<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Dipnote Comments -  You are Following Comments for </title>
    <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>U.S. Department of State</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-15T17:44:49+00:00</dc:date>

    


    <item>
      <title>David has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[David in Kansas writes:<br />
<br />
The focus in this piece on the money we are providing Afghanistan and Pakistan gives the impression (falsely, I hope) that the centerpiece of our outreach is cash.  Money sent alone, without being part of a larger strategy of deeds and words - meaningful words communicated effectively to the foreign audience in terms familiar to them and that match our deeds - is money wasted. Friends that can be bought with cash alone can be bought back by our adversaries.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/public_diplomacy_national_security_imperative/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Jun 17,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Wendy has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Wendy in California writes:<br />
<br />
The idea of "investment in mutual prosperity" is surely the truest way to lead to mutual security.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/public_diplomacy_national_security_imperative/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Jun 14,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>



    
    </channel>
</rss>