine medical clinics straddling border communities, literacy centers, and other social, economic and civic capacity projects conveniently situated that at once commence to improve the brown fields and establish cooperative agricultural production. Such an effort will go much further than doubling the numbers of border agents, patrols, and arresting officers. <br />
<br />
All we need to do is think outside the box and interpollate trade agreements into structural agreements. By promoting participatory forms of binational cooperation in situated agency we should expect to see a decline in the informal and illicit economies filling developments' void.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Mar 25,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Racje; has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Racje in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
The joint problem wiht human  and drug trafficking begins with a earnest evaluation of the problem. There is no one simple cause nor solution. It begins with attacking the economical problems of mexico, the excalation in dangerous arms and violence, the high U.S.A. demand of drugs, and many other aspects. I believe that sometimes we try to patch our problems in Mexico inadequately. We put a band-aid on a broken limb. We seriously have to recreate and rethink some of our methods of attack. This might inculde taking responisbility of the drug trade and dealing with some serious moral issues of drug policies in the U.S. It might mean truely studying the complex system of drug lords, cartels, and their associated gangs. We will have to be very creative in our aid to mexico's evloving goverment, so that imbeded corrupt systems do not hinder nor counter improvement. It will also mean being more creative and supportve on our trade and commerce relations to try to assit Mexican economy will not impeding on our own.<br />
<br />
In terms on illegal immigration, I think attitudes on both sides need to be read justed. I personally believe that Texas being a minority-majority state is by far more benifical in a cultural context. It provides a great mix of culture and languages. If any one has ever tried learing another language it is quite a challege. If we expect the major infulx of immigrants to assimilate into American society, we have to be welcoming and prepared for the changes. We need the infrastucture to support our desires. More programs in schools and in the community to help teach english are needed. If immigrants know the language they can be a more active participant in American society.  Also, maybe this immigration is an opportunity to cause some positive changes in our own society. For example, having biligual schools can be an asset. American children can be learning spanish, english, french, and other languages. Being bi or triligual, strengthens, not degrades, our understaning of a global society. As for immigrant perspective, responsiblities and honest efforts are expected for a transformation of a more active american citizen. Indeed, immigrants will have to claim and recognize their newfounded American roots and responibilites to propel America forward.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Patrick has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Patrick in Maryland writes:<br />
<br />
I think it's the "love Fest" that the United States and Mexico, have for each other.:) This makes for a great relationship . <br />
<br />
Have a great Visit to Mexico .<br />
<br />
Cya :)]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Cindy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Cindy in Washington writes:<br />
<br />
my husband has been deported , my kids and I are here with out a husband or father, his paper are at the mexican emebbsey for the last 4 months , why are familys being apart because paper work takes so long cost, so much, can't get a pass, can you please tell me and my kids why, there are so many family like us]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>John has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[John in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
I believe that the most important thing we can do for our relationship with Mexico is to find a way to reduce the demand for illegal drugs on the U.S. side of the border.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Rosemary has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Rosemary in New Jersey writes:<br />
<br />
Oh!  And Hillary, I also meant to wish you Bon Voyage and Good Luck.  I'll be watching as usual.  You are doing an awesome job!  (I am not surprised in the least).  You are doing us proud!  Go Hillary!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Rosemary has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Rosemary in New Jersey writes:<br />
<br />
John in Greece said "...securing American-Mexican border line is vital, especially if you also consider the fact that this way you actually secure other possible "danger corridors" from South America (Venezuela, etc.).  Unfortunately, this border line is really big to be secured only from the one side (U.S.). That's why the key word is: Collaboration! Mexico must try hard too!"<br />
<br />
You're right!  We also (and I know this is a little off-topic) need to worry about the really really big border north of us also.  While all the fireworks are going off to the south, we should not ignore the fact that there are population centers very close to the Canadian border that are heavily Muslim, in the Rochester, NY area for example and in the Great Lakes region.  I could never figure out why they would settle there.  I hope it is not to secure a network of safe houses for terrorists coming down from the north.  <br />
<br />
I do not mean to imply that Islamic communities in the U.S. are necessarily radical, but it would be easy for cells to blend in. <br />
<br />
So, while we are figuring out what to do in the south, be should be considering a model that is practical and applicable along the northern border as well.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Marty has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Marty in Washington, DC writes:<br />
<br />
We must stop illegal drug trafficking and related gang activity -- in Mexico AND in AMERICA.<br />
<br />
Maslow's hierarchy is broken -- security is fleeting for many poor at the borders -- WE MUST WORK TOGETHER TO HELP PROVIDE A SECURE SYSTEM FOR THE PUBLIC TO WORK IN THE BORDER AREAS.<br />
<br />
