<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Dipnote Comments -  You are Following Comments for </title>
    <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>U.S. Department of State</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T15:54:03+00:00</dc:date>

    


    <item>
      <title>Tim Lovering has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Tom L. in California writes:<br />
<br />
I hope the G-2 summit goes well this July. Both countries need to co-operate a host of issues around the world.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Mon Jun 29,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>jerome has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Jerome in France writes:<br />
<br />
United States and China is a money dialog<br />
<br />
China have $1.2 trillion reserves]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Apr 15,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ken Haumschilt has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ken H. in New Hampshire writes:<br />
<br />
The key to the strategic relationship between the United States and China is an effective military-to-military dialogue that addresses issues relevant to providing security to the region. This reduces the opportunity for misunderstandings between our countries that could escalate during an unforeseen crisis. Ultimately, the test of friendly relations rests on trust and confidence at the highest levels of our respective governments. Military-to-military dialogue is essential to building that trust.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Apr 05,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Eric has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Eric in New Mexico writes:<br />
<br />
RE; NK missile launch-afterword:<br />
<br />
 At least it didn't fall on Japan.<br />
<br />
 NK threatens war in order to defy the will of many nations.<br />
<br />
 Perhaps the only diplomacy that could have stopped them would have been to collectively threaten war on NK in return if they were to go ahead with it.<br />
<br />
 Well, there's always next time...and the next, and the next, and how many times will it take till people realize that diplomacy without teeth is a toothless beggar?<br />
<br />
 Now it's not so important to rid the peninsula of nuclear weapons as it is to remove those with the intent to build them from power.<br />
<br />
 Even if that means war.<br />
<br />
 Because eventually Kim will start one because he sees weakness and will make a fatal mistake upon doing so.<br />
<br />
 You can take that to the bank, but just don't call it an economic stimulus package.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Sun Apr 05,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Zhu has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Zhu in China writes:<br />
<br />
I'm a Chinese, I hope that China and the U.S.A. have a good relationship.  At the same time, I believe the world will be better in future!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Apr 04,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>palgye has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Palgye in South Korea writes:<br />
<br />
Thank you...<br />
<br />
also<br />
<br />
S-Korea`s President Myung-Bak, Lee take some roll  <br />
<br />
and <br />
<br />
S-Korea take part in this recovery]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Sat Apr 04,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Patrick has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Patrick in Maryland writes:<br />
<br />
Hi, My friends at The States Department and Netizens.<br />
<br />
It's good to hear that the Chinese and American people are going to be working more closely in the future. The once a year meeting was a good Idea, it will help us with arerelations with the Chinese people. The more we know about each others cultures, the better we will be able to work together on world Economic and Strategic problems. The Chinese Leaders and people seem to be really working with us on the Economy of other countries. I hope this is the start of a better Friendship/Partnership between our countries. I like the photo of our Leaders together.<br />
<br />
.....Cyou....Bloggers...Later :)]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Apr 03,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Eric has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Eric in New Mexico writes:<br />
<br />
Re: NK missile launch:<br />
<br />
 Ponder this;<br />
<br />
  They call it a satilite, would we know if they stuck a nuke on top for a full scale, real world test?<br />
<br />
 How much "face" would they lose if 'lil Kim's illusions of grandure got some three feet off the ground and "fizzled"?<br />
<br />
 Could be messy, especially when we are accused of sabotaging it so they can "save face".<br />
<br />
 If you want effective missile defense on this planet, I suggest we start by targeting the individuals with ill intent...<br />
<br />
 Directly.<br />
<br />
 And I don't mean with some unanimous UN resolution that demands in the strongest terms, "Please don't do that again."<br />
<br />
 Been there, done that.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Apr 03,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>palgye has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Palgye in South Korea writes:<br />
<br />
Dear to persons in picture.<br />
<br />
your don`t know me, but i don`t know a little.<br />
(please don`t mistake, i just believe)<br />
<br />
it`s a good scene. may, it`s record in history. why?<br />
<br />
please, imagine.   why you, meet at London.<br />
<br />
i believe success.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/china_strategic_economic_dialogue/</link>
      <dc:date>Fri Apr 03,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>



    
    </channel>
</rss>
