<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Dipnote Comments -  You are Following Comments for </title>
    <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>U.S. Department of State</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T15:54:03+00:00</dc:date>

    


    <item>
      <title>Eric has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Eric in New Mexico writes:<br />
<br />
@ Tom, Thanks for posting, not your average "shore leave" us landslubbers imagine folks in the navy having, for sure..<br />
<br />
 Got a question for the Captain if he'll take it, and if you'd pass it on.<br />
<br />
 USN just decommisioned a nuclear aircraft carrier last year, and I wondered what he thought of turning that into a hospital ship, on permanent station (given the many refugee and humanitarian crisis globally?<br />
<br />
 Would it be do-able, and desirable?<br />
<br />
 It may be too old to fight, but not too old for a peaceful mission I think, and shouldn't become scrap if it's still seaworthy and can be refitted for humanitarian application.<br />
<br />
 Thanks, <br />
<br />
  EJ]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/pacific_partnership/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Jul 04,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>



    
    </channel>
</rss>