Our best tools to battle murder and drugs, and related illegal activities, is to promote education, and culturally shared values.  We have much at stake.  <br />
<br />
THE GREED BEHIND DRUGS AND ASSOCIATED ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES  CAN ONLY BE CONQUERED BY EDUCATING AND CREATING A GREATER GOOD BASED ON TRUST AND SHARING.<br />
<br />
Violence begets violence.<br />
<br />
Drugs destroy morality.<br />
<br />
But this world is a little too small to keep build fences.<br />
<br />
You cannot on one day say, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" and then spout "let's build a fence!"  How moronic.<br />
<br />
We must build more suitable commerce. Enact funding and tax breaks for border state industry that self-manifests communities of high standard, provides upward mobility for workers,  and promotes leaders of civic value.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Nomsa has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Nomsa in California writes:<br />
<br />
The current drug war with Mexico jeopardizes the integrity of the border between the two countries, and by extension, strains trade agreements between the two countries and generally undermines the economic and physical safety of each country individually. It is hard to maintain equal standing when the security of each country (i.e. economic, physical and in terms of power) is so uneven. Thanks for asking!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Tue Mar 24,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Susan has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Susan in Wisconsin writes:<br />
<br />
Agreemnet: mutual policy and then the discipline and follow through to back it up. Drug leader control..Forget the little guy...go after the cartels...seeking those with integrity over the MONEY drugs bring in...I agree with what Obama just said about "earning" the rights that come with being American...Speaking english is major;  having some screen for actual resonance with our contitution etc and a not just coming here for economic reasons....Make sure the trade is a win win for each side....Partners and awareness that our countries were originally borderless....Thanks  Susan]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Rozanna has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Rozanna in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
I think the most important aspect of the Mexico U.S.A. relationship is that Mexico is a steadfast ally. I think that the region has been ignored for the last 8 years and we must move towards dialog on immigration, violence on the border, and trade issues.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>R. Brinn has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[R.B. in New York writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of U.S.-Mexico relationship is the potential for reciprocal development and security. This will require a clear and consistent committment to mutual legitimate trade arrangements; and the end of the illicit narco-weapons and human trafficking symbiosis.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Marco` has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Marco in California writes:<br />
<br />
control of the border for iligal inmigrants and drugs]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>chris has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Chris in California writes:<br />
<br />
Illegal immigration is responsible for the ever increasing costs for education, ever increasing class sizes, ever decreasing test scores, ever increasing drop out rate, ever increasing teen birth rates,ever increasing rapid  population growth, ever increasing gang crime, ever increasing ghetto sprawl, ever increasing crime rate, ever increasing prison population, ever increasing workers compensation costs, ever increasing social security fraud, ever increasing medical insurance costs, ever increasing auto insurance fraud, ever increasing lack of respect for the English language here in the U.S.A., ever increasing welfare programs, ever increasing freebies from the government to undeserving illegals. I will gladly pay more for my tomatos.... to save everywhere else... from car insurance to workers comp insurance to medical insurance.<br />
<br />
I am tired as a home owner in LA.... of having my home taxes got to pay for the education of illegal aliens children... especially when I have no children!<br />
<br />
Illegal is illegal. I have watched Illegal aliens go from being called illegal alien...to undocumented worker to undocumented citizen!!! They are not citizens! They are illegal aliens! <br />
<br />
Fix the problem!!!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Hazhir has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Hazhir in California writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of the U.S.-Mexico relationship is illegal immigration into the U.S. Illegal immigration is inextricably linked to the economy, homeland security, drug control, and human rights. America cannot solve this problem alone. No amount of fence along the border will put an end to illegal immigration. The Mexican government must also see that it is in its self-interest to stop the flow of undocumented workers from the Southern border.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Annette has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Annette in Washington writes:<br />
<br />
I would just like to say that the most important aspect of the U.S. and Mexico relationship is to work together regarding the immigration issues that are seperating family members from their homes and the people that love them.  I would like to know what is being accomplished at the State Department level to resolve this issue and improve the immigration process both here and abroad.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Mar 23,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Dina has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Dina in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
As a Texan living on the border, I see how desperate Mexicans are to live a safe and prosperous life. They are willing to risk their lives to come to America to feed their families, with or without that "wall" which is a colossal waste of our money. We need to make sure we stay on friendly terms with our neighbor at all costs. Also, it's obvious our "war on drugs" has not been won. It's time to decriminalize marijuana. Because of the drug cartel's terrorist tactics, especially along the border, Americans are leary of traveling in Mexico. Fortunately, the violence has not spilled over into Texas, but the U.S. needs more Border Patrol agents, not military, and certainly not walls.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Mar 22,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Wendy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Wendy in California writes:<br />
