<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Dipnote Comments -  You are Following Comments for </title>
    <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>U.S. Department of State</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T15:54:03+00:00</dc:date>

    


    <item>
      <title>Zharkov has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:<br />
<br />
I see there is a new land mine policy.  Good.  I've nothing to complain about this land mine policy.<br />
------------------------------------------------------------<br />
<br />
U.S. Landmine PolicyOn Friday, February 27, 2004, the new United States policy on landmines was announced. <br />
<br />
This policy is a significant departure from past approaches to landmines. <br />
<br />
It ensures protection for both military forces and civilians alike, and continues U.S. leadership in humanitarian mine action -- those activities that contribute most directly toward eliminating the landmine problem and mitigating its effects on landmine survivors. Under the new policy, the United States will: <br />
<br />
eliminate all persistent landmines from its arsenal; <br />
<br />
continue to develop non-persistent (self-destructing/self-deactivating) landmines that will not pose a humanitarian threat after use in battle; <br />
<br />
continue to research and develop enhancements to the current self-destructing/self-deactivating landmine technology in order to develop and preserve military capabilities that address the United States transformational goals; <br />
<br />
seek a worldwide ban on the sale or export of all persistent landmines; <br />
<br />
get rid of its non-detectable mines within one year; <br />
<br />
only employ persistent anti-vehicle mines outside of Korea between now and 2010, if needed, when authorized by the President; <br />
<br />
not use any persistent landmines -- neither anti-personnel nor anti-vehicle -- anywhere after 2010; <br />
<br />
begin the destruction within two years of those persistent landmines not needed for the protection of Korea;]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/afghanistan_landmine_clearance/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Sep 17,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Zharkov has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Zharkov in U.S.A. writes:<br />
<br />
Another reference in the same Field Manual:<br />
<br />
Antipersonnel Mines <br />
3-44. SFODs may temporarily use antipersonnel mines along likely avenues of approach into the base. <br />
<br />
Creeks, riverbeds, and the surrounding elevations <br />
are good locations for placing antipersonnel mines. <br />
<br />
Personnel will warn the civilian population about the use of mines to preclude unnecessary civilian casualties. They may temporarily employ antipersonnel mines in the <br />
following areas not used by civilians: <br />
  Near running water sources. <br />
  Around fruit and shade trees. <br />
  On little-used roads and trails. <br />
  In and around abandoned fighting positions or around abandoned uninhabited dwellings.<br />
----------------------------------<br />
Now maybe we do not authorize the sale of mines but we can hardly say we do not "export" them if we are using them on foreign battlefields.<br />
<br />
And look how they are used - precisely where children are likely to play!   Uninhabited buildings, near running water, under fruit and shade trees?<br />
<br />
The only thing left out is playgrounds and schools.   <br />
<br />
Let's stop land mining entirely.   We don't need to go out of our way to maim and kill children with our wars.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/afghanistan_landmine_clearance/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Sep 17,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Peter has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<font class="blogger">DipNote Blogger Peter Villano</font> writes:<br />
<br />
Actually, the United States has not exported a single anti-personnel landmine to anyone anywhere in almost 20 years.  In 1992, Congress enacted a ban on exports of all U.S. anti-personnel landmines.  For more facts about U.S. landmine policy, visit <a href="http://www.state.gov/t/pm/wra/index.htm" title="http://www.state.gov/t/pm/wra/index.htm" class="storyLink">http://www.state.gov/t/pm/wra/index.htm</a>.]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/afghanistan_landmine_clearance/</link>
      <dc:date>Thu Sep 17,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>Ron has posted a new comment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ron in New York writes:<br />
<br />
What's Mine is Yours......<br />
<br />
U.S. leads the world in arms sales....ultimately the majority of mines placed will have a U.S. source. We are willing to sell them and also fund their removal. Brilliant!!]]></description>
      <link>http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entires/afghanistan_landmine_clearance/</link>
      <dc:date>Wed Sep 16,  2009</dc:date>
    </item>



    
    </channel>
</rss>