<br />
Soon in history we will realize that *all* of us on our darling EarthVuravuraJeegoo are family, but clearly Mexico is particularly part of our beloved community family, so deep a part of our heart, parientes y amigas.<br />
<br />
All the practical things are important, the sustainable prosperity and the blossoming lives for all our children together, but this flowering is rooted in our heartfelt kin kindness and recognition and welcome among each other in our hemisphere home.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Mar 22,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Kathleen has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Kathleen in Colorado writes:<br />
<br />
My prayers are with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to address the awkward remark of her counterpart in Mexico and her upcoming appointments]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Mar 22,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Eric has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Eric in New Mexico writes:<br />
<br />
"What Is the Most Important Aspect of the U.S.-Mexico Relationship?"<br />
<br />
 Our common desire to better the human condition.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Mar 22,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Chad has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Chad in Washington writes:<br />
<br />
The biggest concern I have about our relationship with Mexico is the effect of the current economic crisis on the local markets on both sides of our borders.  We can't lose sight of the importance of local farmers growing food and being able to sell it to friends and neighbors in local markets at fair prices.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Mar 22,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Denise Hummel has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Denise H. in California writes:<br />
<br />
While there are of course, many key aspects, perhaps the singular most important at this juncture is not to paint the entire country of Mexico with the tainted brush of the drug lords in the border towns.  The violence and corruption has been a direct result of demand created in the United States and our failure to enforce our own laws and policies.  Failure to take some ownership for the problem and a willingness to blame others can only deepen the chasm, shame, and growing fear.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Mar 21,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Milton has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Milton in Massachusetts writes:<br />
<br />
I think the single most important issue facing the sustained integrity of the Mexican government is the "drug war" of the United States.  The criminalization and  militarization of a social and medical problem has led to billions of dollars going into the hands of extra-governmental INSTITUTIONS (we call them drug lords, but they are now institutionalized) that rival the power of many small nations.  When the U.S. seeks to address OUR drug problems by attacking availability rather than demand, we lose in many ways.  If we don't confront our own responsibility for our drug problems, Mexico will fall.  We don't need a "rogue state" on our southern border.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Mar 21,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Susan has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Susan in Florida writes:<br />
<br />
For so many years we have turned a blind eye to desperate Mexicans crossing our borders.  Why?  To use their desperation for our economic advantage.  Cheap labor, migrant workers working close to slave labor conditions, and now we are blaming them.  Oh, and please don't forget that we are the greatest "buyers" of illegal drugs in the world.  So, how about taking some responsibilty for both problems and stop making it so profitable to continue to cross our borders and to sell us drugs.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Mar 21,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Joe has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Joe in Tennessee writes:<br />
<br />
1.  Why not annex Mexico?  It would be easier and cheaper in the long run.  LOL!<br />
<br />
2.  Drugs.  Throughout three administrations, the transfer of narcotics from El Salvador to Columbia to Mexico has gradually created the situation we have today, which is totally out of control.  The fact the Government of Mexico legalized many class one drugs internally, shows a total lack of authority or care whatsoever.  <br />
<br />
I personally know it goes back much further and simply wonder when and if there will ever be an American Administration that can Control this costly problem with the integrity of the Nixon - Bush Era.  When established entities in the United States regulated this dark aspect of society, it was less costly and crime overall was considerably less.  While some regard this as "Chicago mentality", there are a number of past retired Federal Agents who will attest to this being, by historical finite consequence, the best method of control historically.  People knew when enough was enough and both sides of the fence had established rules.  Until a better method of educating the market end to realize the negative aspect of use, going back historically may be a better alternative then filling our prisons.<br />
<br />
3.  Trade.  The new Nationalization Mexico is establishing exhibits a lever to keep our authorities-DEA and FBI- from following the drug trade profits back to their roots:  The Cabinet Members as they did during Clintons Administration.  We need to take authority back from them and not let trade be an issue used against us with a soft stand.  How this is handled will reflect America's stance worldwide.  If we bow to Mexico, a weak diplomatic view will be taken worldwide.<br />
<br />
DO NOT UNDERSTIMATE THE RESULTS OF THIS MEETING.  If we cannot make accords with our neighbor it will be viewed as weakness.  Do not come back with just diplomatic niceties. <br />
<br />
4.  Immigration.  Mexico has vast resources and their denial of human rights via the lack of the worker rights, still shows a fraudulent democracy and is more a represented Dictatorship than anything which takes vast amounts of American resources.  They do not give back to the people they represent as they should and promise.  They have the means to provide more to their people to keep them in their homeland of Mexico.  This problem alone affects every single American man woman and child's future here.<br />
<br />
5.  Environment.  Their environmental laws are in actuality nonexistent and the resulting devastation directly affects every American citizen and entrepreneur who cannot compete due to environmental regulations not in place there which must be followed here.<br />
<br />
6.  Total Repeal of all NAFTA agreements unless they provide Oil at a low price again for seven years and remain out of OPEC.<br />
<br />
7.  Mexico so divided within itself as to authority and jurisprudence, that leadership is taken no more seriously than in any third world country.  Anyone knows that who has been there or dealt directly with provincial governors.  One set of leadership at vacation resort areas which provides Americans with a false valuation covers over the rest of the corruption country wide.   <br />
<br />
8.  As far as Homeland security is concerned, it is virtually impossible to control.  One small example is the fact that it is difficult to tell a difference physically for most Americans between Arabic and Spanish cultures when dressed in one garb or another.  Combined with the fact that the ease to obtain ANY documentation of Identification in ANY country in South America, as Venezuela, which can be used to travel freely within the entire South American-Mexican community as they have no universal identification program or enforcement programs.  This problem is much more than just with Mexico, who cannot even enforce their own Identification programs and corruption reigns.<br />
<br />
With the tons of narcotics that come across daily, what problem would it be in actuality to move any other item as a bio weapon or even small nuclear devise in pieces, as in the manner that Pakistan received its parts?  <br />
<br />
Annex Mexico and why not as close to one third of Americas voting population is Spanish. I guess it is because American leadership would not be liable for acountability and that is their leverage...we just keep shaking hands with the devil.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Mar 21,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>John has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[John in Greece writes:<br />
<br />
@ Rosemary in New Jersey <br />
<br />
Your video link suggestion is great! I think that anyone who will spend 7 minutes to watch it, will easily understand this "lunatic war" against West that we have to face. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9q7Km6DhM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9q7Km6DhM</a><br />
<br />
Besides, the problem is not only the American-Mexican border security, but also the "West border" security, since anthrax etc. can be transferred from anywhere to everywhere via intermediate "stations". You see, fanatic Muslims are everywhere and "work" on a spider platform. This makes the problem even more complicated; a real nightmare.  <br />
<br />
However, securing American-Mexican border line is VITAL, especially if you also consider the fact that this way you actually secure other possible "danger corridors" from South America (Venezuela, etc.).   <br />
Unfortunately, this border line is really BIG to be secured only from the one side (U.S.). That's why the key word is: Collaboration! Mexico must try hard too!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Mar 21,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Vicki has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Vicki in Montana writes:<br />
<br />
Ms. House Speaker, What are you thinking? How or where else are ICE suppose to find these ILLEGAL aliens?  You really should watch the local news channels in you state.  My goodness woman, fire you speech writer!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Rosemary has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Rosemary in New Jersey writes:<br />
<br />
This could be a concern.  This is what I mean about securing the borders both of the U.S. AND of Mexico.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9q7Km6DhM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9q7Km6DhM</a><br />
<br />
Any takes on this?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Rosemary has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Rosemary in New Jersey writes:<br />
<br />
Most immediately, the drug cartels and violence leaking across the border into undefended U.S. border areas with tiny police departments.  This is a Homeland Security issue, and Janet Napolitano needs to step up to the plate.  The economy and illegal immigration are warp and woof with the above issue.  But we need to recognize that Mexico is part of the corridor of illegal immigration and is equally a victim.  Our border will be more secure if Mexico's borders are also strong.<br />
<br />
I also think we need to step back from trying to impose a political system on any other country.  Mexico has elections.  Quite frankly, in the last election cycle, my own primary vote was simply and summarily given away by my governor on the convention floor.<br />
<br />
Like some other issues raised here, on democracy-building, first we need to fix the problems in our own back yard.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Zharkov has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:<br />
<br />
The most important part of the relationship is Mexico's proximity, which affords a safe haven for persecuted Americans.  And that, plus the beef burrito, is worth keeping Mexico safe for refugees from the Obama Administration.<br />
<br />
Mexico needs better water purification facilities, better food in prisons, better schools, more jobs, and police who communicate in both Spanish and English instead of in dollars.   A complete regime change in Mexican government might actually raise their living standards, but isn't that true for the U.S. as well?]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Peter has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Peter in Canada writes:<br />
<br />
The most important aspect of our relationship with Mexico is to not forget our three country obligations to The Security and Prosperity Partnership as signed by Stephen Harper, Vincente Fox and George W. Bush.  The two northern countries often overlook our most important trading partner when developing our own domestic policy.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>PJ has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[P.J. in New Jersey writes:<br />
<br />
I am an American who lived in Mexico for 6 years.  My three issues would b 1) mexican economic situation, 2) immigration, and 3) the drug cartels.  These are <not> in order -- they are all three equally important and all go hand-in-hand.  The economic situation -- and now the cartels -- are driving the immigrants and the violence is starting to spill over into the U.S. There are regions of the country (eg Oaxaca) where so many of the men have left for the U.S. that there are only women, children, and the elderly remaining.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Cindy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Cindy in Texas writes:<br />
<br />
Homeland Security first, but closely followed by the dangerous drug wars.  Building a fence is insane.  Consider deporting second time offenders to far south Mexico.  Monitor the border and increase employment.<br />
  <br />
Good luck, but remember the your biggest challenge is Pakistan!!!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Thomas has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Thomas in California writes:<br />
<br />
STABILITY.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Anna has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Anna in Washington, DC writes:<br />
<br />
Mexico is a beautiful country but is sadly being torn apart by the drug cartels.  I just read this thoughtful commentary by Ruben Navarrette Jr. on CNN's website:<br />
<br />
QUOTE: Merchants in Puerto Vallarta -- once home to Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor -- usually get a surge in business in March. This year, the crowds are light and...one merchant insisted there really hasn't been a spring break-inspired boost in business this year. And she doesn't expect one, either. She was already trying to be optimistic about next year.<br />
<br />
Given that 8,000 people have already died in the war between the Mexican government and the drug cartels, and no end in sight, optimism is hard to come by in Mexico. Public opinion polls by Mexican newspapers reveal a paradox: A majority of Mexicans support the government's crackdown on the drug cartels but also think it won't ultimately succeed. Even the support appears shaky, as the death toll mounts and the killings become more brutal.<br />
<br />
According to a recent article in USA Today, many Mexicans are growing weary of the drug violence and looking for a way out of their predicament. They fault Mexican President Felipe Calderon for -- in a metaphor that has become popular down here -- stirring the hornet's nest.<br />
<br />
Some Mexicans are actually growing nostalgic for the corrupt Institutional Revolutionary Party known as the PRI. The thinking goes: While the PRI plundered the country and rigged elections for 71 years, at least it didn't antagonize the drug lords. END QUOTE<br />
<br />
Our relationship with our southern neighbor is so critical.  We must promote security in Mexico, for the safety of us as Americans and for the Mexican people who do not want to live under the violence and oppresion of the drug cartels.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Bob has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Bob in California writes:<br />
<br />
We must work to improve Mexico's prosperity and welfare.  Over the years we should strive to improve relations with both our North American neighbors so that ultimately our borders may be as open as those in Western Europe.  We have neglected our neighbor to the South consistently since 1849.  The more Mexico prospers, the less will be our problems with illegal immigrants from the south.  Furthermore, until we reduce our demand for illegal drugs we will be encouraging crime in Mexico.  Mexico should be one of the highest priorities of our foreign policy.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ren頁driᮧ size= has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ren in Arizona writes:<br />
<br />
I believe the most important part of the US-Mexico relationship at this time is drug control because it is currently Mexico's largest issue. We need to distinguish ourselves as a definite ally to our neighbors to the south and help them in their time of need. After or concurrently with helping with the current drug situation we need to also work to tie our economies closer together because it is essential to strengthen our ties to as well as help strengthen the counrties just over our borders. We need strong allies and we need to be doing business closer to home.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ann has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ann in California writes:<br />
<br />
1 Safety]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Jason has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Jason in Kentucky writes:<br />
<br />
We need to find a way to get the Mexican economy to stand on its own. It wasn't before the global economy crashed, and probably won't after the global economy gets on track. This is the reason we have so many people crossing undocumented and why the drug trade has taken off there. The economy of Mexico is the reason for this...people wouldn't cross if they had jobs where they could stay in Mexico and wouldn't be in the drug trade if they had legal options. I have faith that people will do the right thing unless desperation pushes them into things they normally wouldn't do. If we could help the Mexican economy to stand on its own and thrive it would solve many of these problems. We also need to communicate this to the common citizens of both sides. I have noticed that many people on both sides of the border have the wrong idea about the problem. This includes many right wing representatives and senators that use ignorance and prejudice to fuel the hatred on this side of the border. Thanks for truly working on solving these problems.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/q_mexico_relationship/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Mar 20,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>



    
    </channel>
</rss>
